Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Agent Planning with World Knowledge Model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14205 v4 pith:3HZSMXNY submitted 2024-05-23 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.MA

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CVcs.LGcs.MA
keywords knowledgeplanningagentmodelworldtaskgloballocal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent endeavors towards directly using large language models (LLMs) as agent models to execute interactive planning tasks have shown commendable results. Despite their achievements, however, they still struggle with brainless trial-and-error in global planning and generating hallucinatory actions in local planning due to their poor understanding of the ``real'' physical world. Imitating humans' mental world knowledge model which provides global prior knowledge before the task and maintains local dynamic knowledge during the task, in this paper, we introduce parametric World Knowledge Model (WKM) to facilitate agent planning. Concretely, we steer the agent model to self-synthesize knowledge from both expert and sampled trajectories. Then we develop WKM, providing prior task knowledge to guide the global planning and dynamic state knowledge to assist the local planning. Experimental results on three complex real-world simulated datasets with three state-of-the-art open-source LLMs, Mistral-7B, Gemma-7B, and Llama-3-8B, demonstrate that our method can achieve superior performance compared to various strong baselines. Besides, we analyze to illustrate that our WKM can effectively alleviate the blind trial-and-error and hallucinatory action issues, providing strong support for the agent's understanding of the world. Other interesting findings include: 1) our instance-level task knowledge can generalize better to unseen tasks, 2) weak WKM can guide strong agent model planning, and 3) unified WKM training has promising potential for further development. The code is available at https://github.com/zjunlp/WKM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Training LLM-Based Agents with Synthetic Self-Reflected Trajectories and Partial Masking

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new agent-training method combining teacher-generated self-reflection corrections with partial masking of error steps improves open-source LLM agents on ALFWorld, WebShop, and SciWorld.

  2. SOP-Agent: Empower General Purpose AI Agent with Domain-Specific SOPs

    cs.AI 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A decision-graph SOP navigator guides LLM agents through branching and looping workflows, with reported gains on household tasks, code generation, data cleaning, and a new customer-service benchmark.

  3. AgentRefine: Enhancing Agent Generalization through Refinement Tuning

    cs.AI 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Training LLM agents on synthetic trajectories that include mistake-and-refinement steps improves generalization to unseen agent environments.

  4. Quo Vadis, World Modeling?

    cs.CV 2026-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An agent-centric reframing of world modeling, replacing physical state prediction with 'information transitions' organized into six proxy functions and three empowerment levels.

  5. InstructRAG: Leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Instruction Graphs for LLM-Based Task Planning

    cs.AI 2025-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    InstructRAG combines instruction paths from a graph via reinforcement learning and meta-learned selection, reporting relative gains of 2 to 25 percent over its chosen baselines across four LLM planning benchmarks.

Pith tools