pith. sign in

arxiv: 2207.02852 · v1 · pith:PL6G2S3Mnew · submitted 2022-07-05 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.CY

Machine Learning Model Sizes and the Parameter Gap

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords modelsmodelmagnitudeparametersizelanguageordersparameters
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

We study trends in model size of notable machine learning systems over time using a curated dataset. From 1950 to 2018, model size in language models increased steadily by seven orders of magnitude. The trend then accelerated, with model size increasing by another five orders of magnitude in just 4 years from 2018 to 2022. Vision models grew at a more constant pace, totaling 7 orders of magnitude of growth between 1950 and 2022. We also identify that, since 2020, there have been many language models below 20B parameters, many models above 70B parameters, but a scarcity of models in the 20-70B parameter range. We refer to that scarcity as the parameter gap. We provide some stylized facts about the parameter gap and propose a few hypotheses to explain it. The explanations we favor are: (a) increasing model size beyond 20B parameters requires adopting different parallelism techniques, which makes mid-sized models less cost-effective, (b) GPT-3 was one order of magnitude larger than previous language models, and researchers afterwards primarily experimented with bigger models to outperform it. While these dynamics likely exist, and we believe they play some role in generating the gap, we don't have high confidence that there are no other, more important dynamics at play.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analyzing Reverse Address Translation Overheads in Multi-GPU Scale-Up Pods

    cs.DC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Simulation study shows cold TLB misses in reverse address translation dominate latency for small collectives in multi-GPU pods, causing up to 1.4x degradation, while larger ones see diminishing returns.

  2. Using Learning Theories to Evolve Human-Centered XAI: Future Perspectives and Challenges

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Infusing learning theories into the XAI lifecycle offers a learner-centered path to improve human agency and mitigate explanation-related risks in AI systems.

  3. Creating and Evaluating K-12 GenAI Assessment Graders Through Context Engineering

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    LLM graders achieve substantial human agreement on math and science MCAS items but vary on ELA, performing best as sources of formative narrative feedback rather than summative numerical scores.

  4. Enhancing Instructional Quality: Leveraging Computer-Assisted Textual Analysis to Generate In-Depth Insights from Educational Artifacts

    cs.AI 2024-03 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI and NLP applied to educational artifacts within the Instructional Core Framework can identify advantages for teacher coaching, student support, and personalized learning.