Re²Math is a new benchmark that evaluates AI models on retrieving and verifying the applicability of theorems from math literature to advance steps in partial proofs, accepting any sufficient theorem while controlling for leakage.
Rodriques, and Andrew D
9 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
9
Pith papers citing it
years
2026 9representative citing papers
Starling uses LLMs and agents to turn 22.5M PubMed papers into 6.3M nuanced structured records across six tasks with 0.6-7.7% frontier-model rejection rates, lower than error rates on existing curated databases.
PaperMind is a new benchmark that evaluates integrated multimodal reasoning and critique over scientific papers through four complementary task families across seven domains.
FactReview extracts claims from ML papers, positions them via literature retrieval, and verifies them through code execution, labeling each as Supported, Partially supported, or In conflict, as shown in a CompGCN case study.
NanoResearch introduces a tri-level co-evolving framework of skills, memory, and policy to personalize LLM-powered research automation across projects and users.
FAME models scientific topic trajectories in continuous time to forecast paper impact more accurately than LLMs by aligning manuscripts with field momentum in a dynamic latent space.
RAG over structured thinking traces boosts LLM reasoning on AIME, LiveCodeBench, and GPQA, with relative gains up to 56% and little added cost.
Experiment-as-Code Labs encodes experiments as declarative configurations that AI agents generate, systems software analyzes and orchestrates, and device APIs execute on physical lab hardware.
Plasma GraphRAG automates physics-grounded parameter selection for gyrokinetic simulations via a domain-specific knowledge graph and LLMs, reporting over 10% better quality and up to 25% fewer hallucinations than standard RAG.
citing papers explorer
-
PaperMind: Benchmarking Agentic Reasoning and Critique over Scientific Papers in Multimodal LLMs
PaperMind is a new benchmark that evaluates integrated multimodal reasoning and critique over scientific papers through four complementary task families across seven domains.
-
RAG over Thinking Traces Can Improve Reasoning Tasks
RAG over structured thinking traces boosts LLM reasoning on AIME, LiveCodeBench, and GPQA, with relative gains up to 56% and little added cost.