pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.14728 · v1 · pith:BP5FF4KTnew · submitted 2024-10-16 · 💻 cs.CR · cs.AI· cs.MA

Security Threats in Agentic AI System

classification 💻 cs.CR cs.AIcs.MA
keywords agenticdatasecuritysystemsystemsaccessthreatsvulnerabilities
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This research paper explores the privacy and security threats posed to an Agentic AI system with direct access to database systems. Such access introduces significant risks, including unauthorized retrieval of sensitive information, potential exploitation of system vulnerabilities, and misuse of personal or confidential data. The complexity of AI systems combined with their ability to process and analyze large volumes of data increases the chances of data leaks or breaches, which could occur unintentionally or through adversarial manipulation. Furthermore, as AI agents evolve with greater autonomy, their capacity to bypass or exploit security measures becomes a growing concern, heightening the need to address these critical vulnerabilities in agentic systems.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Feedback-Normalized Developer Memory for Reinforcement-Learning Coding Agents: A Safety-Gated MCP Architecture

    cs.SE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RL Developer Memory is a feedback-normalized, safety-gated memory architecture for RL coding agents that logs contextual decisions and applies conservative off-policy gates to maintain 80% decision accuracy and full h...

  2. Why Trust Your Agent? Empirical Security Gains from TRiSM-Guided Agentic Workflows in Healthcare

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    TRiSM-guided agentic workflows reduced RAG poisoning attack success from 31% to 10%, data-field injection from 42% to 25%, eliminated network injection, and raised report accuracy from 72.5% to 86.5% across five LLMs ...