Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Vision Language Models in Medicine

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.01863 v1 pith:MY44SCGG submitted 2025-02-24 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYeess.IV

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.CYeess.IV
keywords healthcaremed-vlmsmodelsmedicalclinicaldataethicalgeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advent of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), medical artificial intelligence (AI) has experienced significant technological progress and paradigm shifts. This survey provides an extensive review of recent advancements in Medical Vision-Language Models (Med-VLMs), which integrate visual and textual data to enhance healthcare outcomes. We discuss the foundational technology behind Med-VLMs, illustrating how general models are adapted for complex medical tasks, and examine their applications in healthcare. The transformative impact of Med-VLMs on clinical practice, education, and patient care is highlighted, alongside challenges such as data scarcity, narrow task generalization, interpretability issues, and ethical concerns like fairness, accountability, and privacy. These limitations are exacerbated by uneven dataset distribution, computational demands, and regulatory hurdles. Rigorous evaluation methods and robust regulatory frameworks are essential for safe integration into healthcare workflows. Future directions include leveraging large-scale, diverse datasets, improving cross-modal generalization, and enhancing interpretability. Innovations like federated learning, lightweight architectures, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) integration are explored as pathways to democratize access and improve clinical relevance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of Med-VLMs' strengths and limitations, fostering their ethical and balanced adoption in healthcare.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CURE: Curriculum-guided Multi-task Training for Reliable Anatomy Grounded Report Generation

    cs.CV 2026-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CURE's curriculum-guided multi-task training improves bounding-box grounding for chest X-ray report generation, but its claimed hallucination reduction is not confirmed by the paper's full evaluation.

Pith tools