pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.25305 · v2 · pith:USRZMWENnew · submitted 2025-09-29 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR

φ-Dwarfs: White Dwarfs probe Quadratically Coupled Scalars

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 21:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords white dwarfsultralight scalarsquadratic couplingsmass-radius relationChandrasekhar limitastrophysical constraintsfermion mass shiftsscalar profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

White dwarf mass-radius data excludes large regions of parameter space for ultralight scalars with quadratic fermion couplings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that ultralight scalar fields carrying quadratic couplings to Standard-Model fermions source interior profiles inside white dwarfs, shift fermion masses, and thereby alter stellar structure and stability. A sympathetic reader would care because the resulting changes produce two clear, observable signatures: ranges of radii that admit no stable white dwarfs and systematic distortions that drive masses toward the Chandrasekhar limit or modify the maximum mass. The analysis incorporates composition and finite-temperature effects for both electron and nucleon couplings, then compares the predicted mass-radius relations against precise data for Sirius B, Procyon B, and the broader white-dwarf population. This comparison rules out substantial portions of the scalar mass and coupling-strength plane without assuming the scalar is dark matter. The same stellar data thereby extend earlier QCD-axion limits to a wider class of scalar theories.

Core claim

Ultralight scalar fields with quadratic couplings to Standard-Model fermions source scalar profiles inside compact stars that shift fermion masses and can produce a new ground state of matter. Two robust observables follow: forbidden gaps in radius with no stable configurations, and characteristic shape distortions that drive white-dwarf masses toward the Chandrasekhar limit for electron couplings or shift the maximum mass for nucleon couplings. Confronting these predictions with precise measurements for Sirius B and Procyon B together with the global white-dwarf population excludes large regions of unexplored parameter space and extends earlier QCD-axion-specific bounds to a broader class.

What carries the argument

Scalar profiles sourced inside white dwarfs by quadratic couplings to fermions, which shift fermion masses and thereby modify the equation of state and mass-radius relation.

If this is right

  • Certain ranges of radii admit no stable white-dwarf configurations.
  • Electron couplings systematically drive masses toward the Chandrasekhar limit.
  • Nucleon couplings shift the maximum stable white-dwarf mass.
  • Large portions of the scalar mass-coupling plane are excluded by existing observations.
  • The constraints hold without requiring the scalar to constitute dark matter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future higher-precision radius measurements of additional white dwarfs could shrink the remaining allowed parameter space.
  • The same sourcing mechanism could be applied to neutron-star mass-radius data for complementary limits on the same couplings.
  • In regions where the scalar-induced mass shifts remain small, laboratory precision experiments stay competitive with the stellar bounds.

Load-bearing premise

White-dwarf structure and equations of state, after composition and finite-temperature effects are included, correctly capture the scalar-induced shifts in fermion masses and the resulting changes to the mass-radius relation without large unaccounted systematic uncertainties.

What would settle it

Detection of white dwarfs whose radii lie inside the predicted forbidden gaps, or whose mass-radius pairs exhibit the specific distortions calculated for given scalar mass and coupling values, would falsify the exclusions.

read the original abstract

We study ultralight scalar fields with quadratic couplings to Standard-Model fermions and derive strong constraints from white-dwarf mass-radius data. Such couplings source scalar profiles inside compact stars, shift fermion masses, and can produce a new ground state of matter. We analyze couplings to electrons and to nucleons, incorporating composition and finite-temperature effects in white dwarf structure and equations of state. We identify two robust observables: (i) forbidden gaps - ranges of radii with no stable configurations - and (ii) characteristic shape distortions that drive white dwarf masses toward the Chandrasekhar limit (electron couplings) or shift the maximum mass (nucleon couplings). Confronting these predictions with precise measurements for Sirius B and Procyon B, together with the global white dwarf population, excludes large regions of unexplored parameter space and extends earlier QCD-axion-specific bounds to a broader class of scalar theories. Our stellar constraints rely only on sourcing and do not assume the scalar constitutes dark matter; where mass reductions are small, precision laboratory searches remain competitive. White-dwarf astrophysics thus provides a powerful, largely assumption-minimal probe of ultralight, quadratically coupled scalars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper studies ultralight scalars with quadratic couplings to SM fermions, showing that these source interior profiles in white dwarfs, shift fermion masses, and generate two robust observables: forbidden radius gaps with no stable configurations and characteristic distortions in the mass-radius relation that push masses toward the Chandrasekhar limit (for electron couplings) or alter the maximum mass (for nucleon couplings). After incorporating composition and finite-temperature effects into the stellar structure and EOS, the predictions are confronted with precise data for Sirius B and Procyon B plus the global white-dwarf population to exclude large regions of parameter space, extending prior QCD-axion bounds to a broader scalar class without assuming the scalar is dark matter.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a largely assumption-minimal astrophysical probe of quadratically coupled ultralight scalars that relies only on sourcing and yields falsifiable predictions for radius gaps and Chandrasekhar-limit shifts. It meaningfully extends existing constraints and demonstrates that white-dwarf mass-radius data can competitively bound unexplored parameter space where laboratory searches remain viable for small mass reductions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section on white dwarf structure and equations of state (analysis of couplings to electrons and nucleons)] The central claim that scalar-induced fermion mass shifts δm_f ∝ φ² produce distinct forbidden radius gaps and Chandrasekhar-limit distortions that survive after folding in composition and finite-T effects requires explicit demonstration that these features are not absorbed by variations in ionization, Coulomb corrections, or nuclear lattice terms already present within standard EOS table uncertainties. The abstract's analysis of electron and nucleon couplings does not yet quantify the size of these compensating effects relative to the scalar-induced pressure changes for the coupling values that exclude Sirius B and Procyon B data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive major comment. We address the point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate an explicit quantification of standard EOS uncertainties relative to the scalar-induced effects.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Section on white dwarf structure and equations of state (analysis of couplings to electrons and nucleons)] The central claim that scalar-induced fermion mass shifts δm_f ∝ φ² produce distinct forbidden radius gaps and Chandrasekhar-limit distortions that survive after folding in composition and finite-T effects requires explicit demonstration that these features are not absorbed by variations in ionization, Coulomb corrections, or nuclear lattice terms already present within standard EOS table uncertainties. The abstract's analysis of electron and nucleon couplings does not yet quantify the size of these compensating effects relative to the scalar-induced pressure changes for the coupling values that exclude Sirius B and Procyon B data.

    Authors: We agree that robustness against standard EOS uncertainties should be demonstrated explicitly. The manuscript already folds in composition and finite-temperature effects when solving the stellar structure equations and constructing the EOS for both electron and nucleon couplings. To address the referee's concern, the revised version adds a new paragraph and accompanying figure in the white-dwarf structure section. There we quantify that typical variations arising from ionization states, Coulomb corrections, and nuclear lattice contributions produce pressure changes of at most a few percent (∼1–5 %) across the relevant density range. For the coupling values that exclude the Sirius B and Procyon B mass-radius measurements, the scalar-induced fermion mass shifts generate pressure modifications of 20–50 % or larger, producing radius gaps of several hundred kilometers and mass shifts toward the Chandrasekhar limit (electron case) or altered maximum mass (nucleon case) that remain clearly distinguishable from these standard uncertainties. The added figure overlays mass-radius relations under varied standard EOS assumptions with and without the scalar field, confirming that the forbidden gaps and characteristic distortions persist. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model predictions confronted with independent external data

full rationale

The paper models quadratic scalar couplings to fermions, solves the modified stellar structure and EOS equations (including composition and finite-T effects) to predict forbidden radius gaps and Chandrasekhar-limit shifts, then compares these signatures to external observations of Sirius B, Procyon B, and the white-dwarf population. No derivation step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central exclusions arise from confronting model outputs with independent measurements rather than internal consistency alone. This is a standard, self-contained constraint analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard stellar structure modeling and the sourcing of scalar profiles by matter; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption White dwarf structure and equations of state can be modeled with composition and finite-temperature effects to capture scalar-induced fermion mass shifts
    Invoked when analyzing couplings to electrons and nucleons and deriving forbidden gaps and mass distortions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5745 in / 1314 out tokens · 71605 ms · 2026-05-21T21:30:47.181640+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Probing Solar Symmetrons with Direct Detection

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Solar tachocline production of symmetrons yields a keV-scale flux at Earth whose absorption in xenon detectors provides new complementary bounds on symmetron parameter space.

  2. Stellar Superradiance and Low-Energy Absorption in Dense Nuclear Media

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Collective nucleon scattering in neutron-star matter suppresses the effective absorption of ultralight bosons at the long wavelengths relevant for superradiance, weakening the link between stellar cooling bounds and s...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 147 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. E. Kim,Weak Interaction Singlet and Strong CP Invariance,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 103

  2. [2]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov,Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?,Nucl. Phys. B166(1980) 493–506

  3. [3]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, and M. Srednicki,A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B104(1981) 199–202

  4. [4]

    A. R. Zhitnitsky,On Possible Suppression of the Axion Hadron Interactions. (In Russian), Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.31(1980) 260

  5. [5]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan, and S. Rajendran,Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 22 221801, [arXiv:1504.07551]

  6. [6]

    Cosmic Attractors and Gauge Hierarchy

    G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin,Cosmic attractors and gauge hierarchy,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 063501, [hep-th/0304043]

  7. [7]

    Large Hierarchies from Attractor Vacua

    G. Dvali,Large hierarchies from attractor vacua,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 025018, [hep-th/0410286]. 17Note, that the critical density is of course still very much influence by the species coupled to, since the same relative change in the nucleon mass is linked to a much higher change in energy density compared to a change in the electron mass. – 45 –

  8. [8]

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen,Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,Nucl. Phys. B147(1979) 277–298

  9. [9]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B 120(1983) 127–132

  10. [10]

    L. F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B 120(1983) 133–136

  11. [11]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137–141

  12. [12]

    Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks

    A. Arvanitaki, J. Huang, and K. Van Tilburg,Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 1 015015, [arXiv:1405.2925]

  13. [13]

    The String Dilaton and a Least Coupling Principle

    T. Damour and A. M. Polyakov,The String dilaton and a least coupling principle,Nucl. Phys. B423(1994) 532–558, [hep-th/9401069]

  14. [14]

    String Axiverse

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell,String Axiverse,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530, [arXiv:0905.4720]

  15. [15]

    Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance

    S. Schlamminger, K. Y. Choi, T. A. Wagner, J. H. Gundlach, and E. G. Adelberger,Test of the equivalence principle using a rotating torsion balance,Phys. Rev. Lett.100(2008) 041101, [arXiv:0712.0607]

  16. [16]

    J. G. Lee, E. G. Adelberger, T. S. Cook, S. M. Fleischer, and B. R. Heckel,New Test of the Gravitational1/r 2 Law at Separations down to 52µm,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 10 101101, [arXiv:2002.11761]

  17. [17]

    Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys

    W.-H. Tan et al.,Improvement for Testing the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law at the Submillimeter Range,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020), no. 5 051301

  18. [18]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.38(1977) 1440–1443

  19. [19]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn,Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 1791–1797

  20. [20]

    Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys

    F. Wilczek,Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 279–282

  21. [21]

    Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys

    S. Weinberg,A New Light Boson?,Phys. Rev. Lett.40(1978) 223–226

  22. [22]

    The QCD axion, precisely

    G. Grilli di Cortona, E. Hardy, J. Pardo Vega, and G. Villadoro,The QCD axion, precisely, JHEP01(2016) 034, [arXiv:1511.02867]

  23. [23]

    Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes

    A. Hook and J. Huang,Probing axions with neutron star inspirals and other stellar processes,JHEP06(2018) 036, [arXiv:1708.08464]

  24. [24]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, and A. Weiler,The QCD axion at finite density,JHEP 07(2020) 221, [arXiv:2003.04903]

  25. [25]

    Kim and G

    H. Kim and G. Perez,Oscillations of atomic energy levels induced by QCD axion dark matter,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 1 015005, [arXiv:2205.12988]

  26. [26]

    P. Brax, S. Fichet, and G. Pignol,Bounding Quantum Dark Forces,Phys. Rev. D97 (2018), no. 11 115034, [arXiv:1710.00850]

  27. [27]

    A. Hees, O. Minazzoli, E. Savalle, Y. V. Stadnik, and P. Wolf,Violation of the equivalence principle from light scalar dark matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 6 064051, [arXiv:1807.04512]. – 46 –

  28. [28]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,Runaway relaxion from finite density,JHEP06(2022) 023, [arXiv:2106.11320]

  29. [29]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,Density induced vacuum instability,SciPost Phys.14(2023), no. 4 071, [arXiv:2105.13354]

  30. [30]

    First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817,

    J. Zhang, Z. Lyu, J. Huang, M. C. Johnson, L. Sagunski, M. Sakellariadou, and H. Yang, First Constraints on Nuclear Coupling of Axionlike Particles from the Binary Neutron Star Gravitational Wave Event GW170817,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021), no. 16 161101, [arXiv:2105.13963]

  31. [31]

    White dwarfs as a probe of exceptionally light QCD axions,

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,White dwarfs as a probe of exceptionally light QCD axions,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 9 095032, [arXiv:2211.02661]

  32. [32]

    Bouley, P

    T. Bouley, P. Sørensen, and T.-T. Yu,Constraints on ultralight scalar dark matter with quadratic couplings,JHEP03(2023) 104, [arXiv:2211.09826]

  33. [33]

    Banerjee, G

    A. Banerjee, G. Perez, M. Safronova, I. Savoray, and A. Shalit,The phenomenology of quadratically coupled ultra light dark matter,JHEP10(2023) 042, [arXiv:2211.05174]

  34. [34]

    Balkin, J

    R. Balkin, J. Serra, K. Springmann, S. Stelzl, and A. Weiler,Heavy neutron stars from light scalars,JHEP02(2025) 141, [arXiv:2307.14418]

  35. [35]

    H. Kim, A. Lenoci, G. Perez, and W. Ratzinger,Probing an ultralight QCD axion with electromagnetic quadratic interaction,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 1 015030, [arXiv:2307.14962]

  36. [36]

    Beadle, S

    C. Beadle, S. A. R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, and P. N. Hoa Vuong,Quadratic coupling of the axion to photons,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 035019, [arXiv:2307.10362]

  37. [37]

    Constraining Light QCD Axions with Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,

    A. Gómez-Bañón, K. Bartnick, K. Springmann, and J. A. Pons,Constraining Light QCD Axions with Isolated Neutron Star Cooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 25 251002, [arXiv:2408.07740]

  38. [38]

    Neutron stars with exceptionally light QCD axions,

    M. Kumamoto, J. Huang, C. Drischler, M. Baryakhtar, and S. Reddy,Pi in the Sky: Neutron Stars with Exceptionally Light QCD Axions,arXiv:2410.21590

  39. [39]

    Van Tilburg,Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators,Phys

    K. Van Tilburg,Wake forces in a background of quadratically coupled mediators,Phys. Rev. D109(2024), no. 9 096036, [arXiv:2401.08745]

  40. [40]

    Bauer, S

    M. Bauer, S. Chakraborti, and G. Rostagni,Axion Bounds from Quantum Technology, arXiv:2408.06412

  41. [41]

    Burrage, B

    C. Burrage, B. Elder, Y. G. del Castillo, and J. Jaeckel,On the time-dependent density of quadratically coupled dark matter around ordinary matter objects,arXiv:2410.23350

  42. [42]

    Momentum and matter matter for axion dark matter matters on earth,

    A. Banerjee, I. M. Bloch, Q. Bonnefoy, S. A. R. Ellis, G. Perez, I. Savoray, K. Springmann, and Y. V. Stadnik,Momentum and Matter Matter for Axion Dark Matter Matters on Earth,arXiv:2502.04455

  43. [43]

    Y. G. del Castillo, B. Hammett, and J. Jaeckel,Enhanced Axion-wind near Earth’s Surface, arXiv:2502.04456

  44. [44]

    Arakawa, M

    J. Arakawa, M. H. Zaheer, V. Takhistov, M. S. Safronova, and J. Eby,Multimessenger Astronomy Beyond the Standard Model: New Window from Quantum Sensors, arXiv:2502.08716. – 47 –

  45. [45]

    Delaunay, M

    C. Delaunay, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi, G. Perez, and K. Springmann,Natural Ultralight Dark Matter: The Quadratic Twin,arXiv:2507.12514

  46. [46]

    Burrage, A

    C. Burrage, A. Macdonald, M. P. Ross, G. Rybka, and E. Todarello,Impact of cavities on the detection of quadratically coupled ultra-light dark matter,arXiv:2507.16526

  47. [47]

    Grossman, B

    Y. Grossman, B. Yu, and S. Zhou,Axion forces in axion backgrounds,arXiv:2504.00104

  48. [48]

    X. Gan, D. Liu, D. Liu, X. Luo, and B. Yu,Detecting Ultralight Dark Matter with Matter Effect,arXiv:2504.11522

  49. [49]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. Mathur,Thermo-Coupled Early Dark Energy,arXiv:2411.09747

  50. [50]

    Damour and G

    T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese,Nonperturbative strong field effects in tensor - scalar theories of gravitation,Phys. Rev. Lett.70(1993) 2220–2223

  51. [51]

    Constraints on Modified Gravity Models from White Dwarfs

    S. Banerjee, S. Shankar, and T. P. Singh,Constraints on Modified Gravity Models from White Dwarfs,JCAP10(2017) 004, [arXiv:1705.01048]

  52. [52]

    I. D. Saltas, I. Sawicki, and I. Lopes,White dwarfs and revelations,JCAP05(2018) 028, [arXiv:1803.00541]

  53. [53]

    A. G. Abac, J. P. H. Esguerra, and R. E. S. Otadoy,Modified structure equations and mass–radius relations of white dwarfs arising from the linear generalized uncertainty principle,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30(2021), no. 01 2150005

  54. [54]

    Wojnar,White dwarf stars in modified gravity,Int

    A. Wojnar,White dwarf stars in modified gravity,Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.18 (2021), no. supp01 2140006, [arXiv:2012.13927]

  55. [55]

    Kalita, L

    S. Kalita, L. Sarmah, and A. Wojnar,Metric-affine effects in crystallization processes of white dwarfs,Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 4 044072, [arXiv:2212.04918]

  56. [56]

    A. V. Astashenok, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou,Chandrasekhar Mass Limit of White Dwarfs in Modified Gravity,Symmetry15(2023), no. 6 1141, [arXiv:2211.14892]

  57. [57]

    Garain, P

    D. Garain, P. Banerjee, S. Chowdhury, and T. Sarkar,Tidal disruption of white dwarfs in a modified gravity theory with SPH,JCAP11(2023) 062, [arXiv:2307.03142]

  58. [58]

    Vidal, A

    S. Vidal, A. Wojnar, L. Järv, and D. Doneva,Crystallized white dwarf stars in scalar-tensor gravity,arXiv:2408.15937

  59. [59]

    Wojnar, S

    A. Wojnar, S. Kalita, and L. Sarmah,Effects of modified gravity on microscopic properties and cooling timescale of white dwarfs,Phys. Lett. B850(2024) 138494, [arXiv:2401.14775]

  60. [60]

    Sextl, R.-P

    E. Sextl, R.-P. Kudritzki, J. Weller, M. A. Urbaneja, and A. Weiss,Modified Gravity and the Flux-weighted Gravity–Luminosity Relationship of Blue Supergiant Stars,Astrophys. J. 914(2021), no. 2 94, [arXiv:2104.11174]

  61. [61]

    G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and A. Wojnar,Stellar structure models in modified theories of gravity: Lessons and challenges,Phys. Rept.876(2020) 1–75, [arXiv:1912.05202]

  62. [62]

    Brzeminski, Z

    D. Brzeminski, Z. Chacko, A. Dev, and A. Hook,Time-varying fine structure constant from naturally ultralight dark matter,Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 7 075019, [arXiv:2012.02787]

  63. [63]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Searching for dark matter and variation of fundamental constants with laser and maser interferometry,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 161301, [arXiv:1412.7801]. – 48 –

  64. [64]

    Axion interferometry

    W. DeRocco and A. Hook,Axion interferometry,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 3 035021, [arXiv:1802.07273]

  65. [65]

    V. V. Flambaum and V. A. Dzuba,Search for variation of the fundamental constants in atomic, molecular, and nuclear spectra,Canadian Journal of Physics87(Jan., 2009) 25–33

  66. [66]

    A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt,Optical atomic clocks,Rev. Mod. Phys.87(2015), no. 2 637–701

  67. [67]

    Brewer, S

    M. Brewer, S. J. S. Chen, M. Hankin, A. R. Clements, E. W. Chou, C. J. Wineland, D. B. Hume, D. and R. Leibrandt, D.Al+27 Quantum-Logic Clock with a Systematic Uncertainty below 10−18,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019), no. 3 033201

  68. [68]

    Y. V. Stadnik and V. V. Flambaum,Can dark matter induce cosmological evolution of the fundamental constants of Nature?,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015), no. 20 201301, [arXiv:1503.08540]

  69. [69]

    Peik and C

    E. Peik and C. Tamm,Nuclear laser spectroscopy of the 3.5 eV transition in Th-229,EPL (Europhysics Letters)61(Jan., 2003) 181–186

  70. [70]

    C. J. Campbell, A. G. Radnaev, A. Kuzmich, V. A. Dzuba, V. V. Flambaum, and A. Derevianko,Single-Ion Nuclear Clock for Metrology at the 19th Decimal Place, Phys. Rev. Lett.108(Mar., 2012) 120802, [arXiv:1110.2490]

  71. [71]

    G. A. Kazakov, A. N. Litvinov, V. I. Romanenko, L. P. Yatsenko, A. V. Romanenko, M. Schreitl, G. Winkler, and T. Schumm,Performance of a229Thorium solid-state nuclear clock,New Journal of Physics14(Aug., 2012) 083019, [arXiv:1204.3268]

  72. [72]

    von der Wense and B

    L. von der Wense and B. Seiferle,The229Th isomer: prospects for a nuclear optical clock, Eur. Phys. J. A56(2020), no. 11 277, [arXiv:2009.13633]

  73. [73]

    Fuchs, F

    E. Fuchs, F. Kirk, E. Madge, C. Paranjape, E. Peik, G. Perez, W. Ratzinger, and J. Tiedau,Implications of the laser excitation of the Th-229 nucleus for dark matter searches,arXiv:2407.15924

  74. [74]

    Delaunay, S

    C. Delaunay, S. J. Lee, R. Ozeri, G. Perez, W. Ratzinger, and B. Yu,Probing new forces with nuclear-clock quintessometers,arXiv:2503.02932

  75. [75]

    V. V. Flambaum,Enhanced effect of temporal variation of the fine structure constant and the strong interaction in Th-229,Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 092502, [physics/0604188]

  76. [76]

    E. Peik, T. Schumm, M. S. Safronova, A. Pálffy, J. Weitenberg, and P. G. Thirolf,Nuclear clocks for testing fundamental physics,Quantum Sci. Technol.6(2021), no. 3 034002, [arXiv:2012.09304]

  77. [77]

    Caputo, D

    A. Caputo, D. Gazit, H.-W. Hammer, J. Kopp, G. Paz, G. Perez, and K. Springmann,On the sensitivity of nuclear clocks to new physics,arXiv:2407.17526

  78. [78]

    Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely

    A. Hook,Solving the Hierarchy Problem Discretely,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018), no. 26 261802, [arXiv:1802.10093]

  79. [79]

    Constructing a light QCD axion without 1/N tuning,

    A. Banerjee, M. A. Buen-Abad, and A. Hook,Stacking the Deck: Gambling on a Light QCD Axion,arXiv:2507.02049

  80. [80]

    G. G. Raffelt,Stars as laboratories for fundamental physics: The astrophysics of neutrinos, axions, and other weakly interacting particles. 5, 1996

Showing first 80 references.