arxiv: 2605.04522 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.AI· cs.CY· econ.GN· q-fin.EC

Recognition: unknown

DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI: A new paradigm for human-machine collaboration

Claudio J. Tessone, Florian Spychiger, Mark C. Ballandies, Uwe Serd\"ult

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.AIcs.CYecon.GNq-fin.EC

keywords DAOdecentralized physical AIDePAIDePINhuman-machine collaborationblockchain governanceself-organizationcryptoeconomics

0 comments

The pith

Decentralized autonomous organizations can coordinate humans and machines in physical AI systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI, as a democratic architecture for coordinating humans and autonomous machines in the operation and governance of physical-digital systems. It connects blockchain foundations and DAO design with decentralized physical infrastructure networks to form a vertically integrated stack running from energy and sensing through to connectivity, storage, compute, models, and robots. This matters to a sympathetic reader because it offers a concrete path for communities to own and direct complex physical systems through transparent rules, on-chain incentives, and permissionless participation rather than top-down control. The result is claimed to produce scalable self-organization while preserving human autonomy in techno-socio-economic systems.

Core claim

By layering DAO governance over decentralized physical infrastructure networks and AI components, the architecture specifies workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight through deliberation and voting, enabling enhanced self-organization of physical-digital systems under community ownership.

What carries the argument

The vertically integrated DAO-governed stack that links physical layers (energy, sensing, robots) to digital governance (blockchains, incentives, voting) to direct machine actions.

Load-bearing premise

That DAO-based deliberation and voting can couple effectively with physical machine execution without introducing delays, security vulnerabilities, or incentive misalignments.

What would settle it

A real-world deployment in which a DAO vote fails to halt or redirect a machine action in time, or in which participation collapses due to slow decision cycles.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04522 by Claudio J. Tessone, Florian Spychiger, Mark C. Ballandies, Uwe Serd\"ult.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The DePAI Stack: A Vertically Integrated Architecture for Decentralized view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Human–machine collaboration for self-organization. Local human and ma view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI (DePAI), a democratic architecture for coordinating humans and autonomous machines in the operation and governance of physical-digital systems. We (1) synthesize foundations in blockchains, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and cryptoeconomics; (2) connect DAO design with digital-democracy research on deliberation and voting, showing how each can advance the other; (3) position DAO-governed decentralized physical infrastructure networks (DePIN) within a vertically integrated stack that links energy and sensing to connectivity, storage/compute, models, and robots; (4) show how these elements specify workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight, enabling enhanced self-organization of techno-socio-economic systems, which we call DePAI; and (5) analyze risks, including security, centralization, incentive failure, legal exposure, and the crowding-out of intrinsic motivation, and argue for value-sensitive design and continuously adaptive governance. DePAI offers a path to scalable, resilient self-organization that integrates physical infrastructure, AI, and community ownership under transparent rules, on-chain incentives, and permissionless participation, aiming to preserve human autonomy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a conceptual synthesis paper that frames a DAO-governed DePIN stack as DePAI but provides no evidence the proposed human-machine coupling works in practice.

read the letter

The paper's main contribution is pulling together blockchains, DAOs, DePIN, and digital democracy into one vertically integrated picture for governing physical AI systems. It labels this DePAI and sketches how deliberation and voting might link to machine execution in areas like energy and robotics. That framing is new enough to be worth noting, even if each piece draws from prior work in those fields. The authors also flag risks around security, centralization, and incentives, which shows they are not treating the idea as an automatic success.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI (DePAI) as a democratic architecture integrating blockchains, DAOs, DePIN, AI models, and robots to coordinate human oversight with machine execution in physical-digital systems. It synthesizes foundations (1), connects to digital-democracy research (2), positions DePIN in a vertical stack (3), specifies workflows for enhanced self-organization (4), and analyzes risks including security, centralization, incentives, legal exposure, and motivation crowding-out while advocating value-sensitive design (5). The central claim is that this yields scalable, resilient self-organization under transparent on-chain rules and permissionless participation while preserving human autonomy.

Significance. If the integration premise holds, the synthesis of DAO governance with DePIN and AI could provide a useful conceptual framework for future decentralized physical systems research, particularly by linking cryptoeconomics to deliberation mechanisms. The paper explicitly connects DAO design to digital-democracy literature and flags incentive and motivation risks, which are strengths for a position paper; however, the absence of formal models, empirical benchmarks, or falsifiable predictions limits immediate impact.

major comments (2)

[Abstract point (5)] Abstract point (5): the risk analysis lists security, centralization, incentive failure, legal exposure, and motivation crowding-out but contains no discussion of blockchain consensus/voting latencies or hybrid on/off-chain fallback mechanisms for time-critical physical actions (e.g., robotic actuation). This omission is load-bearing for the central claim in (4) that DAO deliberation can couple with machine execution to produce self-organization, as physical systems impose hard real-time bounds that pure on-chain governance cannot satisfy.
[Abstract point (4)] Abstract point (4): the claim that the listed elements 'specify workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight' is asserted by construction without concrete workflow diagrams, pseudocode, timing analysis, or case studies. This leaves the 'enhanced self-organization' outcome ungrounded and circular with the definition of DePAI itself.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our position paper. We agree that the two major points identify areas where the manuscript can be strengthened with additional discussion and illustration, and we will revise accordingly while preserving the paper's conceptual and synthetic character.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract point (5)] Abstract point (5): the risk analysis lists security, centralization, incentive failure, legal exposure, and motivation crowding-out but contains no discussion of blockchain consensus/voting latencies or hybrid on/off-chain fallback mechanisms for time-critical physical actions (e.g., robotic actuation). This omission is load-bearing for the central claim in (4) that DAO deliberation can couple with machine execution to produce self-organization, as physical systems impose hard real-time bounds that pure on-chain governance cannot satisfy.

Authors: We accept this observation. The current risk analysis focuses on the listed categories but does not explicitly treat consensus and voting latencies or the necessity of hybrid on/off-chain mechanisms for real-time physical actuation. In the revised manuscript we will expand the risk section (and the corresponding abstract point) to include a dedicated paragraph on these constraints, outlining why pure on-chain deliberation is insufficient for hard real-time bounds and describing high-level hybrid patterns such as off-chain execution with on-chain audit trails and emergency override protocols. This addition directly supports the coupling claim without altering the position-paper framing. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract point (4)] Abstract point (4): the claim that the listed elements 'specify workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight' is asserted by construction without concrete workflow diagrams, pseudocode, timing analysis, or case studies. This leaves the 'enhanced self-organization' outcome ungrounded and circular with the definition of DePAI itself.

Authors: We acknowledge that the workflow description in the manuscript remains at the level of conceptual synthesis rather than providing executable detail. To address the concern of circularity and to ground the claim, the revised version will include a new figure that depicts a representative DePAI workflow (human proposal → DAO vote → off-chain AI/robot execution → on-chain verification) together with a short illustrative case study drawn from existing DePIN deployments. No timing analysis or pseudocode will be added, as these would exceed the scope of a position paper, but the added diagram and example will make the coupling explicit and non-circular. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

DePAI defined as the integration of DAOs/DePIN/AI, with self-organization and coupling benefits asserted by construction

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract, enumerated point (4)]
"show how these elements specify workflows that couple machine execution with human oversight, enabling enhanced self-organization of techno-socio-economic systems, which we call DePAI"

DePAI is introduced as the name for the proposed architecture that integrates the listed elements (DAOs, DePIN, AI, etc.); the paper then claims this architecture enables the self-organization benefit. The benefit is therefore part of the definition rather than derived from any additional mechanism, data, or external principle.

full rationale

The paper's derivation consists of synthesizing existing concepts (blockchains, DAOs, DePIN, AI models) and then naming their vertical integration 'DePAI' while asserting that this integration 'enables enhanced self-organization' and 'couples machine execution with human oversight'. No independent equations, benchmarks, or falsifiable steps are shown; the claimed outcome reduces directly to the definitional combination of the input elements under 'transparent rules, on-chain incentives, and permissionless participation'. This matches self-definitional circularity but is not total, as risk analysis and connections to digital-democracy literature retain some independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The proposal rests on domain assumptions about DAO effectiveness and blockchain transparency rather than new axioms or parameters; DePAI itself is an invented framing without independent evidence.

axioms (2)

domain assumption DAOs can provide effective democratic deliberation and voting for complex physical systems
Invoked when connecting DAO design to digital-democracy research and claiming enhanced self-organization
ad hoc to paper On-chain incentives and permissionless participation preserve human autonomy while enabling machine execution
Stated in the final claim without derivation or supporting mechanism

invented entities (1)

DePAI (DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI) no independent evidence
purpose: A vertically integrated architecture linking energy, sensing, connectivity, models, and robots under DAO governance
Introduced as the central new paradigm; no falsifiable prediction or external evidence provided beyond the synthesis

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5528 in / 1387 out tokens · 43729 ms · 2026-05-08T16:35:07.746159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

AI, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (ai rmf 1.0). URL: https://nvlpubs. nist. gov/nistpubs/ai/nist. ai , pages 100--1

2023
[2]

Ao, L., Liu, H., and Zhang, H. (2025). Agentdao: Synthesis of proposal transactions via abstract dao semantics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10099

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

The future of DAOs is powered by AI

Aragon (2023). The future of DAOs is powered by AI . Aragon Blog. Accessed 2025-10-07

2023
[4]

and Talmon, N

Ashkenazy, L. and Talmon, N. (2023). Efficient social choice via nlp and sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12360

work page arXiv 2023
[5]

Ballandies, M. C. (2022a). Fundamentals of Cryptoeconomics: On the design, construction, and impact of blockchain-based systems and incentives . PhD thesis, ETH Zurich
[6]

Ballandies, M. C. (2022b). To incentivize or not: impact of blockchain-based cryptoeconomic tokens on human information sharing behavior. IEEE Access , 10:74111--74130
[7]

C., Carpentras, D., and Pournaras, E

Ballandies, M. C., Carpentras, D., and Pournaras, E. (2024a). Daos of collective intelligence? unraveling the complexity of blockchain governance in decentralized autonomous organizations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.01823

work page arXiv
[8]

C., Dapp, M

Ballandies, M. C., Dapp, M. M., Degenhart, B., and Helbing, D. (2021). Finance 4.0: Design principles for a value-sensitive cryptoeconomic system to address sustainability. ECIS 2021 Proceedings , page 62

2021
[9]

C., Dapp, M

Ballandies, M. C., Dapp, M. M., and Pournaras, E. (2022). Decrypting distributed ledger design—taxonomy, classification and blockchain community evaluation. Cluster computing , 25(3):1817--1838

2022
[10]

C., Holzwarth, V., Sunderland, B., Pournaras, E., and Brocke, J

Ballandies, M. C., Holzwarth, V., Sunderland, B., Pournaras, E., and Brocke, J. v. (2024b). Advancing customer feedback systems with blockchain: When design science research meets value-sensitive design. Business & Information Systems Engineering , pages 1--23
[11]

C., Li, G., and Tessone, C

Ballandies, M. C., Li, G., and Tessone, C. J. (2025a). Bitcoin, a dao? arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.20838

work page arXiv
[12]

C., Makode, P

Ballandies, M. C., Makode, P. K., and Tessone, C. J. (2025b). 1 a general approach to tokens and non-fungible tokens. Routledge Handbook of NFT Law , page 1
[13]

C., Seepersad, G., Kalabic, U

Ballandies, M. C., Seepersad, G., Kalabic, U. V., Icking, L., Felicio, P., Welde, S., Doyen, J.-P., Keenan, R., Nigg, T., and Ammann, D. (2023a). Onocoy: Enabling mass adoption of high precision gnss positioning using web3
[14]

C., Wang, H., Law, A

Ballandies, M. C., Wang, H., Law, A. C. C., Yang, J. C., G \"o sken, C., and Andrew, M. (2023b). A taxonomy for blockchain-based decentralized physical infrastructure networks (depin). In 2023 IEEE 9th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) , pages 1--6. IEEE

2023
[15]

A., and Bencz \'u r, A

B \'e res, F., Seres, I. A., and Bencz \'u r, A. A. (2021). A cryptoeconomic traffic analysis of bitcoin’s lightning network

2021
[16]

Bolz, M., Br \"u ndler, K., Kane, L., Patsias, P., Tessendorf, L., Gogol, K., Kim, T., and Tessone, C. (2024). Machine learning-based detection of pump-and-dump schemes in real-time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18848

work page arXiv 2024
[17]

C., and Zhou, W

Borjigin, A., He, C., Lee, C. C., and Zhou, W. (2025). Ai agent architecture for decentralized trading of alternative assets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.11117

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Buterin, V. (2013). Bootstrapping a decentralized autonomous corporation: part i. Bitcoin Magazine , 19

2013
[19]

Buterin, V. (2024). The promise and challenges of crypto + AI applications. Vitalik Buterin's blog. Accessed 2025-10-07

2024
[20]

Castillo, F., Castillo, O., Brito, E., and Espinola, S. (2025). Trustworthy decentralized autonomous machines: A new paradigm in automation economy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.15676

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Decentralized Governance of Autonomous AI Agents (ETHOS).arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.171142024

Chaffer, T. J., Goins II, C. v., Okusanya, B., Cotlage, D., and Goldston, J. (2024). Decentralized governance of autonomous ai agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17114

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

Chen, J.-H., Hsu, C.-W., and Tsai, Y.-C. (2025). Intelligent decentralized governance: A case study of klimadao decision-making. Electronics , 14(12):2462

2025
[23]

M., Helbing, D., and Klauser, S

Dapp, M. M., Helbing, D., and Klauser, S. (2021). Finance 4.0-Towards a Socio-Ecological Finance System: A Participatory Framework to Promote Sustainability . Springer Nature

2021
[24]

Dawood, Y. (2015). Campaign finance and american democracy. Annual Review of Political Science , 18(1):329--348

2015
[25]

M., Campajola, C., and Tessone, C

De Collibus, F. M., Campajola, C., and Tessone, C. J. (2025). The microvelocity of money in ethereum. EPJ Data Science , 14(1):11

2025
[26]

M., Partida, A., Pi s korec, M., and Tessone, C

De Collibus, F. M., Partida, A., Pi s korec, M., and Tessone, C. J. (2021). Heterogeneous preferential attachment in key ethereum-based cryptoassets. Frontiers in Physics , 9:720708

2021
[27]

Di Francesco Maesa, D., Marino, A., and Ricci, L. (2018). Data-driven analysis of bitcoin properties: exploiting the users graph. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics , 6:63--80

2018
[28]

DuPont, Q. (2023). New online communities: Graph deep learning on anonymous voting networks to identify sybils in polycentric governance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17929

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

J., and Teixeira, A

Eisermann, T., Campajola, C., Tessone, C. J., and Teixeira, A. S. (2025). Concentration in governance control across decentralised finance protocols. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13377

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Decentralized autonomous organizations (daos)

Ethereum Foundation (n.d.). Decentralized autonomous organizations (daos). https://ethereum.org/en/dao/. Accessed: 2025-06-21

2025
[31]

Freeman, J. (1972). The tyranny of structurelessness. Berkeley journal of sociology , pages 151--164

1972
[32]

O., Rossi, R

Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., and Ahmed, N. K. (2024). Bias and fairness in large language models: A survey. Computational Linguistics , 50(3):1097--1179

2024
[33]

Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Pi s korec, M., and Tessone, C. J. (2025). Monero peer-to-peer network topology analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17809

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

and Serd \"u lt, U

Germann, M. and Serd \"u lt, U. (2017). Internet voting and turnout: Evidence from switzerland. Electoral studies , 47:1--12

2017
[35]

Gotham, E. (2023). Irrational economic action: Running a bitcoin lightning node for negative profit. Ledger , 8

2023
[36]

Greshake, K., Abdelnabi, S., Mishra, S., Endres, C., Holz, T., and Fritz, M. (2023). Not what you've signed up for: Compromising real-world llm-integrated applications with indirect prompt injection. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM workshop on artificial intelligence and security , pages 79--90

2023
[37]

Guidi, B., Michienzi, A., and Ricci, L. (2022). Evaluating the decentralisation of filecoin. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Infrastructure for the Common Good , pages 13--18

2022
[38]

Hanson, R. (2013). Shall we vote on values, but bet on beliefs? Journal of Political Philosophy , 21(2):151--178

2013
[39]

I., H \"a nggli Fricker, R., Helbing, D., Kunz, R., Wang, J., and Pournaras, E

Hausladen, C. I., H \"a nggli Fricker, R., Helbing, D., Kunz, R., Wang, J., and Pournaras, E. (2024). How voting rules impact legitimacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11(1):1--10

2024
[40]

Helbing, D. (2021). Networked minds: Where human evolution is heading. In Next Civilization: Digital Democracy and Socio-Ecological Finance-How to Avoid Dystopia and Upgrade Society by Digital Means , pages 175--196. Springer

2021
[41]

H., Musso, A., Hausladen, C

Helbing, D., Mahajan, S., Fricker, R. H., Musso, A., Hausladen, C. I., Carissimo, C., Carpentras, D., Stockinger, E., Sanchez-Vaquerizo, J. A., Yang, J. C., et al. (2023). Democracy by design: Perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. Journal of Computational Science , 71:102061

2023
[42]

and Page, S

Hong, L. and Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 101(46):16385--16389

2004
[43]

V., and Constantinides, P

Hsieh, Y.-Y., Andersen, J. V., and Constantinides, P. (2025). The impact of forking in decentralized platforms. In Academy of Management Proceedings , volume 2025, page 14328. Academy of Management Valhalla, NY 10595

2025
[44]

Hsieh, Y.-Y., Vergne, J.-P., Anderson, P., Lakhani, K., and Reitzig, M. (2018). Bitcoin and the rise of decentralized autonomous organizations. Journal of Organization Design , 7(1):1--16

2018
[45]

J., Wang, H., Hess, L., and Hall, D

Hunhevicz, J. J., Wang, H., Hess, L., and Hall, D. (2021). no1s1--a blockchain-based dao prototype for autonomous space. In proceedings of the 2021 european Conference on Computing in Construction , volume 2, pages 27--33. University College Dublin

2021
[46]

Ietto, B., Rabe, J., Muth, R., and Pascucci, F. (2023). Blockchain for citizens' participation in urban planning: The case of the city of berlin. a value sensitive design approach. Cities , 140:104382

2023
[47]

C., Paruch, K., Nax, H., and Nigg, T

Kalabi \'c , U., Ballandies, M. C., Paruch, K., Nax, H., and Nigg, T. (2023). Burn-and-mint tokenomics: Deflation and strategic incentives. In 2023 IEEE 9th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) , pages 1--6. IEEE

2023
[48]

social bitcoin

Kleineberg, K.-K. and Helbing, D. (2021). A “social bitcoin” could sustain a democratic digital world. In Finance 4.0-Towards a Socio-Ecological Finance System: A Participatory Framework to Promote Sustainability , pages 39--51. Springer International Publishing Cham

2021
[49]

Kondor, D., P \'o sfai, M., Csabai, I., and Vattay, G. (2014). Do the rich get richer? an empirical analysis of the bitcoin transaction network. PloS one , 9(2):e86197

2014
[50]

K., Saranya, R., and Chacko, A

Kondru, K. K., Saranya, R., and Chacko, A. (2020). A review of distributed supercomputing platforms using blockchain. Advances in Distributed Computing and Machine Learning: Proceedings of ICADCML 2020 , pages 123--133

2020
[51]

D., Tessone, C

K \"o nig, M. D., Tessone, C. J., and Zenou, Y. (2010). From assortative to dissortative networks: the role of capacity constraints. Advances in Complex Systems , 13(04):483--499

2010
[52]

D., Tessone, C

K \"o nig, M. D., Tessone, C. J., and Zenou, Y. (2014). Nestedness in networks: A theoretical model and some applications. Theoretical Economics , 9(3):695--752

2014
[53]

L \"a mmer, S. (2016). Selbst-gesteuerte lichtsignalanlagen im praxistest. Stra enverkehrstechnik , 60(3):1--13

2016
[54]

and Helbing, D

L \"a mmer, S. and Helbing, D. (2008). Self-control of traffic lights and vehicle flows in urban road networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , 2008(04):P04019

2008
[55]

Liang, P., Bommasani, R., Lee, T., Tsipras, D., Soylu, D., Yasunaga, M., Zhang, Y., Narayanan, D., Wu, Y., Kumar, A., et al. (2022). Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09110

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[56]

A., and Sousa-Poza, A

Liebig, T., Puhani, P. A., and Sousa-Poza, A. (2007). taxation and internal migration—evidence from the swiss census using community-level variation in income tax rates. Journal of Regional Science , 47(4):807--836

2007
[57]

Liu, G. (2024). The illusion of democracy—why voting in decentralized autonomous organizations is doomed to fail. NYU Law and Economics Research Paper , (24-13)

2024
[58]

Lustenberger, M., Spychiger, F., and K \"u ng, L. (2024a). Designing a decentralized autonomous organization. In 32nd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Paphos, Cyprus, 13-19 June 2024 . Association for Information Systems

2024
[59]

u ng, L., Bassi, E., and Wollenschl \

Lustenberger, M., Spychiger, F., K \"u ng, L., Bassi, E., and Wollenschl \"a ger, S. (2025a). Dao research trends: Reflections and learnings from the first european dao workshop (dawo). Applied Sciences , 15(7):3491
[60]

Lustenberger, M., Spychiger, F., K \"u ng, L., and Cuadra, P. (2024b). Mastering daos: a practical guidebook for building and managing decentralized autonomous organizations. Available at SSRN 5001424
[61]

Lustenberger, M., Spychiger, F., K \"u ng, L., and Martignoni, J. (2025b). Daos as property owners: a conceptual exploration from the perspective of organizational system theory. Journal of Organization Design , pages 1--17
[62]

Ma, J., Jiang, M., Jiang, J., Luo, X., Hu, Y., Zhou, Y., Wang, Q., and Zhang, F. (2024). Demystifying the dao governance process. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11758

work page arXiv 2024
[63]

and Helbing, D

Mahajan, S. and Helbing, D. (2025). Co-designing ai systems with value-sensitive citizen science. Available at SSRN 5217120

2025
[64]

K., Küng, L., Ballandies, M

Makode, P. K., Küng, L., Ballandies, M. C., Spychiger, F., Lustenberger, M., Serdült, U., Tessone, C. J., and Cheneval, F. (2025). A taxonomy of decentralized autonomous organizations. Under submission. Preprint available on request

2025
[65]

McCabe, B. J. and Heerwig, J. A. (2019). Diversifying the donor pool: how did seattle's democracy voucher program reshape participation in municipal campaign finance? Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy , 18(4):323--341

2019
[66]

McConaghy, T. (2016). AI DAOs , and three paths to get there. Medium. Accessed 2025-10-05

2016
[67]

Meneguzzo, S., Schifanella, C., Gatteschi, V., and Destefanis, G. (2025). Evaluating dao sustainability and longevity through on-chain governance metrics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11341

work page arXiv 2025
[68]

u lt, U. (2016). Haltungen und bed \

Milic, T., McArdle, M., and Serd \"u lt, U. (2016). Haltungen und bed \"u rfnisse der schweizer bev \"o lkerung zu e-voting. Studienberichte des Zentrums f \"u r Demokratie Aarau , (9)

2016
[69]

Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system

2008
[70]

Pacheco, A., Strobel, V., and Dorigo, M. (2020). A blockchain-controlled physical robot swarm communicating via an ad-hoc network. In International Conference on Swarm Intelligence , pages 3--15. Springer

2020
[71]

Pacheco, A., Zhao, H., Strobel, V., Roukny, T., Dudek, G., Reina, A., and Dorigo, M. (2025). Swarm oracle: Trustless blockchain agreements through robot swarms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.15956

work page arXiv 2025
[72]

M., Mukkamala, R

Rossi, S., Michel, A. M., Mukkamala, R. R., and Thatcher, J. B. (2024). An early categorization of prompt injection attacks on large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00898

work page arXiv 2024
[73]

Serd \"u lt, U. (2021). The referendum experience in switzerland. The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums , pages 203--224

2021
[74]

Serd \"u lt, U., Good, A., et al. (2013). Partizipation als Norm und Artefakt in der schweizerischen Abstimmungsdemokratie: Entmystifizierung der durchschnittlichen Stimmbeteiligung anhand von Stimmregisterdaten aus der Stadt St. Gallen . St \"a mpfli

2013
[75]

Somin, I. (2020). Free to move: Foot voting and political freedom . Oxford University Press

2020
[76]

Spychiger, F. (2023). Incentive systems in blockchains . PhD thesis, University of Zurich

2023
[77]

Spychiger, F., Lustenberger, M., and K \"u ng, L. (2025a). Decision-making in decentralized autonomous organizations (daos). In Handbook of Blockchain Technology , pages 142--163. Edward Elgar Publishing
[78]

K., K \"u ng, L., and Tessone, C

Spychiger, F., Makode, P. K., K \"u ng, L., and Tessone, C. J. (2024). Governance and maintenance for a dao with physical assets-an agent-based model. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems (COINS) , pages 1--6. IEEE

2024
[79]

tree of blockchain

Spychiger, F., Tasca, P., and Tessone, C. J. (2021). Unveiling the importance and evolution of design components through the “tree of blockchain”. Frontiers in Blockchain , 3:613476

2021
[80]

Spychiger, F., Wollenschl \"a ger, S., Hafner, M., and Oderbolz, N. (2025b). Short paper: Requirements and benefits of a dao tokenomics framework. In 2025 Crypto Valley Conference (CVC) , pages 81--85. IEEE

2025

Showing first 80 references.