Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A survey
read the original abstract
Deep Learning (DL) is the most widely used tool in the contemporary field of computer vision. Its ability to accurately solve complex problems is employed in vision research to learn deep neural models for a variety of tasks, including security critical applications. However, it is now known that DL is vulnerable to adversarial attacks that can manipulate its predictions by introducing visually imperceptible perturbations in images and videos. Since the discovery of this phenomenon in 2013~[1], it has attracted significant attention of researchers from multiple sub-fields of machine intelligence. In [2], we reviewed the contributions made by the computer vision community in adversarial attacks on deep learning (and their defenses) until the advent of year 2018. Many of those contributions have inspired new directions in this area, which has matured significantly since witnessing the first generation methods. Hence, as a legacy sequel of [2], this literature review focuses on the advances in this area since 2018. To ensure authenticity, we mainly consider peer-reviewed contributions published in the prestigious sources of computer vision and machine learning research. Besides a comprehensive literature review, the article also provides concise definitions of technical terminologies for non-experts in this domain. Finally, this article discusses challenges and future outlook of this direction based on the literature reviewed herein and [2].
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Shapes are not enough: CONSERVAttack and its use for finding vulnerabilities and uncertainties in machine learning applications
CONSERVAttack creates adversarial perturbations in HEP ML models that respect uncertainty bounds but cause misclassifications, revealing gaps in current validation practices.
-
Laundering AI Authority with Adversarial Examples
Adversarial examples enable AI authority laundering by causing production VLMs to give authoritative but wrong responses on subtly perturbed images, with success rates of 22-100% using decade-old attack methods.
-
MAPE: Defending Against Transferable Adversarial Attacks Using Multi-Source Adversarial Perturbations Elimination
MAPE combines a channel-attention U-Net (SAPE) trained on multi-model adversarial examples scheduled by PPSA to eliminate perturbations, reporting over 95.1% average defense on CIFAR-10 and 71.5% on Mini-ImageNet agai...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.