pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

hub

Let's Verify Step by Step

93 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

93 Pith papers citing it
abstract

In recent years, large language models have greatly improved in their ability to perform complex multi-step reasoning. However, even state-of-the-art models still regularly produce logical mistakes. To train more reliable models, we can turn either to outcome supervision, which provides feedback for a final result, or process supervision, which provides feedback for each intermediate reasoning step. Given the importance of training reliable models, and given the high cost of human feedback, it is important to carefully compare the both methods. Recent work has already begun this comparison, but many questions still remain. We conduct our own investigation, finding that process supervision significantly outperforms outcome supervision for training models to solve problems from the challenging MATH dataset. Our process-supervised model solves 78% of problems from a representative subset of the MATH test set. Additionally, we show that active learning significantly improves the efficacy of process supervision. To support related research, we also release PRM800K, the complete dataset of 800,000 step-level human feedback labels used to train our best reward model.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract In recent years, large language models have greatly improved in their ability to perform complex multi-step reasoning. However, even state-of-the-art models still regularly produce logical mistakes. To train more reliable models, we can turn either to outcome supervision, which provides feedback for a final result, or process supervision, which provides feedback for each intermediate reasoning step. Given the importance of training reliable models, and given the high cost of human feedback, it is important to carefully compare the both methods. Recent work has already begun this comparison, bu

co-cited works

representative citing papers

KL for a KL: On-Policy Distillation with Control Variate Baseline

cs.LG · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

vOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation gradients by subtracting a closed-form per-token negative reverse KL baseline as a detached control variate, preserving unbiasedness while lowering variance and matching expensive full-vocabulary methods.

BoostLoRA: Growing Effective Rank by Boosting Adapters

cs.LG · 2026-04-30 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

BoostLoRA grows effective adapter rank linearly via iterative boosting on hard examples with orthogonal low-rank updates, outperforming both single-shot ultra-low-rank adapters and full fine-tuning on math and code tasks with zero added inference overhead.

citing papers explorer

Showing 50 of 93 citing papers.