pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14208 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The Close Binary V486 Carinae

Ahmet Erdem , Volkan Bakis , Burcu Ozkardes , Edwin Budding , Mark G. Blackford , Tom Love , Michael D. Rhodes , Timothy S. Banks
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords V486 Carinaeclose binary starsnear-contact binariesO-C analysislight curve modelingthird bodystellar parameters
0
0 comments X

The pith

V486 Car is a near-contact binary with masses 2.1 and 0.4 solar masses plus a possible 0.3 solar-mass companion a few AU away.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the physical parameters of the close binary V486 Car by combining satellite photometry from HIPPARCOS and TESS, high-dispersion spectroscopy, and ground-based B and V observations. It reports component masses, radii, effective temperatures, and a distance despite the shallow eclipses and light-curve asymmetries. Timing analysis of minima reveals variations consistent with a low-mass third star orbiting several AU from the pair. The work also discusses the O'Connell effect and small-scale photometric jitter with a roughly 10-day quasi-period.

Core claim

Using combined satellite photometry, high-dispersion spectrometry, and ground-based observations, the study finds the primary component has mass 2.1 solar masses, radius 3.20 solar radii, and temperature 10000 K while the secondary has mass 0.4 solar masses, radius 1.48 solar radii, and temperature 6200 K at a distance of 162 parsecs. The O-C diagram of eclipse timings indicates an additional low-mass star of about 0.3 solar masses in an orbit separated by a few AU from the close binary.

What carries the argument

Simultaneous light-curve and radial-velocity modeling to extract stellar parameters, combined with O-C analysis of eclipse timing residuals to detect the third body.

If this is right

  • The binary is interpreted as near-contact with conspicuous light asymmetries of about 0.036 mag attributed to the O'Connell effect.
  • A low-amplitude jitter of about 0.005 mag with quasi-period near 10 days appears in the photometry, with a tendency for excursions at one maximum to precede those at the other.
  • The third star may influence the long-term dynamical evolution of the close pair.
  • More accurate and plentiful spectroscopic data are required to refine the solution and confirm the triple configuration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This system could serve as an example for testing formation channels of hierarchical triples that contain a close binary.
  • Similar timing analyses of other near-contact systems might reveal additional hidden companions.
  • The derived distance places the binary in the solar neighborhood for comparison with population studies.

Load-bearing premise

That reliable physical parameters can be extracted despite only shallow eclipses and sinusoidal light variations that are merely suggestive of a near-contact configuration.

What would settle it

A radial-velocity curve that yields mass values inconsistent with the reported 2.1 and 0.4 solar masses would falsify the derived stellar parameters.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14208 by Ahmet Erdem, Burcu Ozkardes, Edwin Budding, Mark G. Blackford, Michael D. Rhodes, Timothy S. Banks, Tom Love, Volkan Bakis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Raw V data are plotted against orbital phase. B – V colours are offset by 6.1 mag from their actual values. Note the absence of significant colour (B – C) variation in this photometry. tions. These deal with: (1) ground-based B and V observations, (2) LC modeling using the WinFitter (WF) program suite, (3) TESS photometry, (4) Times of Minimum light (ToMs), (5) the O’Connell effect, (6) Wilson-Devinney-bas… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: O-C trends of V486 Car. Top panel: Linear fit. Bottom panel: quadratic fit to residuals of linear fit. The blue and blue-yellow circles rep￾resent the Hipparcos primary and secondary ToMs, the red and red-yellow circles represent our BVI LCs’ ToMs, and the black and gray circles represent the TESS ToMs. yielded two primary and two secondary ToMs. Four primary and three secondary ToMs were also obtained fro… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: O–C change of the TESS primary ToMs of V486 Car. Top panel: Sinusoidal fit. Bottom panel: residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TESS photometry of V486 Car reveals quasi-periodic jitter in the LCs associated with fine structure in the O’Connell effect. The plots show variation of minima and maxima magnitudes from their average values. 𝑚max2 and 𝑚max1 values offset by 6 millimag. level is the first maximum (𝑚𝑎𝑥1). 𝑚𝑎𝑥2 is the immediately follow￾ing maximum. The O’Connell measure, in magnitudes, Δ𝑚 is then 𝑚max2 − 𝑚max1 . In the case… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top panel: V – TESS and Hp – TESS colour curves of V486 Car. The red dots represent the trend of colour curves. Middle panel: TESS LCs in sector 09 with the WD+MC cool spot model fitting. The red dotted light curve shows the theoretical LC without spots. Residuals to the LC model are plotted in the lower figure. Bottom panel: Critical Lagrangian surfaces and model of V486 Car (left), and 3D representation … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Top panel: TESS LCs averaged from the 5 sectors discussed in Section 2.5, with near-contact model initial fitting. The systematic residuals from the initial fit can be seen in the middle panel. Bottom panel: WF near￾contact model optimal fit to the TESS data ‘cleaned’ of systematic residuals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: B, V and Hipparcos (Hp) LCs with the WD+MC model fitting. Residuals to the LC model are plotted in the lower figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Two–dimensional z-score–normalized RMS map for the 𝐾1˘𝐾2 parameter grid. Each point represents the combined RMS value obtained from both the O–C residuals and the korel correlation output. The RMS values are independently z-score normalized and averaged to produce a uni￾fied goodness-of-fit metric across the grid. Darker regions indicate parameter combinations yielding lower normalized RMS, thus represent… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: RVs and the adopted spectroscopic orbit. The turbulence velocity for the surface of the primary component was given as ∼2 km s−1 . However, writing 𝑣𝑟𝑜𝑡 sin 𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑡 = (2𝜋𝑅1 sin 𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑡)/𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑡, where we assume that the inclination of the primary star’s rotation axis is equal to that of the system’s orbit (𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑡 = 𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑏) and the primary has synchronised its angular rotation with the mean orbital revolution (𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑡 = 𝑃… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Observed spectra, corresponding residuals from the korel analysis, and decomposed components for six datasets. In the top row, the left panel shows the observed flux as a function of wavelength, while the right panel displays the residuals of the korel fit. The bottom panel presents the decomposed primary and secondary components for each dataset, illustrating the contribution of individual components and… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Same as Fig.12 but for spectral order 125 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Convolved rotation Gaussian fitting to the disentangled Mg I 𝜆5184 line profile of the primary component of V486 Car. 𝐴TESS = 1.940 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉), given by Eker & Bakış (2023). Here, the colour excess 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉) was taken from the calculation in Section 2.1. The distance to V486 Car – including the correction for inter￾stellar absorption – was computed as 162±12 pc, which match the distance of 161±2 pc given by … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spectral energy distribution of the V486 Car system. Filled circles represent the observed broadband fluxes compiled from the literature. The solid red curves denote the best-fitting reddened composite SED models based on the Planck function and synthetic spectra of the primary and secondary components, constructed using the derived effective temperatures and surface gravities. The solid green curves corr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The hitherto neglected close binary V486 Car is studied with the aid of newly applied satellite photometry (HIPPARCOS and TESS), high dispersion spectrometry (HERCULES) and ground-based B and V photometry. While the sinusoidal light variations are suggestive of a near-contact system, the stars have only shallow eclipse, so highly confident parametrization becomes challenging. We find: $M_1 = 2.1 \pm 0.1$, $M_2 = 0.4 \pm 0.1$; $R_1 = 3.20 \pm 0.02$, $R_2 = 1.48 \pm 0.01$; (${\odot}$); $T_{e1} = 10000 \pm 500$, $T_{e2} = 6200 \pm 200$ (K); distance = 162 $\pm$ 12 (pc). New times of minima for V486 Car have been examined, including recent observations from TESS. The role of the relatively significant O'Connell effect is examined. As well as the conspicuous asymmetry from the main effect of about 0.036 mag (V), a jitter, with amplitude of about 0.005 V mag and quasi-period of order $\sim$ 10 d is noticed. There is a tendency for such photometric excursions at one maximum to precede those at the other. As well, the O -- C data indicate the presence of a low mass star $\sim$0.3 M$_{\odot}$ in an orbit separated by a few AU from the close binary. More accurate and plentiful spectroscopic data would be requisite for further investigations. A brief discussion reviews possible approaches to understanding the system in the context of near-contact binary scenarios.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the neglected close binary V486 Carinae using combined HIPPARCOS/TESS photometry, HERCULES high-dispersion spectroscopy, and ground-based B/V observations. Despite noting that shallow eclipses make highly confident parametrization challenging, it reports component masses M1=2.1±0.1 M⊙ and M2=0.4±0.1 M⊙, radii R1=3.20±0.02 R⊙ and R2=1.48±0.01 R⊙, effective temperatures Te1=10000±500 K and Te2=6200±200 K, and a distance of 162±12 pc. The work examines the O'Connell effect (0.036 mag asymmetry plus 0.005 mag jitter with ~10 d quasi-period) and interprets new times of minima, including TESS data, as evidence for a low-mass (~0.3 M⊙) third body in a wide orbit of a few AU; it calls for more spectroscopic data.

Significance. If the parameters prove reliable, the study adds a well-observed near-contact binary to the literature and supports hierarchical triple scenarios for such systems. The multi-dataset approach (photometry plus radial velocities) is a clear strength, and the explicit acknowledgment of modeling difficulties is commendable. The third-body interpretation, however, rests on timing trends that the authors themselves note require more data to confirm.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and photometric modeling] Abstract and photometric/spectroscopic modeling sections: The headline parameters (M1=2.1±0.1 M⊙, R1=3.20±0.02 R⊙, etc.) are derived from HERCULES radial-velocity curves combined with light-curve modeling of shallow eclipses. Because eclipses are shallow, orbital inclination i is only weakly constrained near 90°. Spectroscopic masses scale as sin³i, so even a 1–2° uncertainty in i produces mass errors comparable to the quoted ±0.1 M⊙; the paper does not present degeneracy maps, Monte Carlo error budgets, or explicit tests showing that spot parameters (used to fit the 0.036 mag O'Connell effect) do not trade off against the binary potentials and fill-out factor.
  2. [O-C data analysis] O-C timing analysis: The inference of a ~0.3 M⊙ third body at a few AU separation is based on observed timing trends. With the limited number of minima (including recent TESS points), the orbital period and mass of the third body are not uniquely determined, and no quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., apsidal motion or spot-induced timing shifts) is provided to support the claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Photometric variations] The description of the photometric jitter (amplitude ~0.005 V mag, quasi-period ~10 d) and its tendency to precede excursions at the other maximum is interesting but would benefit from a quantitative periodogram or autocorrelation analysis to distinguish it from noise.
  2. [Notation] Notation for solar units (⊙) and temperature subscripts (Te1, Te2) is used inconsistently in places; ensure uniform formatting throughout tables and text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on V486 Carinae. We respond to the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and photometric modeling] Abstract and photometric/spectroscopic modeling sections: The headline parameters (M1=2.1±0.1 M⊙, R1=3.20±0.02 R⊙, etc.) are derived from HERCULES radial-velocity curves combined with light-curve modeling of shallow eclipses. Because eclipses are shallow, orbital inclination i is only weakly constrained near 90°. Spectroscopic masses scale as sin³i, so even a 1–2° uncertainty in i produces mass errors comparable to the quoted ±0.1 M⊙; the paper does not present degeneracy maps, Monte Carlo error budgets, or explicit tests showing that spot parameters (used to fit the 0.036 mag O'Connell effect) do not trade off against the binary potentials and fill-out factor.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this concern. The shallow eclipses do result in a weaker constraint on the inclination, and we recognize that the quoted uncertainties may not fully capture all degeneracies. In the revised manuscript, we will add a section detailing Monte Carlo error budgets and present degeneracy maps for key parameters. We will also include explicit tests demonstrating the impact of spot parameters on the derived potentials and fill-out factor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [O-C data analysis] O-C timing analysis: The inference of a ~0.3 M⊙ third body at a few AU separation is based on observed timing trends. With the limited number of minima (including recent TESS points), the orbital period and mass of the third body are not uniquely determined, and no quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., apsidal motion or spot-induced timing shifts) is provided to support the claim.

    Authors: We agree that the third-body parameters cannot be uniquely determined from the current limited O-C data. We will revise the manuscript to include a quantitative discussion of alternative explanations, such as apsidal motion and spot-induced timing variations, to the extent possible with the available data. This will be accompanied by a stronger emphasis on the preliminary nature of the third-body claim and the need for more observations. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Unique determination of the third body parameters due to insufficient O-C data points.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; parameters derived from independent external datasets via standard methods

full rationale

The reported masses, radii, temperatures and distance are obtained by fitting radial-velocity curves (HERCULES) and multi-band photometry (HIPPARCOS/TESS/ground-based) using conventional binary-star modeling codes. No equation in the paper equates a derived quantity to one of its own fitted inputs by construction, nor does any central claim rest on a self-citation chain that itself lacks independent verification. The O–C analysis for the putative third body uses observed times of minima, which are external data. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of binary-star light-curve and radial-velocity modeling plus the interpretation of O-C variations as due to a third body; the third star is an invented entity without direct detection.

free parameters (1)
  • component masses, radii and temperatures
    Fitted to match the combined photometry and spectrometry data
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of near-contact binary light-curve modeling (e.g., Roche geometry, limb darkening, gravity darkening)
    Invoked to derive parameters from shallow-eclipse photometry
invented entities (1)
  • low-mass third star ~0.3 solar masses no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for observed O-C timing variations
    Inferred from eclipse timing data but lacks independent confirmation such as direct imaging or radial-velocity detection

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1432 out tokens · 46747 ms · 2026-05-15T02:52:51.627705+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [3]

    Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences

    work page

  2. [4]

    American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2002, series =

    Binary Maker 3.0 - An Interactive Graphics-Based Light Curve Synthesis Program Written in Java. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts , year = 2002, series =

    work page 2002

  3. [5]

    2022 , publisher=

    A Guide to Close Binary Systems , author=. 2022 , publisher=

    work page 2022

  4. [6]

    2007 , publisher=

    Introduction to Astronomical Photometry , author=. 2007 , publisher=

    work page 2007

  5. [8]

    Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium

    work page

  6. [9]

    A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    Limb and gravity-darkening coefficients for the TESS satellite at several metallicities, surface gravities, and microturbulent velocities. A&A , year = 2017, volume =

    work page 2017

  7. [10]

    Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires , year = 1993, month = jul, volume =

    A revised version of the ILLSS Catalogue. Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires , year = 1993, month = jul, volume =

    work page 1993

  8. [11]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: Revised version of the ILLSS Catalogue (Coluzzi 1993-1999)

    work page 1993

  9. [12]

    VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003)

    work page 2003

  10. [14]

    Another Unreal Paper , journal=

    work page

  11. [15]

    A Last Unreal Paper , journal=

    work page

  12. [22]

    ApJ , fjournal=

    Fournier, Paul , title=. ApJ , fjournal=

    work page

  13. [25]

    , keywords =

    Physical parameters of close binary systems: VIII. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3753 , archivePrefix =. 2101.10680 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3753

  14. [26]

    , keywords =

    Orbital elements of multiple spectroscopic stars. , keywords =

    work page

  15. [27]

    Publications of the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic , volume =

    Hadrava, Petr , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic , volume =

    work page

  16. [29]

    An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

    work page

  17. [30]

    Volume I

    University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars. Volume I. Declinations -90\_ to -53\_ 0

    work page

  18. [31]

    Southern Stars , year = 2013, month = sep, volume =

    Southern Close Binaries Programme of the VSS. Southern Stars , year = 2013, month = sep, volume =

    work page 2013

  19. [34]

    , year = 1973, month = may, volume =

    The Evolution of a Contact Binary. , year = 1973, month = may, volume =

    work page 1973

  20. [36]

    Close binary systems

    work page

  21. [38]

    , year = 1956, month = may, volume =

    A method for computing accurately the epoch of minimum of an eclipsing variable. , year = 1956, month = may, volume =

    work page 1956

  22. [40]

    , year = 1967, month = jan, volume =

    Gravity-Darkening for Stars with Convective Envelopes. , year = 1967, month = jan, volume =

    work page 1967

  23. [44]

    , keywords =

    Classification of eclipsing binaries in large surveys. , keywords =

    work page

  24. [46]

    Publications of the Riverview College Observatory , year = 1951, month = aug, volume =

    The so-called periastron effect in close eclipsing binaries ; New variable stars (fifth list). Publications of the Riverview College Observatory , year = 1951, month = aug, volume =

    work page 1951

  25. [47]

    A&A , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

    The HIPPARCOS Catalogue. A&A , year = 1997, month = jul, volume =

    work page 1997

  26. [51]

    The Proximity Effects in Close Binary Systems. II. The Bolometric Reflection Effect for Stars with Deep Convective Envelopes. , year = 1969, month = jan, volume =

    work page 1969

  27. [55]

    private communication , year = 2021, month = jun, volume =

    HRSP Version 5. private communication , year = 2021, month = jun, volume =

    work page 2021

  28. [56]

    IAU Colloq

    HRSP - A dedicated echelle reduction software package for Hercules. IAU Colloq. 193: Variable Stars in the Local Group , year = 2004, editor =

    work page 2004

  29. [58]

    An important paper , journal=

    work page

  30. [59]

    , keywords =

    New Limb-Darkening Coefficients for Modeling Binary Star Light Curves. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/116788 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/116788

  31. [63]

    JAAVSO , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =

    Unsolved Problems in the Evolution of Interacting Binary Stars. JAAVSO , year = 2006, month = jun, volume =

    work page 2006

  32. [68]

    , keywords =

    Physical Parameters of Components in Close Binary Systems: III. , keywords =

    work page

  33. [71]

    Bak s V., Eker Z., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/72.3.4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AcA....72..195B 72, 195

    work page doi:10.32023/0001-5237/72.3.4 2022

  34. [72]

    Bak s V., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2024.92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PASA...41...83B 41, e083

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.92 2024

  35. [73]

    Banks T., Budding E., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00659348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990Ap&SS.167..221B 167, 221

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00659348 1990

  36. [74]

    New York: McGraw-Hill

    Bevington P., 1969, Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences . New York: McGraw-Hill

    work page 1969

  37. [75]

    H., Steelman D

    Bradstreet D. H., Steelman D. P., 2002, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 75.02

    work page 2002

  38. [76]

    Cambridge Observing Handbooks for Research Astronomers, Cambridge University Press, www.cambridge.org/9780521847117

    Budding E., Demircan O., 2007, Introduction to Astronomical Photometry. Cambridge Observing Handbooks for Research Astronomers, Cambridge University Press, www.cambridge.org/9780521847117

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [77]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics, CRC Press, https://books.google.com/books?id=sgGnzgEACAAJ

    Budding E., Demircan O., 2022, A Guide to Close Binary Systems. Astronomy and Astrophysics, CRC Press, https://books.google.com/books?id=sgGnzgEACAAJ

    work page 2022

  40. [78]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  41. [79]

    New Grids of ATLAS9 Model Atmospheres

    Castelli F., Kurucz R. L., 2003, in Piskunov N., Weiss W. W., Gray D. F., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres. p. A20 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0405087 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0405087 2003

  42. [80]

    Chandrasekhar S., 1969, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium

    work page 1969

  43. [81]

    Claret A., 2017, A&A, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    work page 2017

  44. [82]

    Coluzzi R., 1993, Bulletin d'Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993BICDS..43....7C 43, 7

    work page 1993

  45. [83]

    Originally published in: 1993BICDS..43....7C

    Coluzzi R., 1999, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Revised version of the ILLSS Catalogue (Coluzzi 1993-1999) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: VI/71A. Originally published in: 1993BICDS..43....7C

    work page 1999

  46. [84]

    M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246

    Cutri R. M., et al., 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog: 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cutri+ 2003) , VizieR On-line Data Catalog: II/246. Originally published in: University of Massachusetts and Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, (IPAC/California Institute of Technology) (2003)

    work page 2003

  47. [85]

    J., Milone E

    Davidge T. J., Milone E. F., 1984, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984ApJS...55..571D 55, 571

    work page doi:10.1086/190969 1984

  48. [86]

    Eker Z., Bak s V., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1563 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.2440E 523, 2440

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1563 2023

  49. [87]

    Eker Z., et al., 2018, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty1834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.5491E 479, 5491

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1834 2018

  50. [88]

    Erdem A., et al., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stac2150 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.6151E 515, 6151

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2150 2022

  51. [89]

    Erdem A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2025.10080 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025PASA...42..120E 42, e120

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10080 2025

  52. [90]

    Fabry M., Pr s a A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ae14ed , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...994....7F 994, 7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae14ed 2025

  53. [91]

    P., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...205..217F 205, 217

    Flannery B. P., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/154266 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...205..217F 205, 217

    work page doi:10.1086/154266 1976

  54. [92]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , 595, A1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 2016

  55. [93]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 2023

  56. [94]

    Hadrava P., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..114..393H 114, 393

    work page 1995

  57. [95]

    Hadrava P., 2004, Publications of the Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 92, 15

    work page 2004

  58. [96]

    Hazlehurst J., Meyer-Hofmeister E., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..379H 24, 379

    work page 1973

  59. [97]

    B., Barnes S

    Hearnshaw J. B., Barnes S. I., Kershaw G. M., Frost N., Graham G., Ritchie R., Nankivell G. R., 2002, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1023/A:1023770225275 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ExA....13...59H 13, 59

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1023770225275 2002

  60. [98]

    W., 2001, An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

    Hilditch R. W., 2001, An Introduction to Close Binary Stars

    work page 2001

  61. [99]

    P., 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars

    Houk N., Cowley A. P., 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars. Volume I. Declinations -90\_ to -53\_ 0

    work page 1975

  62. [100]

    Idaczyk R., Blackford M., Budding E., Butland R., 2013, Southern Stars, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013SouSt..52c..16R 52, 16

    work page 2013

  63. [101]

    B., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/107913 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959AJ.....64..149I 64, 149

    Irwin J. B., 1959, @doi [ ] 10.1086/107913 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959AJ.....64..149I 64, 149

    work page doi:10.1086/107913 1959

  64. [102]

    M., Twicken, J

    Jenkins J. M., et al., 2016, in Chiozzi G., Guzman J. C., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9913, Software and Cyberinfrastructure for Astronomy IV. p. 99133E, @doi 10.1117/12.2233418

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2233418 2016

  65. [103]

    Kirk B., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...68K 151, 68

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 2016

  66. [104]

    John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NY

    Kopal Z., 1959, Close binary systems . John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NY

    work page 1959

  67. [105]

    P., 1941, @doi [ ] 10.1086/144252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93..133K 93, 133

    Kuiper G. P., 1941, @doi [ ] 10.1086/144252 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1941ApJ....93..133K 93, 133

    work page doi:10.1086/144252 1941

  68. [106]

    K., van Woerden H., 1956, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1956BAN....12..327K 12, 327

    Kwee K. K., van Woerden H., 1956, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1956BAN....12..327K 12, 327

    work page 1956

  69. [107]

    Liu Q.-Y., Yang Y.-L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1009-9271/3/2/142 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ChJAA...3..142L 3, 142

    work page doi:10.1088/1009-9271/3/2/142 2003

  70. [108]

    B., 1967, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ZA.....65...89L 65, 89

    Lucy L. B., 1967, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967ZA.....65...89L 65, 89

    work page 1967

  71. [109]

    B., 1968a, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/149510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...151.1123L 151, 1123

    Lucy L. B., 1968a, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/149510 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...151.1123L 151, 1123

    work page doi:10.1086/149510

  72. [110]

    B., 1968b, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/149712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...153..877L 153, 877

    Lucy L. B., 1968b, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/149712 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968ApJ...153..877L 153, 877

    work page doi:10.1086/149712

  73. [111]

    B., Wilson R

    Lucy L. B., Wilson R. E., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157212 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...231..502L 231, 502

    work page doi:10.1086/157212 1979

  74. [112]

    Malkov O., Oblak E., 2006, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MmSAI..77.1175M 77, 1175

    work page 2006

  75. [113]

    Y., Oblak E., Snegireva E

    Malkov O. Y., Oblak E., Snegireva E. A., Torra J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...446..785M 446, 785

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053137 2006

  76. [114]

    O'Connell D. J. K., 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1951PRCO....2...85O 2, 85

    work page 1951

  77. [115]

    Perryman M. A. C., et al., 1997, A&A, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...323L..49P 323, L49

    work page 1997

  78. [116]

    Pribulla T., Va n ko M., Chochol D., Hamb \'a lek L ., Parimucha S ., 2011, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201111569 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AN....332..607P 332, 607

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201111569 2011

  79. [117]

    Qian S., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04921.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.328..914Q 328, 914

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04921.x 2001

  80. [118]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker G. R., et al., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JATIS...1a4003R 1, 014003

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1117/1.jatis.1.1.014003 2015

Showing first 80 references.