Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.05894 v2 pith:JK3NEGWO submitted 2024-12-08 q-bio.QM cs.CRcs.DCcs.LG

Batch effects can impair federated learning in multi-center omics studies

classification q-bio.QM cs.CRcs.DCcs.LG
keywords federatedbatchdataeffectsmulti-centeromicsdatasetsfedrbe
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative analysis of biomedical data without exchanging sensitive patient-level information, but its performance in multi-center studies may be compromised by batch effects which can obscure biological signals. Here, we systematically assess the impact of uncorrected batch effects on FL outcomes using four multi-center omics datasets, including transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data, and two representative algorithms: federated k-means clustering and federated random forest classification. Our results demonstrate that uncorrected batch effects undermine unsupervised FL and can substantially degrade supervised FL performance, indicating that privacy-aware batch-effect correction is essential for reliable FL. To enable privacy-preserving BEC in distributed bulk omics data, we introduce fedRBE ( https://featurecloud.ai/app/fedrbe ), a federated implementation of limma's removeBatchEffect() method enhanced by secure multi-party computation, suitable for datasets with missing values and non-identical feature sets across clients, including proteomics and metabolomics data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.