The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2504.11543 · v2 · pith:7AUNQAIW · submitted 2025-04-15 · cs.AI

REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites

Reviewed by Pithpith:7AUNQAIWopen to challenge →

classification cs.AI
keywords realagentevaluationframeworkdeterministictaskswebsitesautonomous
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We introduce REAL, a benchmark and framework for multi-turn agent evaluations on deterministic simulations of real-world websites. REAL comprises high-fidelity, deterministic replicas of 11 widely-used websites across domains such as e-commerce, travel, communication, and professional networking. We also release a benchmark consisting of 112 practical tasks that mirror everyday complex user interactions requiring both accurate information retrieval and state-changing actions. All interactions occur within this fully controlled setting, eliminating safety risks and enabling robust, reproducible evaluation of agent capability and reliability. Our novel evaluation framework combines programmatic checks of website state for action-based tasks with rubric-guided LLM-based judgments for information retrieval. The framework supports both open-source and proprietary agent systems through a flexible evaluation harness that accommodates black-box commands within browser environments, allowing research labs to test agentic systems without modification. Our empirical results show that frontier language models achieve at most a 41% success rate on REAL, highlighting critical gaps in autonomous web navigation and task completion capabilities. Our framework supports easy integration of new tasks, reproducible evaluation, and scalable post-training data generation, marking a significant step forward in evaluating and advancing agent capabilities.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HealthAdminBench: Evaluating Computer-Use Agents on Healthcare Administration Tasks

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    HealthAdminBench evaluates LLM computer-use agents on healthcare admin tasks and finds only 36.3% end-to-end success for the best agent despite 82.8% subtask success, revealing a substantial reliability gap.

  2. MobiBench: Multi-Branch, Modular Benchmark for Mobile GUI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-12 accept novelty 8.0

    MobiBench is the first modular multi-path offline benchmark for mobile GUI agents, achieving 94.72% agreement with human evaluators while allowing component-level analysis.

  3. Agent Meltdowns: The Road to Hell Is Paved with Helpful Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper defines accidental meltdowns as unsafe agent behavior triggered by benign errors and reports that such meltdowns occur in 64.7% of evaluated rollouts across GPT, Grok, and Gemini agents.

  4. FlowEval: Reference-based Evaluation of Generated User Interfaces

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FlowEval evaluates generated UIs by measuring how closely their navigation flows match real websites via reference-based similarity metrics and shows strong correlation with human expert judgments.

  5. ClawBench: Can AI Agents Complete Everyday Online Tasks?

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ClawBench is a benchmark of 153 live-web tasks where AI agents achieve low success rates, e.g. 33.3% for Claude Sonnet 4.6.

  6. MCP vs RAG vs NLWeb vs HTML: A Comparison of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Different Agent Interfaces to the Web (Technical Report)

    cs.CL 2025-11 accept novelty 7.0

    RAG, MCP, and NLWeb interfaces let LLM web agents achieve higher F1 scores (0.75-0.77 vs 0.67) and much lower token usage and runtime than HTML in controlled e-commerce tasks.

  7. WebMall -- A Multi-Shop Benchmark for Evaluating Web Agents

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    WebMall is the first offline multi-shop benchmark for evaluating LLM web agents on complex comparison shopping tasks across heterogeneous product data from multiple simulated e-shops.

  8. Uncertainty Decomposition for Clarification Seeking in LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A prompt-based uncertainty decomposition separates action confidence from request uncertainty to enable clarification seeking in LLM agents, yielding F1 gains of 73% and 36% over baselines on two new underspecified be...

  9. Signal-Driven Observation for Long-Horizon Web Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Signal-Driven Observation decouples observation from action frequency in long-horizon web agents by invoking selective task-relevant DOM reads only on signals such as URL changes or action failures.

  10. Computer Use at the Edge of the Statistical Precipice

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A blind replay script matches frontier model performance on static CUA benchmarks due to non-principled environments and evaluation methods, prompting PRISM design principles and the DigiWorld benchmark with improved ...

  11. AgentFloor: How Far Up the tool use Ladder Can Small Open-Weight Models Go?

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Small open-weight models match GPT-5 on routine agent tool-use tasks but lag on long-horizon planning, supporting tiered routing to reduce costs in agentic systems.

  12. WebFactory: Automated Compression of Foundational Language Intelligence into Grounded Web Agents

    cs.AI 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    WebFactory is a fully automated RL pipeline that compresses LLM-encoded internet knowledge into grounded web agents, achieving performance comparable to human-annotated training but using synthetic data from only 10 websites.

  13. Real-Time Procedural Learning From Experience for AI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    PRAXIS enables AI agents to acquire procedural knowledge in real time by indexing and retrieving state-action-result experiences, leading to better accuracy, reliability, and efficiency on web browsing benchmarks.