Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Generative AI Perceptions: A Survey to Measure the Perceptions of Faculty, Staff, and Students on Generative AI Tools in Academia

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.14415 v1 pith:D3RLNJ5V submitted 2023-04-21 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY

Sara Amani , Lance White , Trini Balart , Laksha Arora , Kristi J. Shryock , Kelly Brumbelow , Karan L. Watson This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
keywords chatgptsurveyfacultymeasurestaffstudentstooleffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

ChatGPT is a natural language processing tool that can engage in human-like conversations and generate coherent and contextually relevant responses to various prompts. ChatGPT is capable of understanding natural text that is input by a user and generating appropriate responses in various forms. This tool represents a major step in how humans are interacting with technology. This paper specifically focuses on how ChatGPT is revolutionizing the realm of engineering education and the relationship between technology, students, and faculty and staff. Because this tool is quickly changing and improving with the potential for even greater future capability, it is a critical time to collect pertinent data. A survey was created to measure the effects of ChatGPT on students, faculty, and staff. This survey is shared as a Texas A&M University technical report to allow other universities and entities to use this survey and measure the effects elsewhere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The New Calculator? Practices, Norms, and Implications of Generative AI in Higher Education

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Interviews show university students self-govern their GenAI use under unclear guidelines, developing unspoken rules and reliance strategies amid plagiarism-focused institutional messaging.

  2. Understanding the Practices, Perceptions, and (Dis)Trust of Generative AI among Instructors: A Mixed-methods Study in the U.S. Higher Education

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Instructors' trust and distrust in generative AI can coexist and are shaped by familiarity, teaching level, and ethical or pedagogical concerns, while hands-on classroom use remains limited.

  3. Beyond the Hype: A Comprehensive Review of Current Trends in Generative AI Research, Teaching Practices, and Tools

    cs.CY 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Computing educators are adopting GenAI faster than they are formalizing policies, and both educators and developers see code reading, evaluation, and problem decomposition as rising in importance over syntax recall.

  4. Scaffold or Crutch? Examining College Students' Use and Views of Generative AI Tools for STEM Education

    physics.ed-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a small U.S. survey, most college STEM students use generative AI for coursework, and over half of those who answered a prompt-writing task would ask the AI to solve the problem directly, often bypassing their own ...

  5. AI Across Borders: Exploring Perceptions and Interactions in Higher Education

    cs.CY 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across 1,211 students at Ulster University and IIT Delhi, computer science students reported similar positive AI attitudes at both institutions, while students in other fields differed and the pooled gender difference...

Pith tools