Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The generalized Lelong numbers and intersection theory

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Generalized Lelong numbers—limits of tube masses—give effective criteria for the existence and continuity of intersections of positive closed currents on compact Kähler manifolds.

desk verdict A serious but unfinished paper: the generalized Lelong number machinery is credible and useful, but the central wedgeability criterion depends on a load-bearing index error in Lemma 11.4 and an imported uniqueness theorem whose hypotheses are not checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02150 v1 pith:S5QLQKWV submitted 2025-01-04 math.CV math.AGmath.DGmath.DSmath.NT

Viet-Anh Nguyen This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CVmath.AGmath.DGmath.DSmath.NT MSC 32U4032U2532Q1532L0514J60
keywords generalizedLelongnumberspositiveplurisubharmoniccurrentstangenthorizontaldimensionDinh-SibonyintersectionLelong-JensenformulacompactKählermanifoldscontinuityofintersections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a numerical intersection theory for positive currents on compact Kähler manifolds, the distributional analogues of complex subvarieties. Its central claim is that generalized Lelong numbers—limits of normalized masses of a current over tubes around a submanifold—are well defined, finite, and intrinsic for large classes of plurisubharmonic, pluriharmonic, and closed currents, and that they carry exactly the information contained in Dinh-Sibony's tangent cohomology classes. The paper then turns this into effective criteria: if certain logarithmic tube integrals involving $-\log \mathrm{dist}(\cdot,\Delta)\,T$ are finite and the corresponding generalized Lelong numbers vanish in the required range, then $m$ positive closed currents admit a Dinh-Sibony intersection $T_1\mathbin{N}\cdots\mathbin{N}T_m$, and a uniform version for sequences makes the intersection of limits equal to the limit of the intersections. This matters because intersections of currents of higher bidegree lack local potentials in general, so criteria that are checkable by tube masses give a practical route to a notoriously nonconstructive theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the logarithmic tube calculus on the normal bundle. Writing $\phi(y)=\|y\|^2$, $\alpha=dd^c\log\phi$, $\beta=dd^c\phi$, and $\mathrm{Tube}(B,r)$ for the tube of radius $r$ over the base $B$, the paper studies the integrals $\kappa^\bullet_j(T,B,\omega^{(j)},r,\tau,h)=\int_{\mathrm{Tube}(B,r)\setminus V}\tau^*T\wedge\pi^*\omega^{(j)}\wedge\alpha^{k-p-j}$ and their regularized versions. The Lelong-Jensen formulas relate differences of normalized tube masses to these logarithmic integrals plus boundary terms of order $O(r^2)$, and the admissible estimates of Section 5 control the error when arbitrary strongly admissible maps replace local holomorphic coordinates. The companion Theorem 8.1 expresses each generalized Lelong number as an integral of a tangent current, and Theorem 2.14 identifies the same numbers with the Dinh-Sibony classes via the displayed cohomological formula. Finiteness of the logarithmic integrals is what Theorem 2.18 converts into existence of the tangent-current intersection, using the uniqueness criterion for tangent currents.

What would settle it

A single positive closed current on a compact Kähler manifold for which the logarithmic tube integrals $\kappa^\bullet_j(-\log \mathrm{dist}(\cdot,\Delta)\,T,\Delta,\omega_\Delta,r,\tau,h)$ are finite in the required range but two different tangent currents along the diagonal exist would disprove Theorem 11.1 and with it the wedgeability criterion Theorem 2.18.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a positive plurisubharmonic current $T$ on a complex manifold $X$, a Kähler submanifold $V$ of dimension $l$, and a domain $B\Subset V$, the generalized Lelong number $\nu(T,B,\omega^{(j)},h)$ associated to a closed smooth $(j,j)$-form $\omega^{(j)}$ is the limit as $r\to0$ of the normalized mass of $\tau^*T$ over the tube $\mathrm{Tube}(B,r)$, wedged with $\pi^*\omega^{(j)}$ and $\beta^{k-p-j}$, where $\beta=dd^c\|y\|^2$ is the flat form of the Hermitian metric on the normal bundle. Theorems 2.5 and 2.7 prove that this limit exists, is finite, and is independent of the admissible map used to pull $T$ back to the normal bundle. Theorems 2.12 and 2.13 characterize the horizontal dimension as the smallest index above which all generalized Lelong numbers vanish, and establish a Siu-type upper-semicontinuity theorem for them. Theorem 2.14 gives the exact formula $\nu(T,V,\omega^{(j)},h)=\sum_{i=j}^{m}\pi_0^*c^{DS}_i(T,V)\,!\,\pi_0^*\{\omega^{(j)}\}\,!\,h_E^{k-l+i-j}$ relating the numbers to the Dinh-Sibony classes, so the numerical and cohomological data are equivalent. On a compact Kähler manifold, Theorems 2.18 and 2.21 assert that finiteness of the logarithmic tube integrals $\kappa^\bullet_j(-\log \mathrm{dist}(\cdot,\Delta)\,T,\Delta,\omega_\Delta,r,\tau,h)$ and vanishing of $\nu_j$ in the range $k-p<j\le k-\max_i p_i$ imply existence of $T_1\mathbin{N}\cdots\mathbin{N}T_m$ in the tangent-current sense, and that the uniform version implies continuity of this intersection.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing hypothesis is that the current $T$ splits as $T=T^+-T^-$ with $T^\pm$ approximable by smooth positive plurisubharmonic, pluriharmonic, or closed forms with boundary control; without such a decomposition, none of the generalized Lelong numbers or intersection criteria are defined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Whenever the finiteness and vanishing conditions hold, $T_1\mathbin{N}\cdots\mathbin{N}T_m$ exists without constructing super-potentials; the check is purely numerical, using arbitrary Hermitian metrics and local charts.
  • The generalized Lelong numbers determine the Dinh-Sibony classes and vice versa, so the cohomological tangent data of a current can be read off from limits of tube masses.
  • The horizontal dimension of $T$ along $V$ is the smallest $j$ with $\nu_q(T,B,\omega,h)=0$ for all $q>j$, giving a numerical definition of minimality of the intersection dimension.
  • If a sequence of currents satisfies the uniform tube-integral condition, then the tangent-current intersections converge and the intersection of the limit currents equals the limit of the intersections.
  • For a single point $V=\{x\}$, the generalized number $\nu_0(T,B)$ is the classical Lelong number, so the criteria specialize to familiar local mass conditions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: the intrinsicness established for pluriharmonic currents suggests that the numbers can serve as local invariants of directed harmonic currents in singular foliations, where closedness typically fails but approximability by pluriharmonic currents is natural.
  • Extension: since Theorem 2.14 identifies generalized Lelong numbers with Dinh-Sibony classes, one could compute the latter by evaluating one-dimensional limits on tubes instead of constructing tangent currents, which may be easier in examples.
  • Extension: a quantitative version of Theorem 2.21 should hold: if $\sup_n\kappa^\bullet_j(\cdots)\to0$ at a known rate, the weak convergence of the intersections should have a rate controlled by that rate and the masses of the currents.
  • Extension: testing the finiteness condition on currents of integration along algebraic cycles would translate the wedgeability criterion into intersection-multiplicity computations, connecting the analytic criteria to algebraic intersection theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a theory of generalized Lelong numbers for positive plurisubharmonic currents along a Kähler submanifold, with emphasis on closed smooth test forms on the base, and relates these numbers to Dinh-Sibony cohomology classes. It also gives effective sufficient conditions for wedgeability and continuity of intersections of positive closed currents on compact Kähler manifolds, using the language of tangent currents. The main results are contained in Theorems 2.5, 2.7, 2.12, 2.13, 2.14, 2.18, and 2.21. The paper builds on the author's previous work [46] and a companion paper [48] for the uniqueness of tangent currents.

Significance. If the central technical gaps are repaired, the paper would provide a substantial and useful extension of the Dinh-Sibony theory of tangent currents and density currents, introducing quantitative invariants (generalized Lelong numbers) that are effective in questions of wedgeability and continuity of intersections. The explicit nature of the criteria in Theorems 2.18 and 2.21 is particularly valuable, and the paper also offers a Siu-type upper-semicontinuity theorem and a relation between Dinh-Sibony classes and the new numerical invariants. However, the proof of the main wedgeability criterion currently relies on a lemma with an index error and on an imported theorem whose hypotheses are not verified in the manuscript; these issues are load-bearing and must be addressed.

major comments (3)
  1. [§11, Lemma 11.4 (p. 55), with (5.22) and (2.8)] The multi-index j := (k−j, 0, j, 0) does not satisfy the admissibility condition k−p−j1−j3 ≥ 0 imposed in (5.22) for a current of bidegree (p,p), since j1+j3 = k. The correct index matching the mass indicators K_{j,k−p−j} used in (11.5) is (k−p−j, 0, j, 0), which gives j1+j3 = k−p and is admissible for the range m ≤ j ≤ m. As stated, Lemma 11.4 cannot justify the implication from (11.2) to (11.5) in the proof of Theorem 11.1, so the bridge between the finiteness condition in Theorem 2.18(1) and the hypotheses of [48, Theorem 1.6] is not established.
  2. [§11, Theorem 11.1 and §2.5, Theorem 2.18] The proof of Theorem 11.1 derives the uniqueness of tangent currents by reducing condition (11.2) to condition (11.4) and then invoking [48, Theorem 1.6]. Because the reduction is carried out through the misstated Lemma 11.4, the hypotheses of [48, Theorem 1.6] are not in fact verified for the tensor-product current T = T1 ⊗ ... ⊗ Tm. The central wedgeability theorem (Theorem 2.18) therefore lacks a valid proof as written. The author should correct Lemma 11.4, prove the required estimates for the corrected multi-index, and either state and verify the hypotheses of [48, Theorem 1.6] directly or include a self-contained proof of the uniqueness criterion.
  3. [§10, Theorem 2.14] The proof of assertion (1) is omitted, with the text stating only that the proof is 'quite similar' to that of assertion (2). Assertion (1), which concerns the closed-current case in the Dinh-Sibony context, is used in the proof of Theorem 2.16 and underlies the claimed equivalence in Remark 2.15. A complete proof, or at least a detailed indication of the additional technical issues, is necessary for the announced result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§8, Theorem 8.5(3)] The statement 'We leave the proof to the interested reader' appears in a theorem in the main body. Since this variant does not appear to be used later, the author should either provide the proof or reformulate it as a remark with a clear reference.
  2. [§11, Lemma 11.4] The notation in Lemma 11.4 uses j both as the summation index and as the multi-index in (k−j, 0, j, 0). This is confusing; a different symbol (for instance, bold j) should be used for the multi-index after the correction is made.
  3. [§11, Theorem 11.1] In (11.2), the symbol ω appears where the definition (2.8) requires a closed smooth (j,j)-form; the author presumably means ω^j or ω(j). Please make this uniform to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typographical and OCR-like errors (e.g., 'for for all', 'in the sense of Definition 2.10' in Remark 2.4, and garbled displays around (12.9)–(12.10)). A careful proofreading pass is needed before the paper can be accepted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circularity found: the generalized Lelong numbers are defined and proved independent, and the intersection criteria rely on prior theorems [46]/[48] as external tools rather than on a definitional equivalence. The main risk is a bidegree-index gap in Lemma 11.4, which is a correctness issue, not circularity.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained relative to its stated approximability framework. The generalized Lelong numbers are defined as limits of tube integrals and then proved to exist, to be independent of the admissible map, and to connect to Dinh-Sibony classes via Theorem 2.14; the proof of intrinsicness of the DS classes compares two tangent currents and uses formula (2.14) together with the already-proved independence of the left side, which is a legitimate proof strategy rather than a definitional equivalence. The intersection criteria (Theorems 2.18 and 2.21) do import a uniqueness theorem from the author's prior work [48], and there is substantial reliance on [46] for Lelong-Jensen formulas and tangent-current existence. However, [48, Theorem 1.6] is cited as a parameter-free theorem with stated hypotheses that do not include the target wedgeability conclusion, so under the review rules it counts as independent support rather than circularity. The main correctness risk, not circularity, is that Lemma 11.4 sets j := (k-j,0,j,0), whose first and third entries sum to k, violating the bidegree constraint k-p-j1-j3 >= 0 from (5.22) unless p=0; as written, the bridge from condition (2.18)(1) to condition (11.4) of [48] is not established. This gap would undermine Theorem 2.18, but it is a missing proof or incorrect index, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. No step in the paper equates a prediction to a fitted parameter or defines a quantity in terms of the target result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, conserved quantities, dimensions, or analogous entities are introduced. The generalized Lelong numbers and Dinh-Sibony classes are functions and cohomology classes derived from existing objects, so no independent empirical evidence is relevant. The main implicit assumptions are the validity of imported results from [46] and [48] and the approximability hypothesis on currents.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Lelong-Jensen formulas and tangent theorems of [46] are valid as stated.
    These results from the author's 241-page predecessor are cited and not reproved; they underpin the tube estimates, mass indicator finiteness, and tangent-current representations used in Sections 5 through 8.
  • domain assumption Existence of strongly admissible maps along B for Kähler X.
    The definitions of generalized Lelong numbers require a strongly admissible map; without existence the tube integrals in (2.6) through (2.9) are not defined. Existence is quoted as Theorem 3.7 from [46].
  • domain assumption Uniqueness of tangent currents under condition (11.4), imported from [48].
    Theorem 2.18's proof of wedgeability imports uniqueness of tangent currents from [48, Theorem 1.6]; this is load-bearing and is not proved in the present paper.
  • standard math Leray-Hirsch decomposition and Poincare duality for the compactified normal bundle E = P(E direct sum C).
    Used in Theorem 2.14 to decompose Dinh-Sibony classes and to conclude that a cohomology class vanishes from vanishing pairings against a basis of forms.
  • domain assumption Approximability hypotheses T = T+ - T- with T+ and T- in SHp;3,3, PHp;2,2, or CLp;1,1/2,2 suffice for all limiting integrals to exist.
    The existence and finiteness of generalized Lelong numbers in Theorems 2.5 and 2.7 depend on these classes; Theorem 3.9 gives sufficient conditions, but the decomposition is not automatic for arbitrary positive currents.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The generalized Lelong numbers and intersection theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S5QLQKWV

@misc{pith2026250102150,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The generalized Lelong numbers and intersection theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/S5QLQKWV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02150}
}
abstract

Let $X$ be a complex manifold of dimension $k,$ and $(V,\omega)$ be a K\"ahler submanifold of dimension $l$ in $X,$ and $B\Subset V$ be a domain with $\mathcal{C}^2$-smooth boundary. Let $T$ be a positive plurisubharmonic current on $X$ such that $T$ satisfies a reasonable approximation condition on $X$ and near $\partial B.$ In our previous work we introduce the concept of the generalized Lelong numbers $\nu_j(T,B)\in\mathbb{R}$ of $T$ along $B$ for $0\leq j\leq l.$ When $l=0,$ $V=B$ is a single point $x,$ $\nu_0(T,B)$ is none other than the classical Lelong number of $T$ at $x.$ This article has five purposes: Firstly, we formulate the notion of the generalized Lelong number of $T$ associated to every closed smooth $(j,j)$-form on $V.$ This concept extends the previous notion of the generalized Lelong numbers. We also establish their basic properties. Secondly, we define the horizontal dimension $\hbar$ of such a current $T$ along $B.$ Next, we characterize $\hbar$ in terms of the generalized Lelong numbers. We also establish a Siu's upper-semicontinuity type theorem for the generalized Lelong numbers. In their above-mentioned context, Dinh and Sibony introduced some cohomology classes which may be regarded as their analogues of the classical Lelong numbers. Our third objective is to generalize their notion to the broader context where $T$ is (merely) positive pluriharmonic. Moreover, we also establish a formula relating Dinh-Sibony classes and the generalized Lelong numbers. Fourthly, we obtain an effective sufficient condition for defining the intersection of $m$ positive closed currents in the sense of Dinh-Sibony's theory of tangent currents on a compact K\"ahler manifold. Finally, we establish an effective sufficient condition for the continuity of the above intersection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Continuous local potential functionals and the Dinh-Sibony product

    math.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On any complex manifold, the Dinh-Sibony product of three positive closed currents is well defined and associative when the first current has continuous local potential functionals and the other two satisfy Condition (I).

  2. Uniqueness of tangent currents for positive closed currents

    math.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A logarithmic integrability condition on generalized Lelong numbers forces a unique tangent current along a submanifold.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [46]

    arXiv:2111.11024v2, 241 pages

    Nguyên, Viêt-Anh: Positive plurisubharmonic current s: Generalized Lelong numbers and Tangent theorems. arXiv:2111.11024v2, 241 pages

    arXiv

  2. [48]

    Nguyên, Viêt-Anh; Truong, T uyen Trung: Uniqueness of t angent currents for positive closed currents. (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [1]

    Ahn, Taeyong; Vu, Duc-Viet: Equidistribution for non-p luripolar currents with respect to holomorphic correspondences of compact Kähler manifolds. Anal. Math. Phys. 14 (2024), no. 6, Paper No. 115, 18 pp

    work page 2024

  4. [2]

    Forum Math

    Alessandrini, Lucia; Bassanelli, Giovanni: Plurisubh armonic currents and their extension across ana- lytic subsets. Forum Math. 5 (1993), no. 6, 577-602

    work page 1993

  5. [3]

    Results Math

    Alessandrini, Lucia; Bassanelli, Giovanni: Lelong num bers of positive plurisubharmonic currents. Results Math. 30 (1996), no. 3-4, 191–224

    1996

  6. [4]

    Forum Math

    Bassanelli, Giovanni: A cut-off theorem for plurisubha rmonic currents. Forum Math. 6 (1994), no. 5, 567–595

    work page 1994

  7. [5]

    Alan: Fine topology , Silov bou ndary , andpddcqn

    Bedford, Eric; Taylor , B. Alan: Fine topology , Silov bou ndary , andpddcqn. J. Funct. Anal. 72 (1987), no. 2, 225–251

    work page 1987

  8. [6]

    Indiana Univ

    Bayraktar , T urgay: Equidistribution of zeros of random holomorphic sections. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 65 (2016), no. 5, 1759–1793

    work page 2016

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Berndtsson, Bo; Sibony , Nessim: The B-equation on a positive current. Invent. Math. 147 (2002), no. 2, 371–428

    2002

  2. [8]

    (French) Ann

    Blanchard, André: Sur les variétés analytiques complex es. (French) Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (3) 73 (1956), 157–202

    1956

  3. [9]

    (French) [Existence of the tangent cone of a c losed positive current] Ark

    Blel, Mongi; Demailly , Jean-Pierre; Mouzali, Mokhtar: Sur l’existence du cône tangent à un courant positif fermé. (French) [Existence of the tangent cone of a c losed positive current] Ark. Mat. 28 (1990), no. 2, 231–248

    1990

  4. [10]

    Bost J.-B., Gillet H., Soulé C., Heights of projective v arieties and positive Green forms. J. Amer . Math. Soc. 7 (1994), no. 4, 903-1027

    1994

  5. [11]

    T exts in Math.,82 Springer- Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982

    Bott, Raoul; T u, Loring W.: Differential forms in algeb raic topology .Grad. T exts in Math.,82 Springer- Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982. xiv+331 pp

    1982

  6. [12]

    Coman, Dan; Marinescu, George: Equidistribution resu lts for singular metrics on line bundles. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér . (4) 48 (2015), no. 3, 497–536

    2015

  7. [13]

    Demailly , Jean-Pierre: Courants positifs et théorie d e l’intersection (French), Gaz. Math. 53 (1992), 131–159

    1992

  8. [14]

    Complex analysis and geometry , 115–193, Univ

    Demailly , Jean-Pierre: Monge-Ampère operators, Lelo ng numbers and intersection theory . Complex analysis and geometry , 115–193, Univ . Ser . Math., Plenum, New York, 1993

    1993

  9. [15]

    Manuscript available at http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/„demailly/books.html, (2012)

    Demailly , Jean-Pierre: Complex Analytic and Differen tial Geometry . Manuscript available at http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/„demailly/books.html, (2012)

    2012

  10. [16]

    Surveys of Modern Mathematics, 1

    Demailly , Jean-Pierre: Analytic methods in algebraic geometry . Surveys of Modern Mathematics, 1. International Press, Somerville, MA; Higher Education Press , Beijing, 2012. viii+231 pp

    2012

  11. [17]

    De Thélin, Henry; Vigny , Gabriel: Entropy of meromorph ic maps and dynamics of birational maps.(English, French summary) Mém. Soc. Math. Fr . (N.S.) No. 122(2010), vi+98 pp

    2010

  12. [18]

    In preparation (2024)

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Nguyên, Viêt-Anh: Siu’s analyticit y theorem for positive pluriharmonic currents. In preparation (2024)

    2024

  13. [19]

    Duke Math

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Nguyên, Viêt-Anh; Sibony , Nessim: U nique Ergodicity for foliations on compact Kähler surfaces. Duke Math. J. 171 (2022), no. 13, 2627–2698

    2022

  14. [20]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Nguyên, Viêt-Anh; Vu, Duc-Viet: Sup er-potentials, densities of currents and num- ber of periodic points for holomorphic maps. Adv. Math. 331 (2018), 874–907

    2018

  15. [21]

    Indiana Univ

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Nguyên, Viêt-Anh; Truong, T uyen Tru ng: Equidistribution for meromorphic maps with dominant topological degree. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 64 (2015), no. 6, 1805–1828

    2015

  16. [22]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Nguyên, Viêt-Anh; Truong, T uyen Trung: Growth of the number of periodic points for meromorphic maps. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 49 (2017), no. 6, 947–964

    2017

  17. [23]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Regularization of c urrents and entropy .Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 37 (2004), no. 6, 959–971

    2004

  18. [24]

    Acta Math

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Super-potentials o f positive closed currents, intersection theory and dynamics. Acta Math. 203 (2009), no. 1, 1-82

    2009

  19. [25]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Super-potentials f or currents on compact Kähler manifolds and dynamics of automorphisms. J. Algebraic Geom. 19 (2010), no. 3, 473–529. 77

    2010

  20. [26]

    Holomorphic dynamical systems, 165–294, Lecture Notes in Math., 1998, Springer , Berlin, 2010

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Dynamics in several complex variables: endomorphisms of projective spaces and polynomial-like mappings. Holomorphic dynamical systems, 165–294, Lecture Notes in Math., 1998, Springer , Berlin, 2010

    1998

  21. [27]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Equidistribution o f saddle periodic points for Hénon-type auto- morphisms of Ck. Math. Ann. 366 (2016), no. 3-4, 1207–1251

    2016

  22. [28]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Density of positive closed currents, a theory of non-generic inter- sections. J. Algebraic Geom. 27 (2018), 497–551

    2018

  23. [29]

    Dinh, Tien-Cuong; Sibony , Nessim: Unique ergodicity f or foliations in P2 with an invariant curve. Invent. Math. 211 (2018), no. 1, 1–38

    2018

  24. [30]

    Die Grund lehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153 Springer-V erlag New York Inc., New York 1969 xiv+676 pp

    Federer , Herbert: Geometric measure theory . Die Grund lehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 153 Springer-V erlag New York Inc., New York 1969 xiv+676 pp

    1969

  25. [31]

    Fornæss, John Erik; Sibony , Nessim: Oka’s inequality f or currents and applications. Math. Ann. 301 (1995), no. 3, 399–419

    1995

  26. [32]

    Fornæss, John Erik; Sibony , Nessim: Harmonic currents of finite energy and laminations. Geom. Funct. Anal. 15 (2005), no. 5, 962–1003

    2005

  27. [33]

    Fornæss, John Erik; Sibony , Nessim: Riemann surface la minations with singularities. J. Geom. Anal. 18 (2008), no. 2, 400–442

    2008

  28. [34]

    Fornæss, John Erik; Sibony , Nessim: Unique ergodicity of harmonic currents on singular foliations of P2. Geom. Funct. Anal. 19 (2010), no. 5, 1334–1377

    2010

  29. [35]

    Pure and Applied Mathematics

    Griffiths, Phillip; Harris, Joseph: Principles of alge braic geometry . Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York, 1978. xii+813 pp

    1978

  30. [36]

    Several complex variables (Proc

    Harvey , Reese: Holomorphic chains and their boundarie s. Several complex variables (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XXX, Part 1, Williams Coll., Williamstown, M ass., 1975), pp. 309–382. Amer . Math. Soc., Providence, R. I., 1977

    1975

  31. [37]

    Indiana Univ

    Dinh T uan Huynh; Kaufmann, Lucas; Vu, Duc-Viet: Inters ection of p1, 1q-currents and the domain of definition of the Monge-Ampère operator . Indiana Univ. Math. J. 72 (2023), no. 1, 239–261

    2023

  32. [38]

    Huynh, Dinh T uan; Vu, Duc-Viet: On the set of divisors wi th zero geometric defect. J. Reine Angew. Math. 771 (2021), 193–213

    2021

  33. [39]

    Internat

    Kaufmann, Lucas: Self-intersection of foliation cycl es on complex manifolds. Internat. J. Math. 28 (2017), no. 8, 1750054, 18 pp

    2017

  34. [40]

    Kaufmann, Lucas; Vu, Duc-Viet: Density and intersecti on of p1, 1q-currents. J. Funct. Anal. 277 (2019), no. 2, 392–417

    2019

  35. [41]

    International Symposium in Memory of Hua Loo Keng, Vol

    Kiselman, Christer O.: Tangents of plurisubharmonic f unctions. International Symposium in Memory of Hua Loo Keng, Vol. II (Beijing, 1988), 157–167, Springer , Berlin,1991

    1988

  36. [42]

    Lazarsfeld, Robert: Positivity in algebraic geometry . I. Classical setting: line bundles and linear series. Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 48 [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Ser ies of Modern Surveys in Mathematics] Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2 004. xviii+387 pp

  37. [43]

    Lazarsfeld, Robert: Positivity in algebraic geometry . II. Positivity for vector bundles, and multiplier ideals Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 49 [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Ser ies of Modern Surveys in Mathematics] Springer-Verlag, Berlin , 2004. xvi...

    2004

  38. [44]

    (French) Bull

    Lelong, Pierre: Intégration sur un ensemble analytiqu e complexe. (French) Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), 239–262

    1957

  39. [45]

    (French) Gordon & Breach, Paris-London-New York (Distributed by Dunod édit eur , Paris) 1968 ix+79 pp

    Lelong, Pierre: Fonctions plurisousharmoniques et fo rmes différentielles positives. (French) Gordon & Breach, Paris-London-New York (Distributed by Dunod édit eur , Paris) 1968 ix+79 pp

    1968

  40. [47]

    In progress

    Nguyên, Viêt-Anh: Thie type theorems and the generaliz ed Lelong numbers for complex analytic sets. In progress

  41. [49]

    (French) [Some extension problems for currents in complex analysis] Duke Math

    Sibony , Nessim: Quelques problèmes de prolongement de courants en analyse complexe. (French) [Some extension problems for currents in complex analysis] Duke Math. J. 52 (1985), no. 1, 157– 197. 78

    1985

  42. [50]

    Siu, Yum Tong: Analyticity of sets associated to Lelong numbers and the extension of closed positive currents. Invent. Math. 27 (1974), 53–156

    1974

  43. [51]

    (French) [Extension of closed, positive currents of finite mass] Invent

    Skoda, Henri: Prolongement des courants, positifs, fe rmés de masse finie. (French) [Extension of closed, positive currents of finite mass] Invent. Math. 66 (1982), no. 3, 361–376

    1982

  44. [52]

    Thie, Paul R.: The Lelong number of a point of a complex an alytic set. Math. Ann. 172 (1967), 269–312

    1967

  45. [53]

    Vigny , Gabriel: Exponential decay of correlations for generic regular birational maps of Pk. Math. Ann. 362 (2015), no. 3-4, 1033–1054

    2015

  46. [54]

    Voisin, Claire: Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. I. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Math- ematics, 76. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

    2007

  47. [55]

    Michigan Math

    Vu, Duc-Viet: Intersection of positive closed current s of higher bi-degree. Michigan Math. J. 65 (2016), no. 4, 863-872

    2016

  48. [56]

    Vu, Duc-Viet: Densities of currents on non-Kähler mani folds. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN. 2021, no. 17, 13282–13304

    2021

  49. [57]

    Vu, Duc-Viet: Density currents and relative non-pluri polar products. Bull. London. Math. Soc. 53 (2021), no. 2, 548–559

    2021

  50. [58]

    Vu, Duc-Viet: Exotic periodic points. Commun. Contemp. Math. 24 (2022), no. 5, Paper No. 2150029, 15 pp. UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE , L ABORATOIRE DE MATHÉMATIQUES PAUL PAINLEVÉ , CNRS U.M.R. 8524, 59655 VILLENEUVE D ’ASCQ CEDEX , F RANCE . AND VIETNAM INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.