pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12787 · v1 · pith:WWUFARK4new · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.SI · cs.CY· cs.SY· econ.GN· eess.SY· q-fin.EC· q-fin.RM

Orchestrating the Twin Transition in Multinational Corporations: Technology Roadmapping for Green and Digital Global Business Services

Han-Teng Liao , Karen Ang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SI cs.CYcs.SYecon.GNeess.SYq-fin.ECq-fin.RM
keywords Global Business ServicesTwin TransitionTechnology RoadmappingSustainable IntelligenceMultinational CorporationsOperational AirlockMiddle Power HubsIndustry 5.0
0
0 comments X

The pith

Global Business Services units act as operational airlocks to mediate the green and digital twin transition in multinational corporations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to establish that Global Business Services units function as central mediators for harmonizing environmental and digital demands inside multinational corporations. Bibliometric mapping of research trends shows an evolutionary move from basic automation toward sustainable intelligence, which the authors combine with roadmapping methods to produce a design approach. This identifies how units can balance external regulatory pressures with internal workflow innovations while supporting alternative paths in global value chains. If the claim holds, leaders gain a structured way to direct talent and supply flows amid divided economic conditions.

Core claim

The paper claims that the GBS unit is a central operational airlock mediating between landscape pressures such as dual mandates and carbon adjustment mechanisms and niche innovations in AI-native workflows, with the synthesis of technology roadmapping and the innovation ecosystem toolkit yielding a data-driven design approach that maps clusters onto a stakeholder engagement canvas and highlights resilient middle power hubs providing a third way for global value chains.

What carries the argument

The operational airlock mechanism in GBS units, which mediates external landscape pressures and internal niche innovations during the twin transition.

If this is right

  • Leaders can apply the data-driven design approach to orchestrate talent and supply chain flows.
  • Resilient middle power hubs in certain locations bypass the middle-income trap to supply a third way in global value chains.
  • The framework enriches the conceptual role of GBS within Industry 5.0 as a mechanism for the multipolar digital economy.
  • Entrepreneurial support networks gain tools to align with the evolutionary shift toward sustainable intelligence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach might extend to empirical tests in additional multinational corporations beyond the bibliometric clusters to check mediation effects.
  • Similar airlock dynamics could appear in other organizational units handling regulatory and technological shifts in different sectors.
  • Policy makers in emerging economies might examine support for the identified hubs as a route to stabilize participation in global value chains.
  • The canvas could be adapted to track whether the twin transition produces measurable changes in operational resilience over time.

Load-bearing premise

That clusters drawn from research literature accurately mirror real evolutionary changes in GBS practice and that the roadmapping synthesis produces non-circular actionable guidance for leaders.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of GBS operations in selected multinational corporations against the mapped clusters, checking whether the described mediation between regulatory pressures and AI workflow innovations occurs in practice or produces measurable orchestration improvements.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12787 by Han-Teng Liao, Karen Ang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual network: keyword co-occurrence v [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Factorial Analysis A critical reflection suggests the existence of "conceptual inertia." The density of the central cluster may mask a "digitalization paradox" in which traditional efficiency metrics (RPA, cost-reduction) overshadow the emerging Twin Transition requirements of green ICT and human-centric AI. Furthermore, the isolation of niche clusters like IT-enabled services (ITES) and process innovation… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Thematic evolution and strategic mapping of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: reveals a stratified geographic distribution of research output. The collaborative network points toward the growing role of "Middle Power" innovation hubs alongside the dominant outputs of the United States and China [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stakeholder Engagement Tool Canvas Integrating bibliometric science mapping with the MLP￾STT framework provides a robust stakeholder engagement foundation, showing how industrial policies act as regime￾level influences compelling MNCs to adapt their roadmaps. The Stakeholder Map ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Global Business Services (GBS) have emerged as a "living laboratory" for the Twin Transition of Green and Digital Transformation, as multinational corporations (MNCs) face increasing pressure to harmonize digital efficiency with environmental stewardship. Aiming to derive a socio-technical framework, this paper synthesizes Technology Roadmapping (TRM) with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) ICT-centric innovation ecosystem toolkit. A bibliometric analysis of research clusters reveals an evolutionary shift from basic process automation toward "Sustainable Intelligence," identifying the GBS unit as a central "operational airlock" that mediates between landscape pressures -- such as the EU's dual mandate and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanisms -- and niche innovations in AI-native workflows. The study further maps these clusters onto a stakeholder engagement canvas, highlighting how resilient "Middle Power" hubs in Poland, Portugal, and Malaysia are bypassing the middle-income trap to provide a "third way" for global value chains amidst a bifurcated geopolitical cloud. The results offer a data-driven design approach for leaders and entrepreneurial support networks to orchestrate talent and supply chain flows, thereby enriching the conceptual understanding of Industry 5.0 and the role of GBS as a primary mechanism for navigating a volatile, multipolar digital economy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper performs a bibliometric analysis of research clusters on Global Business Services (GBS) and the twin (green-digital) transition in MNCs. It synthesizes Technology Roadmapping (TRM) with the ITU ICT-centric innovation ecosystem toolkit to derive a socio-technical framework. Key claims include an evolutionary shift in the literature from process automation to 'Sustainable Intelligence,' identification of the GBS unit as a central 'operational airlock' mediating landscape pressures (EU dual mandate, CBAM) and niche AI innovations, emergence of 'Middle Power' hubs (Poland, Portugal, Malaysia) offering a 'third way' for global value chains, and mapping to a stakeholder canvas that yields a data-driven design approach for orchestrating talent and supply-chain flows in Industry 5.0.

Significance. If the bibliometric clusters and interpretive synthesis are shown to be robust and externally validated, the work could supply a useful conceptual bridge between established roadmapping toolkits and GBS practice, highlighting a potential mediation role for GBS units. The integration of TRM and ITU elements is a constructive synthesis step. However, the absence of any methodological transparency or external anchoring means the 'data-driven' and 'third way' claims currently add little beyond re-interpretation of existing literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Bibliometric Analysis] Abstract and Bibliometric Analysis section: no search terms, database(s), query strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, time window, corpus size, or clustering/validation procedure are supplied. Without these, the claimed 'evolutionary shift' to Sustainable Intelligence and the identification of GBS as an operational airlock cannot be evaluated or reproduced.
  2. [Abstract / Framework Synthesis] Abstract and Framework Synthesis: the mediator role of GBS and the 'third way' for Middle Power hubs are presented as emerging directly from the chosen literature clusters and toolkit combination. No independent test, external benchmark, or operational dataset (talent flows, CBAM compliance, supply-chain metrics) is used to anchor these interpretations, making the central mediation claim circular by construction.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the synthesis 'offers a data-driven design approach' is unsupported when the underlying bibliometric procedure itself lacks any reported error assessment, robustness check, or mapping to real-world GBS operational data.
minor comments (2)
  1. The novel terms 'operational airlock,' 'Sustainable Intelligence,' and 'Middle Power hubs' are introduced without explicit definitions or citations to prior usage; a short definitional paragraph would improve clarity.
  2. The stakeholder engagement canvas is mentioned but not described or illustrated; adding a figure or table summarizing its dimensions would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which identify key areas where methodological transparency can be strengthened. We address each major comment point-by-point below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Bibliometric Analysis] Abstract and Bibliometric Analysis section: no search terms, database(s), query strings, inclusion/exclusion criteria, time window, corpus size, or clustering/validation procedure are supplied. Without these, the claimed 'evolutionary shift' to Sustainable Intelligence and the identification of GBS as an operational airlock cannot be evaluated or reproduced.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of these details limits reproducibility and evaluation. The revised manuscript will add a dedicated 'Bibliometric Methods' subsection specifying the databases (Scopus), search terms and query strings, time window, inclusion/exclusion criteria, final corpus size, and clustering/validation approach (including software and parameters used). This will directly support assessment of the evolutionary shift and GBS role claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Framework Synthesis] Abstract and Framework Synthesis: the mediator role of GBS and the 'third way' for Middle Power hubs are presented as emerging directly from the chosen literature clusters and toolkit combination. No independent test, external benchmark, or operational dataset (talent flows, CBAM compliance, supply-chain metrics) is used to anchor these interpretations, making the central mediation claim circular by construction.

    Authors: The mediator role and 'third way' are interpretive propositions arising from the TRM-ITU synthesis applied to the identified clusters; the paper does not claim new empirical testing or external datasets. We will revise the text to explicitly label these as conceptual derivations rather than direct empirical findings, add a limitations paragraph acknowledging the lack of independent validation, and note that operational anchoring remains for future research. This addresses the circularity concern by clarifying the interpretive scope without overstating the evidence base. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the synthesis 'offers a data-driven design approach' is unsupported when the underlying bibliometric procedure itself lacks any reported error assessment, robustness check, or mapping to real-world GBS operational data.

    Authors: We accept that 'data-driven' overstates the current contribution given the missing robustness details. The abstract and synthesis sections will be revised to describe the output as a 'synthesis-based design approach' derived from bibliometric mapping. We will also add explicit discussion of limitations, including the absence of error assessment and real-world mapping, to avoid unsupported claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on independent bibliometric analysis and synthesis of external toolkits

full rationale

The paper conducts a bibliometric analysis on research literature to identify clusters, then applies the external TRM and ITU ICT-centric innovation ecosystem toolkit to interpret those clusters and map them onto a stakeholder canvas. The resulting claims (evolutionary shift to 'Sustainable Intelligence', GBS as 'operational airlock', 'third way' for hubs) are presented as interpretive outputs of this process rather than inputs redefined by construction. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown to reduce the central claims to their own inputs; the bibliometric step and toolkit synthesis supply independent content. This is the most common honest finding for papers that perform explicit data analysis and methodological combination without the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on interpretive synthesis of existing toolkits and bibliometric patterns without new primary data collection, formal modeling, or external validation; several domain assumptions and coined entities are introduced without independent evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Global Business Services have emerged as a living laboratory for the Twin Transition of Green and Digital Transformation
    Stated as premise in the opening sentence of the abstract.
  • domain assumption Bibliometric analysis of research clusters reveals an evolutionary shift from basic process automation toward Sustainable Intelligence
    Presented as a finding but functions as an interpretive premise for the framework.
invented entities (3)
  • operational airlock no independent evidence
    purpose: Metaphor for GBS unit mediating external pressures and internal innovations
    New term introduced to describe the mediator role; no independent falsifiable test supplied.
  • Sustainable Intelligence no independent evidence
    purpose: Label for the identified evolutionary stage of research and practice
    Coined term used to characterize the shift; no separate empirical definition or measurement provided.
  • Middle Power hubs no independent evidence
    purpose: Designation of Poland, Portugal, and Malaysia as resilient locations bypassing the middle-income trap
    Interpretive classification of countries; no quantitative criteria or external data cited in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5776 in / 1718 out tokens · 30552 ms · 2026-06-27T05:34:40.122396+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    engine room

    Keyword co-occurrence network The keyword co-occurrence network (Fig. 1) reveals five clusters: the Red Cluster anchors the traditional B PO and offshoring narrative, centered on risk and performa nce in established hubs like India and the Philippines. Th e Green Cluster represents the technical "engine room" of p rocess engineering, utilizing simulation ...

    1993

  2. [2]

    conceptual inertia

    Factorial Analysis The factorial map (Fig. 2) is dominated by a large central red cluster, where terms such as process automation, cloud computing, and performance management converge. This red cluster represents the stabilized core of the GBS d omain, where technical efficiency and standardized data management have become the industry baseline. The proxi...

  3. [3]

    Thematic evolution analysis Grounding the roadmapping, a longitudinal analysis identifies the shift of clusters from 'niche' to 'm otor' regimes using the MLP-STT framework. Fig. 5 illustrates the matic evolution through a longitudinal lens across three periods and four subfigures. Fig. 5(a) shows that BPO, Business Process Optimization, and SSC dominated...

  4. [4]

    evolution

    as the established GBS "regime," focused on efficiency, cost reduction, and task centralization. The middle period (2016–2020) introduced RPA, performance metrics, and ICT as bridging themes. The current period (2021–2026) shows significant diversification, enriched by Digital Transformation (DT), CSR, process automation, and the digital economy. Fig. 3 T...

    2016

  5. [5]

    Co-dependence: Human capital strategy and AI adoption must function as simultaneous, co-dependen t investments rather than sequential tasks

  6. [6]

    Holistic Design: The Twin Transition is a deliberate socio-technical realignment of GVC—not merely a technical upgrade—, in which human and algorithmic components must be designed together from the outset

  7. [7]

    Disciplinary Reframing : GBS governance is an inherently socio-technical discipline, transcending its operational or logistical constraints . C. Future Work and Perspectives The integration of bibliometric data with the ITU I CT- Centric Innovation Ecosystem Toolkit provides a rig orous framework for mapping the Twin Transition as a soci o- technical real...

  8. [8]

    AI and semiconductor roadmaps for regeneratively accountable and environmentally safe supplies

  9. [9]

    Cognitive Computing Continuum for controlling loops that balance yields with resource circularity

  10. [10]

    Trustworthy autonomous AI agents , serving as regulatory proxies to secure RegTech innovation usi ng industrial data spaces; and

  11. [11]

    Regenerative socio-technical architecture to support material lifecycle tracking using digital product passports. By deploying the remaining components of the ITU toolkit—the Ecosystem Maturity Map , Sector Development Canvas , and Storytelling Tool —this initiative will document the GBS transition from outsourcing destinations to innovation hubs. Redefin...

  12. [12]

    Business service centres in Portugal,

    I. Oz, “Business service centres in Portugal,” AICEP, Jun. 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    AI Chatbots as Pro fessional Service Agents: Developing a Professional Identity,

    W. Li, K. Shi, and Y. Chai, “AI Chatbots as Pro fessional Service Agents: Developing a Professional Identity,” in Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan guage Processing , C. Christodoulopoulos, T. Chakraborty, C. Rose, a nd V. Peng, Eds., Suzhou, China: Association for Computational Linguistics, Nov. 2025, pp. 12912–12925....

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.emnlp-main.652 2025

  14. [14]

    Business Services Sector in Poland 2025,

    ABSL, “Business Services Sector in Poland 2025, ” Warsaw: Association of Business Service Leaders, May 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    GBS malays ia strategy mid-term report 2022-2027: unleashing GBS 5.0 – human-centric, AI- driven, impact-focused,

    PIKOM, GBS Malaysia, MDEC, and UNM, “GBS malays ia strategy mid-term report 2022-2027: unleashing GBS 5.0 – human-centric, AI- driven, impact-focused,” Selangor: PIKOM (Persatuan Industri Komputer dan Multimedia Malaysia); MDEC (Malaysia D igital Economy Corporation); UNM (University of Nottingham Malaysia), Oct. 2025

    2022

  16. [16]

    28, 2026

    ITSelecta, AI & gbs in 2026: what is changing and why it matters? an interview with romek lubaczewski , Jan. 28, 2026. Accessed: Feb. 27,

    2026

  17. [17]

    Available: https://youtu.be/Ji7wxPtzzIY

    [Online]. Available: https://youtu.be/Ji7wxPtzzIY

  18. [18]

    Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2020

    ITU-D, Bridging the digital innovation divide: a toolkit for developing sustainable ict-centric ecosystem projects . Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union (ITU), 2020. Available: http://handle.itu.int/11.1002/pub/816bc8cc-en

    2020

  19. [19]

    Penang unveils the development o f GBS@technoplex to harness AI growth and cement its position as Mal aysia’s digital innovation hub,

    InvestPenang, “Penang unveils the development o f GBS@technoplex to harness AI growth and cement its position as Mal aysia’s digital innovation hub,” Nov. 13, 2025

    2025

  20. [20]

    How AI & Automation are Shaping Tomorrows GBS Landscape,

    ABSL Portugal, “How AI & Automation are Shaping Tomorrows GBS Landscape,” 2026. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2026. [Online] . Available: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/absl-portugal_how-ai-automation- are-shaping-tomorrows-activity-7404195003419389952-p84y/

    2026

  21. [21]

    Integrati on management-system for technical-information,

    K. Okawa, S. Sato, and T. Haraguchi, “Integrati on management-system for technical-information,” NEC Res. Dev. , vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 205–215, Apr. 1994

    1994

  22. [22]

    Christensen, Digital economics: the digital transformation of global business

    J. Christensen, Digital economics: the digital transformation of global business . Copenhagen: BoD, 2016

    2016

  23. [23]

    Plugge and S

    A. Plugge and S. Nikou, Digitalisation of global business services: orchestrating the enterprise ecosystem . Springer Nature, 2024. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-51528-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51528-6 2024

  24. [24]

    Dig ital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platf orms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods,

    M. Graham, I. Hjorth, and V. Lehdonvirta, “Dig ital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platf orms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods,” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 135–162, May 2017, doi: 10.1177/1024258916687250

    work page doi:10.1177/1024258916687250 2017

  25. [25]

    The global platform economy: a new offshoring instituti on enabling emerging-economy microproviders,

    V. Lehdonvirta, O. Kässi, I. Hjorth, H. Barnar d, and M. Graham, “The global platform economy: a new offshoring instituti on enabling emerging-economy microproviders,” Journal of Management , vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 567–599, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/0149206318786781

    work page doi:10.1177/0149206318786781 2019

  26. [26]

    The global polarisation of remote wor k,

    F. Braesemann, F. Stephany, O. Teutloff, O. Kässi, M. Graham, and V. Lehdonvirta, “The global polarisation of remote wor k,” PLOS ONE , vol. 17, no. 10, p. e0274630, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274630

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274630 2022

  27. [27]

    Digital transformation of global business processes: the ro le of dual embeddedness,

    P. Ekman, P. Thilenius, S. Thompson, and J. Wh itaker, “Digital transformation of global business processes: the ro le of dual embeddedness,” Business Process Management Journal , vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 570–592, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-02-2019-0080

    work page doi:10.1108/bpmj-02-2019-0080 2019

  28. [28]

    Digital Tran sformation and Innovation and Business Ecosystems: A Bibliometric Analysis for Conceptual Insights and Collaborative Practices for Ecosystem Innovation,

    H.-T. Liao, C.-L. Pan, and Z. Wu, “Digital tra nsformation and innovation and business ecosystems: a bibliometric analysis for conceptual insights and collaborative practices for ecosystem innovation,” International Journal of Innovation Studies , p. S2096248724000171, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2024.04.003 2024

  29. [29]

    Roboti c process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?,

    L. Willcocks, M. Lacity, and A. Craig, “Roboti c process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?,” Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17–28, May 2017, doi: 10.1057/s41266-016-0016-9

    work page doi:10.1057/s41266-016-0016-9 2017

  30. [30]

    Integrating culture and tourism: a resilient scale for digital transformation innovation,

    C.-Y. Lin, C. Li, S. Mahmood, F. Guo, and Z. Q ian, “Integrating culture and tourism: a resilient scale for digital transformation innovation,” J. Knowl. Econ. , Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13132-024- 01753-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s13132-024- 2024

  31. [31]

    Research on impact of digit al economy on real economy based on perspective of coupling and coordi nation of manufacturing and service industries,

    F. He and H. Qin, “Research on impact of digit al economy on real economy based on perspective of coupling and coordi nation of manufacturing and service industries,” Sustainability , vol. 17, no. 2, p. 729, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17020729

    work page doi:10.3390/su17020729 2025

  32. [32]

    Robotic automation process - the next major revolution in terms of back office operations improvement,

    S. Anagnoste, “Robotic automation process - the next major revolution in terms of back office operations improvement,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence , Warsaw: De Gruyter Poland Sp Zoo, Jul. 2017, pp. 676–686. doi: 10.1515/picbe-2017-0072

    work page doi:10.1515/picbe-2017-0072 2017

  33. [33]

    External and global, or internal and local? Which main factors shape the organisational culture of shared service centres of transnational corporations in Poland?,

    M. Niewierko, “External and global, or internal and local? Which main factors shape the organisational culture of shared service centres of transnational corporations in Poland?,” E-Mentor , no. 4, pp. 48–59, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Intelligent automation of financ ial and accounting processes in business process outsourcing centers i n Poland,

    K. Szortyka, “Intelligent automation of financ ial and accounting processes in business process outsourcing centers i n Poland,” Zesz. Teor. Rachun. , vol. 48, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.7261

    work page doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.7261 2024

  35. [35]

    Digital transfor mation and corporate performance: evidence from China,

    S. Li, Z. Yang, and Y. Tian, “Digital transfor mation and corporate performance: evidence from China,” China Econ. J. , Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1080/17538963.2023.2254138

    work page doi:10.1080/17538963.2023.2254138 2023

  36. [36]

    The impact of stru ctural upgrading of the service industry on regional ecologicalization effi ciency of industry: empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces,

    C. Fu, C. Luo, and Y. Liu, “The impact of stru ctural upgrading of the service industry on regional ecologicalization effi ciency of industry: empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces,” Heliyon , vol. 10, no. 1, p. e23817, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23817

    work page doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23817 2024

  37. [37]

    The Global Business Services maturity m odel,

    KPMG, “The Global Business Services maturity m odel,” Sep. 2016. Available: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg /xx/ pdf/2016/09/gbs-pov-maturity-model.pdf

    2016

  38. [38]

    Computer world: digital public services and well-being in europe,

    P. E. Martinussen, O. Nordheim, and B. Zyzak, “Computer world: digital public services and well-being in europe,” Inf. Polity , Dec. 2025, doi: 10.1177/15701255251401358

    work page doi:10.1177/15701255251401358 2025

  39. [39]

    Smart di gital platforms for carbon neutral management and services: Business mo dels based on ITU standards for green digital transformation,

    H.-T. Liao, C.-L. Pan, and Y. Zhang, “Smart di gital platforms for carbon neutral management and services: business mo dels based on ITU standards for green digital transformation,” Front. Ecol. Evol. , vol. 11, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1134381

    work page doi:10.3389/fevo.2023.1134381 2023

  40. [40]

    System of Systems - the meaning of of,

    J. Boardman and B. Sauser, “System of Systems - the meaning of of,” in 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering , Apr. 2006, p. 6 pp.-. doi: 10.1109/SYSOSE.2006.1652284

    work page doi:10.1109/sysose.2006.1652284 2006

  41. [41]

    Socio-technical transitions to s ustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Pers pective,

    F. W. Geels, “Socio-technical transitions to s ustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Pers pective,” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability , vol. 39, pp. 187–201, Aug. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009 2019

  42. [42]

    Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy,

    F. Kern, “Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 298–310, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.004 2012

  43. [43]

    Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-level p erspective,

    M. E. Wainstein and A. G. Bumpus, “Business models as drivers of the low carbon power system transition: a multi-level p erspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production , vol. 126, pp. 572–585, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.095

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.095 2016

  44. [44]

    A socio- technical transition path for new energy vehicles in China: A multi-leve l perspective,

    Z. Wu, Q. Shao, Y. Su, and D. Zhang, “A socio- technical transition path for new energy vehicles in China: A multi-leve l perspective,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol. 172, p. 121007, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121007 2021

  45. [45]

    Understanding Nigeria’s transition pathway to carbon neutrality using the Multilevel Perspective,

    C. G. Ogbonna, C. C. Nwachi, I. O. Okeoma, and O. A. Fagbami, “Understanding Nigeria’s transition pathway to carbon neutrality using the Multilevel Perspective,” Carb Neutrality , vol. 2, no. 1, p. 24, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s43979-023-00065-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s43979-023-00065-5 2023

  46. [46]

    Roadmap ping for strategy and innovation,

    R. Phaal, C. Farrukh, and D. Probert, “Roadmap ping for strategy and innovation,” Aligning technology and markets in a dynamic world. University of Cambridge , 2010

    2010

  47. [47]

    Emerging trends in roadmapping research: A bibliom etric literature review,

    S. Vinayavekhin, R. Phaal, T. Thanamaitreejit, and K. Asatani, “Emerging trends in roadmapping research: A bibliom etric literature review,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 558–572, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2021.1979210

    work page doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1979210 2023

  48. [48]

    A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: bib liometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study,

    Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, X. Wang, D. Zhu, and A. L. P orter, “A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: bib liometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study,” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management , vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 707–724, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.803064

    work page doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.803064 2013

  49. [49]

    Integra ting bibliometrics and roadmapping methods: A case of dye-sensitized solar cell technology- based industry in China,

    X. Li, Y. Zhou, L. Xue, and L. Huang, “Integra ting bibliometrics and roadmapping methods: A case of dye-sensitized solar cell technology- based industry in China,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol. 97, pp. 205–222, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.007 2015

  50. [50]

    Technology roadmapping for competitive technical intelligence,

    Y. Zhang, D. K. R. Robinson, A. L. Porter, D. Zhu, G. Zhang, and J. Lu, “Technology roadmapping for competitive technical intelligence,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change , vol. 110, pp. 175–186, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.029 2016

  51. [51]

    How to combine term clumping and technology roadmapping fo r newly emerging science & technology competitive intelligence:

    Y. Zhang, X. Zhou, A. L. Porter, and J. M. V. Gomila, “How to combine term clumping and technology roadmapping fo r newly emerging science & technology competitive intelligence: "problem & solution” pattern based semantic TRIZ tool and case study,” Scientometrics , vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 1375–1389, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1262-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1262-2 2014

  52. [52]

    Knowledge mapping analysis of intelligent ports: research facing global value cha in challenges,

    H.-T. Liao, T.-M. Lo, and C.-L. Pan, “Knowledge mapping analysis of intelligent ports: research facing global value cha in challenges,” Systems , vol. 11, no. 2, p. 88, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/systems11020088

    work page doi:10.3390/systems11020088 2023

  53. [53]

    Knowledg e mapping of resilience and human rights in supply chains: a roadmapping taxonomy for twin green and digital transition design,

    C.-L. Pan, H.-T. Liao, and Y. Zhang, “Knowledg e mapping of resilience and human rights in supply chains: a roadmapping taxonomy for twin green and digital transition design,” Frontiers in Environmental Science , vol. 11, p. 1152345, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1152345

    work page doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1152345 2023

  54. [54]

    Collabor ating on ESG consulting, reporting, and engaging education: Using partner maps for capability building design,

    H.-T. Liao, C.-L. Pan, and Y. Zhang, “Collabor ating on ESG consulting, reporting, and communicating education: using partner maps for capability building design,” Front. Environ. Sci. , vol. 11, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119011

    work page doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1119011 2023

  55. [55]

    Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations,

    J. W. Schneider and P. Borlund, “Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri: Methodical considerations,” Journal of Documentation , vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 524–549, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1108/00220410410560609

    work page doi:10.1108/00220410410560609 2004

  56. [56]

    bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,

    M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics , 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

    work page doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007 2017

  57. [57]

    Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools,

    M. J. Cobo, A. G. Lopez-Herrera, E. Herrera-Vi edma, and F. Herrera, “Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. , vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1382–1402, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1002/asi.21525

    work page doi:10.1002/asi.21525 2011

  58. [58]

    Orchestrating sustaina ble AI and semiconductor ecosystems: RegTech and FinTech frameworks,

    H.-T. Liao and K. Ang, “Orchestrating sustaina ble AI and semiconductor ecosystems: RegTech and FinTech frameworks,” 2026, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DPJYN

    work page doi:10.17605/osf.io/dpjyn 2026