pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26239 · v1 · pith:WJXSBSMWnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.MA

Sentinel: Embodied Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning

Xiangye Lin , Hongxin Zhang , Ruxi Deng , Qinhong Zhou , Chuang Gan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 22:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.MA
keywords multi-agent cooperationembodied AIspatial reasoningnatural language communicationpath planningcity-scale environmentsdecentralized agentsdynamic obstacles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Decentralized agents gather faster and safer in city scenes by sharing language updates and replanning paths together.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that multiple embodied agents can coordinate to select a safe meeting point in large outdoor areas by exchanging natural language messages about their positions and obstacles. This matters because it demonstrates coordination without a central controller or perfect shared maps, using only coarse spatial data and dynamic communication. The authors introduce the Sentinel Challenge benchmark and the CoSaR framework that links foundation-model reasoning to classical navigation algorithms. In tests across 14 city scenes with 3-5 agents, the method produces shorter paths, quicker arrivals, and fewer encounters with patrolling sentinels.

Core claim

CoSaR enables agents to exchange situational updates, reason over evolving spatial constraints, and collaboratively replan trajectories, consistently leading to faster gathering, shorter path lengths, and improved safety when evaluated across 14 city-level scenes with 3-5 agents.

What carries the argument

CoSaR (Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning) framework, which bridges high-level communication and planning of foundation models with classical spatial navigation algorithms.

If this is right

  • Agents reach safe meeting points through language exchanges alone even when maps are incomplete.
  • Collaborative replanning reduces exposure to dynamic obstacles such as patrolling sentinels.
  • The same integration of communication and navigation scales to groups of three to five agents in varied city layouts.
  • Classical navigation algorithms supply the precision that pure language planning lacks in physical movement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The benchmark could serve as a testbed for comparing different foundation models on spatial coordination tasks.
  • Similar language-plus-navigation loops might support robot teams in search-and-rescue operations inside buildings.
  • Removing the coarse spatial tool entirely would clarify how much the method depends on that specific input.
  • Extending the sentinels to actively pursue agents would test whether the replanning step remains robust.

Load-bearing premise

Coarse spatial information and natural language communication supply enough shared grounding for agents to agree on mutually safe meeting points without central coordination.

What would settle it

Remove all natural language communication or replace the coarse spatial tool with random data, then measure whether gathering times increase and collision rates rise in the same 14 scenes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26239 by Chuang Gan, Hongxin Zhang, Qinhong Zhou, Ruxi Deng, Xiangye Lin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Embodied agents need to have Cooperative Spatial Intelligence to cooperate efficiently under dynamic spatial constraints in large spatial extents. language to agree on a mutually safe and convenient gathering point in large, city-scale outdoor scenes. After reaching consensus, each agent must navigate safely while avoiding dynamically moving sentinels patrolling the environment, relying on a map tool that … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Method overview. CoSaR maintains a Spatial Memory that integrates perceived visual observations, map-tool responses, and spatial information extracted from natural-language communication. A spatial-aware reasoning module then uses this memory to plan the actions. – QueryRefinedRoute(list[p]): return a waypoint-based route. The Map Tool first maps each input coordinate p to the nearest valid waypoint, and t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Route Refinement. The agent will call QueryMap and get a coarse-level 2D-map image, which is dynamically augmented with visual prompts representing the current route (blue) and danger zones (red) corresponding to sentinel locations. A Vision-Language Model (VLM) performs zero-shot spatial reasoning over this annotated visual input to synthesize a new route that ensures safe navigation toward the meeting po… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Method comparison under the standard setting with stationary sentinels. Results are reported as mean ± SEM over 14 scenes with 5 agents and 10 sentinels (6 runs per scene). Left: task success rate (%). Right: caught rate (%). Success 26.2% Caught 67.9% Incomplete 4.8% RoCo Success 16.7% Caught 69.0% Incomplete 8.3% No Meeting 6.0% CoELA Caught 74.0% Incomplete 26.0% MAT Success 32.1% Caught 66.7% CoSaR (Ou… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Failure breakdown (%) under the setting of 5 agents and 10 stationary sentinels over 14 scenes and 6 runs. Most failures lie in unsafe decisions (Caught). During the meeting procedure, certain circumstances may arise, like a new sentinel or invalid reference route, which will result in an increase in the current estimated time to arrival. Through coordinated decision-making, the agents are also able to add… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Case Study. The left panels demonstrate how CoSaR agents decide their next action when actively communicating. The right panel showcases an example of how CoSaR agents successfully change their meeting place upon changing circumstances. More case studies are provided in the Appendix. size grows. Moreover, CoSaR prevents its success rate from deteriorating as sharply as the other methods, demonstrating stro… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Waypoints in the Map Tool. The left image shows the road annotations provided by the Virtual Community dataset. Based on these annotations, we further generate waypoints and connect them to construct our Map Tool. A.1 Waypoints and Connectivity Graph Waypoints serve as discrete, navigable anchors placed throughout the city’s road network. Each waypoint corresponds to a location in the simulator, and togeth… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Coarse Obstacle Map and Occupancy Map. Left: the coarse obstacle map of the Long Island scene. Right: the occupancy map observed by an agent, with the agent’s position shown as a green dot. The white circle marks a danger zone containing a sentinel. The occupancy map provides significantly finer spatial detail. 4. To prevent the agent from being enclosed by newly created danger zones￾which may interfere wi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: We demonstrate three typical outcomes of route refinement: success, partial failure, and complete failure. The images are identical to those used during the route refinement procedure, except that the refined route is overlaid in orange. 09:00:01 Adam Pierce : Hello team , I ’ m currently at [ -138.45686722 , -30.63088512]. Could everyone please share their current positions ? This will help us find a cent… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we study Cooperative Spatial Intelligence, the ability of decentralized embodied agents to coordinate effectively under dynamic environmental constraints across city-scale outdoor domains. We introduce Sentinel Challenge, a benchmark where multiple decentralized embodied agents must communicate in natural language to agree on a mutually safe and convenient meeting point within large, city-scale outdoor environments. Each agent must then navigate safely while avoiding dynamic sentinels patrolling the area, using a tool that provides coarse spatial information. To address this, we propose CoSaR (Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning), a framework that bridges the high-level communication and planning abilities of foundation models with the precision of classical spatial navigation algorithms. CoSaR enables agents to exchange situational updates, reason over evolving spatial constraints, and collaboratively replan trajectories. Evaluated across 14 city-level scenes with 3-5 agents, CoSaR consistently leads to faster gathering, shorter path lengths, and improved safety. Our results demonstrate that integrating dynamic communication with spatial reasoning is essential for robust multi-agent cooperation. By formalizing this new setting and providing a scalable benchmark, we aim to build a foundation for advancing cooperative spatial intelligence in embodied multi-agent systems. Code and challenge are available at https://github.com/UMass-Embodied-AGI/Sentinel.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the Sentinel Challenge benchmark for cooperative spatial intelligence, where decentralized embodied agents in city-scale outdoor scenes must use natural language communication and a coarse spatial information tool to agree on safe meeting points while avoiding dynamic sentinels. It proposes the CoSaR framework, which combines foundation models for high-level reasoning and communication with classical spatial navigation algorithms for trajectory planning and replanning. Evaluation across 14 scenes with 3-5 agents reports that CoSaR yields faster gathering, shorter path lengths, and improved safety.

Significance. If the empirical results are robust, the work formalizes a new setting for multi-agent embodied cooperation and provides evidence that hybrid LLM-classical methods can address dynamic spatial constraints without central coordination. The public release of code and the benchmark supports reproducibility and is a clear strength.

major comments (1)
  1. [Evaluation] The central empirical claim (faster gathering, shorter paths, improved safety) is presented without details on the baselines, exact metrics, statistical significance tests, error bars, or ablation studies in the reported evaluation across 14 scenes. This information is load-bearing for assessing whether the gains are reliable and attributable to CoSaR.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'integrating dynamic communication with spatial reasoning is essential' but does not reference prior multi-agent navigation or LLM-planning literature that could contextualize this claim.
  2. The description of the coarse spatial information tool would benefit from a concrete example of the information it returns to clarify how it supports mutually safe meeting-point agreement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the novelty of the Sentinel Challenge benchmark, the CoSaR framework, and the value of the public code and benchmark release. We address the single major comment on evaluation details below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Evaluation] The central empirical claim (faster gathering, shorter paths, improved safety) is presented without details on the baselines, exact metrics, statistical significance tests, error bars, or ablation studies in the reported evaluation across 14 scenes. This information is load-bearing for assessing whether the gains are reliable and attributable to CoSaR.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks sufficient detail on these aspects, which is necessary to substantiate the claims. In the revised manuscript we will add: (1) explicit descriptions of all baselines (including their implementation and any adaptations), (2) precise mathematical definitions of each metric together with how they are computed from raw trajectories, (3) results of statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with reported p-values) across the 14 scenes, (4) error bars or standard deviations on all quantitative results, and (5) ablation studies that isolate the contribution of the natural-language communication module, the spatial-reasoning component, and the classical replanning algorithm. These additions will appear in an expanded Experiments section with new tables and figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical benchmark (Sentinel Challenge) and a framework (CoSaR) evaluated on 14 scenes with released code; the central claims concern measured improvements in gathering speed, path length, and safety under explicit design choices (coarse spatial tool + NL communication). No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps appear in the provided text. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not reduce any result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review reveals no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work is empirical and introduces a benchmark plus integration framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5762 in / 1073 out tokens · 21419 ms · 2026-06-29T22:56:48.858260+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordances

    Ahn, M., Brohan, A., Brown, N., Chebotar, Y., Cortes, O., David, B., Finn, C., Gopalakrishnan, K., Hausman, K., Herzog, A., et al.: Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.01691 (2022) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 64, 817–859 (2019) 3

    Amato, C., Konidaris, G., Kaelbling, L.P., How, J.P.: Modeling and planning with macro-actions in decentralized pomdps. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 64, 817–859 (2019) 3

    2019

  3. [3]

    On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agents

    Anderson, P., Chang, A., Chaplot, D.S., Dosovitskiy, A., Gupta, S., Koltun, V., Kosecka, J., Malik, J., Mottaghi, R., Savva, M., et al.: On evaluation of embodied navigation agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06757 (2018) 4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  4. [4]

    In: International Conference on LearningRepresentations(2020), https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkxpxJBKwS 3

    Baker, B., Kanitscheider, I., Markov, T., Wu, Y., Powell, G., McGrew, B., Mordatch, I.: Emergent tool use from multi-agent autocurricula. In: International Conference on LearningRepresentations(2020), https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkxpxJBKwS 3

    2020

  5. [5]

    Artificial Intelligence280, 103216 (2020) 3

    Bard, N., Foerster, J.N., Chandar, S., Burch, N., Lanctot, M., Song, H.F., Parisotto, E., Dumoulin, V., Moitra, S., Hughes, E., et al.: The hanabi challenge: A new frontier for ai research. Artificial Intelligence280, 103216 (2020) 3

    2020

  6. [6]

    Mathematics of operations research27(4), 819–840 (2002) 4

    Bernstein, D.S., Givan, R., Immerman, N., Zilberstein, S.: The complexity of decentralized control of markov decision processes. Mathematics of operations research27(4), 819–840 (2002) 4

    2002

  7. [7]

    In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Cai, W., Ponomarenko, I., Yuan, J., Li, X., Yang, W., Dong, H., Zhao, B.: Spa- tialbot: Precise spatial understanding with vision language models. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 9490–9498. IEEE (2025) 4

    2025

  8. [8]

    Advances in neural information processing systems32(2019) 3

    Carroll, M., Shah, R., Ho, M.K., Griffiths, T., Seshia, S., Abbeel, P., Dragan, A.: On the utility of learning about humans for human-ai coordination. Advances in neural information processing systems32(2019) 3

    2019

  9. [9]

    Numerische Mathematik1(1), 269–271 (1959) 6, 10

    Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik1(1), 269–271 (1959) 6, 10

    1959

  10. [10]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11401 (2024) 4

    Fu, R., Liu, J., Chen, X., Nie, Y., Xiong, W.: Scene-llm: Extending language model for 3d visual understanding and reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11401 (2024) 4

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.104213(4), 7 (2022) 4

    Gadre, S.Y., Wortsman, M., Ilharco, G., Schmidt, L., Song, S.: Clip on wheels: Zero-shot object navigation as object localization and exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.104213(4), 7 (2022) 4

    work page arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    Guo, D., Yang, D., Zhang, H., Song, J., Zhang, R., Xu, R., Zhu, Q., Ma, S., Wang, P., Bi, X., et al.: Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 (2025) 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 20482–20494 (2023) 4

    Hong, Y., Zhen, H., Chen, P., Zheng, S., Du, Y., Chen, Z., Gan, C.: 3d-llm: Injecting the 3d world into large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems36, 20482–20494 (2023) 4

    2023

  14. [14]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05714 (2022) 4 18 Xiangye Lin, Hongxin Zhang, et al

    Huang, C., Mees, O., Zeng, A., Burgard, W.: Visual language maps for robot navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05714 (2022) 4 18 Xiangye Lin, Hongxin Zhang, et al

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Science364(6443), 859–865 (2019) 3

    Jaderberg, M., Czarnecki, W.M., Dunning, I., Marris, L., Lever, G., Castaneda, A.G., Beattie, C., Rabinowitz, N.C., Morcos, A.S., Ruderman, A., et al.: Human- level performance in 3d multiplayer games with population-based reinforcement learning. Science364(6443), 859–865 (2019) 3

    2019

  16. [16]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16

    Jain, U., Weihs, L., Kolve, E., Farhadi, A., Lazebnik, S., Kembhavi, A., Schwing, A.: A cordial sync: Going beyond marginal policies for multi-agent embodied tasks. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part V 16. pp. 471–490. Springer (2020) 3

    2020

  17. [17]

    In: Fortieth International Conference on Machine Learning (2023) 4

    Jiang, Y., Gupta, A., Zhang, Z., Wang, G., Dou, Y., Chen, Y., Fei-Fei, L., Anand- kumar, A., Zhu, Y., Fan, L.: Vima: General robot manipulation with multimodal prompts. In: Fortieth International Conference on Machine Learning (2023) 4

    2023

  18. [18]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6(2), 1312–1319 (2021) 4

    Kahn, G., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.: Badgr: An autonomous self-supervised learning- based navigation system. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6(2), 1312–1319 (2021) 4

    2021

  19. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Khandelwal, A., Weihs, L., Mottaghi, R., Kembhavi, A.: Simple but effective: Clip embeddings for embodied ai. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 14829–14838 (2022) 4

    2022

  20. [20]

    OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Model

    Kim, M.J., Pertsch, K., Karamcheti, S., Xiao, T., Balakrishna, A., Nair, S., Rafailov, R., Foster, E., Lam, G., Sanketi, P., et al.: Openvla: An open-source vision-language- action model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09246 (2024) 4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    AI2-THOR: An Interactive 3D Environment for Visual AI

    Kolve, E., Mottaghi, R., Han, W., VanderBilt, E., Weihs, L., Herrasti, A., Deitke, M., Ehsani, K., Gordon, D., Zhu, Y., et al.: Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474 (2017) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    In: 2013 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation

    Kümmerle, R., Ruhnke, M., Steder, B., Stachniss, C., Burgard, W.: A navigation system for robots operating in crowded urban environments. In: 2013 IEEE Inter- national Conference on Robotics and Automation. pp. 3225–3232. IEEE (2013) 4

    2013

  23. [23]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Li, C., Zhang, R., Wong, J., Gokmen, C., Srivastava, S., Martín-Martín, R., Wang, C., Levine, G., Lingelbach, M., Sun, J., et al.: Behavior-1k: A benchmark for embodied ai with 1,000 everyday activities and realistic simulation. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 80–93. PMLR (2023) 3

    2023

  24. [24]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04679 (2024) 2, 3

    Liu, J., Zhou, P., Du, Y., Tan, A.H., Snoek, C.G., Sonke, J.J., Gavves, E.: Capo: Cooperative plan optimization for efficient embodied multi-agent cooperation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04679 (2024) 2, 3

    work page arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detection

    Liu, S., Zeng, Z., Ren, T., Li, F., Zhang, H., Yang, J., Jiang, Q., Li, C., Yang, J., Su, H., et al.: Grounding dino: Marrying dino with grounded pre-training for open-set object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.05499 (2023) 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Liu, X., Li, J., Jiang, Y., Sujay, N., Yang, Z., Zhang, J., Abanes, J., Zhang, J., Feng, C.: Citywalker: Learning embodied urban navigation from web-scale videos. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 6875–6885 (2025) 4

    2025

  27. [27]

    Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems30(2017) 3

    Lowe, R., Tamar, A., Harb, J., Pieter Abbeel, O., Mordatch, I.: Multi-agent actor- critic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems30(2017) 3

    2017

  28. [28]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 32340–32352 (2022) 4

    Majumdar, A., Aggarwal, G., Devnani, B., Hoffman, J., Batra, D.: Zson: Zero-shot object-goal navigation using multimodal goal embeddings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 32340–32352 (2022) 4

    2022

  29. [29]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04738 (2023) 3, 11, 15 Sentinel: Embodied Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning 19

    Mandi, Z., Jain, S., Song, S.: Roco: Dialectic multi-robot collaboration with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04738 (2023) 3, 11, 15 Sentinel: Embodied Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning 19

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Mapping Instructions to Actions in 3D Environments with Visual Goal Prediction

    Misra, D., Bennett, A., Blukis, V., Niklasson, E., Shatkhin, M., Artzi, Y.: Mapping instructions to actions in 3d environments with visual goal prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00786 (2018) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Nature Machine Intelligence pp

    Mon-Williams, R., Li, G., Long, R., Du, W., Lucas, C.G.: Embodied large language models enable robots to complete complex tasks in unpredictable environments. Nature Machine Intelligence pp. 1–10 (2025) 4

    2025

  32. [32]

    Morales, Y., Carballo, A., Takeuchi, E., Aburadani, A., Tsubouchi, T.: Autonomous robotnavigationinoutdoorclutteredpedestrianwalkways.JournalofFieldRobotics 26(8), 609–635 (2009) 4

    2009

  33. [33]

    OpenAI: Gpt-4 technical report (2023) 2

    2023

  34. [34]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    Padmakumar, A., Thomason, J., Shrivastava, A., Lange, P., Narayan-Chen, A., Gella, S., Piramuthu, R., Tur, G., Hakkani-Tur, D.: Teach: Task-driven embodied agents that chat. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. vol. 36, pp. 2017–2025 (2022) 3

    2017

  35. [35]

    Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior

    Park, J.S., O’Brien, J.C., Cai, C.J., Morris, M.R., Liang, P., Bernstein, M.S.: Generative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.03442 (2023) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021) 3

    Puig, X., Shu, T., Li, S., Wang, Z., Liao, Y.H., Tenenbaum, J.B., Fidler, S., Torralba, A.: Watch-and-help: A challenge for social perception and human-ai collaboration. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021) 3

    2021

  37. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13724 (2023)

    Puig, X., Undersander, E., Szot, A., Cote, M.D., Yang, T.Y., Partsey, R., Desai, R., Clegg, A.W., Hlavac, M., Min, S.Y., et al.: Habitat 3.0: A co-habitat for humans, avatars and robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13724 (2023) 3

    work page arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    In: International conference on machine learning

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International conference on machine learning. pp. 8748–8763. PmLR (2021) 7

    2021

  39. [39]

    Ravi, N., Gabeur, V., Hu, Y.T., Hu, R., Ryali, C., Ma, T., Khedr, H., Rädle, R., Rolland, C., Gustafson, L., Mintun, E., Pan, J., Alwala, K.V., Carion, N., Wu, C.Y., Girshick, R., Dollár, P., Feichtenhofer, C.: Sam 2: Segment anything in images and videos (2024),https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.007147

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems

    Samvelyan, M., Rashid, T., Schroeder de Witt, C., Farquhar, G., Nardelli, N., Rudner, T.G., Hung, C.M., Torr, P.H., Foerster, J., Whiteson, S.: The starcraft multi-agent challenge. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. pp. 2186–2188 (2019) 3

    2019

  41. [41]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Savva, M., Kadian, A., Maksymets, O., Zhao, Y., Wijmans, E., Jain, B., Straub, J., Liu, J., Koltun, V., Malik, J., et al.: Habitat: A platform for embodied ai research. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 9339–9347 (2019) 3

    2019

  42. [42]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Shah, D., Eysenbach, B., Kahn, G., Rhinehart, N., Levine, S.: Ving: Learning open-world navigation with visual goals. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 13215–13222. IEEE (2021) 4

    2021

  43. [43]

    In: Conference on robot learning

    Shah, D., Osiński, B., Levine, S., et al.: Lm-nav: Robotic navigation with large pre-trained models of language, vision, and action. In: Conference on robot learning. pp. 492–504. PMLR (2023) 4

    2023

  44. [44]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14846 (2023) 4

    Shah, D., Sridhar, A., Dashora, N., Stachowicz, K., Black, K., Hirose, N., Levine, S.: Vint: A foundation model for visual navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14846 (2023) 4

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01517 (2021) 3 20 Xiangye Lin, Hongxin Zhang, et al

    Sharma, P., Torralba, A., Andreas, J.: Skill induction and planning with latent language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01517 (2021) 3 20 Xiangye Lin, Hongxin Zhang, et al

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Song, C.H., Wu, J., Washington, C., Sadler, B.M., Chao, W.L., Su, Y.: Llm-planner: Few-shot grounded planning for embodied agents with large language models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 2998–3009 (2023) 4

    2023

  47. [47]

    In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems

    Spaan, M.T., Gordon, G.J., Vlassis, N.: Decentralized planning under uncertainty for teams of communicating agents. In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems. pp. 249–256 (2006) 4

    2006

  48. [48]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

    Sridhar, A., Shah, D., Glossop, C., Levine, S.: Nomad: Goal masked diffusion policies for navigation and exploration. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). pp. 63–70. IEEE (2024) 4

    2024

  49. [49]

    Autonomous Robots8, 345–383 (2000) 3

    Stone, P., Veloso, M.: Multiagent systems: A survey from a machine learning perspective. Autonomous Robots8, 345–383 (2000) 3

    2000

  50. [50]

    Neural MMO: A Massively Multiagent Game Environment for Training and Evaluating Intelligent Agents

    Suarez, J., Du, Y., Isola, P., Mordatch, I.: Neural mmo: A massively multiagent game environment for training and evaluating intelligent agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00784 (2019) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  51. [51]

    Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents

    Sumers, T., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., Griffiths, T.L.: Cognitive architectures for language agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02427 (2023) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Szot, A., Jain, U., Batra, D., Kira, Z., Desai, R., Rai, A.: Adaptive coordination in social embodied rearrangement. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 33365–33380. PMLR (2023) 3

    2023

  53. [53]

    Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Models

    Wang, G., Xie, Y., Jiang, Y., Mandlekar, A., Xiao, C., Zhu, Y., Fan, L., Anandkumar, A.: Voyager: An open-ended embodied agent with large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16291 (2023) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

    Wang, L., Ma, C., Feng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, Z., Tang, J., Chen, X., Lin, Y., et al.: A survey on large language model based autonomous agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.11432 (2023) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang, T., Mao, X., Zhu, C., Xu, R., Lyu, R., Li, P., Chen, X., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Xue, T., et al.: Embodiedscan: A holistic multi-modal 3d perception suite towards embodied ai. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 19757–19767 (2024) 4

    2024

  56. [56]

    In: Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2023) 3

    Wang, Z., Cai, S., Chen, G., Liu, A., Ma, X., Liang, Y.: Describe, explain, plan and select: interactive planning with llms enables open-world multi-task agents. In: Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2023) 3

    2023

  57. [57]

    In: Second Agent Learning in Open-Endedness Workshop (2023),https://openreview.net/forum? id=xzPkZyHlOW4

    Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liu, A., Ma, X., Liang, Y.: JARVIS-1: Open-world multi-task agents with memory-augmented multimodal language models. In: Second Agent Learning in Open-Endedness Workshop (2023),https://openreview.net/forum? id=xzPkZyHlOW4

    2023

  58. [58]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 16509–16521 (2022) 3, 11

    Wen, M., Kuba, J., Lin, R., Zhang, W., Wen, Y., Wang, J., Yang, Y.: Multi- agent reinforcement learning is a sequence modeling problem. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems35, 16509–16521 (2022) 3, 11

    2022

  59. [59]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00357 (2019) 4

    Wijmans, E., Kadian, A., Morcos, A., Lee, S., Essa, I., Parikh, D., Savva, M., Batra, D.: Dd-ppo: Learning near-perfect pointgoal navigators from 2.5 billion frames. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00357 (2019) 4

    work page arXiv 1911

  60. [60]

    The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey

    Xi, Z., Chen, W., Guo, X., He, W., Ding, Y., Hong, B., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Jin, S., Zhou, E., et al.: The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07864 (2023) 3

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Xia, F., Zamir, A.R., He, Z., Sax, A., Malik, J., Savarese, S.: Gibson env: Real- world perception for embodied agents. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 9068–9079 (2018) 3 Sentinel: Embodied Cooperative Spatial Reasoning and Planning 21

    2018

  62. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Xiang, F., Qin, Y., Mo, K., Xia, Y., Zhu, H., Liu, F., Liu, M., Jiang, H., Yuan, Y., Wang, H., et al.: Sapien: A simulated part-based interactive environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 11097–11107 (2020) 3

    2020

  63. [63]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Yang, J., Yang, S., Gupta, A.W., Han, R., Fei-Fei, L., Xie, S.: Thinking in space: How multimodal large language models see, remember, and recall spaces. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 10632–10643 (2025) 4

    2025

  64. [64]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Yang, Y., Yang, H., Zhou, J., Chen, P., Zhang, H., Du, Y., Gan, C.: 3d-mem: 3d scene memory for embodied exploration and reasoning. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 17294–17303 (2025) 4

    2025

  65. [65]

    Zhang, H., Du, W., Shan, J., Zhou, Q., Du, Y., Tenenbaum, J.B., Shu, T., Gan, C.: Building cooperative embodied agents modularly with large language models (2023) 2, 3, 4, 11, 15

    2023

  66. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10775 (2024) 4

    Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Lyu, Q., Zhang, Z., Chen, S., Shu, T., Dariush, B., Lee, K., Du, Y., Gan, C.: Combo: compositional world models for embodied multi-agent cooperation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10775 (2024) 4

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24019 (2025) 3

    Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhang, Z., Fang, L., Zhou, Q., Gan, C.: Ella: Embodied social agents with lifelong memory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.24019 (2025) 3

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Zheng, D., Huang, S., Zhao, L., Zhong, Y., Wang, L.: Towards learning a generalist model for embodied navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 13624–13634 (2024) 4

    2024

  69. [69]

    Zhou, Q., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Xu, H., Du, W., Zhang, H., Du, Y., Tenenbaum, J.B., Gan, C.: Hazard challenge: Embodied decision making in dynamically changing environments (2024) 3

    2024

  70. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14893 (2025) 3, 10

    Zhou, Q., Zhang, H., Lin, X., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Liu, W., Zhang, Z., Chen, S., Fang, L., Lyu, Q., et al.: Virtual community: An open world for humans, robots, and society. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14893 (2025) 3, 10

    work page arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    In: Conference on Robot Learning

    Zitkovich, B., Yu, T., Xu, S., Xu, P., Xiao, T., Xia, F., Wu, J., Wohlhart, P., Welker, S., Wahid, A., et al.: Rt-2: Vision-language-action models transfer web knowledge to robotic control. In: Conference on Robot Learning. pp. 2165–2183. PMLR (2023) 4

    2023

  72. [72]

    In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference

    Zu, L., Lin, L., Fu, S., Zhao, N., Zhou, P.: Collaborative tree search for enhancing embodied multi-agent collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference. pp. 29513–29522 (2025) 3 A Additional Details on the Sentinel Challenge The navigation component of theSentinelchallenge is fundamentally built upon the map tool...

    2025

  73. [73]

    dangerous

    Each RGB–D frame is accompanied by semantic labels. The agent keeps a set of “dangerous” labels corresponding to sentinel-related classes

  74. [74]

    For every pixel whose semantic label belongs to this dangerous set, its 3D location is reconstructed from the depth value and camera pose

  75. [75]

    Specifically, letps denote the reconstructed sentinel-related point

    Around each reconstructed location, the occupancy map marks nearby cells within a fixed radius as dangerous. Specifically, letps denote the reconstructed sentinel-related point. All cellspsatisfying ∥p−p s∥ ≤r (1) are marked as dangerous, wherer is the danger-zone radius. In our experi- ments,ris set to10. 24 Xiangye Lin, Hongxin Zhang, et al. Fig.8: Coar...

  76. [76]

    Letpa denote the agent position

    To prevent the agent from being enclosed by newly created danger zones- which may interfere with A* navigation-we restrict danger labeling using a distance-difference constraint relative to the agent position. Letpa denote the agent position. A cellpis marked as dangerous only if d(p,p s)−d(p,p a)< τ, (2) where d(·,· )denotes Euclidean distance and τ is a...

  77. [77]

    Danger zones are updated continuously. If a region previously marked as dangerous becomes visible again in a later frame and no dangerous labels are detected, the corresponding cells are cleared and restored to a safe state. Consequently, the map reflects currently observed threats and automatically removes outdated danger markings. B.2 Emergency avoidanc...

  78. [78]

    Emergency avoidance is triggered whenever: (a) the agent receives a warning signal from any sentinel, or (b) the agent visually detects a sentinel within a certain threshold

  79. [79]

    Once triggered, the agent performs anemergency avoidance target selection and moves toward the target for10consecutive steps, away from the nearest sentinels

  80. [80]

    If the area is clear, the agent resumes its original task

    After completing these10steps, the agent scans its surroundings to confirm that no sentinel is still in close proximity. If the area is clear, the agent resumes its original task. Emergency Avoidance Target Selection.When an agent detects nearby sentinels, it performs an emergency avoidance procedure to select a temporary navigation target that moves it a...

    work page arXiv 1948

Showing first 80 references.