pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically

Canonical reference. 79% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

65 Pith papers citing it
Background 79% of classified citations
abstract

Deep learning (DL) creates impactful advances following a virtuous recipe: model architecture search, creating large training data sets, and scaling computation. It is widely believed that growing training sets and models should improve accuracy and result in better products. As DL application domains grow, we would like a deeper understanding of the relationships between training set size, computational scale, and model accuracy improvements to advance the state-of-the-art. This paper presents a large scale empirical characterization of generalization error and model size growth as training sets grow. We introduce a methodology for this measurement and test four machine learning domains: machine translation, language modeling, image processing, and speech recognition. Our empirical results show power-law generalization error scaling across a breadth of factors, resulting in power-law exponents---the "steepness" of the learning curve---yet to be explained by theoretical work. Further, model improvements only shift the error but do not appear to affect the power-law exponent. We also show that model size scales sublinearly with data size. These scaling relationships have significant implications on deep learning research, practice, and systems. They can assist model debugging, setting accuracy targets, and decisions about data set growth. They can also guide computing system design and underscore the importance of continued computational scaling.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 13 method 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract Deep learning (DL) creates impactful advances following a virtuous recipe: model architecture search, creating large training data sets, and scaling computation. It is widely believed that growing training sets and models should improve accuracy and result in better products. As DL application domains grow, we would like a deeper understanding of the relationships between training set size, computational scale, and model accuracy improvements to advance the state-of-the-art. This paper presents a large scale empirical characterization of generalization error and model size growth as training

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

KAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks

cs.LG · 2024-04-30 · conditional · novelty 8.0

KANs with learnable univariate spline activations on edges achieve better accuracy than MLPs with fewer parameters, faster scaling, and direct visualization for scientific discovery.

Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

cs.CL · 2020-05-28 · accept · novelty 8.0

GPT-3 shows that scaling an autoregressive language model to 175 billion parameters enables strong few-shot performance across diverse NLP tasks via in-context prompting without fine-tuning.

Olivia: Harmonizing Time Series Foundation Models with Power Spectral Density

cs.LG · 2026-05-17 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Olivia harmonizes time series datasets via normalized power spectral density using a Harmonizer module and resonator-based HarmonicAttention, achieving state-of-the-art zero-shot, few-shot, and full-shot forecasting on TSLib, GIFT-Eval, and GluonTS benchmarks.

Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling

cs.LG · 2020-10-28 · accept · novelty 7.0

Autoregressive transformers follow power-law scaling laws for cross-entropy loss with nearly universal exponents relating optimal model size to compute budget across four domains.

Label-Efficient Dataset Pruning via Semi-Supervised Pseudo-Labeling

cs.LG · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

SemiPrune uses a small labeled subset and semi-supervised pseudo-labeling to enable supervised dataset pruning methods, achieving state-of-the-art results on domain-specific, image-corrupted, and long-tailed datasets.

AIPO: Learning to Reason from Active Interaction

cs.CL · 2026-05-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

AIPO adds active multi-agent consultation (Verify, Knowledge, Reasoning agents) plus custom importance sampling to RLVR training so LLMs expand their reasoning boundary and then operate without the agents.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.