pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.16331 · v1 · submitted 2026-03-12 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.AI· cs.CV· cs.MA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory for Embodied Agent Task Planning

Xiaoyu Ma , Lianyu Hu , Wenbing Tang , Zixuan Hu , Zeqin Liao , Zhizhen Wu , Yang Liu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 11:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.AIcs.CVcs.MA
keywords embodied agentstask planningmemory systemsknowledge graphsLLM plannerslong-horizon taskstraining-free methodshuman-inspired AI
0
0 comments X

The pith

BrainMem equips LLM-based embodied planners with a training-free hierarchical memory that turns interaction histories into reusable knowledge graphs and guidelines, raising success rates especially on long-horizon tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces BrainMem as a plug-and-play memory system for agents operating in 3D environments. It draws on human cognition by maintaining working, episodic, and semantic memory layers that continuously convert raw interaction histories into structured knowledge graphs and distilled symbolic guidelines. These structures let planners retrieve relevant past experience, reason about spatial and temporal dependencies, and adapt behavior without any model fine-tuning or task-specific engineering. Experiments across four benchmarks show consistent gains in task completion, with the biggest lifts on longer and more spatially demanding sequences. A sympathetic reader would see this as evidence that persistent, evolving memory can turn stateless reactive planners into agents that learn from their own history.

Core claim

BrainMem transforms sequences of agent-environment interactions into a hierarchical memory store consisting of working memory for immediate context, episodic memory for specific past episodes, and semantic memory for generalized rules; the store is maintained as knowledge graphs plus symbolic guidelines that any multi-modal LLM can query at planning time, yielding higher success rates on long-horizon embodied tasks without retraining the underlying model.

What carries the argument

The BrainMem hierarchical memory system that converts interaction histories into retrievable knowledge graphs and symbolic guidelines across working, episodic, and semantic layers.

If this is right

  • Task success rates rise across multiple models and difficulty levels on EB-ALFRED, EB-Navigation, EB-Manipulation, and EB-Habitat.
  • Gains are largest on long-horizon and spatially complex tasks that require tracking dependencies over time.
  • Agents reduce repeated errors by retrieving and adapting prior experience at planning time.
  • The same planner works with different multi-modal LLMs without prompt redesign or retraining.
  • Reliance on hand-crafted task-specific prompts decreases because memory supplies reusable structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same conversion of histories into graphs could be applied to non-embodied sequential reasoning domains such as software debugging or scientific experiment design.
  • Accumulated semantic guidelines might eventually support cross-task transfer that current per-episode planners lack.
  • If the knowledge graphs grow without bound, mechanisms for forgetting or abstraction would become necessary to keep retrieval efficient.
  • Real-robot deployment would test whether the symbolic guidelines survive the shift from simulation to noisy physical sensing.

Load-bearing premise

Interaction histories can be reliably turned into structured knowledge graphs and symbolic guidelines that remain useful to arbitrary multi-modal LLMs without fine-tuning or extra engineering.

What would settle it

A controlled test on EB-ALFRED or EB-Habitat long-horizon subsets in which adding BrainMem produces no increase or a decrease in success rate relative to the identical base LLM without memory would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.16331 by Lianyu Hu, Wenbing Tang, Xiaoyu Ma, Yang Liu, Zeqin Liao, Zhizhen Wu, Zixuan Hu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Typical failure modes of stateless planners. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overall framework of the proposed BrainMem system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Visualization of task execution without and with memory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Error distribution on EB-ALFRED using GPT-4o. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Habitat task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Habitat task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Navigation task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Navigation task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Manipulation task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Manipulation task visualization (without vs. with memory). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Embodied task planning requires agents to execute long-horizon, goal-directed actions in complex 3D environments, where success depends on both immediate perception and accumulated experience across tasks. However, most existing LLM-based planners are stateless and reactive, operating without persistent memory and therefore repeating errors and struggling with spatial or temporal dependencies. We propose BrainMem(Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory), a training-free hierarchical memory system that equips embodied agents with working, episodic, and semantic memory inspired by human cognition. BrainMem continuously transforms interaction histories into structured knowledge graphs and distilled symbolic guidelines, enabling planners to retrieve, reason over, and adapt behaviors from past experience without any model fine-tuning or additional training. This plug-and-play design integrates seamlessly with arbitrary multi-modal LLMs and greatly reduces reliance on task-specific prompt engineering. Extensive experiments on four representative benchmarks, including EB-ALFRED, EB-Navigation, EB-Manipulation, and EB-Habitat, demonstrate that BrainMem significantly enhances task success rates across diverse models and difficulty subsets, with the largest gains observed on long-horizon and spatially complex tasks. These results highlight evolving memory as a promising and scalable mechanism for generalizable embodied intelligence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes BrainMem, a training-free hierarchical memory system (working, episodic, and semantic) inspired by human cognition for embodied LLM-based agents. It continuously converts interaction histories into structured knowledge graphs and distilled symbolic guidelines, enabling retrieval and adaptation of past experience. The system is presented as plug-and-play with arbitrary multi-modal LLMs and is evaluated on four benchmarks (EB-ALFRED, EB-Navigation, EB-Manipulation, EB-Habitat), where it is claimed to yield significant success-rate gains, especially on long-horizon and spatially complex tasks.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the work would offer a scalable, training-free mechanism to address statelessness in embodied planners, reducing prompt-engineering overhead and improving handling of temporal/spatial dependencies. The plug-and-play compatibility with diverse models and the brain-inspired framing constitute clear strengths that could influence future memory-augmented agent designs.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim asserts that BrainMem 'significantly enhances task success rates across diverse models and difficulty subsets' on four named benchmarks, yet supplies no quantitative numbers, baselines, error bars, or implementation details. This prevents verification of the headline result and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.
  2. [Method] Method (history-to-KG transformation): the claim that interaction histories are reliably transformed into structured knowledge graphs and symbolic guidelines that remain useful to off-the-shelf multi-modal LLMs rests on an unshown assumption of robustness. No ablations or diagnostics are referenced that rule out hallucinated edges, lossy spatial compression, or guidelines that only work for the generator LLM.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the benchmark acronyms (EB-ALFRED, etc.) are introduced without expansion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and positive assessment of the work's significance. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and empirical support.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central empirical claim asserts that BrainMem 'significantly enhances task success rates across diverse models and difficulty subsets' on four named benchmarks, yet supplies no quantitative numbers, baselines, error bars, or implementation details. This prevents verification of the headline result and is load-bearing for the paper's contribution.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should include concrete quantitative results to make the central claim verifiable. In the revision we will add specific success-rate improvements (e.g., average +12.4% on EB-ALFRED, +18.7% on EB-Habitat for long-horizon subsets), baseline comparisons against prior memory-augmented planners, and a brief note on statistical significance and error bars derived from the main experiments. Implementation details (model versions, retrieval hyperparameters) will be referenced to the experimental section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method] Method (history-to-KG transformation): the claim that interaction histories are reliably transformed into structured knowledge graphs and symbolic guidelines that remain useful to off-the-shelf multi-modal LLMs rests on an unshown assumption of robustness. No ablations or diagnostics are referenced that rule out hallucinated edges, lossy spatial compression, or guidelines that only work for the generator LLM.

    Authors: The current manuscript provides qualitative examples of generated KGs and guidelines in the appendix, but we acknowledge the absence of quantitative robustness diagnostics. In the revision we will add a new subsection with (i) an ablation measuring KG fidelity against human-annotated ground-truth edges on 200 sampled interactions and (ii) a cross-LLM transfer experiment showing downstream success rates when guidelines generated by one model are used by another. These additions will directly address hallucination, compression loss, and generator-specificity concerns. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical plug-and-play system evaluated on external benchmarks

full rationale

The manuscript presents a training-free hierarchical memory module (working/episodic/semantic) that converts histories into KGs and symbolic guidelines for off-the-shelf LLMs. No equations, fitted parameters, or mathematical derivations appear. Claims rest on measured success-rate improvements across four independent embodied benchmarks (EB-ALFRED, EB-Navigation, etc.), which are externally falsifiable. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked that reduce the central result to a definition or prior fit by the same authors. The architecture is therefore self-contained against external task performance rather than tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The design rests on the premise that human memory categories translate directly into useful AI structures and that graph-based distillation of histories yields reusable guidelines without additional training.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Human working, episodic, and semantic memory categories provide a directly transferable template for agent memory design
    The paper invokes this mapping in the abstract without empirical justification or comparison to alternative memory organizations.
invented entities (1)
  • Evolving Memory system (BrainMem) no independent evidence
    purpose: To continuously convert interaction histories into retrievable knowledge graphs and symbolic guidelines
    A new composite module whose only external validation is the reported benchmark gains.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1306 out tokens · 49283 ms · 2026-05-15T11:49:16.955727+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances

    Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., Finn, C., Fu, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., et al.: Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Anthropic: Claude 3.5 sonnet.https://www.anthropic.com (2024), accessed: 2024- 10-01

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Annual review of psychology63(1), 1–29 (2012)

    Baddeley, A.: Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology63(1), 1–29 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Model-Free Episodic Control

    Blundell, C., Uria, B., Pritzel, A., Li, Y., Ruderman, A., Leibo, J.Z., Rae, J., Wier- stra, D., Hassabis, D.: Model-free episodic control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04460 (2016)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Cartillier, V., Ren, Z., Jain, N., Lee, S., Essa, I., Batra, D.: Semantic mapnet: Building allocentric semantic maps and representations from egocentric views. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 35, pp. 964–972 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05155 (2020)

    Chaplot, D.S., Gandhi, D., Gupta, S., Gupta, A., Salakhutdinov, R.: Learning to explore using active neural slam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.05155 (2020)

    work page arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23127 (2025)

    Fei, Z., Ji, L., Wang, S., Shi, J., Gong, J., Qiu, X.: Unleashing embodied task planning ability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.23127 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    the biology of the mind,(2014) (2006)

    Gazzaniga, M.S., Ivry, R.B., Mangun, G.: Cognitive neuroscience. the biology of the mind,(2014) (2006)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18904 (2025)

    Geng, H., Wang, F., Wei, S., Li, Y., Wang, B., An, B., Cheng, C.T., Lou, H., Li, P., Wang, Y.J., et al.: Roboverse: Towards a unified platform, dataset and benchmark for scalable and generalizable robot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18904 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12846 (2025)

    Ginting, M.F., Kim, D.K., Meng, X., Reinke, A., Krishna, B.J., Kayhani, N., Peltzer, O., Fan, D.D., Shaban, A., Kim, S.K., et al.: Enter the mind palace: Reasoning and planning for long-term active embodied question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.12846 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21716 (2025)

    Glocker, M., Hönig, P., Hirschmanner, M., Vincze, M.: Llm-empowered embodied agent for memory-augmented task planning in household robotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21716 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    The Llama 3 Herd of Models

    Grattafiori, A., Dubey, A., Jauhri, A., Pandey, A., Kadian, A., Al-Dahle, A., Letman, A., Mathur, A., Schelten, A., Vaughan, A., et al.: The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Neural Turing Machines

    Graves, A., Wayne, G., Danihelka, I.: Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Graves, A., Wayne, G., Reynolds, M., Harley, T., Danihelka, I., Grabska-Barwińska, A., Colmenarejo, S.G., Grefenstette, E., Ramalho, T., Agapiou, J., et al.: Hybrid computingusinganeuralnetworkwithdynamicexternalmemory.Nature538(7626), 471–476 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Hu, J., Hendrix, R., Farhadi, A., Kembhavi, A., Martín-Martín, R., Stone, P., Zeng, K.H., Ehsani, K.: Flare: Achieving masterful and adaptive robot policies with large-scale reinforcement learning fine-tuning. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 3617–3624. IEEE (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22657 (2025) 16 X

    Hu, W., Hong, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, L., Wei, Z., Yao, X., Peng, N., Bitton, Y., Szpektor, I., Chang, K.W.: 3dllm-mem: Long-term spatial-temporal memory for embodied 3d large language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22657 (2025) 16 X. Ma, et al

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models

    Huang, W., Xia, F., Xiao, T., Chan, H., Liang, J., Florence, P., Zeng, A., Tompson, J., Mordatch, I., Chebotar, Y., et al.: Inner monologue: Embodied reasoning through planning with language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05608 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report

    Hui, B., Yang, J., Cui, Z., Yang, J., Liu, D., Zhang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Yu, B., Lu, K., et al.: Qwen2. 5-coder technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.12186 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    GPT-4o System Card

    Hurst, A., Lerer, A., Goucher, A.P., Perelman, A., Ramesh, A., Clark, A., Ostrow, A., Welihinda, A., Hayes, A., Radford, A., et al.: Gpt-4o system card. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering20(3), 363–373 (2019)

    Jiang, Y.q., Zhang, S.q., Khandelwal, P., Stone, P.: Task planning in robotics: an empirical comparison of pddl-and asp-based systems. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering20(3), 363–373 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 59532–59569 (2024)

    Jimenez Gutierrez, B., Shu, Y., Gu, Y., Yasunaga, M., Su, Y.: Hipporag: Neurobio- logically inspired long-term memory for large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 59532–59569 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI

    Kolve, E., Mottaghi, R., Han, W., VanderBilt, E., Weihs, L., Herrasti, A., Deitke, M., Ehsani, K., Gordon, D., Zhu, Y., et al.: Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  23. [23]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01415 (2025)

    Lei, M., Cai, H., Cui, Z., Tan, L., Hong, J., Hu, G., Zhu, S., Wu, Y., Jiang, S., Wang, G., et al.: Robomemory: A brain-inspired multi-memory agentic framework for interactive environmental learning in physical embodied systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01415 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10177 (2025)

    Lei, M., Zhao, Y., Wang, G., Mai, Z., Cui, S., Han, Y., Ren, J.: Stma: A spatio- temporal memory agent for long-horizon embodied task planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.10177 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    ACM Computing Surveys57(7), 1–36 (2025)

    Liu, H., Guo, D., Cangelosi, A.: Embodied intelligence: A synergy of morphology, action, perception and learning. ACM Computing Surveys57(7), 1–36 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (2025)

    Liu, Y., Chen, W., Bai, Y., Liang, X., Li, G., Gao, W., Lin, L.: Aligning cyber space with physical world: A comprehensive survey on embodied ai. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Ovis2.5 technical report.arXiv:2508.11737, 2025

    Lu, S., Li, Y., Xia, Y., Hu, Y., Zhao, S., Ma, Y., Wei, Z., Li, Y., Duan, L., Zhao, J., et al.: Ovis2. 5 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11737 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20754 (2025)

    Mao, Y., Ye, H., Dong, W., Zhang, C., Zhang, H.: Meta-memory: Retrieving and integrating semantic-spatial memories for robot spatial reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20754 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Packer, C., Fang, V., Patil, S., Lin, K., Wooders, S., Gonzalez, J.: Memgpt: towards llms as operating systems. (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Neural Map: Structured Memory for Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Parisotto, E., Salakhutdinov, R.: Neural map: Structured memory for deep rein- forcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08360 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology

    Park, J.S., O’Brien, J., Cai, C.J., Morris, M.R., Liang, P., Bernstein, M.S.: Genera- tive agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. In: Proceedings of the 36th annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology. pp. 1–22 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Pritzel, A., Uria, B., Srinivasan, S., Badia, A.P., Vinyals, O., Hassabis, D., Wierstra, D., Blundell, C.: Neural episodic control. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 2827–2836. PMLR (2017)

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    Shinn, N., Cassano, F., Gopinath, A., Narasimhan, K., Yao, S.: Reflexion: Language agentswithverbalreinforcementlearning.Advancesinneuralinformationprocessing systems36, 8634–8652 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Shridhar, M., Thomason, J., Gordon, D., Bisk, Y., Han, W., Mottaghi, R., Zettle- moyer, L., Fox, D.: Alfred: A benchmark for interpreting grounded instructions for BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory 17 everyday tasks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 10740–10749 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Song, C.H., Wu, J., Washington, C., Sadler, B.M., Chao, W.L., Su, Y.: Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 2998–3009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023)

    Sumers, T., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K.R., Griffiths, T.L.: Cognitive architectures for language agents. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03673 (2025)

    Tan, H., Hao, X., Lin, M., Wang, P., Lyu, Y., Cao, M., Wang, Z., Zhang, S.: Roboos: A hierarchical embodied framework for cross-embodiment and multi-agent collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03673 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context

    Team,G., Georgiev, P., Lei,V.I., Burnell, R., Bai, L., Gulati, A., Tanzer, G., Vincent, D., Pan, Z., Wang, S., et al.: Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530 (2024)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2), 223–238 (1984)

    Tulving, E.: Precis of elements of episodic memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7(2), 223–238 (1984)

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadi- enne26(1), 1 (1985)

    Tulving, E.: Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadi- enne26(1), 1 (1985)

    work page 1985

  41. [41]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09560 (2025)

    Yang, R., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, M., Qian, C., Wang, K., Wang, Q., Koripella, T.V., Movahedi, M., Li, M., et al.: Embodiedbench: Comprehensive benchmarking multi-modal large language models for vision-driven embodied agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09560 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Yang, Y., Yang, H., Zhou, J., Chen, P., Zhang, H., Du, Y., Gan, C.: 3d-mem: 3d scene memory for embodied exploration and reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 17294–17303 (2025)

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    In: The eleventh international conference on learning representations (2022)

    Yao, S., Zhao, J., Yu, D., Du, N., Shafran, I., Narasimhan, K.R., Cao, Y.: React: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In: The eleventh international conference on learning representations (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Zhang, X., Qin, H., Wang, F., Dong, Y., Li, J.: Lamma-p: Generalizable multi- agent long-horizon task allocation and planning with lm-driven pddl planner. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 10221–10221. IEEE (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    ACM Transactions on Information Systems43(6), 1–47 (2025)

    Zhang, Z., Dai, Q., Bo, X., Ma, C., Li, R., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, Z., Wen, J.R.: A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model-based agents. ACM Transactions on Information Systems43(6), 1–47 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Zhao, A., Huang, D., Xu, Q., Lin, M., Liu, Y.J., Huang, G.: Expel: Llm agents are experiential learners. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 38, pp. 19632–19642 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models

    Zhu, J., Wang, W., Chen, Z., Liu, Z., Ye, S., Gu, L., Tian, H., Duan, Y., Su, W., Shao, J., et al.: Internvl3: Exploring advanced training and test-time recipes for open-source multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10479 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory for Embodied Agent Task Planning

    Zou, D., Wang, F., Ge, M., Fan, S., Zhang, Z., Chen, W., Wang, L., Hu, Z., Yan, W., Gao, Z., et al.: Embodiedbrain: Expanding performance boundaries of task planning for embodied intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.20578 (2025) BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory 1 Supplementary Materials for “BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory for Embodied...

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory 7

    Observe the environment and summarize key objects and agent pose. BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory 7

    work page

  50. [50]

    Create or reuse a state nodest with this summary

    work page

  51. [51]

    Execute the chosen actionat and record its outcome

    work page

  52. [52]

    Fork on countertop, sink visible

    Create a transition edgeet−1→t linkings t−1 tos t. Example evolution for a cleaning task: Episodic KG Evolution Step 0: s_000 = “Fork on countertop, sink visible” Step 1: s_000 –[PickUp(fork)]–>s_001 Step 2: s_001 –[MoveAhead]–>s_002 Step 3: s_002 –[PutObject(sink)]–>s_003 Step 4: s_003 –[TurnOnFaucet]–>s_004 B.2.2 Merging Across EpisodesWhen multiple epi...

    work page

  53. [53]

    clean: pick up the Fork; find a Sink; put down the Fork; turn on the Fauce

    work page

  54. [54]

    C.3 Semantic Guideline Prompt Example Semantic guidelines are high-confidence strategies extracted from successful experiences

    clean: pick up the Spoon; find a Sink; put down the Spoon; turn on the Faucet Real-time Action Hints:Object-specific successful actions retrieved from the episode KG: Real-time Action Hints Successful actions for fork:pick up the Fork; find a Sink; put down the Fork Spatial Reasoning Guidance:General spatial reasoning principles: Spatial Reasoning Guidanc...

    work page

  55. [55]

    Check sink availability before attempting PutObject

    Always pick up objects before navigating to cleaning locations. Check sink availability before attempting PutObject. (Validated 23 times, 92% confidence) [clean, place]

    work page

  56. [56]

    Ensure object is in hand before moving to sink area

    Navigate to sink before PutObject. Ensure object is in hand before moving to sink area. (Validated 18 times, 90% confidence) [clean]

    work page

  57. [57]

    (Validated 15 times, 88% confidence) [place, container]

    For container-object manipulation: first locate container, then pick up object, then navigate to container, finally PutObject near container. (Validated 15 times, 88% confidence) [place, container]

    work page

  58. [58]

    (Validated 12 times, 85% confidence) [clean, rinse, wet]

    For cleaning tasks: Pick up object, Put in sink, Turn on faucet, Rinse, Turn off faucet, Pick up, Place at target. (Validated 12 times, 85% confidence) [clean, rinse, wet]

    work page

  59. [59]

    set X with Y in it

    For complex placement (“set X with Y in it”): Pick up small object (Y), Put into container (X), Pick up container (X), Place at target. (Validated 10 times, 83% confidence) [place, container] CRITICAL: These guidelines come from proven successful experiences. Follow them whenever applicable. Each guideline includes: (1) the strategy text, (2) success coun...

    work page

  60. [60]

    Effective action strategies

    work page

  61. [61]

    Important spatial layout utilization

    work page

  62. [62]

    Ma, et al

    Key points in object interaction Experience Summary (1-2 sentences): 12 X. Ma, et al. For failed tasks: Failure Reflection Extraction Based on the following failed task information, conduct a reflective analysis: Task Instruction: [task instruction] Room: [room_id] Task Type: [task_type] Action Sequence: [action sequence] Failure Reason: Task not complete...

    work page

  63. [63]

    Possible strategy issues

    work page

  64. [64]

    Areas that need improvement

    work page

  65. [65]

    Core Rules:

    Behaviors to avoid next time Reflection Summary (1-2 sentences): C.5 Full Planner Prompt Demonstration A complete end-to-end prompt integrating all memory components during a test episode: Full Planner Prompt SYSTEM PROMPT (Base ALFRED system prompt with action descriptions and guidelines) Streaming Memory System: You have multi-layer memory: working memo...

    work page

  66. [66]

    Working Memory: Always record last 5 actions and current holding status before acting 2.Single Object: Robot can only hold one object at a time

    work page

  67. [67]

    Put down

    Container Logic: “Put down” near a container automatically places object INSIDE container

    work page

  68. [68]

    Episodic Graph: Store object-location-action transitions per room number, predict state changes

    work page

  69. [69]

    Experience Storage: Record task, strategy, outcome, and cause for success/- failure reflection

    work page

  70. [70]

    MEMORY CONTEXT Enhanced Memory Context: Valuable Guidelines (Proven Strategies): BrainMem: Brain-Inspired Evolving Memory 13

    Guideline Application: Apply rules for tasks that are often done incorrectly or inefficiently Cleaning Tasks(rinse/clean/wet): Pick up object, Put in sink, Turn on faucet, Rinse, Turn off faucet, Pick up, Place at target TASK INSTRUCTION Put a clean fork on the dining table. MEMORY CONTEXT Enhanced Memory Context: Valuable Guidelines (Proven Strategies): ...

    work page

  71. [71]

    [Validated 23 times, 92% confidence] [clean, place]

    Always pick up objects before navigating to cleaning locations. [Validated 23 times, 92% confidence] [clean, place]

    work page

  72. [72]

    [Validated 18 times, 90% confidence] [clean] Room Successful Patterns:

    Navigate to sink before PutObject. [Validated 18 times, 90% confidence] [clean] Room Successful Patterns:

    work page

  73. [73]

    clean: pick up the Fork; find a Sink; put down the Fork Relevant Experiences:

    work page

  74. [74]

    Check sink availability before attempting PutObject

    Always pick up objects before navigating to cleaning locations. Check sink availability before attempting PutObject

    work page

  75. [75]

    Place the prism into the black container

    Navigate to sink area first, then PutObject when close enough. Successful actions for fork:pick up the Fork; put down the Fork Spatial Reasoning: –Observe the current view to understand object positions –Note spatial relationships: left/right, front/back, near/far –Consider which objects to approach first based on their locations –Plan efficient movement ...

    work page