pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11239 · v1 · pith:YOK4EEWQnew · submitted 2019-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.GA· astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and Instrumentation

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords Event Horizon TelescopeVLBIM87black hole imagingmillimeter astronomyinstrumentationphasing systemshydrogen maser
0
0 comments X

The pith

A global array of millimeter telescopes with new high-speed systems and maser clocks enabled the first event-horizon-scale images of the M87 black hole.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The Event Horizon Telescope forms a very long baseline interferometer from telescopes spread across Earth, operating at a wavelength of about 1.3 millimeters to reach an angular resolution of roughly 25 microarcseconds. This scale matches the size of structures around the supermassive black hole candidate in M87. Achieving usable sensitivity required digital systems that process data at 64 gigabits per second, plus phasing equipment, new receivers at several sites, and hydrogen maser frequency standards to keep all telescopes coherent. These upgrades were installed on existing facilities and supported the first full global observations in April 2017. The paper presents the overall system design, the specific instrumentation choices, and quantitative measures of the array's resulting performance.

Core claim

The EHT is a VLBI array of millimeter- and submillimeter-wavelength telescopes separated by distances comparable to the diameter of the Earth. At a nominal operating wavelength of ~1.3 mm, it achieves an angular resolution of ~25 micro-as. Meeting the sensitivity requirements demanded high-bandwidth digital systems processing data at rates of 64 gigabit/s, phasing systems at array facilities, new receiver installations, and the deployment of hydrogen maser frequency standards. These developments enabled the coordination and execution of the first Global EHT observations in 2017 April and produced event-horizon-scale imaging of the supermassive black hole candidate in M87.

What carries the argument

Heterogeneous global VLBI array at 1.3 mm synchronized by hydrogen masers and using 64 Gbit/s digital backends, which extends coherent interferometry across existing telescopes to event-horizon scales.

If this is right

  • The array resolution suffices to probe general relativistic effects in the strong-field regime around the black hole.
  • The same configuration supports studies of accretion flows and relativistic jet formation near the event horizon.
  • Performance metrics confirm that the upgrades deliver the sensitivity needed for event-horizon-scale imaging.
  • The approach demonstrates that VLBI techniques can be extended to millimeter wavelengths on a heterogeneous global network.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same instrumentation approach could be applied to image the black hole candidate at the Galactic center.
  • Time-resolved observations of black hole variability become feasible once the array reaches the demonstrated sensitivity.
  • Adding more sites or increasing bandwidth would further improve image quality without requiring entirely new facilities.

Load-bearing premise

The newly developed phasing systems, receivers, and hydrogen maser standards could be successfully installed and operated across the heterogeneous set of existing telescopes to deliver coherent, high-sensitivity data at 1.3 mm.

What would settle it

Absence of detectable fringes or failure to reach the required signal-to-noise ratio in the April 2017 M87 data set would show that the installed systems did not meet the coherence and sensitivity targets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11239 by The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Atmospheric coherence time for EHT ALMA baselines. VLBI observations consist of scans, each ∼3–7 minutes long (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Expected EHT Fourier space coverage on Sgr A* . The left panel shows both detections (red) and non-detections (gray) of Sgr A* in the 2013 EHT campaign. Participating telescopes were: APEX, CARMA, JCMT, SMA, and SMT. The dashed circles mark baselines with a fringe spacing equal to 50 μas (approximately the diameter of the shadow of the SMBH candidate Sgr A* ) and 25 μas. The two remaining panels show simul… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: System diagram at a single-dish EHT site with 64 Gbps capability. Dual-polarization (left and right circular polarization (LCP and RCP)) and upper- and lower-sideband (USB and LSB) analog IF signals are sent from the receiver. The receiver local oscillator is locked to the station hydrogen maser 10 MHz reference. Block downconverters (BDCs) mix these signals to baseband. R2DBEs sample the analog signals an… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: measured Allan standard deviation, sy (t), of the hydrogen maser at the LMT compared to a precision quartz oscillator. The open red points are the manufacturer specifications of the hydrogen maser when compared to another maser. At a 1 s integration time, the quartz oscillator and maser have similar stability, so the measurements indicate that the maser is meeting its specifications as installed… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simplified schematic diagram of the BDC. Only one of the two (identical) polarization channels is shown, and several intermediate amplification stages are omitted. Two local oscillators maser-locked and tuned to 6 GHz and 7 GHz are used to mix all the filtered IF bands between 4 and 9 GHz to baseband (0–2 GHz). For 230 GHz operation, a 5–9 GHz IF band is split with output of 5–7 GHz (“low-band”) and 7–9 GH… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Functional diagram of the R2DBE. A pair of ADCs sample two channels of 2.048 GHz Nyquist bandwidth IF bands, typically representing two antenna polarizations. After requantization of the samples to 2 bits, the data are distributed in VDIF packets over a 10 GbE network to Mark 6 recorders. The maximum FPGA clock speed is too slow to process the ADC output stream rate of 4096 megasamples per second in series… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Recording rate of EHT observations over time. As of 2018, EHT stations record at 64 Gbps, equivalent to a doubling of recorded bandwidth every two years for over a decade (blue curve). The high bandwidth, a result of linking EHT instrumentation to industry trends and commodity electronics, is a crucial component of the EHT’s sensitivity, enabling detections on long baselines, providing resilience of the ne… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: EHT digital VLBI backend as installed at the Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (IRAM) PV 30 m telescope in Spain. The upper portion of the right-hand side rack holds the four R2DBE units. Two block downconverters are installed near the middle. The VLBI backend computer is mounted on the bottom right. The rack on the left and the lower portion of the rack on the right hold the four Mark 6 recorders … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Aggregate EHT baseline coverage for M87 over four nights of observing with the 2017 array. Only detections are shown. The dashed circles show baseline lengths corresponding to fringe spacings of 25 and 50 μas. See Paper III for details [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: EHT 2017 observing schedule for M87 and 3C 279, covering one day of observations (April 6). Empty rectangles represent scans that were scheduled, but were not observed successfully due to weather, insufficient sensitivity, or technical issues. The filled rectangles represent scans corresponding to detections available in the final data set. Scan durations vary between 3 and 7 minutes, as reflected by the … view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Fringes detected on EHT baselines before and after phase steering using the ALMA phased array as a reference station. Shown here are residual fringe-rate spectra, where the peak occurs at a single fringe-rate that is consistent with linear clock drift over the entire scan. Stochastic atmospheric phase variations result in fringe-rate variation over time, spreading the signal in the plot on the left. To re… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Block diagram demonstrating the VLBI data pipeline, from SWARM to correlatable data in VDIF format. The SDBE is integrated with SWARM and does the real-time processing necessary to interface with the on-site Mark 6 during an observation. After observing, the data is preprocessed offline in APHIDS prior to correlation with data from other sites. 144 See also the related SMA Memo 163 at https://www.cfa.harv… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) is a very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) array that comprises millimeter- and submillimeter-wavelength telescopes separated by distances comparable to the diameter of the Earth. At a nominal operating wavelength of ~1.3 mm, EHT angular resolution (lambda/D) is ~25 micro-as, which is sufficient to resolve nearby supermassive black hole candidates on spatial and temporal scales that correspond to their event horizons. With this capability, the EHT scientific goals are to probe general relativistic effects in the strong-field regime and to study accretion and relativistic jet formation near the black hole boundary. In this Letter we describe the system design of the EHT, detail the technology and instrumentation that enable observations, and provide measures of its performance. Meeting the EHT science objectives has required several key developments that have facilitated the robust extension of the VLBI technique to EHT observing wavelengths and the production of instrumentation that can be deployed on a heterogeneous array of existing telescopes and facilities. To meet sensitivity requirements, high-bandwidth digital systems were developed that process data at rates of 64 gigabit/s, exceeding those of currently operating cm-wavelength VLBI arrays by more than an order of magnitude. Associated improvements include the development of phasing systems at array facilities, new receiver installation at several sites, and the deployment of hydrogen maser frequency standards to ensure coherent data capture across the array. These efforts led to the coordination and execution of the first Global EHT observations in 2017 April, and to event-horizon-scale imaging of the supermassive black hole candidate in M87.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper describes the system design of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) VLBI array operating at ~1.3 mm, including high-bandwidth (64 Gbps) digital backends, phasing systems at array facilities, new receivers, hydrogen maser frequency standards, and performance measures. These developments enabled the first global EHT observations in 2017 April and event-horizon-scale imaging of the M87 supermassive black hole candidate.

Significance. This manuscript provides essential technical documentation of the heterogeneous array and instrumentation that extended VLBI to millimeter wavelengths. The explicit performance measures and successful deployment across sites constitute a key reference for the EHT results series; the factual reporting of executed observations strengthens the central claim without reliance on untested extrapolations.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that performance measures are provided would benefit from a brief parenthetical example (e.g., achieved SEFD or coherence time) to orient readers before the detailed sections.
  2. The manuscript would be strengthened by an explicit table or section summarizing achieved vs. required sensitivity metrics across the array sites.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and their recommendation to accept. The report contains no major comments requiring response.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; factual instrumentation report

full rationale

This paper is a factual technical report describing the EHT array design, new phasing systems, receivers, hydrogen masers, and digital backends, along with their installation and measured performance. It contains no derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical claims that reduce to inputs by construction. All central statements concern hardware that was built, deployed, and operated to enable the 2017 observations, supported directly by the reported execution rather than any self-referential logic or self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational instrumentation paper; it introduces no free parameters, mathematical axioms, or postulated physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5828 in / 1211 out tokens · 30074 ms · 2026-05-25T14:58:45.021968+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Rotating Black Holes with Primary Scalar Hair: Shadow Signatures in Beyond Horndeski Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Rotating black holes with primary scalar hair in beyond Horndeski gravity produce shadows whose diameter increases for negative Q and whose distortion increases for positive Q, with EHT bounds on M87* restricting but ...

  2. Photon rings and shadows of black holes with non-minimal couplings between curvature and electromagnetic field

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Three distinct non-minimal curvature-EM couplings produce different enlargements or reductions of black hole shadows and alter photon ring separations in characteristic ways.

  3. Dimming of Photon Ring due to Photon-Axion Conversion around Kerr Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Photon-axion conversion near Kerr black holes produces dimming of photon spectral luminosity that increases with black hole spin, magnetic field strength, and photon-axion coupling, most efficiently at high frequencies.

  4. Effective null geodesics and black hole images in Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In Kruglov's Born-Infeld-type nonlinear electrodynamics, the effective photon geometry around a charged black hole produces q-dependent shifts in light deflection, shadow radius, and accretion disk images, including s...

  5. Effective null geodesics and black hole images in Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In Kruglov nonlinear electrodynamics, small positive values of the parameter q produce stable photon orbits outside the event horizon and modify black hole shadows and relativistic images even when the spacetime metri...

  6. Roche limit and stellar disruption in the Simpson--Visser spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tidal forces in the Simpson-Visser spacetime produce Roche radii for stars that depend on observer type and regularization, with some disruptions occurring outside the event horizon for supermassive black holes.

  7. Observational Signatures of Rotating Ay\'{o}n-Beato-Garc\'{i}a Black Holes: Shadows, Accretion Disks and Images

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Rotating Ayón-Beato-García black holes produce smaller and sometimes D-shaped shadows whose size constrains the charge parameter ζ to the range 0.132811M–0.213607M when matched to EHT observations of M87* and Sgr A*.

  8. The Early Career Workshop of GR-Amaldi 2025

    physics.soc-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    The paper reports on the aims, activities, and conclusions of an early-career workshop focused on scientific overviews, transferable skills, and networking in gravitational physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · cited by 7 Pith papers · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, PhRvL, 116, 061102

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    2017, AJ, 153, 159

    Akiyama, K., Ikeda, S., Pleau, M., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 159

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    L., et al

    Akiyama, K., Lu, R.-S., Fish, V. L., et al. 2015, ApJ, 807, 150

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Baars, J. W. M., Hooghoudt, B. G., Mezger, P. G., & de Jonge, M. J. 1987, A&A, 175, 319

    work page 1987

  5. [5]

    Peters, W. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 627

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al

    Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 891

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Balick, B., & Brown, R. L. 1974, ApJ, 194, 265

    work page 1974

  8. [8]

    M., Press, W

    Bardeen, J. M., Press, W. H., & Teukolsky, S. A. 1972, ApJ, 178, 347

    work page 1972

  9. [9]

    Bardeen, J. M. 1973, in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus ), ed. C. Dewitt & B. S. Dewitt (London: Gordon and Breach ), 215

    work page 1973

  10. [10]

    B., et al

    Blackburn, L., Chan, C.-K., Crew, G. B., et al. 2019, arXiv: 1903.08832

    work page arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al

    Blakeslee, J. P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 556

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    2018, ARA&A, in press (arXiv:1812.06025)

    Blandford, R., Meier, D., & Readhead, A. 2018, ARA&A, in press (arXiv:1812.06025)

    work page arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    P., Ros, E., & Zensus, J

    Boccardi, B., Krichbaum, T. P., Ros, E., & Zensus, J. A. 2017, A&ARv, 25, 4

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , 4, 512

    Bouman, K., Johnson, M., Dalca, A., et al. 2018, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging , 4, 512

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    L., Johnson, M

    Bouman, K. L., Johnson, M. D., Zoran, D., et al. 2016, in IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)( New York: IEEE ), 913

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    C., Deller, A., Demorest, P., et al

    Bower, G. C., Deller, A., Demorest, P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, 120

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    C., Goss, W

    Bower, G. C., Goss, W. M., Falcke, H., Backer, D. C., & Lithwick, Y. 2006, ApJL, 648, L127

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    E., & Loeb, A

    Broderick, A. E., & Loeb, A. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 905

    work page 2006

  19. [19]

    E., & Loeb, A

    Broderick, A. E., & Loeb, A. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1164

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    E., Ade, P

    Carlstrom, J. E., Ade, P. A. R., Aird, K. A., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 568

    work page 2011

  21. [21]

    2012, A&A, 538, A89

    Carter, M., Lazareff, B., Maier, D., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A89

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    A., Johnson, M

    Chael, A. A., Johnson, M. D., Bouman, K. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 857, 23

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    A., Johnson, M

    Chael, A. A., Johnson, M. D., Narayan, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 11

    work page 2016

  24. [24]

    1983, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford:

    Chandrasekhar, S. 1983, The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes (Oxford:

    work page 1983

  25. [25]

    Chen, M.-T., Raf fin, P., Ho, P. T. P., et al. 2018, Proc. SPIE, 10700, 107000H

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Cooper, B. F. C. 1970, AuJPh, 23, 521

    work page 1970

  27. [27]

    T., Brisken, W

    Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 275

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    C., & McKinney, J

    Dexter, J., Agol, E., Fragile, P. C., & McKinney, J. C. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1092 Di Matteo, T., Quataert, E., Allen, S. W., Narayan, R., & Fabian, A. C. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 507

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    2010, in Proc

    Doeleman, S. 2010, in Proc. 10th European VLBI Network Symp. and EVN Users Meeting: VLBI and the New Generation of Radio Arrays (Trieste: SISSA), 53

    work page 2010

  30. [30]

    Doeleman, S., & Krichbaum, T. P. 1999, in 2nd Millimeter-VLBI Science Workshop, ed. A. Greve & T. P. Krichbaum (St. Martin d ’Heres: IRAM), 73

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Doeleman, S., Mai, T., Rogers, A. E. E., et al. 2011, PASP, 123, 582

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    S., Fish, V

    Doeleman, S. S., Fish, V. L., Schenck, D. E., et al. 2012, Sci, 338, 355

    work page 2012

  33. [33]

    S., Phillips, R

    Doeleman, S. S., Phillips, R. B., Rogers, A. E. E., et al. 2002, in Proc. 6th EVN Symp., ed. E. Ros et al. (Bonn: Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie ), 223

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    S., Weintroub, J., Rogers, A

    Doeleman, S. S., Weintroub, J., Rogers, A. E. E., et al. 2008, Natur, 455, 78 EHT Collaboration et al. 2019a, ApJL, 875, L1 (Paper I ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019b, ApJL, 875, L3 (Paper III ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019c, ApJL, 875, L4 (Paper IV ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019d, ApJL, 875, L5 (Paper V ) EHT Collaboration et al. 2019e, ApJL, 875, L6 (P...

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    2007, in ASP Conf

    Erickson, N., Narayanan, G., Goeller, R., & Grosslein, R. 2007, in ASP Conf. Ser. 375, From Z-Machines to ALMA: (Sub)Millimeter Spectroscopy of Galaxies, ed. A. J. Baker et al. (San Francisco, CA: ASP ), 71

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    2000, ApJL, 528, L13

    Falcke, H., Melia, F., & Agol, E. 2000, ApJL, 528, L13

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    L., Doeleman, S

    Fish, V. L., Doeleman, S. S., Beaudoin, C., et al. 2011, ApJL, 727, L36

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    L., Doeleman, S

    Fish, V. L., Doeleman, S. S., Broderick, A. E., Loeb, A., & Rogers, A. E. E. 2009, ApJ, 706, 1353

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    L., Johnson, M

    Fish, V. L., Johnson, M. D., Lu, R.-S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 134

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    2016, A&A, 588, A57

    Fraga-Encinas, R., Mo ścibrodzka, M., Brinkerink, C., & Falcke, H. 2016, A&A, 588, A57

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    2011, ApJ, 729, 119

    Gebhardt, K., Adams, J., Richstone, D., et al. 2011, ApJ, 729, 119

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    2010, RvMP, 82, 3121

    Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F., & Gillessen, S. 2010, RvMP, 82, 3121

    work page 2010

  43. [43]

    M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N

    Ghez, A. M., Salim, S., Weinberg, N. N., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 1044

    work page 2008

  44. [44]

    2019, PASP, submitted

    Gill, A., Blackburn, L., Roshanineshat, A., et al. 2019, PASP, submitted

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    2019, PASP, in press

    Goddi, C., Marti-Vidal, I., Messias, H., et al. 2019, PASP, in press

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    C., Johnson, M

    Gold, R., McKinney, J. C., Johnson, M. D., & Doeleman, S. S. 2017, ApJ, 837, 180 GRAVITY Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2018a, A&A, 618, L10 Gravity Collaboration, Abuter, R., Amorim, A., et al. 2018b, A&A, 615, L15

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    E., et al

    Greve, A., Torres, M., Wink, J. E., et al. 1995, A&A, 299, L33

    work page 1995

  48. [48]

    1992, A&A, 262, 624 Güsten, R., Nyman, L

    Guilloteau, S., Delannoy, J., Downes, D., et al. 1992, A&A, 262, 624 Güsten, R., Nyman, L. Å., Schilke, P., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, L13

    work page 1992

  49. [49]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 589

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    2016, JAI, 5, 1641001 24 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875:L2 (28pp), 2019 April 10 The EHT Collaboration et al

    Hickish, J., Abdurashidova, Z., Ali, Z., et al. 2016, JAI, 5, 1641001 24 The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 875:L2 (28pp), 2019 April 10 The EHT Collaboration et al

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    1917, NWGot, 8, 53

    Hilbert, D. 1917, NWGot, 8, 53

    work page 1917

  52. [52]

    Ho, L. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 475

    work page 2008

  53. [53]

    Ho, P. T. P., Moran, J. M., & Lo, K. Y. 2004, ApJL, 616, L1

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    2014, PASJ, 66, 95

    Honma, M., Akiyama, K., Uemura, M., & Ikeda, S. 2014, PASJ, 66, 95

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    C., Asada, K., et al

    Inoue, M., Algaba-Marcos, J. C., Asada, K., et al. 2014, RaSc, 49, 564

    work page 2014

  56. [56]

    D., Blackburn, L., et al

    Issaoun, S., Johnson, M. D., Blackburn, L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 30

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    rPICARD: A CASA-based Calibration Pipeline for VLBI Data. Calibration and imaging of 7 mm VLBA observations of the AGN jet in M87

    Janssen, M., Goddi, C., van Bemmel, I. M., et al. 2019, A&A, submitted (arXiv:1902.01749)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    2014, PASP, 126, 761

    Jiang, H., Liu, H., Guzzino, K., et al. 2014, PASP, 126, 761

    work page 2014

  59. [59]

    2010, ApJ, 718, 446

    Johannsen, T., & Psaltis, D. 2010, ApJ, 718, 446

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    2012, ApJ, 758, 30

    Johannsen, T., Psaltis, D., Gillessen, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 758, 30

    work page 2012

  61. [61]

    D., Fish, V

    Johnson, M. D., Fish, V. L., Doeleman, S. S., et al. 2015, Sci, 350, 1242

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    D., Narayan, R., Psaltis, D., et al

    Johnson, M. D., Narayan, R., Psaltis, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 104

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    S., Khartov, V

    Kardashev, N. S., Khartov, V. V., Abramov, V. V., et al. 2013, ARep, 57, 153

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    R., Pan, S.-K., Claude, S

    Kerr, A. R., Pan, S.-K., Claude, S. M. X., et al. 2014, ITTST, 4, 201

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    P., Graham, D

    Krichbaum, T. P., Graham, D. A., Alef, W., et al. 2002, in Proc. 6th EVN Symp., ed. E. Ros et al. (Bonn: Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie), 125

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    P., Graham, D

    Krichbaum, T. P., Graham, D. A., Witzel, A., et al. 1998, A&A, 335, L106

    work page 1998

  67. [67]

    2018, Proc

    Kubo, D., Han, C.-C., Nishioka, H., et al. 2018, Proc. SPIE , 10708, 1070816

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Y., Asada, K., Rao, R., et al

    Kuo, C. Y., Asada, K., Rao, R., et al. 2014, ApJL, 783, L33

    work page 2014

  69. [69]

    2018, ApJ, 858, 56

    Kuramochi, K., Akiyama, K., Ikeda, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 858, 56

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    B., & Gontier, A.-M

    Lambert, S. B., & Gontier, A.-M. 2009, A&A, 493, 317

    work page 2009

  71. [71]

    Y., Shen, Z.-Q., Zhao, J.-H., & Ho, P

    Lo, K. Y., Shen, Z.-Q., Zhao, J.-H., & Ho, P. T. P. 1998, ApJL, 508, L61

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    E., Baron, F., et al

    Lu, R.-S., Broderick, A. E., Baron, F., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 120

    work page 2014

  73. [73]

    P., Eckart, A., et al

    Lu, R.-S., Krichbaum, T. P., Eckart, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 525, A76

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    P., Roy, A

    Lu, R.-S., Krichbaum, T. P., Roy, A. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 60

    work page 2018

  75. [75]

    1979, A&A, 75, 228

    Luminet, J.-P. 1979, A&A, 75, 228

    work page 1979

  76. [76]

    G., Baars, J

    Mangum, J. G., Baars, J. W. M., Greve, A., et al. 2006, PASP, 118, 1257

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    P., Moran, J

    Marrone, D. P., Moran, J. M., Zhao, J.-H., & Rao, R. 2007, ApJL, 654, L57

    work page 2007

  78. [78]

    P., Tilanus, R

    Marrone, D. P., Tilanus, R. P. J., & Doeleman, S. S. 2014, EHT Memo Series, 2014-ETWG-01 Martí-Vidal, I., Roy, A., Conway, J., & Zensus, A. J. 2016, A&A, 587, A143

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    L., et al

    Matsushita, S., Asada, K., Martin-Cocher, P. L., et al. 2017, PASP, 129, 025001

    work page 2017

  80. [80]

    D., Crew, G

    Matthews, L. D., Crew, G. B., Doeleman, S. S., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 015002

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.