arxiv: 2601.04168 · v4 · submitted 2026-01-07 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.IM· astro-ph.SR

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A framework for LISA population inference

Alexandre Toubiana , Jonathan Gair

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SR

keywords LISAgravitational wavespopulation inferencehierarchical BayesianGlobal Fitstochastic backgroundresolved sources

0 comments

The pith

A hierarchical Bayesian framework infers astrophysical population properties directly from LISA Global Fit outputs by jointly using resolved sources and unresolved backgrounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

LISA will record a dense mixture of gravitational wave signals from many source types, some individually detectable and others blending into a stochastic background. The paper introduces a hierarchical Bayesian method that takes the full output of the Global Fit and turns it into constraints on the underlying populations, such as black hole or white dwarf distributions. This matters because earlier detectors needed simpler selection effects, but LISA's overlapping signals require a joint treatment to avoid losing information or introducing bias. The authors demonstrate the method on a toy model of the Global Fit and show how choices like the signal-to-noise cutoff for resolved sources alter the recovered population parameters. Their approach supplies a practical starting point for turning LISA data into astrophysical insights once the full analysis pipeline exists.

Core claim

We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework to infer the properties of astrophysical populations directly from the output of a LISA Global Fit, consistently accounting for information encoded in both the resolved sources and the unresolved background. Using a simplified model of the Global Fit, we illustrate how the interplay between resolved and unresolved components affects population inference and highlight the impact of data analysis choices, such as the signal-to-noise threshold for resolved sources, on the results.

What carries the argument

A hierarchical Bayesian model that takes Global Fit outputs (catalog of resolved sources plus stochastic background parameters) as input and infers population hyperparameters through a likelihood that incorporates detection thresholds and selection effects.

If this is right

Population constraints tighten when the unresolved background is included alongside resolved sources.
Raising or lowering the resolution threshold changes both the central values and the uncertainties of inferred population parameters.
The method supplies a consistent route to population studies once real LISA Global Fit products become available.
It can be extended to other space-based detectors that will face similar mixtures of resolved and unresolved signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same structure could be applied to joint analyses of LISA with ground-based detectors to link different parts of the black-hole mass spectrum.
Ignoring the background component would systematically bias population inferences toward models that overpredict bright sources.
Future work could test the framework by injecting known populations into full end-to-end LISA simulations and recovering them.

Load-bearing premise

The framework is built on a simplified model of the Global Fit that may not capture the full correlations and complexities of actual LISA data analysis pipelines.

What would settle it

Generate synthetic LISA data from a known population model, process it through a simulated Global Fit, apply the framework, and check whether the recovered population parameters agree with the input values to within the reported uncertainties.

read the original abstract

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is expected to have a source rich data stream containing signals from large numbers of many different types of source. This will include both individually resolvable signals and overlapping stochastic backgrounds, a regime intermediate between current ground-based detectors and pulsar timing arrays. The resolved sources and backgrounds will be fitted together in a high dimensional Global Fit. To extract information about the astrophysical populations to which the sources belong, we need to decode the information in the Global Fit, which requires new methodology that has not been required for the analysis of current gravitational wave detectors. Here, we %start that development, presenting present a hierarchical Bayesian framework to infer the properties of astrophysical populations directly from the output of a LISA Global Fit, consistently accounting for information encoded in both the resolved sources and the unresolved background. Using a simplified model of the Global Fit, we illustrate how the interplay between resolved and unresolved components affects population inference and highlight the impact of data analysis choices, such as the signal-to-noise threshold for resolved sources, on the results. Our approach provides a practical foundation for population inference using LISA data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper sketches a hierarchical Bayesian framework for LISA population inference from global fits but only tests it on a simplified model.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a hierarchical Bayesian framework that pulls population parameters straight from LISA's global fit output while folding in both resolved sources and the unresolved background. That is the concrete new piece for this detector's mixed regime. The authors lay out the logic in a straightforward way and use a simple model to show how the SNR threshold for calling sources resolved changes the inferred population constraints. The structure follows standard hierarchical Bayes but is applied correctly to the LISA case where previous ground-based or PTA methods do not transfer directly. They also flag the effect of analysis choices on the results, which is useful to see early. The soft spot is the validation. The demonstration stays on a simplified global fit model, and the abstract itself notes that this version may miss the parameter covariances and overlapping-signal correlations that real pipelines will produce. No quantitative check is given on whether the population posteriors remain calibrated once those effects are restored, so the practical reliability is still open. This is for LISA data analysts and population modelers who are already thinking about end-to-end pipelines. A reader who wants a ready-to-apply tool will find it thin, but someone looking for the conceptual setup will get a clear starting point. The paper deserves a serious referee because the problem is timely and the core thinking is sound; I would send it for review with the expectation that the authors add more realistic tests.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a hierarchical Bayesian framework to infer astrophysical population properties directly from the output of a LISA Global Fit analysis. The approach is designed to consistently incorporate information from both individually resolved sources and the unresolved stochastic background. It is illustrated using a simplified model of the Global Fit, which demonstrates the interplay between resolved and unresolved components and the effects of analysis choices such as the signal-to-noise ratio threshold for source resolution.

Significance. If validated on realistic simulations, the framework would address a genuine methodological need for population inference in the LISA regime, which lies between current ground-based detectors and pulsar timing arrays. The hierarchical structure is logically sound and provides a practical foundation for extracting population parameters while folding in Global Fit covariances.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the framework 'consistently accounting for information encoded in both the resolved sources and the unresolved background' rests on the method remaining unbiased under realistic Global Fit outputs. However, the illustration uses a simplified model that, as the abstract itself states, 'may not fully capture the complexities and correlations present in actual LISA data analysis pipelines.' No quantitative test of posterior calibration with injected source-background correlations or parameter covariances is shown.
[Numerical illustration] Section on numerical illustration (around the simplified Global Fit model): the demonstration omits overlapping-signal correlations and selection effects that real pipelines produce. This is load-bearing for the reliability claim; a controlled test restoring those correlations and checking for bias in the recovered population posteriors is required.

minor comments (2)

A diagram or flowchart of the hierarchical model structure would improve readability of the framework description.
Clarify the exact form of the likelihood for the unresolved background component when it is passed from the Global Fit output.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the framework's logical structure and for identifying key areas where the presentation of limitations can be strengthened. We respond to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the framework 'consistently accounting for information encoded in both the resolved sources and the unresolved background' rests on the method remaining unbiased under realistic Global Fit outputs. However, the illustration uses a simplified model that, as the abstract itself states, 'may not fully capture the complexities and correlations present in actual LISA data analysis pipelines.' No quantitative test of posterior calibration with injected source-background correlations or parameter covariances is shown.

Authors: We agree that the numerical illustration employs a simplified Global Fit model, as the abstract already notes. The central claim of the paper is that the hierarchical framework provides a consistent way to propagate information from any Global Fit posterior (resolved sources plus background) into population inference; the illustration serves only to demonstrate the interplay between components and the effect of SNR thresholds. No claim is made that the specific numerical results are unbiased under realistic covariances. We will revise the abstract to more explicitly separate the general framework from the demonstrative example and add a sentence clarifying that full calibration tests are left for future work with realistic pipelines. revision: partial
Referee: [Numerical illustration] Section on numerical illustration (around the simplified Global Fit model): the demonstration omits overlapping-signal correlations and selection effects that real pipelines produce. This is load-bearing for the reliability claim; a controlled test restoring those correlations and checking for bias in the recovered population posteriors is required.

Authors: The simplified model is deliberately chosen to isolate the hierarchical inference step without conflating it with the details of a particular Global Fit implementation. The framework itself is constructed to accept the full joint posterior from any Global Fit, thereby incorporating correlations and selection effects by construction. We therefore do not view the omission as undermining the reliability of the proposed method. A controlled test with injected correlations would require a complete end-to-end LISA simulation pipeline that is outside the scope of this methodological paper; such validation is planned for follow-up work. revision: no

standing simulated objections not resolved

A controlled test restoring overlapping-signal correlations and selection effects from realistic LISA pipelines cannot be performed in the present work, as it would require access to full simulation and Global Fit outputs not available to the authors at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: methodological framework illustrated independently on simplified model

full rationale

The paper introduces a hierarchical Bayesian framework to infer astrophysical population properties from LISA Global Fit outputs, explicitly accounting for both resolved sources and unresolved backgrounds. The derivation consists of standard Bayesian hierarchical modeling steps applied to the Global Fit posterior; no equations reduce the target population parameters to quantities fitted inside the paper, and no self-citation chain or ansatz is invoked to force the result. The illustration uses an explicitly simplified Global Fit model whose limitations are stated in the abstract, but this does not create circularity because the framework itself is not derived from or calibrated to that model. The central claim therefore remains self-contained and externally falsifiable against future realistic Global Fit outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard hierarchical Bayesian inference principles applied to gravitational wave data, with the simplified Global Fit model serving as the demonstration vehicle; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard hierarchical Bayesian methods can be extended to jointly model resolved and unresolved gravitational wave signals
The framework builds directly on established Bayesian population inference techniques from other gravitational wave contexts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5504 in / 1192 out tokens · 31908 ms · 2026-05-16T16:09:23.776080+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic.lean LogicNat recovery and embed_injective unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We introduce an approach that coherently incorporates the correlation between the resolvable population and the background... p(d|Λ)∝∑_{n1} ∫ d{θ}1_{n1} dΣ p(d|{θ}1_{n1},n1,Σ) p(Σ|Λ) ∏ p1(θ1_i|Λ) N1^{n1}/n1! e^{-N1} (Eq. 3.16)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BranchSelection.lean branch_selection and RCLCombiner_isCoupling_iff unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Using a simplified model of the Global Fit... α(f,fres,sres)=½[1+tanh((log f−log fres)/sres)] (Eq. 4.5)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Inferring the population properties of galactic binaries from LISA's stochastic foreground
astro-ph.HE 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 6.0

A neural posterior estimator trained on simulated LISA foreground spectra recovers galactic binary population parameters, including total number, with good accuracy in validation tests.
Estimating galactic foreground with the population of resolved galactic binaries
astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Population properties of resolved galactic binaries can be used to model and subtract the confusion foreground, yielding feasible detection of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds in Taiji simulations under stati...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 105 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Accounting for source uncertainties in analyses of astronomical survey data,

T. J. Loredo, “Accounting for source uncertainties in analyses of astronomical survey data,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 735, no. 1, pp. 195–206, 2004

work page 2004
[2]

Astrophysical Model Selection in Gravitational Wave Astronomy,

M. R. Adams, N. J. Cornish, and T. B. Littenberg, “Astrophysical Model Selection in Gravitational Wave Astronomy,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 86, p. 124032, 2012

work page 2012
[3]

Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases,

I. Mandel, W. M. Farr, and J. R. Gair, “Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 486, no. 1, pp. 1086–1093, 2019

work page 2019
[4]

Inferring the Properties of a Population of Compact Binaries in Presence of Selection Effects,

S. Vitale, D. Gerosa, W. M. Farr, and S. R. Taylor, “Inferring the Properties of a Population of Compact Binaries in Presence of Selection Effects,” inHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, p. 45, Springer, 2022

work page 2022
[5]

Advanced LIGO,

J. Aasiet al., “Advanced LIGO,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 32, p. 074001, 2015

work page 2015
[6]

Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,

F. Acerneseet al., “Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 32, no. 2, p. 024001, 2015

work page 2015
[7]

Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,

K. Somiya, “Detector configuration of KAGRA: The Japanese cryogenic gravitational-wave detector,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 29, p. 124007, 2012

work page 2012
[8]

Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,

Y. Aso, Y. Michimura, K. Somiya, M. Ando, O. Miyakawa, T. Sekiguchi, D. Tatsumi, and H. Yamamoto, “Interferometer design of the KAGRA gravitational wave detector,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, no. 4, p. 043007, 2013

work page 2013
[9]

Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically motivated parameterization,

C. Talbot and E. Thrane, “Measuring the binary black hole mass spectrum with an astrophysically motivated parameterization,”Astrophys. J., vol. 856, no. 2, p. 173, 2018. – 24 –

work page 2018
[10]

Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?,

M. Fishbach, D. E. Holz, and W. M. Farr, “Does the Black Hole Merger Rate Evolve with Redshift?,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 863, no. 2, p. L41, 2018

work page 2018
[11]

GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,

A. G. Abacet al., “GWTC-4.0: Population Properties of Merging Compact Binaries,” 8 2025

work page 2025
[12]

Gravitational waves reveal the pair-instability mass gap and constrain nuclear burning in massive stars,

F. Antonini, I. Romero-Shaw, T. Callister, F. Dosopoulou, D. Chattopadhyay, M. Gieles, and M. Mapelli, “Gravitational waves reveal the pair-instability mass gap and constrain nuclear burning in massive stars,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[13]

Do both black holes spin in merging binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and astrophysical implications,

C. Adamcewicz, N. Guttman, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, “Do both black holes spin in merging binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and astrophysical implications,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[14]

Evidence of the pair instability gap in the distribution of black hole masses,

H. Tonget al., “Evidence of the pair instability gap in the distribution of black hole masses,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[15]

Where did heavy binaries go? Gravitational-wave populations using Delaunay triangulation with optimized complexity,

R. Tenorio, A. Toubiana, T. Bruel, D. Gerosa, and J. R. Gair, “Where did heavy binaries go? Gravitational-wave populations using Delaunay triangulation with optimized complexity,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[16]

Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses,

S. Banagiri, E. Thrane, and P. D. Lasky, “Evidence for Three Subpopulations of Merging Binary Black Holes at Different Primary Masses,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[17]

Trends in the Population of Binary Black Holes Following the Fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog: a Data-Driven Analysis,

N. Guttman, E. Payne, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, “Trends in the Population of Binary Black Holes Following the Fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog: a Data-Driven Analysis,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[18]

Reexamining Evidence of a Pair-Instability Mass Gap in the Binary Black Hole Population,

A. Ray and V. Kalogera, “Reexamining Evidence of a Pair-Instability Mass Gap in the Binary Black Hole Population,” 10 2025

work page 2025
[19]

Population of Binary Black Holes Inferred from One Hundred and Fifty Gravitational Wave Signals,

V. Tiwari, “Population of Binary Black Holes Inferred from One Hundred and Fifty Gravitational Wave Signals,” 10 2025

work page 2025
[20]

A subpopulation of low-mass, spinning black holes: signatures of dynamical assembly,

H. Tong, T. A. Callister, M. Fishbach, E. Thrane, F. Antonini, S. Stevenson, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and F. Dosopoulou, “A subpopulation of low-mass, spinning black holes: signatures of dynamical assembly,” 11 2025

work page 2025
[21]

Searching for additional structure and redshift evolution in the observed binary black hole population with a parametric time-dependent mass distribution,

V. Gennari, S. Mastrogiovanni, N. Tamanini, S. Marsat, and G. Pierra, “Searching for additional structure and redshift evolution in the observed binary black hole population with a parametric time-dependent mass distribution,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 12, p. 123046, 2025

work page 2025
[22]

High resolution nonparametric inference of gravitational-wave populations in multiple dimensions,

J. Heinzel, M. Mould, S. Álvarez-López, and S. Vitale, “High resolution nonparametric inference of gravitational-wave populations in multiple dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 6, p. 063043, 2025

work page 2025
[23]

On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology,

S. Mastrogiovanni, K. Leyde, C. Karathanasis, E. Chassande-Mottin, D. A. Steer, J. Gair, A. Ghosh, R. Gray, S. Mukherjee, and S. Rinaldi, “On the importance of source population models for gravitational-wave cosmology,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, no. 6, p. 062009, 2021

work page 2021
[24]

GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation,

A. G. Abacet al., “GWTC-4.0: Constraints on the Cosmic Expansion Rate and Modified Gravitational-wave Propagation,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[25]

Spectral siren cosmology from gravitational-wave observations in GWTC-4.0,

I. Magaña Hernandez and A. Palmese, “Spectral siren cosmology from gravitational-wave observations in GWTC-4.0,” 9 2025

work page 2025
[26]

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,

R. Abbottet al., “Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 084080, 2025

work page 2025
[27]

Fortifying gravitational-wave tests of general relativity against astrophysical assumptions,

E. Payne, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, “Fortifying gravitational-wave tests of general relativity against astrophysical assumptions,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 12, p. 124060, 2023

work page 2023
[28]

Impact of selection biases on tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave inspirals,

R. Magee, M. Isi, E. Payne, K. Chatziioannou, W. M. Farr, G. Pratten, and S. Vitale, “Impact of selection biases on tests of general relativity with gravitational-wave inspirals,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 109, no. 2, p. 023014, 2024. – 25 –

work page 2024
[29]

Multidimensional hierarchical tests of general relativity with gravitational waves,

H. Zhong, M. Isi, K. Chatziioannou, and W. M. Farr, “Multidimensional hierarchical tests of general relativity with gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 4, p. 044053, 2024

work page 2024
[30]

The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project,

R. N. Manchester, “The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project,”Highlights Astron., vol. 15, p. 233, 2010

work page 2010
[31]

High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array,

G. Desvigneset al., “High-precision timing of 42 millisecond pulsars with the European Pulsar Timing Array,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 458, no. 3, pp. 3341–3380, 2016

work page 2016
[32]

The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves

F. Jenet, L. S. Finn, J. Lazio, A. Lommen, M. McLaughlin, I. Stairs, D. Stinebring, J. Verbiest, A. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Backer, J. Cordes, P. Demorest, R. Ferdman, P. Freire, M. Gonzalez, V. Kaspi, V. Kondratiev, D. Lorimer, R. Lynch, D. Nice, S. Ransom, R. Shannon, and X. Siemens, “The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Wave...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[33]

The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,

J. Antoniadiset al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 685, p. A94, 2024

work page 2024
[34]

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background,

G. Agazieet al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Binaries from the Gravitational-wave Background,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 952, no. 2, p. L37, 2023

work page 2023
[35]

Reconciling PTA and JWST, and preparing for LISA with POMPOCO: a Parametrisation Of the Massive black hole POpulation for Comparison to Observations,

A. Toubiana, L. Sberna, M. Volonteri, E. Barausse, S. Babak, R. Enficiaud, D. I. Villalba, J. R. Gair, J. E. Greene, and H. Quelquejay Leclere, “Reconciling PTA and JWST, and preparing for LISA with POMPOCO: a Parametrisation Of the Massive black hole POpulation for Comparison to Observations,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 700, p. A135, 2025

work page 2025
[36]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,” 2 2017

work page 2017
[37]

LISA Definition Study Report,

M. Colpiet al., “LISA Definition Study Report,” 2 2024

work page 2024
[38]

Constraining properties of the black hole population using LISA,

J. R. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Berti, and M. Volonteri, “Constraining properties of the black hole population using LISA,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 28, p. 094018, 2011

work page 2011
[39]

Reconstructing the massive black hole cosmic history through gravitational waves,

A. Sesana, J. Gair, E. Berti, and M. Volonteri, “Reconstructing the massive black hole cosmic history through gravitational waves,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 83, p. 044036, 2011

work page 2011
[40]

Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries,

A. Kleinet al., “Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA: Supermassive black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 93, no. 2, p. 024003, 2016

work page 2016
[41]

The hierarchical assembly of galaxies and black holes in the first billion years: predictions for the era of gravitational wave astronomy,

P. Dayal, E. M. Rossi, B. Shiralilou, O. Piana, T. R. Choudhury, and M. Volonteri, “The hierarchical assembly of galaxies and black holes in the first billion years: predictions for the era of gravitational wave astronomy,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 486, no. 2, pp. 2336–2350, 2019

work page 2019
[42]

Massive Black Hole Merger Rates: The Effect of Kiloparsec Separation Wandering and Supernova Feedback,

E. Barausse, I. Dvorkin, M. Tremmel, M. Volonteri, and M. Bonetti, “Massive Black Hole Merger Rates: The Effect of Kiloparsec Separation Wandering and Supernova Feedback,” Astrophys. J., vol. 904, no. 1, p. 16, 2020

work page 2020
[43]

Discriminating between different scenarios for the formation and evolution of massive black holes with LISA,

A. Toubiana, K. W. K. Wong, S. Babak, E. Barausse, E. Berti, J. R. Gair, S. Marsat, and S. R. Taylor, “Discriminating between different scenarios for the formation and evolution of massive black holes with LISA,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 104, p. 083027, 2021

work page 2021
[44]

Prospects to Explore High-redshift Black Hole Formation with Multi-band Gravitational Waves Observatories,

H.-Y. Chen, A. Ricarte, and F. Pacucci, “Prospects to Explore High-redshift Black Hole Formation with Multi-band Gravitational Waves Observatories,” 2 2022

work page 2022
[45]

Probing the delay time of supermassive black hole binary mergers with gravitational waves,

Y. Fang and H. Yang, “Probing the delay time of supermassive black hole binary mergers with gravitational waves,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 523, no. 4, pp. 5120–5133, 2023

work page 2023
[46]

Stars or gas? Constraining the hardening processes of massive black-hole binaries with LISA,

A. Spadaro, R. Buscicchio, D. Izquierdo-Villalba, D. Gerosa, A. Klein, and G. Pratten, “Stars or gas? Constraining the hardening processes of massive black-hole binaries with LISA,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 2, p. 023004, 2025. – 26 –

work page 2025
[47]

Hierarchical Bayesian inference on an analytical model of the LISA massive black hole binary population,

V. Langen, N. Tamanini, S. Marsat, and E. Bortolas, “Hierarchical Bayesian inference on an analytical model of the LISA massive black hole binary population,” 9 2024

work page 2024
[48]

The gravitational wave signal from the galactic disk population of binaries containing two compact objects,

G. Nelemans, L. R. Yungelson, and S. F. Portegies Zwart, “The gravitational wave signal from the galactic disk population of binaries containing two compact objects,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 375, pp. 890–898, 2001

work page 2001
[49]

The LISA Gravitational Wave Foreground: A Study of Double White Dwarfs,

A. J. Ruiter, K. Belczynski, M. Benacquista, S. L. Larson, and G. Williams, “The LISA Gravitational Wave Foreground: A Study of Double White Dwarfs,”Astrophys. J., vol. 717, pp. 1006–1021, 2010

work page 2010
[50]

Prospects for detection of detached double white dwarf binaries with Gaia, LSST and LISA,

V. Korol, E. M. Rossi, P. J. Groot, G. Nelemans, S. Toonen, and A. G. A. Brown, “Prospects for detection of detached double white dwarf binaries with Gaia, LSST and LISA,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 470, no. 2, pp. 1894–1910, 2017

work page 1910
[51]

Predicting the LISA white dwarf binary population in the Milky Way with cosmological simulations,

A. Lamberts, S. Blunt, T. B. Littenberg, S. Garrison-Kimmel, T. Kupfer, and R. E. Sanderson, “Predicting the LISA white dwarf binary population in the Milky Way with cosmological simulations,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 490, no. 4, pp. 5888–5903, 2019

work page 2019
[52]

Observationally driven Galactic double white dwarf population for LISA,

V. Korol, N. Hallakoun, S. Toonen, and N. Karnesis, “Observationally driven Galactic double white dwarf population for LISA,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 511, no. 4, pp. 5936–5947, 2022

work page 2022
[53]

Probing the Efficiency of Tidal Synchronization in Outspiralling Double White Dwarf Binaries with LISA,

S. Biscoveanu, K. Kremer, and E. Thrane, “Probing the Efficiency of Tidal Synchronization in Outspiralling Double White Dwarf Binaries with LISA,”Astrophys. J., vol. 949, no. 2, p. 95, 2023

work page 2023
[54]

The interacting double white dwarf population with LISA: Stochastic foreground and resolved sources,

A. Toubiana, N. Karnesis, A. Lamberts, and M. C. Miller, “The interacting double white dwarf population with LISA: Stochastic foreground and resolved sources,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 692, p. A165, 2024

work page 2024
[55]

Recovering Injected Astrophysics from the LISA Double White Dwarf Binaries,

V. Delfavero, K. Breivik, S. Thiele, R. O’Shaughnessy, and J. G. Baker, “Recovering Injected Astrophysics from the LISA Double White Dwarf Binaries,”Astrophys. J., vol. 981, no. 1, p. 66, 2025

work page 2025
[56]

LISA extreme-mass-ratio inspiral events as probes of the black hole mass function,

J. R. Gair, C. Tang, and M. Volonteri, “LISA extreme-mass-ratio inspiral events as probes of the black hole mass function,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 104014, 2010

work page 2010
[57]

Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,

P. Amaro-Seoane, “Relativistic dynamics and extreme mass ratio inspirals,”Living Rev. Rel., vol. 21, no. 1, p. 4, 2018

work page 2018
[58]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,

S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sopuerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Petiteau, and A. Klein, “Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 95, no. 10, p. 103012, 2017

work page 2017
[59]

Formation Rate of Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals in Active Galactic Nuclei,

Z. Pan and H. Yang, “Formation Rate of Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals in Active Galactic Nuclei,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 10, p. 103018, 2021

work page 2021
[60]

Mono- and oligochromatic extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,

P. A. Seoane, Y. Lin, and K. Tzanavaris, “Mono- and oligochromatic extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 6, p. 064011, 2024

work page 2024
[61]

Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914,

A. Sesana, “Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 23, p. 231102, 2016

work page 2016
[62]

Detectable environmental effects in GW190521-like black-hole binaries with LISA,

A. Toubianaet al., “Detectable environmental effects in GW190521-like black-hole binaries with LISA,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 10, p. 101105, 2021

work page 2021
[63]

Observing GW190521-like binary black holes and their environment with LISA,

L. Sbernaet al., “Observing GW190521-like binary black holes and their environment with LISA,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 106, no. 6, p. 064056, 2022

work page 2022
[64]

Zwick, J

L. Zwick, J. Takátsy, P. Saini, K. Hendriks, J. Samsing, C. Tiede, C. Rowan, and A. A. Trani, “Environmental Effects in Stellar Mass Gravitational-wave Sources. I. Expected Fraction of – 27 – Signals with Significant Dephasing in the Dynamical and Active Galactic Nucleus Channels,” Astrophys. J., vol. 991, no. 2, p. 131, 2025

work page 2025
[65]

Environmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources II: Joint detections of eccentricity and phase shifts in binary sub-populations,

L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, J. Takátsy, C. Rowan, J. Samsing, and J. Stegmann, “Environmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources II: Joint detections of eccentricity and phase shifts in binary sub-populations,” 11 2025

work page 2025
[66]

Environmental effects in the LISA stochastic signal from stellar-mass black hole binaries,

R. Chen, R. S. Chandramouli, F. Pozzoli, R. Buscicchio, and E. Barausse, “Environmental effects in the LISA stochastic signal from stellar-mass black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 112, no. 8, p. 084053, 2025

work page 2025
[67]

LISA data analysis using MCMC methods,

N. J. Cornish and J. Crowder, “LISA data analysis using MCMC methods,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 72, p. 043005, 2005

work page 2005
[68]

Prototype global analysis of LISA data with multiple source types,

T. B. Littenberg and N. J. Cornish, “Prototype global analysis of LISA data with multiple source types,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 6, p. 063004, 2023

work page 2023
[69]

Efficient GPU-accelerated multisource global fit pipeline for LISA data analysis,

M. L. Katz, N. Karnesis, N. Korsakova, J. R. Gair, and N. Stergioulas, “Efficient GPU-accelerated multisource global fit pipeline for LISA data analysis,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 2, p. 024060, 2025

work page 2025
[70]

Global analysis of LISA data with Galactic binaries and massive black hole binaries,

S. H. Strub, L. Ferraioli, C. Schmelzbach, S. C. Stähler, and D. Giardini, “Global analysis of LISA data with Galactic binaries and massive black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 110, no. 2, p. 024005, 2024

work page 2024
[71]

Modular global-fit pipeline for LISA data analysis,

S. Deng, S. Babak, M. Le Jeune, S. Marsat, É. Plagnol, and A. Sartirana, “Modular global-fit pipeline for LISA data analysis,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 10, p. 103014, 2025

work page 2025
[72]

Gravitational wave background from extreme mass ratio inspirals,

M. Bonetti and A. Sesana, “Gravitational wave background from extreme mass ratio inspirals,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 10, p. 103023, 2020

work page 2020
[73]

Computation of stochastic background from extreme-mass-ratio inspiral populations for LISA,

F. Pozzoli, S. Babak, A. Sesana, M. Bonetti, and N. Karnesis, “Computation of stochastic background from extreme-mass-ratio inspiral populations for LISA,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 10, p. 103039, 2023. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 049903 (2024)]

work page 2023
[74]

Shouts and Murmurs: Combining Individual Gravitational-Wave Sources with the Stochastic Background to Measure the History of Binary Black Hole Mergers,

T. Callister, M. Fishbach, D. Holz, and W. Farr, “Shouts and Murmurs: Combining Individual Gravitational-Wave Sources with the Stochastic Background to Measure the History of Binary Black Hole Mergers,”Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 896, no. 2, p. L32, 2020

work page 2020
[75]

The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

M. Punturoet al., “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,”Class. Quant. Grav., vol. 27, p. 194002, 2010

work page 2010
[76]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,

D. Reitzeet al., “Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO,”Bull. Am. Astron. Soc., vol. 51, no. 7, p. 035, 2019

work page 2019
[77]

The Science of the Einstein Telescope,

A. Abacet al., “The Science of the Einstein Telescope,” 3 2025

work page 2025
[78]

Stochastic gravitational-wave background as a tool for investigating multi-channel astrophysical and primordial black-hole mergers,

S. S. Bavera, G. Franciolini, G. Cusin, A. Riotto, M. Zevin, and T. Fragos, “Stochastic gravitational-wave background as a tool for investigating multi-channel astrophysical and primordial black-hole mergers,”Astron. Astrophys., vol. 660, p. A26, 2022

work page 2022
[79]

A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,

M. Evanset al., “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” 9 2021

work page 2021
[80]

Subtracting compact binary foregrounds to search for subdominant gravitational-wave backgrounds in next-generation ground-based observatories,

B. Zhou, L. Reali, E. Berti, M. Çalışkan, C. Creque-Sarbinowski, M. Kamionkowski, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Subtracting compact binary foregrounds to search for subdominant gravitational-wave backgrounds in next-generation ground-based observatories,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 108, no. 6, p. 064040, 2023

work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.