pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1408.4837 · v2 · submitted 2014-08-20 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT· math.PR

Recognition: unknown

The Gaussian min-max theorem in the Presence of Convexity

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.IT math.ITmath.PR
keywords optimizationproblemsgaussianconvexitycostmin-maxnoisyoptimal
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Gaussian comparison theorems are useful tools in probability theory; they are essential ingredients in the classical proofs of many results in empirical processes and extreme value theory. More recently, they have been used extensively in the analysis of non-smooth optimization problems that arise in the recovery of structured signals from noisy linear observations. We refer to such problems as Primary Optimization (PO) problems. A prominent role in the study of the (PO) problems is played by Gordon's Gaussian min-max theorem (GMT) which provides probabilistic lower bounds on the optimal cost via a simpler Auxiliary Optimization (AO) problem. Motivated by resent work of M. Stojnic, we show that under appropriate convexity assumptions the (AO) problem allows one to tightly bound both the optimal cost, as well as the norm of the solution of the (PO). As an application, we use our result to develop a general framework to tightly characterize the performance (e.g. squared-error) of a wide class of convex optimization algorithms used in the context of noisy signal recovery.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Does $\ell_2$-Boosting Overfit Benignly? High-Dimensional Risk Asymptotics and the $\ell_1$ Implicit Bias

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ℓ₂-Boosting exhibits benign overfitting with logarithmic excess variance decay Θ(σ²/log(p/n)) under isotropic noise due to ℓ₁ bias, and a subdifferential early stopping rule recovers minimax-optimal ℓ₁ rates.

  2. When Does $\ell_2$-Boosting Overfit Benignly? High-Dimensional Risk Asymptotics and the $\ell_1$ Implicit Bias

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ℓ₂-boosting localizes noise into sparse sets under isotropic pure-noise models, yielding excess variance Θ(σ²/log(p/n)) instead of linear decay, with a tuning-free early stopping rule attaining minimax ℓ₁ rates.

  3. PRADAS: PRior-Assisted DAta Splitting for False Discovery Rate Control

    stat.ME 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PRADAS derives a Bayes-optimal mirror statistic for any splitting scheme, establishes asymptotic FDR control under weak dependence, and optimizes the split ratio as a stopping time to improve power over standard equal...

  4. Characterization of Gaussian Universality Breakdown in High-Dimensional Empirical Risk Minimization

    stat.ML 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    In high-dimensional convex ERM with non-Gaussian data, the projection of the estimator onto a test covariate asymptotically follows the convolution of a generally non-Gaussian term with an independent centered Gaussia...