arxiv: 2604.11845 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-12 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Quasi-resonances in the vicinity of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black hole

S.V. Bolokhov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords quasinormal modesEinstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holesquasi-resonancesmassive scalar fieldsringdown spectroscopyWKB approximationtime-domain evolution

0 comments

The pith

Increasing scalar field mass around charged dilaton black holes suppresses damping and produces very long-lived quasi-resonant modes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the quasinormal spectra of massive scalar fields propagating in the geometry of charged Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes. High-order WKB-Padé approximations are cross-checked against direct time-domain evolution to map how the imaginary parts of the frequencies change with scalar mass and dilaton coupling. The calculations reveal that larger scalar masses drive several mode branches toward vanishingly small damping rates, indicating an approach to quasi-resonances. These shifts persist across different dilaton values and exceed estimated numerical errors, suggesting the effect is a genuine feature of the spacetime rather than an artifact.

Core claim

We study massive scalar quasinormal spectra of charged Einstein--Maxwell--dilaton black holes by combining high-order WKB--Padé calculations with time-domain evolution. The two approaches show close agreement in the regime where both methods are reliable, allowing controlled tracking of spectral trends across different charges and dilaton couplings. We find that increasing scalar-field mass can strongly suppress damping for several branches, signaling an approach to quasi-resonant, very long-lived oscillations. Although WKB is not expected to determine modes extremely close to the real-frequency axis with high precision, the onset of this regime is clear and appears for multiple dilaton 0cou

What carries the argument

High-order WKB-Padé method paired with time-domain integration of the massive scalar wave equation, used to follow the reduction in damping rates as scalar mass and dilaton coupling are varied.

If this is right

Quasi-resonant behavior appears for several different values of the dilaton coupling.
Additional near-resonant modes arise in lower-multipole sectors.
The effect remains larger than numerical uncertainty across the range of black-hole charges examined.
These long-lived modes would modify the late-time ringdown phase observable in gravitational-wave signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the quasi-resonances survive in full nonlinear evolutions they could provide a new observational handle on scalar-tensor extensions of gravity.
Similar damping suppression may occur in other massive-field theories and could be checked with existing numerical codes for different potentials.
The lower-multipole near-resonances might be accessible to current gravitational-wave detectors if the mass parameter lies in an astrophysically plausible range.

Load-bearing premise

The observed trend of damping suppression continues to hold even when the WKB approximation is applied near the real-frequency axis where its accuracy is reduced.

What would settle it

A long-duration time-domain simulation at high scalar mass that measures whether the oscillation amplitude continues to decay at the extrapolated slow rate or instead damps out after a finite time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.11845 by S.V. Bolokhov.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time-domain profile for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: A complementary characterization is provided by the damping rate Γ ≡ −𝐼𝑚(𝜔), (17) shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Quality factors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Damping rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study massive scalar quasinormal spectra of charged Einstein--Maxwell--dilaton black holes by combining high-order WKB--Pad\'e calculations with time-domain evolution. The two approaches show close agreement in the regime where both methods are reliable, allowing controlled tracking of spectral trends across different charges and dilaton couplings. We find that increasing scalar-field mass can strongly suppress damping for several branches, signaling an approach to quasi-resonant, very long-lived oscillations. Although WKB is not expected to determine modes extremely close to the real-frequency axis with high precision, the onset of this regime is clear and appears for multiple dilaton couplings, with additional near-resonant behavior in lower-multipole sectors. The dilaton-induced shifts are substantially larger than the estimated numerical uncertainty, indicating that quasi-resonances are a robust physical signature relevant for ringdown spectroscopy in scalar-extended gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows numerically that scalar mass can drive damping rates down sharply in EMD black holes across several dilaton values, but the quasi-resonance claim leans on WKB trends in the regime the authors note is least reliable.

read the letter

The central observation is that raising the scalar mass μ reduces the imaginary part of several quasinormal frequencies for charged Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes, with the trend appearing for multiple dilaton couplings. The two methods—high-order WKB-Padé and time-domain integration—agree in the region where both are trustworthy, and the dilaton-induced changes exceed the quoted numerical uncertainties. That cross-check and the parameter scan are the parts that hold up cleanly. The work is a straightforward numerical extension of standard techniques to this specific family, and the authors are explicit about WKB losing accuracy as modes approach the real axis. The soft spot is the interpretation of the continued trend into the quasi-resonant regime. Time-domain validation stops where the damping is still moderate, and no higher-precision solver is applied to the smallest-Im(ω) points. If the Padé approximant begins to underestimate damping once turning points near the horizon, the “robust physical signature” conclusion weakens. The abstract already flags this limitation, so the gap is not hidden, but it remains the load-bearing step. This is useful reading for anyone working on ringdown spectroscopy in scalar-tensor or string-inspired models; the plots give concrete numbers to compare against future data or other codes. It is not a foundational result, but the numerics are honest enough that a referee could usefully check the WKB extrapolation and ask for one additional cross-validation run. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies massive scalar quasinormal modes of charged Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes by combining high-order WKB-Padé calculations with time-domain evolution. It reports that increasing the scalar-field mass strongly suppresses damping rates for several branches, indicating an approach to quasi-resonant, very long-lived oscillations, with dilaton couplings producing larger shifts than estimated numerical uncertainty; the two methods agree where both are reliable.

Significance. If the central trend holds, the results would identify quasi-resonances as a robust signature in scalar-extended gravity, relevant for ringdown spectroscopy and tests of modified gravity. Credit is due for the direct numerical approach with no free parameters or circular definitions, the explicit cross-check between independent methods in their overlapping regime of validity, and the focus on falsifiable spectral trends.

major comments (2)

[Discussion of numerical methods and WKB accuracy (near the end of the results section)] The manuscript acknowledges that WKB loses precision for modes extremely close to the real-frequency axis, yet the quasi-resonance interpretation and the claim of a 'robust physical signature' rest on the continuation of the WKB-Padé trend for Im(ω) as μ increases. Time-domain agreement is shown only in the regime where both methods are reliable; no independent high-accuracy solver is applied to the smallest-Im(ω) points. This makes the suppression of damping and the onset of the quasi-resonant regime a load-bearing claim that requires additional validation.
[Results on spectral trends with scalar mass and dilaton coupling] The estimated numerical uncertainty is stated to be smaller than the dilaton-induced shifts, but the uncertainty quantification for the WKB-Padé approximant itself is not detailed once the turning points approach the horizon. An explicit error budget or convergence test for the near-real-axis cases would be needed to confirm that the reported suppression is not an artifact of the approximant.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract could specify the multipole and charge ranges over which the quasi-resonance onset is observed, to make the scope of the claim clearer.
[Results section] A short table summarizing the lowest damping rates obtained by each method for representative μ and dilaton values would improve readability of the trend.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, with revisions made to improve the presentation of numerical uncertainties and method limitations.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Discussion of numerical methods and WKB accuracy (near the end of the results section)] The manuscript acknowledges that WKB loses precision for modes extremely close to the real-frequency axis, yet the quasi-resonance interpretation and the claim of a 'robust physical signature' rest on the continuation of the WKB-Padé trend for Im(ω) as μ increases. Time-domain agreement is shown only in the regime where both methods are reliable; no independent high-accuracy solver is applied to the smallest-Im(ω) points. This makes the suppression of damping and the onset of the quasi-resonant regime a load-bearing claim that requires additional validation.

Authors: We agree that WKB-Padé accuracy degrades for modes with extremely small imaginary parts and that time-domain validation is limited to the overlapping regime. The quasi-resonant trend is inferred from the systematic decrease in Im(ω) with increasing μ, which persists across multiple branches, multipoles, and dilaton couplings. We have added higher-resolution time-domain runs that extend further into the low-damping regime and included a dedicated paragraph discussing the method limitations and the robustness of the observed trend against these limitations. An independent high-accuracy solver beyond the two methods already employed is not available to us at present. revision: partial
Referee: [Results on spectral trends with scalar mass and dilaton coupling] The estimated numerical uncertainty is stated to be smaller than the dilaton-induced shifts, but the uncertainty quantification for the WKB-Padé approximant itself is not detailed once the turning points approach the horizon. An explicit error budget or convergence test for the near-real-axis cases would be needed to confirm that the reported suppression is not an artifact of the approximant.

Authors: We have revised the manuscript to include an explicit error budget for the WKB-Padé approximant. This comprises convergence tests with respect to the WKB order, the Padé approximant degree, and the location of turning points relative to the horizon. For near-real-axis modes we report the spread among different approximants and the discrepancy with time-domain results (where the latter remain feasible) as quantitative uncertainty estimates. These additions confirm that the dilaton-induced shifts exceed the quantified errors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical computation of quasinormal spectra

full rationale

The paper computes massive scalar quasinormal modes of Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton black holes via high-order WKB-Padé approximations cross-checked against time-domain evolution. Spectral trends (suppression of damping with rising scalar mass) are obtained by direct solution of the wave equation for varying charges and dilaton couplings; no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of itself, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain. The explicit caveat that WKB loses precision near the real axis is stated in the abstract and does not create a self-referential loop—the reported onset of quasi-resonance is presented as an observed numerical trend, not a derived necessity. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard black-hole perturbation theory and the known analytic form of the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton solution; no new entities are introduced and the only free parameters are the physical inputs (charge, dilaton coupling, scalar mass) that are varied explicitly.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Linear perturbation theory around a fixed background black-hole solution remains valid
Implicit in all quasinormal-mode calculations; stated by the use of the wave equation on the fixed metric.
domain assumption WKB-Padé approximation captures the correct trend even when absolute precision near the real axis is limited
Explicitly qualified in the abstract but still used to identify the onset of quasi-resonance.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5447 in / 1484 out tokens · 75012 ms · 2026-05-10T15:05:17.805834+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Massive Scalar Quasinormal Modes, Greybody Factors, and Absorption Cross Section of a Parity-Symmetric Beyond-Horndeski Black Hole
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

Increasing the mass of a scalar field around a parity-symmetric beyond-Horndeski black hole strongly reduces the damping rate of quasinormal modes while suppressing low-frequency absorption and shifting efficient abso...
Bardeen spacetime as quantum corrected black hole: Grey-body factors and quasinormal modes of gravitational perturbations
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Increasing the quantum-correction scale in Bardeen spacetime raises quasinormal frequencies, slows decay, suppresses low-frequency transmission, and reorganizes absorption cross-sections.
Long-lived massive scalar modes, grey-body factors, and absorption cross sections of the Reissner--Nordstr\"om-like brane-world black hole
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Positive tidal charge in this brane-world black hole lowers the effective potential barrier, pushes massive scalar quasinormal modes toward arbitrarily long lifetimes, and increases transmission and absorption.
Massive scalar quasinormal modes of an asymptotically flat regular black hole supported by a phantom Dirac--Born--Infeld field
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Massive scalar quasinormal modes in this DBI-supported regular black hole show higher oscillation frequencies and lower damping as field mass increases, with larger regularity scales producing softer and longer-lived ringing.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 8 internal anchors

[1]

tortoise coordinate

The dilaton and electromagnetic fields are given by 𝑒2𝑎𝜙 = (︁ 1− 𝑟− 𝑟 )︁2𝑎2 1+𝑎2 , 𝐹 𝑡𝑟 = 𝑒2𝑎𝜙𝑄 𝑅2 .(6) For perturbation equations below, we define 𝑓(𝑟)≡𝜆 2(𝑟).(7) The covariant Klein-Gordon equation for a massive scalar fieldΦis 1√−𝑔 𝜕𝜇 (︀√−𝑔𝑔 𝜇𝜈𝜕𝜈Φ )︀ −𝜇 2Φ = 0.(8) After separation of variables in the background metric (2), with𝑓(𝑟)defined by Eq. (7), E...
[2]

K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel.2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[3]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
[4]

S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.31, 423 (2025)

2025
[5]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[6]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017
[7]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[9]

B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Living Rev. Rel.19, 1 (2016), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[10]

R. A. Konoplya, Gen. Rel. Grav.34, 329 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0109096

work page arXiv 2002
[11]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D66, 084007 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0207028

work page arXiv 2002
[12]

A. F. Zinhailo, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 912 (2019), arXiv:1909.12664 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[13]

K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D96, 064004 (2017), arXiv:1706.07460 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D92, 064022 (2015), arXiv:1507.05649 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[15]

Fernando and K

S. Fernando and K. Arnold, Gen. Rel. Grav.36, 1805 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0312041

work page arXiv 2004
[16]

Quasinormal modes of dilaton-de Sitter black holes: scalar perturbations

S. Fernando, Gen. Rel. Grav.48, 24 (2016), arXiv:1601.06407 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[17]

R. A. Konoplya and A. V. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B609, 377 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0411059

work page arXiv 2005
[18]

R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D98, 104033 (2018), arXiv:1808.03346 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[19]

and M.-a

A. Ohashi and M.-a. Sakagami, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 3973 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0407009

work page arXiv 2004
[20]

Zhang, J

M. Zhang, J. Jiang, and Z. Zhong, Phys. Lett. B789, 13 (2019), arXiv:1811.04183 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D109, 064017 (2024)

2024
[22]

S. V. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 634 (2024), arXiv:2404.09364 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Bolokhov, Eur

S. Bolokhov, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1166 (2025)

2025
[24]

Skvortsova, EPL 149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

M. Skvortsova, EPL149, 59001 (2025), arXiv:2503.03650 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Skvortsova, (2025), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

M. Skvortsova, (2025), arXiv:2509.18061 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, (2026), arXiv:2603.10844 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[27]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, S. Murodov, M. Abdullaev, J. Ray- imbaev, M. Akhmedov, and M. Matyoqubov, (2026), arXiv:2602.11001 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[28]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, J. Rayimbaev, B. Rahmatov, F. Shayi- mov, and I. Davletov, (2026), arXiv:2601.17906 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[29]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Phys. Lett. B872, 140082 (2026), arXiv:2510.25969 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Fortsch. Phys.74, e70074 (2026), arXiv:2510.10579 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1076 (2025), arXiv:2508.19194 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Malik, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2511.12335 [gr- qc]

Z. Malik, (2025), arXiv:2511.12335 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Malik, (2025), arXiv:2510.06689 [gr-qc]

Z. Malik, (2025), arXiv:2510.06689 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Malik, Annals Phys

Z. Malik, Annals Phys.482, 170238 (2025), arXiv:2504.12570 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

Dubinsky, Int

A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Theor. Phys.65, 45 (2026), arXiv:2511.00778 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

Dubinsky, Eur

A. Dubinsky, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 924 (2025), arXiv:2505.08545 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, (2026), arXiv:2603.24424 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

S. S. Seahra, C. Clarkson, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. 8 Lett.94, 121302 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0408032

work page arXiv 2005
[39]

Zhidenko, Phys

A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D74, 064017 (2006), arXiv:gr- qc/0607133

work page arXiv 2006
[40]

M. S. Churilova, Phys. Rev. D102, 024076 (2020), arXiv:2002.03450 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[41]

S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D110, 024010 (2024), arXiv:2311.05503 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[42]

M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B802, 135207 (2020), arXiv:1911.05246 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[43]

Jing, Phys

J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D72, 027501 (2005), arXiv:gr- qc/0408090

work page arXiv 2005
[44]

H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D65,084031 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0112075

work page arXiv 2002
[45]

and Rogatko, M., Phys

R. Moderski and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D64, 044024 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0105056

work page arXiv 2001
[46]

Rogatko and A

M. Rogatko and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D76, 044010 (2007)

2007
[47]

H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D64,044014 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103086

work page arXiv 2001
[48]

H.KoyamaandA.Tomimatsu,Phys.Rev.D63,064032 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0012022

work page arXiv 2001
[49]

G. W. Gibbons, M. Rogatko, and A. Szyplowska, Phys. Rev. D77, 064024 (2008), arXiv:0802.3259 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[50]

G. W. Gibbons and M. Rogatko, Phys. Rev. D77, 044034 (2008), arXiv:0801.3130 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[51]

Dubinsky, EPL 147, 19003 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

A. Dubinsky, EPL147, 19003 (2024), arXiv:2403.01883 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[52]

R. A. Konoplya and R. D. B. Fontana, Phys. Lett. B 659, 375 (2008), arXiv:0707.1156 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[53]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Lett. B666, 283 (2008), arXiv:0801.0846 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[54]

Wu and R

C. Wu and R. Xu, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 391 (2015), arXiv:1507.04911 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[55]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B853, 138685 (2024), arXiv:2307.01110 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Lett. B853, 138682 (2024), arXiv:2403.06867 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

Carter, Commun

B. Carter, Commun. Math. Phys.10, 280 (1968)

1968
[58]

R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D97, 084044 (2018), arXiv:1801.07195 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[59]

Late-Time Behavior of Stellar Collapse and Explosions: I. Linearized Perturbations

C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 49, 883 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9307009

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[60]

Dubinsky, Int

A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.1, 2 (2025), arXiv:2507.00256 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Malik, Annals Phys

Z. Malik, Annals Phys.479, 170046 (2025), arXiv:2409.01561 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[62]

R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D109, 104005 (2024), arXiv:2403.07848 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

Skvortsova, Fortsch

M. Skvortsova, Fortsch. Phys.72, 2400132 (2024), arXiv:2405.06390 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

Malik, Int

Z. Malik, Int. J. Theor. Phys.63, 199 (2024), arXiv:2308.10412 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[65]

Evolution of massive fields around a black hole in Horava gravity

N. Varghese and V. C. Kuriakose, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 2757 (2011), arXiv:1011.6608 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[66]

Skvortsova, Fortsch

M. Skvortsova, Fortsch. Phys.72, 2400036 (2024), arXiv:2311.11650 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

Skvortsova, Grav

M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol.30, 279 (2024), arXiv:2405.15807 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 486 (2025), arXiv:2503.16087 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[69]

S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Lett. B856, 138879 (2024), arXiv:2310.12326 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[70]

M. S. Churilova, R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Zhidenko, JCAP10, 010 (2021), arXiv:2107.05977 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[71]

Dubinsky and A

A. Dubinsky and A. F. Zinhailo, EPL149, 69004 (2025), arXiv:2410.15232 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

Scalar field propagation in higher dimensional black holes at a Lifshitz point

E. Abdalla, O. P. F. Piedra, F. S. Nuñez, and J. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D88, 064035 (2013), arXiv:1211.3390 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[73]

S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2603.22310 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[74]

J. P. Arbelaez, (2026), arXiv:2601.22340 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[75]

J. P. Arbelaez, (2025), arXiv:2509.25141 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[76]

R.A.Konoplya, A.Zhidenko, andA.F.Zinhailo,Class. Quant. Grav.36, 155002 (2019), arXiv:1904.10333 [gr- qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[77]

Iyer and C

S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D35, 3621 (1987)

1987
[78]

R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

work page Pith review arXiv 2003
[79]

Quasinormal modes of black holes. The improved semianalytic approach

J. Matyjasek and M. Opala, Phys. Rev. D96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[80]

R. A. Konoplya, J. Matyjasek, and A. Zhidenko, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys.2, 5 (2026), arXiv:2603.12466 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.