pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

Canonical reference. 80% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

34 Pith papers citing it
Background 80% of classified citations
abstract

Autonomous agents have long been a prominent research focus in both academic and industry communities. Previous research in this field often focuses on training agents with limited knowledge within isolated environments, which diverges significantly from human learning processes, and thus makes the agents hard to achieve human-like decisions. Recently, through the acquisition of vast amounts of web knowledge, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in achieving human-level intelligence. This has sparked an upsurge in studies investigating LLM-based autonomous agents. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these studies, delivering a systematic review of the field of LLM-based autonomous agents from a holistic perspective. More specifically, we first discuss the construction of LLM-based autonomous agents, for which we propose a unified framework that encompasses a majority of the previous work. Then, we present a comprehensive overview of the diverse applications of LLM-based autonomous agents in the fields of social science, natural science, and engineering. Finally, we delve into the evaluation strategies commonly used for LLM-based autonomous agents. Based on the previous studies, we also present several challenges and future directions in this field. To keep track of this field and continuously update our survey, we maintain a repository of relevant references at https://github.com/Paitesanshi/LLM-Agent-Survey.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 8 baseline 1 dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

EvoMAS: Learning Execution-Time Workflows for Multi-Agent Systems

cs.AI · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

EvoMAS trains a workflow adapter with policy gradients to dynamically instantiate stage-specific multi-agent workflows from a fixed agent pool, using explicit task-state construction and terminal success signals, and outperforms static baselines on GAIA, HLE, and DeepResearcher.

An AI Agent Execution Environment to Safeguard User Data

cs.CR · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

GAAP guarantees confidentiality of private user data for AI agents by enforcing user-specified permissions deterministically through persistent information flow tracking, without trusting the agent or requiring attack-free models.

SoK: Agentic Skills -- Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents

cs.CR · 2026-02-24 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The paper systematizes agentic skills beyond tool use, providing design pattern and representation-scope taxonomies plus security analysis of malicious skill infiltration in agent marketplaces.

Agentic Inequality

cs.CY · 2025-10-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Introduces the concept of agentic inequality and develops a three-dimensional framework (availability, quality, quantity) to analyze how autonomous AI agents could deepen or mitigate existing divides through scalable goal delegation.

Mobile GUI Agents under Real-world Threats: Are We There Yet?

cs.CR · 2025-07-06 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Introduces an app-content instrumentation framework and benchmark showing that examined GUI agents suffer 42.0% and 36.1% average misleading rates from third-party content in dynamic and static tests respectively.

OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agents

cs.CL · 2024-10-30 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

OS-Atlas, trained on the largest open-source cross-platform GUI grounding corpus of 13 million elements, outperforms prior open-source models on six benchmarks across mobile, desktop, and web platforms.

citing papers explorer

Showing 34 of 34 citing papers.