Recognition: unknown
Towards Improving Speaker Distance Estimation through Generative Impulse Response Augmentation
Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 18:25 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Using generated room impulse responses with a quality filter substantially lowers errors in estimating speaker distances from audio.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors generate room impulse responses using FastRIR conditioned only on speaker and listener locations. They introduce a quality filter to align the generated responses with the challenge dataset and optimize hyperparameters during fine-tuning of the speaker distance estimation model. This augmentation reduces the mean absolute error from 1.66m to 0.6m for GWA rooms and from 2.18m to 0.69m for Treble rooms, demonstrating significant improvements in estimation accuracy particularly at medium to long distances.
What carries the argument
A quality filter for selecting realistic generated room impulse responses from the FastRIR generator to augment training data for speaker distance estimation.
If this is right
- The augmentation significantly improves estimation accuracy particularly at medium to long distances.
- Performance gains are observed across different room simulation types including GWA and Treble rooms.
- Hyperparameter optimization supports effective use of the augmented data during model fine-tuning.
- Generated data can supplement sparse real datasets when properly filtered for alignment.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the quality filter can be generalized, this approach may apply to estimating other room acoustic properties like reverberation time.
- Combining generative augmentation with real data collection could address data scarcity in many audio ML tasks.
- Further conditioning the generator on room properties might yield even larger gains by increasing diversity of augmented examples.
Load-bearing premise
The quality filter selects generated RIRs realistic enough to boost generalization without causing artifacts or shifts that hurt performance on new rooms.
What would settle it
A direct test on real-world recorded impulse responses from rooms outside the original challenge data would determine if the error reductions hold up beyond simulations.
read the original abstract
The Room Acoustics and Speaker Distance Estimation (SDE) Challenge at ICASSP 2025 explores the effectiveness of augmented room impulse response (RIR) data for improving SDE model performance. This challenge at GenDARA involves generating RIRs to supplement sparse datasets and fine-tuning SDE models with the augmented data. We employ the open-source fast diffuse room impulse response generator (FastRIR) conditioned only on speaker and listener locations. We design a quality filter to ensure generated RIR alignment with challenge RIRs, and hyperparameter optimization is employed for model fine-tuning. Our approach reduces the mean absolute error (MAE) of the five positions from 1.66m to 0.6m for GWA rooms and from 2.18m to 0.69m for Treble rooms, with results demonstrating that the augmentation approach significantly improves estimation accuracy, particularly at medium to long distances.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper claims that augmenting sparse RIR datasets with FastRIR-generated impulse responses (conditioned only on speaker/listener locations) plus a quality filter, followed by hyperparameter-optimized fine-tuning, substantially improves speaker distance estimation. It reports MAE reductions from 1.66 m to 0.6 m on GWA rooms and from 2.18 m to 0.69 m on Treble rooms, with particular gains at medium-to-long distances.
Significance. If the reported gains are robustly attributable to improved generalization from the filtered augmentations rather than data volume or post-hoc tuning, the work would offer a practical, low-cost route to data augmentation for room-acoustics tasks where real RIR collection is expensive. The emphasis on medium-to-long distances addresses a known weakness in current SDE models and could influence challenge submissions and downstream applications in spatial audio.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: The quality filter is invoked as the mechanism that ensures generated RIRs are realistic enough to improve generalization, yet neither its decision rule, acceptance thresholds, nor any explicit validation criteria (e.g., against measured RIR statistics) are provided. Because FastRIR produces only diffuse approximations that omit geometry, materials, and specular reflections, the absence of these details leaves open the possibility that the MAE drops (1.66 m → 0.6 m on GWA) arise from distribution shift mitigation by other means or from increased training volume alone.
- [Experiments] Experiments: No ablation is reported that isolates the contribution of the quality filter (filtered vs. unfiltered FastRIR augmentation) or that compares against a simple data-volume-matched baseline. Without such controls, the central empirical claim cannot be confidently attributed to the proposed augmentation strategy rather than hyperparameter optimization or other experimental factors.
minor comments (1)
- [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the number of generated RIRs retained after filtering and the exact SDE model architecture used for fine-tuning.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We address each major point below and indicate where the manuscript has been revised to improve clarity and address concerns about attribution of the reported gains.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / Methods] Abstract and Methods: The quality filter is invoked as the mechanism that ensures generated RIRs are realistic enough to improve generalization, yet neither its decision rule, acceptance thresholds, nor any explicit validation criteria (e.g., against measured RIR statistics) are provided. Because FastRIR produces only diffuse approximations that omit geometry, materials, and specular reflections, the absence of these details leaves open the possibility that the MAE drops (1.66 m → 0.6 m on GWA) arise from distribution shift mitigation by other means or from increased training volume alone.
Authors: We agree that the original manuscript provided insufficient detail on the quality filter. The filter selects FastRIR outputs whose RT60 and direct-to-reverberant ratio lie within one standard deviation of the corresponding statistics derived from the challenge training RIRs; this criterion was validated by measuring the reduction in distribution mismatch on a small held-out set of real RIRs. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that fully specifies the decision rule, thresholds, and validation procedure. This revision directly addresses the concern that gains could stem from volume or tuning alone by tying the selection explicitly to acoustic-property alignment. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments: No ablation is reported that isolates the contribution of the quality filter (filtered vs. unfiltered FastRIR augmentation) or that compares against a simple data-volume-matched baseline. Without such controls, the central empirical claim cannot be confidently attributed to the proposed augmentation strategy rather than hyperparameter optimization or other experimental factors.
Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit filtered-versus-unfiltered ablation with volume-matched controls would strengthen attribution. Such experiments were not performed in the original submission owing to the strict compute and timeline constraints of the ICASSP 2025 challenge. We have added a limitations paragraph in the Experiments section that discusses this gap, reports the hyperparameter-optimization protocol used for all conditions, and supplies qualitative evidence (energy-decay and spectrogram comparisons) showing that unfiltered FastRIR outputs frequently deviate from real RIR statistics. While these additions do not replace a quantitative ablation, they clarify the experimental design and the rationale for attributing gains to the filtered augmentation. revision: partial
- A quantitative ablation isolating the quality filter (filtered vs. unfiltered) together with a data-volume-matched baseline, which could not be executed within the challenge's time and resource limits.
Circularity Check
No circularity: empirical MAE gains on held-out challenge data
full rationale
The paper describes a practical pipeline: FastRIR generation conditioned on locations, application of a quality filter for alignment, and hyperparameter-tuned fine-tuning of an SDE model. Reported results are MAE reductions measured directly on the challenge's held-out GWA and Treble test sets. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are invoked that reduce these performance numbers to fitted inputs or prior author results by construction. The central claim remains an independent empirical measurement on external data.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- quality filter thresholds
axioms (1)
- domain assumption FastRIR produces RIRs whose statistical properties are close enough to real rooms that a quality filter can select useful training examples
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
This challenge at GenDARA involves two tasks: augmenting RIR data using generation systems and im- proving SDE models with the augmented data
INTRODUCTION The Room Acoustics and Speaker Distance Estimation (SDE) Challenge at ICASSP 2025 aims to investigate the impact of augmented room impulse response (RIR) data on SDE model performance [1]. This challenge at GenDARA involves two tasks: augmenting RIR data using generation systems and im- proving SDE models with the augmented data. Speaker dist...
2025
-
[2]
Towards Improving Speaker Distance Estimation through Generative Impulse Response Augmentation
METHODOLOGY In this section, we detail the methodology employed to en- hance the performance of speaker distance estimation models using augmented room impulse response (RIR) data. Our ap- proach consists of two primary tasks: augmenting RIR data with a RIR generation system and improving the speaker dis- tance estimation model using the augmented data. 2...
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
-
[3]
RESULTS Figure 2 presents a comprehensive analysis of our SDE model’s performance across all twenty test rooms, with sepa- rate evaluations for the first ten Treble rooms and the last ten rooms from GW A dataset. The figure is organized in three rows (all rooms, Treble rooms 1-10, and GW A rooms 11-20) and three columns (ground truth distance distribution...
-
[4]
CONCLUSIONS The methodology employed in the Room Acoustics and Speaker Distance Estimation (SDE) Challenge at ICASSP 2025 demonstrates significant improvements in SDE model performance. By augmenting room impulse response (RIR) data using our modified FastRIR tool [6] and fine-tuning the state-of-the-art distance model [3] with the generated data, we achi...
2025
-
[5]
Generative data augmentation challenge: Synthesis of room acoustics for speaker distance estimation,
Jackie Lin, Georg Gotz, Hermes Sampedro Llopis, Haukur Hafsteinsson, Steinar Guonsson, Daniel Gert Nielsen, Finnur Pind, Paris Smaragdis, Dinesh Manocha, John Hershey, Trausti Kristjansson, and Minje Kim, “Generative data augmentation challenge: Synthesis of room acoustics for speaker distance estimation,” inIEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Spe...
2025
-
[6]
Gwa: A large high-quality acous- tic dataset for audio processing,
Zhenyu Tang, Rohith Aralikatti, Anton Jeran Ratnarajah, and Dinesh Manocha, “Gwa: A large high-quality acous- tic dataset for audio processing,” inACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings, 2022, pp. 1–9
2022
-
[7]
Speaker distance estimation in enclosures from single-channel audio,
Michael Neri, Archontis Politis, Daniel Krause, Marco Carli, and Tuomas Virtanen, “Speaker distance estimation in enclosures from single-channel audio,” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Lan- guage Processing, 2024
2024
-
[8]
Database of omnidi- rectional and b-format room impulse responses,
Rebecca Stewart and Mark Sandler, “Database of omnidi- rectional and b-format room impulse responses,” in2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. IEEE, 2010, pp. 165–168
2010
-
[9]
Cstr vctk corpus: English multi-speaker cor- pus for cstr voice cloning toolkit (version 0.92),
Junichi Yamagishi, Christophe Veaux, Kirsten MacDon- ald, et al., “Cstr vctk corpus: English multi-speaker cor- pus for cstr voice cloning toolkit (version 0.92),”Uni- versity of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research (CSTR), pp. 271–350, 2019
2019
-
[10]
Fast-rir: Fast neural diffuse room impulse response generator,
Anton Ratnarajah, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Meng Yu, Zhenyu Tang, Dinesh Manocha, and Dong Yu, “Fast-rir: Fast neural diffuse room impulse response generator,” in ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2022, pp. 571–575
2022
-
[11]
Mesh2ir: Neural acoustic impulse response generator for complex 3d scenes,
Anton Ratnarajah, Zhenyu Tang, Rohith Chandrashekar Aralikatti, and Dinesh Manocha, “Mesh2ir: Neural acoustic impulse response generator for complex 3d scenes,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09248, 2022
-
[12]
Listen2scene: Interactive material-aware binaural sound propagation for reconstructed 3d scenes,
Anton Ratnarajah and Dinesh Manocha, “Listen2scene: Interactive material-aware binaural sound propagation for reconstructed 3d scenes,” in2024 IEEE Conference Vir- tual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), 2024, pp. 254– 264
2024
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.