Pith. sign in

REVIEW 23 cited by

Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2508.09726 v1 pith:EMBLYIJF submitted 2025-08-13 cs.CL cs.LG

Sample More to Think Less: Group Filtered Policy Optimization for Concise Reasoning

classification cs.CL cs.LG
keywords accuracygfpolengthtokentrainingdifficultyefficiencyfiltered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models trained with reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards tend to trade accuracy for length--inflating response lengths to achieve gains in accuracy. While longer answers may be warranted for harder problems, many tokens are merely "filler": repetitive, verbose text that makes no real progress. We introduce GFPO (Group Filtered Policy Optimization), which curbs this length explosion by sampling larger groups per problem during training and filtering responses to train on based on two key metrics: (1) response length and (2) token efficiency: reward per token ratio. By sampling more at training time, we teach models to think less at inference time. On the Phi-4-reasoning model, GFPO cuts GRPO's length inflation by 46-71% across challenging STEM and coding benchmarks (AIME 24/25, GPQA, Omni-MATH, LiveCodeBench) while maintaining accuracy. Optimizing for reward per token further increases reductions in length inflation to 71-85%. We also propose Adaptive Difficulty GFPO, which dynamically allocates more training resources to harder problems based on real-time difficulty estimates, improving the balance between computational efficiency and accuracy especially on difficult questions. GFPO demonstrates that increased training-time compute directly translates to reduced test-time compute--a simple yet effective trade-off for efficient reasoning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 23 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cross-Epoch Adaptive Rollout Optimization for RL Post-Training

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CERO uses Beta posteriors and Fenchel-dual online optimization to adaptively allocate a fixed rollout budget across prompts and epochs in LLM RL, outperforming fixed-allocation GRPO on math reasoning benchmarks.

  2. LEAD: Length-Efficient Adaptive and Dynamic Reasoning for Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LEAD uses online adaptive mechanisms including Potential-Scaled Instability and symmetric efficiency rewards based on correct rollouts to achieve higher accuracy-efficiency scores with substantially shorter reasoning ...

  3. CoDistill-GRPO: A Co-Distillation Recipe for Efficient Group Relative Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CoDistill-GRPO lets small and large models mutually improve via co-distillation in GRPO, raising small-model math accuracy by over 11 points while cutting large-model training time by about 18%.

  4. Post Reasoning: Improving the Performance of Non-Thinking Models at No Cost

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 7.0

    Post-Reasoning boosts LLM accuracy by reversing the usual answer-after-reasoning order, delivering mean relative gains of 17.37% across 117 model-benchmark pairs with zero extra cost.

  5. Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    This survey introduces the Generate-Filter-Control-Replay (GFCR) taxonomy to structure rollout pipelines for RL-based post-training of reasoning LLMs.

  6. Right Makes Might: Aligning Verified Hidden States Empowers RL Reasoning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Hidden-Align adds an auxiliary loss to align hidden states of correct reasoning paths at the pre-answer token in RLVR, improving pass@1 by 3.8-6.2 points over DAPO on eight math benchmarks for Qwen3 models of 1.7B-14B scale.

  7. Spend Your Rollouts Where It Counts: Rollout Allocation for Group-Based RL Post-Training

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Pilot-Commit estimates per-prompt informativeness via a pilot stage and skips low-variance prompts, matching baseline accuracy with up to 4.0x fewer cumulative rollouts than DAPO on math reasoning tasks.

  8. MEMENTO: Teaching LLMs to Manage Their Own Context

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MEMENTO trains LLMs to segment reasoning into blocks, generate mementos as dense summaries, and reason forward using only mementos and KV states, cutting peak KV cache by ~2.5x while preserving benchmark accuracy.

  9. Rubrics to Tokens: Bridging Response-level Rubrics and Token-level Rewards in Instruction Following Tasks

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RTT bridges response-level rubrics to token-level rewards via a relevance discriminator and intra-sample group normalization, yielding higher instruction and rubric accuracy than baselines.

  10. On the Optimal Reasoning Length for RL-Trained Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    For RL-trained language models, reasoning accuracy peaks at an intermediate output length; longer outputs mainly add dispersion around an improving mode, while too-short outputs under-think.

  11. GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization

    cs.CL 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GDPO decouples per-reward normalization in multi-reward RL to avoid advantage collapse and improve convergence over GRPO on tool-calling, math, and coding tasks.

  12. Learning to Reason Efficiently with Discounted Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Discounted correctness rewards in GRPO post-training shorten LLM reasoning traces by roughly 13-40% while matching pass@1 accuracy, supported by Blackwell-optimality analysis for restricted policy classes.

  13. Entropy After </Think> for reasoning model early exiting

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Entropy After </Think> (EAT) enables early exiting in reasoning LLMs by tracking entropy stabilization after a </think> token, cutting token use 12-22% on MATH500 and AIME2025 with no accuracy loss.

  14. SimpleTIR: End-to-End Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Turn Tool-Integrated Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Filtering out trajectories with 'void turns' (no code, no answer) stabilizes multi-turn tool-integrated RL and substantially improves math reasoning benchmarks.

  15. Modularized Reinforcement Learning on LLMs: From MDP Creation to Exploration and Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Survey mapping RL techniques onto LLM training and highlighting gaps in value-based, off-policy, and bootstrapping methods.

  16. Masked Distillation: Internalizing the Chain-of-Thought in Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    Masked distillation shows a student LLM can internalize its teacher's chain-of-thought on GSM8K but not on Countdown; emitting the last 30% of the trace as a 'suffix scaffold' recovers teacher-level accuracy with fewe...

  17. Trust Region On-Policy Distillation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TrOPD stabilizes on-policy distillation for LLMs with trust-region learning, outlier estimation, and off-policy guidance, outperforming prior OPD methods on reasoning and code benchmarks.

  18. On the Implicit Reward Overfitting and the Low-rank Dynamics in RLVR

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    RLVR exhibits implicit reward overfitting to training data and optimizes heavy-tailed singular spectra with rank-1 focus on reasoning capability.

  19. SaFRO: Satisfaction-Aware Fusion via Dual-Relative Policy Optimization for Short-Video Search

    cs.IR 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    A reinforcement-learning fusion framework using query reformulation, session gaps, and next-day retention as satisfaction rewards improved short-video search ranking and retention in Kuaishou's online A/B test.

  20. CLPO: Curriculum Learning meets Policy Optimization for LLM Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    CLPO: an online curriculum that rewrites each problem according to the model's own current accuracy and scales the KL penalty by difficulty, reporting strong but internally inconsistent gains over GRPO and DAPO.

  21. Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-03 accept novelty 5.0

    A survey organizing techniques to achieve efficient reasoning in LLMs by shortening chain-of-thought outputs.

  22. Knowledge Graph-Driven Expert-Level Reasoning for Neuroscience

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A textbook-derived neuroscience knowledge graph supplies synthetic multi-hop QA supervision and RL rewards to fine-tune a small LM claimed to exceed larger general models on expert reasoning.

  23. N-GRPO: Embedding-Level Neighbor Mixing for Enhanced Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    N-GRPO enhances GRPO via Semantic Neighbor Mixing of token embeddings to improve diversity and consistency in LLM math reasoning rollouts.