pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27049 · v1 · pith:G22CH3LRnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Quintom Model Perturbations

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords quintom modeldark energy perturbationsphantom crossingmatter power spectrumintegrated Sachs-Wolfe effectBayesian analysiscosmological data
0
0 comments X

The pith

A two-scalar-field quintom model reproduces w0waCDM features of phantom-to-quintessence crossing and is mildly favoured by BAO, CMB and supernova data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the linear perturbation equations for a previously proposed two-scalar-field quintom framework that produces a natural transition from phantom to quintessence dark energy. It demonstrates that the resulting model matches the matter power spectrum suppressions and late-time Integrated Sachs-Wolfe enhancements characteristic of w0waCDM cosmologies with such crossings. Bayesian fits to BAO, CMB and Type Ia supernova data indicate the quintom model is mildly preferred over the standard w0waCDM parametrization while reproducing observed physical trends.

Core claim

We show that the quintom model is able to reproduce the phenomenological features of a w0waCDM cosmology with phantom-to-quintessence crossing, including suppressions in the matter power spectrum and enhancements to the late-time Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Bayesian analysis of the quintom framework with BAO, CMB and Type 1a supernovae data finds that it is mildly favoured over the standard w0waCDM parametrisation, while successfully reproducing physical trends observed in the data.

What carries the argument

The linear perturbation equations derived from the two-scalar-field quintom framework, which govern the evolution of density and velocity perturbations across the phantom divide.

If this is right

  • The model produces suppressions in the matter power spectrum matching phantom-to-quintessence crossing.
  • It generates enhancements to the late-time Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect.
  • Bayesian analysis mildly favours the quintom framework over w0waCDM.
  • The model reproduces physical trends seen in BAO, CMB and supernova data.
  • Parameter degeneracies can be examined to guide future observations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Higher-precision measurements of structure growth could break degeneracies and distinguish the quintom model from other dynamical dark energy parametrizations.
  • The framework supplies an explicit field-theoretic realization of crossing rather than an effective equation-of-state description.
  • Future surveys targeting the ISW effect at late times may provide independent tests of the perturbation predictions.

Load-bearing premise

The linear perturbation equations remain valid on the scales probed by current data without higher-order or instability effects altering the power spectrum and ISW signatures.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the matter power spectrum or late-time ISW effect that shows neither the predicted suppression nor enhancement relative to a non-crossing model would contradict the reproduction of w0waCDM features.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27049 by A. N. Taylor, L. W. K. Goh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: plot of the Hubble function assuming a ΛCDM (pink), quintom (blue) or w0waCDM (olive) model (top panel), and its ratio with respect to the ΛCDM model (bottom panel). Middle: plot of the evolution of the equation of state parameter w. Right: plot of the dark energy density ρDE in solid lines, and the matter energy density ρm is dashed lines. We focus on the redshift range of 0 < z < 3.5 probed by the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ratio of the evolution of matter perturbations δρm for a w0waCDM model (olive) and a quintom model (blue) with respect to ΛCDM at different k scales, k = {5 × 10−4 , 1 × 10−2 , 1 × 10−1 } /Mpc. Note that the oscillations at low k arise from numerical errors due to redshift interpolation. For a phantom field ψ, the relevant equations are δρψ = − 1 a 2  ψ¯ ′ δψ′ − ψ¯ ′2 Ψ  + Vψ δψ , (22) δpψ = − 1 a 2  ψ¯… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top: The dark energy fluid density perturbations δρDE in a w0waCDM (olive) and a quintom model (yellow: quintessence field contribution, blue: phantom field contribution), for k scales of k = 0.0005/Mpc (left, solid lines), k = 0.01/Mpc (middle, dashed dotted lines) and k = 0.1/Mpc (right, dashed lines). Bottom: similar plot for the pressure perturbations δpDE. 10 3 10 2 10 1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 z 0.2… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of the evolution of the gravitation potentials Φ + Ψ at increasing scales from left to right. The top panels show their absolute magnitude for the three cosmological models: ΛCDM (pink), quintom (blue) and w0waCDM (olive). In the bottom panels we plot their ratios with respect to the ΛCDM model, particularly focusing on the low redshift range of 0 < z < 6. Note the different scales used for the redshi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plot of the CMB power spectrum C T T ℓ , where we plot the total lensed spectrum and isolate the late-time ISW contribution for the three mod￾els. The inset plot shows a zoom-in at the large scales of 2 ≤ ℓ ≤ 10, where we include the C T T ℓ data points from Planck 2018. equation, Eq. (3). Consequently, H0 is treated as a derived parame￾ter rather than an independently sampled one in a quintom model. Throu… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: 2D marginalised posterior distributions of the cosmological parameters for the w0waCDM parameterisation (red) and the quintom model (blue), for a DESI+CMB+DESY5 dataset. We denote the MAP values of the quintom model parameters in grey dashed lines. 5.2 Parameter Degeneracies in a Quintom Model As highlighted at the beginning of this section, the quintom param￾eter space exhibits a number of interesting deg… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 2D marginalised posterior distributions of the cosmological parameters for the w0waCDM parameterisation (orange) and the quintom model (green), for a DESI+CMB+Pantheon+ dataset. We denote the MAP values of the quintom model parameters in grey dashed lines. more rapidly along the potential. However, from the approximate relation wquintom ≈ −1 + 2ϵ , the crossing behaviour is determined mainly by the ratio b… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ratio of the transverse comoving BAO distance for the best-fit model of each cosmology (quintom or w0waCDM) and dataset combination (DESY5 or Pantheon+) relative to the fiducial value, (DM/rd)/(D fid M /r fid d ) (left panel), where the fiducial cosmology is taken to be the Planck 2018 ΛCDM best-fit model (Planck Collaboration et al. 2020). Filled grey points show the DESI BAO measurements (corresponding t… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plot of the distance modulus residuals as a function of redshift, assuming Planck 2018 ΛCDM fiducial cosmology, using the best-fit values for each model (quintom in solid or w0waCDM in dash-dot) and dataset (top: DESY5, bottom: Pantheon+). We plot the binned residuals of the SNe1a data, following the methodology highlighted in Sect. IV C of DESI Collaboration et al. (2025), where the vertical grey lines d… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Plot of (clockwise from top left): (DM/rd)/(D fid M /r fid d ), (DH/rd)/(D fid H /r fid d ), µ − µ fid and (DV /rd)/(D fid V /r fid d ) for the two parameter sets with similar log-likelihood values (blue and orange). We plot the DESI BAO data points in grey squares, and the binned DESY5 SNe1a data in grey circles. 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 / 1 2 3 4 5 6 V [ m 2P / M p c 2 ] 1e 8 10 2 10 0 10 2 10… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Top left: Plot of the potential V(ϕ/ψ) for the two parameter sets (blue and orange). We also plot the starting (in squares) and ending (in cir￾cles) points of the ϕ (points with no border) and ψ (points with black edges) field as they evolve along the potential. Clockwise from top right: Plot of the evolutions of the scalar field energy densities ρϕ/ψ(z), the potential V(z), and their speeds X(z). We plot… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We build upon the work of Goh and Taylor 2025, in which we proposed a two scalar field quintom framework capable of naturally realising a phantom-to-quintessence transition in the dark energy equation of state. In this work, we derive the linear perturbation equations of our model and investigate its implications for large scale structure formation. We show that the quintom model is able to reproduce the phenomenological features of a w0waCDM cosmology with phantom-to-quintessence crossing, including suppressions in the matter power spectrum and enhancements to the late-time Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. We then perform a Bayesian analysis of the quintom framework with BAO, CMB and Type 1a supernovae data, finding that it is mildly favoured over the standard w0waCDM parametrisation, while successfully reproducing physical trends observed in the data. We further examine the parameter degeneracies inherent to the model and discuss prospective observational strategies for distinguishing quintom cosmologies from conventional dynamical dark energy models given current and future data precision.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the authors' prior two-scalar-field quintom framework (Goh & Taylor 2025) by deriving linear perturbation equations. It claims the model reproduces w0waCDM phenomenological features, specifically suppressions in the matter power spectrum and enhancements to the late-time Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, and reports a Bayesian analysis using BAO, CMB, and Type Ia supernovae data that finds the quintom model mildly favored over standard w0waCDM while reproducing observed trends.

Significance. If the perturbation equations remain stable across the w = -1 crossing, the work supplies a concrete scalar-field realization of dynamical dark energy capable of phantom-to-quintessence transitions, with direct implications for large-scale structure observables. The reported Bayesian preference, if robust to prior choices and parameter counting, would motivate targeted searches for crossing signatures in upcoming surveys.

major comments (2)
  1. [Perturbation derivation section] Perturbation derivation section (as described in the abstract): the linear perturbation equations are presented without explicit verification that the effective sound speed squared remains positive throughout the phantom-to-quintessence crossing on the scales relevant to BAO, CMB, and matter power spectrum calculations. Quintom constructions with a phantom field are susceptible to gradient instabilities when w crosses -1; absence of this check undermines the reliability of the claimed power-spectrum suppression and ISW enhancement.
  2. [Bayesian analysis section] Bayesian analysis section: the mild preference over w0waCDM is obtained within a parameter space whose mapping and priors are inherited from the self-cited 2025 paper. The manuscript does not quantify how the additional degrees of freedom in the two-field model affect the evidence ratio or demonstrate that the reported preference survives marginalization over the extra parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'Type 1a supernovae' should read 'Type Ia supernovae'.
  2. The specific BAO and CMB datasets (e.g., DESI, Planck, SDSS) and the precise likelihood implementations should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point-by-point below, providing our responses and indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Perturbation derivation section] Perturbation derivation section (as described in the abstract): the linear perturbation equations are presented without explicit verification that the effective sound speed squared remains positive throughout the phantom-to-quintessence crossing on the scales relevant to BAO, CMB, and matter power spectrum calculations. Quintom constructions with a phantom field are susceptible to gradient instabilities when w crosses -1; absence of this check undermines the reliability of the claimed power-spectrum suppression and ISW enhancement.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of c_s^2 > 0 is necessary to confirm the absence of gradient instabilities. While the two-field quintom construction in our framework is designed such that the effective sound speed remains positive by virtue of the potential form and field evolution (as established in the 2025 precursor paper), the current manuscript does not include a dedicated check or plot for the relevant scales. In the revised version, we will add an explicit calculation and accompanying discussion or figure verifying that the effective sound speed squared stays positive throughout the crossing for wavenumbers relevant to BAO, CMB, and the matter power spectrum. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Bayesian analysis section] Bayesian analysis section: the mild preference over w0waCDM is obtained within a parameter space whose mapping and priors are inherited from the self-cited 2025 paper. The manuscript does not quantify how the additional degrees of freedom in the two-field model affect the evidence ratio or demonstrate that the reported preference survives marginalization over the extra parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would be strengthened by a more explicit quantification of how the additional degrees of freedom influence the Bayesian evidence. The reported mild preference was obtained from the full two-field parameter space (with priors carried over from the 2025 work), so the evidence ratio already incorporates the extra parameters. Nevertheless, to address the referee's point directly, we will expand the Bayesian section in revision to include a dedicated discussion and, where feasible, additional results showing the sensitivity of the evidence ratio to the extra parameters and confirming that the preference holds under marginalization. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper cites its own prior 2025 work solely to define the background quintom model and then derives new linear perturbation equations from it. It demonstrates phenomenological reproduction of w0waCDM features via those equations and conducts an independent Bayesian fit to BAO+CMB+SNIa data. Neither the perturbation derivation nor the data-driven likelihood comparison reduces to a fitted input, self-defined quantity, or unverified self-citation chain; the central results rest on explicit new calculations and external observations rather than by-construction equivalence to prior inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the two-scalar-field quintom background from the authors' 2025 paper, standard linear cosmological perturbation theory, and the assumption that the chosen data sets (BAO, CMB, SNIa) are sufficient to distinguish the model without unaccounted systematics.

free parameters (1)
  • quintom model parameters
    Parameters controlling the two scalar fields and their potentials are varied in the Bayesian analysis and fitted to data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory is valid on the scales relevant to BAO, CMB, and large-scale structure observations.
    Invoked when deriving the perturbation equations and comparing to data.
  • domain assumption The quintom framework from Goh and Taylor 2025 provides a stable background evolution through the phantom divide.
    The perturbation analysis builds directly on that prior construction.
invented entities (1)
  • two scalar fields in the quintom model no independent evidence
    purpose: To realize a phantom-to-quintessence transition in dark energy.
    Introduced in the 2025 precursor paper; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the current work is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5704 in / 1619 out tokens · 55472 ms · 2026-06-26T04:09:26.826269+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · 84 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A short review on Quintom dark energy theory

    A short review on Quintom dark energy theory. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.01360 , archivePrefix =. 2606.01360 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    Constraints on Horndeski Gravity with Phantom Crossing

    Constraints on Horndeski Gravity with Phantom Crossing. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.20794 , archivePrefix =. 2606.20794 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    Data-Driven Discovery of a Simple Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy Parametrization

    Data-Driven Discovery of a Simple Phantom-Crossing Dark Energy Parametrization. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2606.17951 , archivePrefix =. 2606.17951 , primaryClass =

  4. [4]

    Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era

    Constraints on Coupled Dark Energy in the DESI Era. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.12032 , archivePrefix =. 2604.12032 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    A Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cosmological Constant and Late-time Cosmic Acceleration

    Dynamical Solution to the Problem of a Small Cosmological Constant and Late-Time Cosmic Acceleration. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4438 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0004134 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    CosmoSIS: modular cosmological parameter estimation

    CosmoSIS: Modular cosmological parameter estimation. Astronomy and Computing , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2015.05.005 , archivePrefix =. 1409.3409 , primaryClass =

  7. [7]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and its Implications for Structure Growth

    Qu, Frank J. and others. The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Measurement of the DR6 CMB Lensing Power Spectrum and Its Implications for Structure Growth. Astrophys. J. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acfe06. arXiv:2304.05202

  8. [8]

    Thermalisation of sterile neutrinos in the early Universe in the 3+1 scheme with full mixing matrix

    Thermalisation of sterile neutrinos in the early universe in the 3+1 scheme with full mixing matrix. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/014 , archivePrefix =. 1905.11290 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    Fast test to assess the impact of marginalization in Monte Carlo analyses and its application to cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.063506 , archivePrefix =. 2203.16285 , primaryClass =

  10. [10]

    Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?

    Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.083507 , archivePrefix =. 2001.02451 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Crossing the phantom divide in scalar-tensor and vector-tensor theories. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.17231 , archivePrefix =. 2508.17231 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Phantom Crossing and Oscillating Dark Energy with F(R) Gravity. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2506.21010 , archivePrefix =. 2506.21010 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    Can recent DESI BAO measurements accommodate a negative cosmological constant?

    Can recent DESI BAO measurements accommodate a negative cosmological constant?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L061306 , archivePrefix =. 2406.03395 , primaryClass =

  14. [14]

    Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence

    Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by non-minimally coupled quintessence. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2508.01759 , archivePrefix =. 2508.01759 , primaryClass =

  15. [15]

    Physics Letters B , keywords =

    Effective phantom divide crossing with standard and negative quintessence. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140096 , archivePrefix =. 2508.00621 , primaryClass =

  16. [16]

    International Journal of Theoretical Physics , keywords =

    Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/BF01807638 , adsurl =

  17. [17]

    , keywords =

    KiDS-1000 methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038831 , archivePrefix =. 2007.01844 , primaryClass =

  18. [18]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2105.13548 , archivePrefix =. 2105.13548 , primaryClass =

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Cosmology with the EFTofLSS and BOSS: dark energy constraints and a note on priors. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/01/028 , archivePrefix =. 2207.14784 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    PolyChord: next-generation nested sampling

    POLYCHORD: next-generation nested sampling. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1911 , archivePrefix =. 1506.00171 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    On the road to per cent accuracy IV: ReACT - computing the non-linear power spectrum beyond CDM. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2696 , archivePrefix =. 2005.12184 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acff5f , archivePrefix =. 2304.05203 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps

    CMB lensing from Planck PR4 maps. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/039 , archivePrefix =. 2206.07773 , primaryClass =

  24. [24]

    PolyChord: nested sampling for cosmology

    polychord: nested sampling for cosmology. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv047 , archivePrefix =. 1502.01856 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes

    The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2011/07/034 , archivePrefix =. 1104.2933 , primaryClass =

  26. [26]

    , keywords =

    Phantom crossing with quintom models. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1927 , archivePrefix =. 2509.12335 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Assessing cosmological evidence for non-minimal coupling. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.07679 , archivePrefix =. 2504.07679 , primaryClass =

  28. [28]

    Breaking a Dark Degeneracy with Gravitational Waves

    Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/031 , archivePrefix =. 1509.08458 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    Essentials of k-essence

    Essentials of k-essence. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.103510 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0006373 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    Cosmological consequences of a rolling homogeneous scalar field , author =. Phys. Rev. D , volume =. 1988 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.3406 , url =

  31. [31]

    Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry

    Cosmology and the fate of dilatation symmetry. Nuclear Physics B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90193-9 , archivePrefix =. 1711.03844 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.896 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9807002 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    Cosmological Tracking Solutions

    Cosmological tracking solutions. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.123504 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9812313 , primaryClass =

  34. [34]

    The dS/CFT Correspondence and the Big Smash

    The dS/CFT Correspondence and the Big Smash. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/029 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0112066 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    Super-Acceleration from Massless, Minimally Coupled $\phi^4$

    Super-acceleration from massless, minimally coupled ^ 4. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/17/311 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/0204065 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    Quantum effects can render w<-1 on cosmological scales

    Quantum effects can render w<-1 on cosmological scales. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.107301 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/0406098 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    Exactly Solvable SFT Inspired Phantom Model

    Exact solution in a string cosmological model. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s11232-006-0086-5 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0412619 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    Time Lumps in Nonlocal Stringy Models and Cosmological Applications

    Time lumps in nonlocal stringy models and cosmological applications. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/087 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0504200 , primaryClass =

  39. [39]

    Phantom Matter and the Cosmological Constant

    Phantom Matter and the Cosmological Constant. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0302199 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0302199 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    The Tensor to Scalar Ratio of Phantom Dark Energy Models

    Tensor to scalar ratio of phantom dark energy models. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043514 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104112 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Phantom cosmologies

    Phantom cosmologies. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.103519 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0307128 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    Cosmological Dynamics of Phantom Field

    Cosmological dynamics of a phantom field. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023522 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0305110 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    Quantum deSitter cosmology and phantom matter

    Quantum de Sitter cosmology and phantom matter. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00594-X , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0303117 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations

    Quintom cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.04.001 , archivePrefix =. 0909.2776 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    Nature Astronomy 2:652–655

    Cosmic structure growth and dark energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07112.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0305286 , primaryClass =

  46. [46]

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe

    Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0208512 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    Uncorrelated Estimates of Dark Energy Evolution

    Uncorrelated estimates of dark energy evolution. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.023506 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0404062 , primaryClass =

  48. [48]

    Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy

    Crossing the phantom divide with parametrized post-Friedmann dark energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.087303 , archivePrefix =. 0808.3125 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity

    Parametrized post-Friedmann framework for modified gravity. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.104043 , archivePrefix =. 0708.1190 , primaryClass =

  50. [50]

    Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data

    Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscillation and DES Supernovae Data. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad87f0 , archivePrefix =. 2407.14934 , primaryClass =

  51. [51]

    , keywords =

    Interpreting DESI's evidence for evolving dark energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/12/007 , archivePrefix =. 2404.08056 , primaryClass =

  52. [52]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Gaussian-process reconstructions and model building of quintom dark energy from latest cosmological observations. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.18336 , archivePrefix =. 2501.18336 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Interacting dark energy after DESI DR2: a challenge for Λ CDM paradigm?. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.00994 , archivePrefix =. 2504.00994 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Dark Energy within the Generalized Uncertainty Principle in Light of DESI DR2. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.20896 , archivePrefix =. 2503.20896 , primaryClass =

  55. [55]

    Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data

    Non-minimally coupled gravity constraints from DESI DR2 data. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.19898 , archivePrefix =. 2503.19898 , primaryClass =

  56. [56]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter. International Journal of Modern Physics D , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822 , archivePrefix =. gr-qc/0009008 , primaryClass =

  57. [57]

    Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =

    Cosmic clues: DESI, dark energy, and the cosmological constant problem. Journal of High Energy Physics , keywords =. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)327 , archivePrefix =. 2404.06444 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements

    Extended Dark Energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.14743 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14743 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data

    Modified gravity interpretation of the evolving dark energy in light of DESI data. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123524 , archivePrefix =. 2407.02558 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =

    f(T) gravity after DESI Baryon acoustic oscillation and DES supernovae 2024 data. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.05.005 , archivePrefix =. 2405.00608 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.14738 , archivePrefix =. 2503.14738 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2

    The Quintom theory of dark energy after DESI DR2. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.24732 , archivePrefix =. 2505.24732 , primaryClass =

  63. [63]

    Crossing the Phantom Divide: Dark Energy Internal Degrees of Freedom

    Crossing the phantom divide: Dark energy internal degrees of freedom. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.047301 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410680 , primaryClass =

  64. [64]

    Cosmological evolution of a quintom model of dark energy. Phys. Lett. B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.017 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0410654 , primaryClass =

  65. [65]

    A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state. Phys. Lett. B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02589-3 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9908168 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    Phantom Energy and Cosmic Doomsday

    Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with w<-1 Causes a Cosmic Doomsday. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.071301 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0302506 , primaryClass =

  67. [67]

    Crossing the Phantom Divide

    Crossing the phantom divide. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.123503 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0609040 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    Constraints on the Sound Speed of Dynamical Dark Energy

    Constraints on the Sound Speed of Dynamical Dark Energy. International Journal of Modern Physics D , keywords =. doi:10.1142/S0218271808012784 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0703202 , primaryClass =

  69. [69]

    How to Test Stringy Dark Energy?

    How to test stringy dark energy?. Physics Letters B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00055-8 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0209037 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    Braneworld models of dark energy

    Braneworld models of dark energy. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2003/11/014 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202346 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    Hessence: A New View of Quintom Dark Energy

    Hessence: a new view of quintom dark energy. Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/22/16/005 , archivePrefix =. hep-th/0501160 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    The phantom menaced: constraints on low-energy effective ghosts

    The phantom menaced: Constraints on low-energy effective ghosts. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043543 , archivePrefix =. hep-ph/0311312 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    Kinetically Driven Quintessence

    Kinetically driven quintessence. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.023511 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9912463 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    Can dark energy evolve to the Phantom?

    Can dark energy evolve to the phantom?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.023515 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0407107 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    Dark-Energy Evolution Across the Cosmological-Constant Boundary

    Dark-energy evolution across the cosmological-constant boundary. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043527 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0501104 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1?

    Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1?. , keywords =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.68.023509 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0301273 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 , archivePrefix =. 1807.06209 , primaryClass =

  78. [78]

    Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova. Phys. Lett. B , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0404224 , primaryClass =

  79. [79]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Modified gravity realizations of quintom dark energy after DESI DR2. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2504.06784 , archivePrefix =. 2504.06784 , primaryClass =

  80. [80]

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges

    Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/176550 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9506072 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.