pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2509.04637 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational-wave constraints on the pair-instability mass gap and nuclear burning in massive stars

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords massblackpair-instabilityholesmathrmstellaraboveburning
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Pair-instability should prevent the direct formation of black holes above about $50M_\odot$ creating a pair-instability mass gap. Yet gravitational-wave observations have detected black holes in this mass range. These systems can be explained with uncertainties in massive-star evolution, or hierarchical mergers in stellar clusters, which are expected to produce large spins with isotropic orientations. Here we present evidence for the pair-instability mass gap in the LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA fourth transient catalog, with a lower edge at $44.3^{+5.9}_{-3.5}\,M_\odot$. We also obtain a measurement of the ${}^{12}\mathrm{C}(\alpha,\gamma){}^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction rate, yielding an $S$-factor of $268^{+195}_{-116}\,\mathrm{keV\,b}$, a parameter critical for modeling helium burning and stellar evolution. The data reveal two populations: a low-spin group with no black holes above the gap, and a high-spin, isotropic group that extends across the full mass range and occupies the gap, consistent with hierarchical mergers. These findings are consistent with pair-instability playing a role in shaping the black hole mass spectrum, point to a connection between gravitational wave astronomy and nuclear astrophysics, and highlight dense stellar clusters as key environments in the growth of black holes.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Secondary-Mass Features improve Spectral-Siren $H_0$ Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new model emphasizing secondary mass features and pairing transitions improves spectral siren H0 constraints by ~30% using 142 GW events from GWTC-4.0.

  2. The Black Hole Mass Gap as a New Probe of Millicharged Particles

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Millicharged particles weaken pulsational pair-instability in massive stars, shifting the lower edge of the black hole mass gap upward and turning gravitational wave observations into a probe for particles with masses...

  3. Repopulating the pair-instability mass gap without sustained growth to massive IMBHs: the case of 47\,Tuc

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulations of 47 Tuc show hierarchical mergers and occasional surviving primordial seeds above the pair-instability gap produce retained black holes of 45-1100 solar masses with distinct spin distributions, favoring ...

  4. Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamical formation in globular clusters produces a robust second black-hole mass peak at ~70 solar masses from second-generation mergers when the first-generation spectrum is truncated by pair-instability supernovae.

  5. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse IMBHs in GWTC-4; heavy BHs from hierarchical mergers, with low-spin mass distribution truncating at ~65 solar masses and PIMG upper edge estimated at 150 solar masses.

  6. How do the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's Heavy Black Holes Form? No evidence for core-collapse Intermediate-mass black holes in GWTC-4

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    No evidence for core-collapse formed low-spin IMBHs in GWTC-4, with 90% upper limit on merger rate of 0.077 Gpc^{-3} yr^{-1}, low-spin BH mass truncation at 65 solar masses consistent with pair-instability gap lower e...

  7. Constraints on the $^{12}$C$(\alpha, \gamma)^{16}$O and $^{16}$O+$^{16}$O Reaction Rates from Binary Black Holes Detected via Gravitational Wave Signals

    astro-ph.SR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Stellar models show that the 12C(alpha,gamma)16O rate uncertainty moves the black hole mass gap, constraining its S300 to 137.6-263.4 keV barn when matched to the observed gap from gravitational waves.

  8. No model-independent evidence for a peak in binary black hole spin (mis)alignments

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    No model-independent evidence for a peak in binary black hole spin tilts is found in GWTC-4; mass-spin magnitude correlation is confirmed but mass-tilt correlation is not.

  9. Signatures of a subpopulation of hierarchical mergers in the GWTC-4 gravitational-wave dataset

    gr-qc 2026-01

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages · cited by 8 Pith papers · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    E., & Heger, A

    Woosley, S.E., Heger, A.: The Pair-instability Mass Gap for Black Holes. Astrophys. J. Lett. 912(2), 31 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c4 arXiv:2103.07933 [astro-ph.SR]

  2. [2]

    Astrophys

    O’Leary, R.M., Rasio, F.A., Fregeau, J.M., Ivanova, N., O’Shaughnessy, R.: Binary Mergers and Growth of Black Holes in Dense Star Clusters. Astrophys. J. 637(2), 937–951 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1086/498446 arXiv:astro-ph/0508224 [astro-ph]

  3. [3]

    R., Pols, O

    Giersz, M., Leigh, N., Hypki, A., L¨ utzgendorf, N., Askar, A.: MOCCA code for star cluster simulations - IV. A new scenario for intermediate mass black hole formation in globular clusters. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454, 3150–3165 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2162 arXiv:1506.05234

  4. [4]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Antonini, F., Rasio, F.A.: Merging Black Hole Binaries in Galactic Nuclei: Implications for Advanced-LIGO Detections. Astrophys. J. 831(2), 187 (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187 arXiv:1606.04889 [astro-ph.HE]

  5. [5]

    Astrophys

    Kimball, C., Talbot, C., Berry, C.P.L., Zevin, M., Thrane, E., Kalogera, V., Buscicchio, R., Carney, M., Dent, T., Middleton, H., Payne, E., Veitch, J., Williams, D.: Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Mergers in the Second LIGO- Virgo Gravitational Wave Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett. 915(2), 35 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef arXiv:2011....

  6. [6]

    Rezzolla, L., Barausse, E., Dorband, E.N., Pollney, D., Reisswig, C., Seiler, J., Husa, S.: Final spin from the coalescence of two black holes. Phys. Rev. D 78, 044002 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044002

  7. [7]

    Campanelli, M., Lousto, C.O., Marronetti, P., Zlochower, Y.: Accurate evolu- tions of orbiting black-hole binaries without excision. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101

  8. [8]

    Baker, J.G., Centrella, J., Choi, D.-I., Koppitz, M., Meter, J.: Gravitational-wave extraction from an inspiraling configuration of merging black holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111102 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102

  9. [9]

    ApJL, In Press (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L2

    Rodriguez, C.L., Zevin, M., Pankow, C., Kalogera, V., Rasio, F.A.: Illuminating Black Hole Binary Formation Channels with Spins in Advanced LIGO. ApJL, In Press (2016) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/832/1/L2

  10. [10]

    GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, The Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Col- laboration: GWTC-4.0: Updating the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog with Observations from the First Part of the Fourth LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Observing Run. arXiv e-prints, 2508–18082 (2025) arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., Gualandris, A.: Black hole growth through hierar- chical black hole mergers in dense star clusters: implications for gravitational wave detections. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486(4), 5008–5021 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1149 arXiv:1811.03640 [astro-ph.HE]

  12. [12]

    Kritos, K., Berti, E., Silk, J.: Massive black hole assembly in nuclear star clus- ters. Phys. Rev. D 108(8), 083012 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 108.083012 arXiv:2212.06845 [astro-ph.HE]

  13. [13]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. Physical Review X9(3), 031040 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.9.031040 arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

  14. [14]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: Binary Black Hole Popula- tion Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. Astrophys. J. Lett. 882(2), 24 (2019) https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab3800 arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

  15. [16]

    D., Acernese, F., et al

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the Second Part of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X 13(4), 041039 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.041039 15 arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

  16. [17]

    2021 , note =

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Physical Review X11(2), 021053 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.021053 arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

  17. [19]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Belczynski, K., Holz, D.E., Bulik, T., O’Shaughnessy, R.: The first gravitational- wave source from the isolated evolution of two stars in the 40–100 solar mass range. Nature 534(7608), 512–515 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18322

  18. [20]

    The Astrophysical Journal 810(1), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10

    Stevenson, S., Ohme, F., Fairhurst, S.: Distinguishing compact binary popula- tion synthesis models using gravitational wave observations of coalescing binary black holes. The Astrophysical Journal 810(1), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0004-637X/810/1/58

  19. [21]

    M., & Moriya, T

    Marchant, P., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Tauris, T.M., Moriya, T.J.: Astron- omy & Astrophysics A new route towards merging massive black holes. A&A 588 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628133

  20. [22]

    Farrell, E., Groh, J.H., Hirschi, R., Murphy, L., Kaiser, E., Ekstr¨ om, S., Georgy, C., Meynet, G.: Is GW190521 the merger of black holes from the first stellar generations? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502(1), 40–44 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa196 arXiv:2009.06585 [astro-ph.SR]

  21. [23]

    Astrophys

    Belczynski, K., Hirschi, R., Kaiser, E.A., Liu, J., Casares, J., Lu, Y., O’Shaughnessy, R., Heger, A., Justham, S., Soria, R.: The Formation of a 70 M⊙ Black Hole at High Metallicity. Astrophys. J. 890(2), 113 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d77 arXiv:1911.12357 [astro-ph.HE]

  22. [24]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Woosley, S.E.: Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal 836(2), 244 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/244

  23. [25]

    Spera, M., Mapelli, M.: Very massive stars, pair-instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the sevn code. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470(4), 4739–4749 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1576 arXiv:1706.06109 [astro-ph.SR]

  24. [27]

    Hendriks, D.D., van Son, L.A.C., Renzo, M., Izzard, R.G., Farmer, R.: Pulsational pair-instability supernovae in gravitational-wave and electromagnetic transients. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(3), 4130–4147 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/stad2857 arXiv:2309.09339 [astro-ph.HE]

  25. [28]

    2019, The Astrophysical Journal, 887, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b

    Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S.E., Marchant, P., Justham, S.: Mind the Gap: The Location of the Lower Edge of the Pair-instability Supernova Black Hole Mass Gap. Astrophys. J. 887(1), 53 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab518b arXiv:1910.12874 [astro-ph.SR]

  26. [29]

    Leung, S.-C., Nomoto, K., Blinnikov, S.: Pulsational Pair-instability Super- novae. I. Pre-collapse Evolution and Pulsational Mass Ejection. Astrophys. J. 887(1), 72 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4fe5 arXiv:1901.11136 [astro-ph.HE]

  27. [30]

    and others

    Abbott et al.: Population Properties of Compact Objects from the Second LIGO- Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Astrophys. J. Lett.913(1), 7 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abe949 arXiv:2010.14533 [astro-ph.HE]

  28. [31]

    Astrophys

    Edelman, B., Doctor, Z., Farr, B.: Poking Holes: Looking for Gaps in LIGO/Virgo’s Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. Lett. 913(2), 23 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abfdb3 arXiv:2104.07783 [astro-ph.HE]

  29. [32]

    Physical Review X , author =

    Abbott et al.: Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Grav- itational Waves through GWTC-3. Physical Review X 13(1), 011048 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.13.011048 arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

  30. [33]

    2023, ApJ, 957, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf452

    Ray, A., Hernandez, I.M., Mohite, S., Creighton, J., Kapadia, S.: Nonparamet- ric Inference of the Population of Compact Binaries from Gravitational-wave Observations Using Binned Gaussian Processes. Astrophys. J. 957(1), 37 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf452 arXiv:2304.08046 [gr-qc]

  31. [34]

    Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population,

    Callister, T.A., Farr, W.M.: Parameter-Free Tour of the Binary Black Hole Population. Physical Review X 14(2), 021005 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.021005 arXiv:2302.07289 [astro-ph.HE]

  32. [35]

    Afroz, S., Mukherjee, S.: Phase space of binary black holes from gravitational wave observations to unveil its formation history. Phys. Rev. D 112(2), 023531 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/7zc2-g9vq arXiv:2411.07304 [astro-ph.HE]

  33. [36]

    Winch, E.R.J., Vink, J.S., Higgins, E.R., Sabhahitf, G.N.: Predicting the heaviest black holes below the pair instability gap. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 529(3), 2980–3002 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae393 arXiv:2401.17327 [astro-ph.HE]

  34. [37]

    Costa, G., Bressan, A., Mapelli, M., Marigo, P., Iorio, G., Spera, M.: Formation of GW190521 from stellar evolution: the impact of the hydrogen-rich envelope, 17 dredge-up, and 12C(α, γ)16O rate on the pair-instability black hole mass gap. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 501(3), 4514–4533 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1093/ mnras/staa3916 arXiv:2010.02242 [astro-ph.SR]

  35. [38]

    Chattopadhyay, D., Stegmann, J., Antonini, F., Barber, J., Romero-Shaw, I.M.: Double black hole mergers in nuclear star clusters: eccentricities, spins, masses, and the growth of massive seeds. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(4), 4908–4928 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3048 arXiv:2308.10884 [astro-ph.HE]

  36. [39]

    L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al

    Rodriguez, C.L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., Chatterjee, S., Haster, C.-J., Rasio, F.A.: Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implications for Advanced LIGO. Physical Review Letters 115(5), 051101 (2015) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101

  37. [40]

    Ajith, P., Hannam, M., Husa, S., Chen, Y., Br¨ ugmann, B., Dorband, N., M¨ uller, D., Ohme, F., Pollney, D., Reisswig, C., Santamar´ ıa, L., Seiler, J.: Inspiral-merger- ringdown waveforms for black-hole binaries with nonprecessing spins. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 241101 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.241101

  38. [41]

    Antonini, F., Romero-Shaw, I.M., Callister, T.: Star Cluster Population of High Mass Black Hole Mergers in Gravitational Wave Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134(1), 011401 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.011401 arXiv:2406.19044 [astro-ph.HE]

  39. [42]

    GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, the KAGRA Collab- oration: GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries. arXiv e-prints, 2508–18083 (2025) arXiv:2508.18083 [astro-ph.HE]

  40. [43]

    Zenodo (2025)

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V., Collaboration, K.: GWTC-4: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the O3b Observing Run. Zenodo (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16053484 . https://zenodo. org/records/16053484

  41. [44]

    Antonini, F., Gieles, M., Dosopoulou, F., Chattopadhyay, D.: Coalescing black hole binaries from globular clusters: mass distributions and comparison to gravi- tational wave data from GWTC-3. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522(1), 466–476 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad972 arXiv:2208.01081 [astro-ph.HE]

  42. [45]

    Tiwari, V.: What’s in a binary black hole’s mass parameter? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 527(1), 298–306 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3155 arXiv:2304.03498 [astro-ph.HE]

  43. [46]

    The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution,

    Tiwari, V., Fairhurst, S.: The Emergence of Structure in the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution. Astrophys. J. Lett.913(2), 19 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/abfbe7 arXiv:2011.04502 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. [47]

    Li, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-Z., Tang, S.-P., Fan, Y.-Z.: Resolving the Stellar-Collapse 18 and Hierarchical-Merger Origins of the Coalescing Black Holes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133(5), 051401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051401 arXiv:2303.02973 [astro-ph.HE]

  45. [48]

    Karathanasis, C., Mukherjee, S., Mastrogiovanni, S.: Binary black holes pop- ulation and cosmology in new lights: signature of PISN mass and formation channel in GWTC-3. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 523(3), 4539–4555 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1373 arXiv:2204.13495 [astro-ph.CO]

  46. [49]

    Seeking spinning subpopulations of black hole binaries via iterative density estimation,

    Sadiq, J., Dent, T., Lorenzo-Medina, A.: Seeking Spinning Subpopulations of Black Hole Binaries via Iterative Density Estimation. arXiv e-prints, 2506–02250 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.02250 arXiv:2506.02250 [astro-ph.HE]

  47. [50]

    Maga˜ na Hernandez and A

    Maga˜ na Hernandez, I., Palmese, A.: Astrophysics informed Gaussian processes for gravitational-wave populations: Evidence for the onset of the pair-instability supernova mass gap. arXiv e-prints, 2508–19208 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2508.19208 arXiv:2508.19208 [astro-ph.HE]

  48. [51]

    Astrophys

    Sallaska, A.L., Iliadis, C., Champange, A.E., Goriely, S., Starrfield, S., Timmes, F.X.: STARLIB: A Next-generation Reaction-rate Library for Nuclear Astrophysics. Astrophys. J. Sup. 207(1), 18 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0067-0049/207/1/18 arXiv:1304.7811 [astro-ph.SR]

  49. [52]

    Farmer, M

    Farmer, R., Renzo, M., de Mink, S.E., Fishbach, M., Justham, S.: Constraints from Gravitational-wave Detections of Binary Black Hole Mergers on the 12C(α, γ)16O Rate. Astrophys. J. Lett. 902(2), 36 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 2041-8213/abbadd arXiv:2006.06678 [astro-ph.HE]

  50. [53]

    Physical Models for the Astrophysical Population of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources,

    Golomb, J., Isi, M., Farr, W.M.: Physical Models for the Astrophysical Pop- ulation of Black Holes: Application to the Bump in the Mass Distribution of Gravitational-wave Sources. Astrophys. J. 976(1), 121 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ad8572 arXiv:2312.03973 [astro-ph.HE]

  51. [54]

    An, Z., Ma, Z.-Y., Yuan, C.-L., Meng, J.: New analysis of the 12C(α, γ)16O reac- tion cross section at astrophysical energies. Phys. Rev. C 92(1), 015802 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.015802 arXiv:1509.00725 [nucl-ex]

  52. [55]

    de Boer, R.J., Brune, C.R., Gai, M., Kunz, R., Li, Z.H., Oulebsir, N., Runkle, R., Sayre, D.B., Sch¨ urmann, D., Spillane, T., Xu, Y.: The12C(α, γ)16O reaction revisited: a new R-matrix evaluation. Eur. Phys. J. A 61(2), 37 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01537-1

  53. [56]

    Astrophys

    Shen, Y., Guo, B., deBoer, R.J., Li, E., Li, Z., Li, Y., Tang, X., Pang, D., Adhikari, S., Basu, C., Su, J., Yan, S., Fan, Q., Liu, J., Chen, C., Han, Z., Li, X., Lian, G., Ma, T., Nan, W., Nan, W., Wang, Y., Zeng, S., Zhang, H., Liu, W.: New Determi- nation of the 12C(α, γ)16O Reaction Rate and Its Impact on the Black-hole Mass 19 Gap. Astrophys. J. 945(...

  54. [57]

    2022, ApJ, 928, 155, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac589a

    Tiwari, V.: Exploring Features in the Binary Black Hole Population. Astrophys. J. 928(2), 155 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac589a arXiv:2111.13991 [astro-ph.HE]

  55. [58]

    S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H

    Vink, J.S., Koter, A., Lamers, H.J.G.L.M.: Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity. Astronomy and Astrophysics 369(2), 574–588 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20010127

  56. [59]

    Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Bartos, I., Kocsis, B., Haiman, Z., M´ arka, S.: Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei. Astrophys. J. 835(2), 165 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165 arXiv:1602.03831 [astro- ph.HE]

  57. [60]

    Zenodo (2022)

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V.: GWTC-2.1: Data Quality Products for Compact Binary Coalescence Searches during the First Half of the Third Observing Run. Zenodo (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6477646 . https: //zenodo.org/records/6477646

  58. [61]

    Zenodo (2023)

    Collaboration, L.S., Collaboration, V., Collaboration, K.: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — Data behind the figures. Zenodo (2023). https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7997424 . https://zenodo.org/records/7997424

  59. [62]

    , keywords =

    Buikema, A., Cahillane, C., Mansell, G.L., et al. : Sensitivity and performance of the Advanced LIGO detectors in the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 102(6), 062003 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.062003 arXiv:2008.01301 [astro-ph.IM]

  60. [63]

    Capote, E., Jia, W., Aritomi, N., Nakano, M., Xu, V., Abbott, R.,et al.: Advanced LIGO detector performance in the fourth observing run. Phys. Rev. D 111(6), 062002 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.062002 arXiv:2411.14607 [gr-qc]

  61. [64]

    K., Davis, D., et al

    Soni, S., Berger, B.K., Davis, D., Di Renzo, F., Effler, A., et al. : LIGO Detector Characterization in the first half of the fourth Observing run. Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 42(8), 085016 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/adc4b6 arXiv:2409.02831 [astro-ph.IM]

  62. [65]

    Nature 643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3 arXiv:2412.11824 [quant-ph]

    Novikov, V., Jia, J., Brasil, T.B., Grimaldi, A., Bocoum, M., Balabas, M., M¨ uller, J.H., Zeuthen, E., Polzik, E.S.: Hybrid quantum network for sensing in the acous- tic frequency range. Nature 643(8073), 955–960 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09224-3 arXiv:2412.11824 [quant-ph]

  63. [66]

    Mazin, Editorial: Altermagnetism—a new punch line of fundamental magnetism, Phys

    Ganapathy, D., Jia, W., Nakano, M., Xu, V., Aritomi, N., Cullen, T., et al. : Broadband quantum enhancement of the ligo detectors with frequency-dependent 20 squeezing. Phys. Rev. X 13, 041021 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 13.041021

  64. [67]

    Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit

    Jia, W., Xu, V., Kuns, K., Nakano, M., Barsotti, L., et al. : Squeezing the quan- tum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit. Science 385(6715), 1318–1321 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ado8069 arXiv:2404.14569 [gr-qc]

  65. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636816

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, and KAGRA Collabo- ration: GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run — O1+O2+O3 Search Sen- sitivity Estimates. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5636816 . https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.5636816

  66. [69]

    Astrophys

    Callister, T.A., Miller, S.J., Chatziioannou, K., Farr, W.M.: No Evidence that the Majority of Black Holes in Binaries Have Zero Spin. Astrophys. J. Lett. 937(1), 13 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac847e arXiv:2205.08574 [astro-ph.HE]

  67. [70]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Fishbach, M., Holz, D.E., Farr, W.M.: Does the black hole merger rate evolve with redshift? The Astrophysical Journal Letters 863(2), 41 (2018) https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/aad800

  68. [71]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , author =

    Callister, T., Fishbach, M., Holz, D.E., Farr, W.M.: Shouts and murmurs: Com- bining individual gravitational-wave sources with the stochastic background to measure the history of binary black hole mergers. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 896(2), 32 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab9743

  69. [72]

    A ViLA: Asynchronous vision-language agent for streaming multimodal data interaction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.18472, 2025

    Antonini, F., Callister, T., Dosopoulou, F., Romero-Shaw, I., Chattopadhyay, D.: Inferring the pair-instability mass gap from gravitational wave data using flexible models. arXiv e-prints, 2506–09154 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506. 09154 arXiv:2506.09154 [astro-ph.HE]

  70. [73]

    Massive runaways and walkaway stars

    Renzo, M., Zapartas, E., de Mink, S.E., G¨ otberg, Y., Justham, S., Farmer, R.J., Izzard, R.G., Toonen, S., Sana, H.: Massive runaway and walkaway stars. A study of the kinematical imprints of the physical processes governing the evolution and explosion of their binary progenitors. A&A 624, 66 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1051/0004-6361/201833297 arXiv:1804...

  71. [74]

    2020, ApJ, 888, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d

    Mapelli, M., Spera, M., Montanari, E., Limongi, M., Chieffi, A., Giacobbo, N., Bressan, A., Bouffanais, Y.: Impact of the Rotation and Compactness of Pro- genitors on the Mass of Black Holes. Astrophys. J. 888(2), 76 (2020) https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab584d arXiv:1909.01371 [astro-ph.HE]

  72. [75]

    Astrophys

    Woosley, S.E.: The Evolution of Massive Helium Stars, Including Mass Loss. Astrophys. J. 878(1), 49 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b41 arXiv:1901.00215 [astro-ph.SR] 21

  73. [76]

    Fern´ andez, R., Quataert, E., Kashiyama, K., Coughlin, E.R.: Mass ejec- tion in failed supernovae: variation with stellar progenitor. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476(2), 2366–2383 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty306 arXiv:1710.01735 [astro-ph.HE]

  74. [77]

    Iorio, G., Mapelli, M., Costa, G., Spera, M., Escobar, G.J., Sgalletta, C., Trani, A.A., Korb, E., Santoliquido, F., Dall’Amico, M., Gaspari, N., Bressan, A.: Compact object mergers: exploring uncertainties from stellar and binary evolu- tion with SEVN. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 524(1), 426–470 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1630 arXiv:2211.1...

  75. [78]

    Formation mechanisms, mass, and spin of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters with up to 1 million stars

    Arca Sedda, M., Kamlah, A.W.H., Spurzem, R., Rizzuto, F.P., Naab, T., Giersz, M., Berczik, P.: The DRAGON-II simulations - II. Formation mechanisms, mass, and spin of intermediate-mass black holes in star clusters with up to 1 million stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 526(1), 429–442 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stad2292 arXiv:2307.04806 [astro-ph.GA]

  76. [79]

    Costa, G., Mapelli, M., Iorio, G., Santoliquido, F., Escobar, G.J., Klessen, R.S., Bressan, A.: Massive binary black holes from Population II and III stars. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.525(2), 2891–2906 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/ stad2443 arXiv:2303.15511 [astro-ph.GA]

  77. [80]

    Mbarek and D

    Santoliquido, F., Mapelli, M., Bouffanais, Y., Giacobbo, N., Di Carlo, U.N., Rastello, S., Artale, M.C., Ballone, A.: The Cosmic Merger Rate Density Evo- lution of Compact Binaries Formed in Young Star Clusters and in Isolated Binaries. Astrophys. J. 898(2), 152 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ ab9b78 arXiv:2004.09533 [astro-ph.HE]

  78. [81]

    Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks

    De Luca, V., Franciolini, G., Riotto, A.: GW231123: a Possible Primordial Black Hole Origin. arXiv e-prints, 2508–09965 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2508.09965 arXiv:2508.09965 [astro-ph.CO]

  79. [82]

    Mandel, I., Farr, W.M., Gair, J.R.: Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 486(1), 1086–1093 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz896 arXiv:1809.02063 [physics.data-an]

  80. [83]

    Abbott et al.: GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run. Phys. Rev. D 109(2), 022001 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.022001 arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.