arxiv: 2605.09076 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 💻 cs.MA · cs.AI· cs.LG

Recognition: no theorem link

Robust Multi-Agent LLMs under Byzantine Faults

Dimitra Panagou, Haejoon Lee, Hyeonho Oh, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Vincent-Daniel Yun

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.MA cs.AIcs.LG

keywords Byzantine faultsmulti-agent LLMsdecentralized consensusrobust graphsSelf-Anchored Consensusfault tolerance

0 comments

The pith

Decentralized LLM agents can preserve reliable outputs under Byzantine faults when their communication graph meets (F+1)-robustness and they apply local filtering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Large language model agents collaborating over networks face the risk that unreliable or adversarial participants distort shared conclusions. The paper introduces Self-Anchored Consensus, a protocol in which agents exchange responses, locally judge and discard unreliable messages, and iteratively refine their own answers. It specifies (F+1)-robustness conditions on the network graph that let honest agents retain and spread accurate information even with up to F faulty agents present. Experiments on mathematical and commonsense reasoning tasks show the approach blocks adversarial effects and raises performance across varied topologies, while earlier leader-based or confidence-based methods decline under attack.

Core claim

Self-Anchored Consensus is a fully decentralized iterative filter-and-refine protocol in which agents exchange responses, locally evaluate and filter unreliable messages, and refine their own outputs. The paper shows that (F+1)-robustness conditions on the communication graph ensure honest agents preserve and propagate reliable information despite Byzantine influence. This holds without leader coordination or shared knowledge of which agents are faulty.

What carries the argument

Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC), an iterative protocol where agents locally evaluate neighbor messages for reliability and refine outputs over rounds.

If this is right

Honest agents preserve and propagate reliable information despite up to F Byzantine agents.
SAC suppresses Byzantine influence and improves results on mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks.
The protocol works across diverse communication topologies without central coordination.
Prior leader-based or self-reported confidence methods degrade when adversaries manipulate the system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same local-filtering pattern could apply to other multi-agent AI setups that lack a trusted coordinator.
If real networks rarely satisfy (F+1)-robustness, dynamic link adjustment or agent reputation tracking may be needed to maintain the guarantee.
The method assumes each agent possesses enough independent judgment to rate incoming messages, which may limit use in weaker models.

Load-bearing premise

Agents can reliably and locally evaluate and filter unreliable messages from neighbors without additional mechanisms or shared knowledge of which agents are Byzantine.

What would settle it

A controlled test in which a graph violates (F+1)-robustness or local filters cannot separate Byzantine messages, causing honest agents to converge on incorrect answers on the same reasoning benchmarks.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09076 by Dimitra Panagou, Haejoon Lee, Hyeonho Oh, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Vincent-Daniel Yun.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Venn diagram showing the partitioning of agents into reliable agents [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Overview of Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC) on an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly collaborate over peer-to-peer networks to improve their reliability. However, these same interactions can also become a source of vulnerability, as unreliable or Byzantine agents may sway neighboring agents toward incorrect conclusions and degrade overall system performance. Existing methods rely on leader-based coordination or self-reported confidence, both of which are susceptible to adversarial manipulation. We study decentralized LLM multi-agent systems (LLM-MAS) and propose Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC), a fully decentralized iterative filter-and-refine protocol in which agents iteratively exchange responses, locally evaluate and filter unreliable messages, and refine their own outputs. We present $(F{+}1)$-robustness conditions for the communication graph that ensure honest agents preserve and propagate reliable information despite Byzantine influence. Experiments on mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks show that SAC effectively suppresses Byzantine influence and consistently improves performance across diverse communication topologies, whereas prior methods degrade under adversarial conditions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

SAC gives a clean decentralized filter-and-refine protocol for LLM agents that beats the obvious baselines in the abstract, but the whole thing rests on whether local LLM judgment can actually spot Byzantine messages reliably.

read the letter

The paper's real contribution is Self-Anchored Consensus, an iterative peer-to-peer protocol where agents exchange answers, locally filter what looks unreliable, and refine their own outputs. It states (F+1)-robustness conditions on the communication graph and reports that this setup keeps honest agents from being pulled off course by faulty neighbors. That is a step past the leader-based and self-reported methods it compares against, and the experiments on math and commonsense benchmarks show consistent gains across topologies where the baselines drop off under attack. The idea is straightforward and the experimental direction is useful for anyone thinking about scalable multi-agent LLM systems without central control. The soft spot is the filtering step itself. The abstract gives no derivation of the robustness conditions and no concrete description of how an agent decides a neighbor's message is bad. If that decision relies on the LLM spotting inconsistencies or low quality on its own, then subtle or prompt-engineered adversarial replies could slip through and break the propagation guarantee even when the graph meets the connectivity rule. The reported results also lack error bars, explicit baseline numbers, or details on data splits, so it is difficult to gauge how large or stable the improvement actually is. This paper is for people working on fault-tolerant multi-agent AI and decentralized coordination. A reader who needs a practical starting point for robust LLM collaboration will find the protocol worth trying, but anyone planning to build on the claims should wait for the full proofs and experimental controls. It deserves peer review so referees can check the filtering logic and the experimental rigor directly.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC), a fully decentralized iterative filter-and-refine protocol for LLM-based multi-agent systems. It claims that (F+1)-robustness conditions on the communication graph enable honest agents to locally evaluate, filter unreliable messages from Byzantine agents, and refine outputs while preserving reliable information. Experiments on mathematical and commonsense reasoning benchmarks are reported to show that SAC suppresses Byzantine influence and improves performance across diverse topologies, in contrast to prior leader-based or confidence-based methods.

Significance. If the (F+1)-robustness conditions are formally established and the local LLM-based filtering is shown to be reliable, the work would offer a timely contribution to fault-tolerant decentralized multi-agent AI. It addresses vulnerabilities in peer-to-peer LLM collaboration without relying on leaders or shared fault knowledge, with the experimental evaluation across multiple topologies providing initial empirical support. The absence of derivation details and statistical rigor in the current draft limits immediate impact.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (Robustness Conditions): The (F+1)-robustness conditions on the communication graph are asserted to guarantee that honest agents preserve and propagate reliable information under Byzantine influence, but no formal derivation, inductive argument, or proof is supplied showing how the graph connectivity interacts with the SAC filter-and-refine steps to maintain this invariant. This is load-bearing for the central theoretical claim.
[§4.2] §4.2 (SAC Protocol): The local evaluation and filtering steps assume that LLM agents can reliably detect and exclude Byzantine deviations without external oracles or shared knowledge of faulty agents. No analysis or bounds are given for cases where adversarial messages contain subtle inconsistencies or prompt-engineered content that evades detection, which could break the propagation guarantee even when the graph satisfies the stated conditions.
[§5] §5 (Experiments): The reported performance gains and suppression of Byzantine influence lack error bars, statistical significance tests, explicit baseline implementations, and data exclusion criteria. Without these, it is not possible to verify the consistency of improvements or rule out that gains are artifacts of particular random seeds or topology selections.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and §3] The notation (F{+}1) in the abstract and text should be standardized to F+1 for clarity and consistency with standard fault-tolerance literature.
[§2] A brief comparison table summarizing prior methods (leader-based, self-reported confidence) versus SAC would improve readability of the motivation section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and insightful comments, which help strengthen the theoretical foundations and empirical validation of our work on Self-Anchored Consensus (SAC). We address each major comment point-by-point below and commit to a major revision that incorporates formal derivations, expanded discussion of limitations, and improved statistical reporting.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Robustness Conditions): The (F+1)-robustness conditions on the communication graph are asserted to guarantee that honest agents preserve and propagate reliable information under Byzantine influence, but no formal derivation, inductive argument, or proof is supplied showing how the graph connectivity interacts with the SAC filter-and-refine steps to maintain this invariant. This is load-bearing for the central theoretical claim.

Authors: We agree that a formal derivation is essential to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection to §3 containing an inductive argument. The proof will show by induction over iterations that, under the (F+1)-robustness condition, every honest agent retains a sufficient set of honest neighbors to filter Byzantine messages locally; the inductive step will demonstrate that refined outputs from honest agents propagate without corruption, preserving the invariant across rounds. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (SAC Protocol): The local evaluation and filtering steps assume that LLM agents can reliably detect and exclude Byzantine deviations without external oracles or shared knowledge of faulty agents. No analysis or bounds are given for cases where adversarial messages contain subtle inconsistencies or prompt-engineered content that evades detection, which could break the propagation guarantee even when the graph satisfies the stated conditions.

Authors: We acknowledge this as a substantive limitation of the current analysis. The protocol relies on the LLM's local reasoning for filtering, which our experiments indicate works for the Byzantine behaviors tested (random flips, contradictions). However, we provide no formal bounds or analysis for sophisticated prompt-engineered evasions. In the revision we will expand §4.2 with an explicit limitations paragraph discussing this gap and proposing future mitigations such as cross-query consistency verification, while noting that the iterative filter-and-refine structure offers partial resilience by accumulating evidence over rounds. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (Experiments): The reported performance gains and suppression of Byzantine influence lack error bars, statistical significance tests, explicit baseline implementations, and data exclusion criteria. Without these, it is not possible to verify the consistency of improvements or rule out that gains are artifacts of particular random seeds or topology selections.

Authors: We agree that additional statistical rigor is required. The revised §5 will report means and standard deviations (error bars) over at least five independent random seeds per configuration, include paired statistical significance tests (e.g., Wilcoxon signed-rank) against baselines, provide complete implementation details for the leader-based and confidence-based baselines, and state explicit data-exclusion rules (limited to malformed JSON outputs). Results on additional topology instances will also be included to confirm consistency. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; claims rest on independent protocol and graph conditions

full rationale

The abstract and described protocol introduce SAC as a filter-and-refine method and state (F+1)-robustness conditions for the communication graph as separate contributions that ensure preservation of reliable information. No equations, parameter fits, self-citations, or definitional reductions are present that would make the robustness result equivalent to its inputs by construction. The experimental results are presented as empirical validation rather than part of any derivation chain. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the unproven ability of individual agents to perform accurate local reliability evaluation and on the communication graph satisfying (F+1)-robustness; both are domain assumptions not derived or evidenced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Individual agents possess a local mechanism to evaluate and filter unreliable messages from neighbors.
The filter-and-refine loop depends on this capability being effective without external trust or shared Byzantine labels.
domain assumption The communication graph satisfies (F+1)-robustness for the number of Byzantine agents F.
This graph-theoretic condition is invoked to guarantee preservation of reliable information.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5476 in / 1392 out tokens · 47339 ms · 2026-05-12T02:01:07.680696+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Lamport, Leslie and Shostak, Robert and Pease, Marshall , journal =. The. 1982 , publisher =

work page 1982
[2]

IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume =

Resilient Asymptotic Consensus in Robust Networks , author =. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume =. 2013 , publisher =

work page 2013
[3]

, journal=

Su, Lili and Vaidya, Nitin H. , journal=. Byzantine-Resilient Multiagent Optimization , year=

work page
[4]

and Pinter, Shlomit S

Dolev, Danny and Lynch, Nancy A. and Pinter, Shlomit S. and Stark, Eugene W. and Weihl, William E. , title =. 1986 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/5925.5931 , journal =

work page doi:10.1145/5925.5931 1986
[5]

and Azadmanesh, M.H

Kieckhafer, R.M. and Azadmanesh, M.H. , journal=. Reaching approximate agreement with mixed-mode faults , year=

work page
[6]

IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , year=

Resilient Distributed Economic Dispatch in Smart Grids , author=. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control , year=

work page
[7]

Distributed Optimization Under Adversarial Nodes , year=

Sundaram, Shreyas and Gharesifard, Bahman , journal=. Distributed Optimization Under Adversarial Nodes , year=

work page
[8]

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=

Communication-efficient and resilient distributed Q-learning , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

work page 2023
[9]

Resilient Distributed Averaging , year=

Dibaji, Seyed Mehran and Safi, Mostafa and Ishii, Hideaki , booktitle=. Resilient Distributed Averaging , year=

work page
[10]

2023 , issn =

Graph-theoretic approaches for analyzing the resilience of distributed control systems: A tutorial and survey , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111264 , author =

work page doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2023.111264 2023
[11]

A Notion of Robustness in Complex Networks , year=

Zhang, Haotian and Fata, Elaheh and Sundaram, Shreyas , journal=. A Notion of Robustness in Complex Networks , year=

work page
[12]

Automatica , volume=

Determining r-and (r, s)-robustness of digraphs using mixed integer linear programming , author=. Automatica , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

work page 2020
[13]

and Prorok, A

Saldaña, D. and Prorok, A. and Campos, M. F. M. and Kumar, V. , title =. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics , year =

work page
[14]

Resilient Multiagent Reinforcement Learning With Function Approximation , year=

Ye, Lintao and Figura, Martin and Lin, Yixuan and Pal, Mainak and Das, Pranoy and Liu, Ji and Gupta, Vijay , journal=. Resilient Multiagent Reinforcement Learning With Function Approximation , year=

work page
[15]

Minimal construction of graphs with maximum robustness,

Minimal Construction of Graphs with Maximum Robustness , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.00415 , year =

work page arXiv
[16]

Distributed Resilience-Aware Control in Multi-Robot Networks , year=

Lee, Haejoon and Panagou, Dimitra , booktitle=. Distributed Resilience-Aware Control in Multi-Robot Networks , year=

work page
[17]

Rethinking the Reliability of Multi-agent System: A Perspective from

Zheng, Lifan and Chen, Jiawei and Yin, Qinghong and Zhang, Jingyuan and Zeng, Xinyi and Tian, Yu , booktitle =. Rethinking the Reliability of Multi-agent System: A Perspective from. 2026 , note =

work page 2026
[18]

Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages =

Large Language Model based Multi-agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges , author =. Proceedings of the 33rd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) , pages =

work page
[19]

Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , volume =

Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate , author =. Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , volume =. 2024 , publisher =

work page 2024
[20]

Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of

Tian, Yu and Yang, Xiao and Zhang, Jingyuan and Dong, Yinpeng and Su, Hang , journal =. Evil Geniuses: Delving into the Safety of

work page
[21]

Not What You've Signed Up For: Compromising Real-World

Greshake, Kai and Abdelnabi, Sahar and Mishra, Shailesh and Endres, Christoph and Holz, Thorsten and Fritz, Mario , booktitle =. Not What You've Signed Up For: Compromising Real-World. 2023 , publisher =

work page 2023
[22]

Let's Verify Step by Step

Let's Verify Step by Step , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.20050 , year=

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

2023 , pages =

Zhiqiang Hu and Lei Wang and Yihuai Lan and Wanyu Xu and Ee-Peng Lim and Lidong Bing and Xing Xu and Soujanya Poria and Roy Ka-Wei Lee , booktitle =. 2023 , pages =

work page 2023
[24]

Li, Guohao and Hammoud, Hasan Abed Al Kader and Itani, Hani and Khizbullin, Dmitrii and Ghanem, Bernard , booktitle =

work page
[25]

and Burger, Doug and Wang, Chi , journal =

Wu, Qingyun and Bansal, Gagan and Zhang, Jieyu and Wu, Yiran and Li, Beibin and Zhu, Erkang and Jiang, Li and Zhang, Xiaoyun and Zhang, Shaokun and Liu, Jiale and Awadallah, Ahmed Hassan and White, Ryen W. and Burger, Doug and Wang, Chi , journal =

work page
[26]

International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

Hong, Sirui and Zheng, Xiawu and Chen, Jonathan and Cheng, Yuheng and Wang, Jinlin and Zhang, Ceyao and Wang, Zili and Yau, Steven Ka Shing and Lin, Zijuan and Zhou, Liyang and Ran, Chenyu and Xiao, Lingfeng and Wu, Chenglin and Schmidhuber, J. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , year =

work page
[27]

Chen, Weize and Su, Yusheng and Zuo, Jingwei and Yang, Cheng and Yuan, Chenfei and Chan, Chen-Ming and Yu, Heyang and Lu, Yaxi and Hung, Yi-Hsin and Qian, Chen and Qin, Yujia and Cong, Xin and Xie, Ruobing and Liu, Zhiyuan and Sun, Maosong and Zhou, Jie , booktitle =

work page
[28]

Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate

Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19118 , year =

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[29]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07155 , year=

Scaling Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Collaboration , author =. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07155 , year =

work page arXiv
[30]

, journal =

Tran, Khanh-Tung and Dao, Dung and Nguyen, Minh-Duong and Pham, Quoc-Viet and O'Sullivan, Barry and Nguyen, Hoang D. , journal =. Multi-agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of

work page
[31]

Yu, Miao and Wang, Shilong and Zhang, Guibin and Mao, Junyuan and Yin, Chenlong and Liu, Qijiong and Wen, Qingsong and Wang, Kun and Wang, Yang , journal =

work page
[32]

Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for

Zhang, Guibin and Yue, Yanwei and Li, Zhixun and Yun, Sukwon and Wan, Guancheng and Wang, Kun and Cheng, Dawei and Yu, Jeffrey Xu and Chen, Tianlong , journal =. Cut the Crap: An Economical Communication Pipeline for

work page
[33]

A Weighted

Luo, Haoxiang and Sun, Gang and Liu, Yinqiu and Zhao, Dongzhao and Niyato, Dusit and Yu, Han and Dustdar, Schahram , journal =. A Weighted

work page
[34]

Jo, Yongrae and Park, Chanik , journal =

work page
[35]

Practical

Castro, Miguel and Liskov, Barbara , booktitle =. Practical

work page
[36]

and Gueta, Guy Golan and Abraham, Ittai , booktitle =

Yin, Maofan and Malkhi, Dahlia and Reiter, Michael K. and Gueta, Guy Golan and Abraham, Ittai , booktitle =. 2019 , publisher =

work page 2019
[37]

IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems , volume =

A Notion of Robustness in Complex Networks , author =. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems , volume =. 2015 , publisher =

work page 2015
[38]

2017 American Control Conference (ACC) , pages =

Resilient Consensus for Time-Varying Networks of Dynamic Agents , author =. 2017 American Control Conference (ACC) , pages =. 2017 , organization =

work page 2017
[39]

2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pages =

r -Robustness and (r,s) -Robustness of Circulant Graphs , author =. 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) , pages =. 2017 , organization =

work page 2017
[40]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume =

Formations for Resilient Robot Teams , author =. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , volume =. 2017 , publisher =

work page 2017
[41]

Acta Mathematica Hungarica , volume=

On the strength of connectedness of a random graph , author=. Acta Mathematica Hungarica , volume=. 1961 , publisher=

work page 1961
[42]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15153 , year=

When Disagreements Elicit Robustness: Investigating Self-Repair Capabilities under LLM Multi-Agent Disagreements , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15153 , year=

work page arXiv
[43]

Uncertainty Estimation for Tumor Prediction with Unlabeled Data , year=

Yun, Juyoung and Abousamra, Shahira and Li, Chen and Gupta, Rajarsi and Kurc, Tahsin and Samaras, Dimitris and Van Dyke, Alison and Saltz, Joel and Chen, Chao , booktitle=. Uncertainty Estimation for Tumor Prediction with Unlabeled Data , year=

work page