pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.06482 · v2 · pith:IR4WML5Snew · submitted 2019-07-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesLISAwhite dwarf binariesblack hole mergersmillihertzastrophysicscosmologyspace interferometer
0
0 comments X

The pith

LISA will conduct the first survey of the millihertz gravitational wave sky by detecting tens of thousands of sources from white-dwarf binaries to distant black hole mergers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review paper presents the case for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna as a space-based observatory targeting gravitational waves in the millihertz frequency range. It establishes that LISA would detect a large population of individual astrophysical sources, including white-dwarf binaries in the Milky Way and mergers of massive black holes at high redshifts. These detections are projected to supply direct information on the final stages of stellar evolution, the formation and growth of massive black holes, and the linked history of galaxies and black holes. The paper also notes LISA's potential reach to intermediate-mass black holes and certain cosmological signals such as those from cosmic strings.

Core claim

LISA will broaden gravitational wave astronomy by conducting the first survey of the millihertz gravitational wave sky, detecting tens of thousands of individual astrophysical sources ranging from white-dwarf binaries in our own galaxy to mergers of massive black holes at redshifts extending beyond the epoch of reionization, thereby informing our understanding of the end state of stellar evolution, massive black hole birth, and the co-evolution of galaxies and black holes through cosmic time, while also offering the possibility of detecting signals from intermediate-mass black holes and exotic cosmological sources such as inflationary fields and cosmic string cusps.

What carries the argument

The LISA space-based interferometer array, which measures gravitational wave strains in the millihertz band inaccessible to ground-based detectors.

Load-bearing premise

The mission will be funded, launched, and will reach the sensitivity and operational performance needed to detect the projected sources.

What would settle it

If LISA launches but detects far fewer than tens of thousands of sources or none of the high-redshift massive black hole mergers after several years of operation, the survey projections would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.06482 by Ann Hornschemeier, Anthony Yu, Bernard J. Kelly, Brent Ware, Brittany Kamai, Craig Hogan, Curt Cutler, David Shoemaker, Deirdre Shoemaker, Elizabeth C. Ferrara, Emanuele Berti, Guido Mueller, Ira Thorpe, Jacob Slutsky, Jeff Livas, Jeremy Schnittman, Jillian Bellovary, Joey Shapiro Key, John Baker, John W. Conklin, John Ziemer, Jordan Camp, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Kenji Numata, Kirk McKenzie, Martin Hewitson, Michael Eracleous, Michele Vallisneri, Neil Cornish, Norman Rioux, Peter L. Bender, Peter Wass, Priyamvada Natarajan, Robert Caldwell, Robert Spero, Robin Stebbins, Ryan DeRosa, Samuel Francis, Sean T. McWilliams, Shane L. Larson, Shannon R. Sankar, Sridhar Manthripragada.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative examples of LISA sources compared with the instrument sen￾sitivity. Sources and instrument sensitivity are plotted as frequency spectra of charac￾teristic GW strain. All sources are observed simultaneously and individually extracted through a global fit of the LISA time-series data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Orbital configuration of the LISA mission. The 2.5Mkm triangular constella￾tion is inclined to the ecliptic by 60◦ and un￾dergoes a cartwheeling motion once per or￾bit. 3.1 LISA mission design At the most basic level, the LISA mea￾surement concept parallels that which has been successfully employed on LIGO and other terrestrial GW interferometers [34, 35]. A set of test masses are arranged across widely-se… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An overview of the current LISA schedule including major project milestones. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The first terrestrial gravitational wave interferometers have dramatically underscored the scientific value of observing the Universe through an entirely different window, and of folding this new channel of information with traditional astronomical data for a multimessenger view. The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will broaden the reach of gravitational wave astronomy by conducting the first survey of the millihertz gravitational wave sky, detecting tens of thousands of individual astrophysical sources ranging from white-dwarf binaries in our own galaxy to mergers of massive black holes at redshifts extending beyond the epoch of reionization. These observations will inform - and transform - our understanding of the end state of stellar evolution, massive black hole birth, and the co-evolution of galaxies and black holes through cosmic time. LISA also has the potential to detect gravitational wave emission from elusive astrophysical sources such as intermediate-mass black holes as well as exotic cosmological sources such as inflationary fields and cosmic string cusps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is an overview of the LISA space-based gravitational-wave mission. It claims that LISA will perform the first survey of the millihertz gravitational-wave sky, detecting tens of thousands of individual sources (galactic white-dwarf binaries, massive black-hole mergers out to high redshift, and potentially intermediate-mass black holes or cosmological sources) and thereby transforming understanding of stellar evolution, black-hole formation, and galaxy-black-hole co-evolution.

Significance. If the stated sensitivity and operational performance are achieved, the projected observations would open a new observational window complementary to ground-based detectors and enable multimessenger studies across a wide range of astrophysical and cosmological topics. The paper synthesizes prior design studies into a coherent science case; its value lies in this consolidation rather than in new derivations or data.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the detection numbers and redshift reach are presented as firm outcomes; a short parenthetical noting that they derive from earlier population-synthesis and sensitivity studies would make the conditional character of the projections explicit without altering the central message.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending acceptance. The referee accurately characterizes the paper as a synthesis of prior LISA design studies into a coherent science case, with its primary value lying in consolidation rather than new derivations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; descriptive mission concept with no derivations

full rationale

The paper is a mission concept white paper whose central content consists of conditional projections for LISA performance and science return. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivation chains appear in the provided abstract or framing. Claims are explicitly framed as expected outcomes assuming the instrument meets its design specifications, with no self-referential reduction of predictions to inputs, no self-citation load-bearing on uniqueness theorems, and no renaming of known results as new derivations. The structure is self-contained as a forward-looking description rather than an empirical or mathematical derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a mission proposal white paper rather than a theoretical derivation or data analysis paper. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced or fitted in the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5878 in / 1117 out tokens · 31285 ms · 2026-05-24T21:18:02.993491+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 15 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cosmic Collider Gravitational Waves sourced by Right-handed Neutrino production from Bubbles: Testing Seesaw, Leptogenesis and Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bubble collisions in a seesaw model produce right-handed neutrinos that source novel gravitational waves detectable by LISA, ET, and LVK while allowing the lightest RHN to explain dark matter or enable leptogenesis.

  2. New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions

    hep-ph 2020-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Defines peak-integrated sensitivity curves (PISCs) that fold in the expected spectral shape of gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions and supplies semianalytical fits plus public data for major detectors.

  3. Primordial Black Hole from Tensor-induced Density Fluctuation: First-order Phase Transitions and Domain Walls

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Tensor perturbations from first-order phase transitions and domain wall annihilation induce curvature fluctuations at second order that form primordial black holes, allowing asteroid-mass PBHs to comprise all dark mat...

  4. Prospects for multi-messenger discovery of the gravitational-wave background anisotropies via cross-correlation with galaxies

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New simulations show that cross-correlating gravitational wave background anisotropies with galaxy distributions can enable discovery at angular scales of 4-6 degrees with next-generation observatories.

  5. Irreducible Gravitational Wave Background as a Particle Detector

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Spectral features imprinted by long-lived BSM particles on any primordial GWB directly determine the particles' mass and decay rate once the model and initial abundance are specified.

  6. Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extends diagrammatic approach for scalar-induced gravitational waves to arbitrary-order local PNG, deriving semi-analytic spectra for energy density, anisotropies, bispectrum and trispectrum up to quartic terms.

  7. Recombination Thickness as an Uncertainty in Inflationary Observables

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Finite recombination thickness introduces Gaussian smoothing in ln k to the primordial power spectrum, producing non-trivial differences between TT and EE spectral indices that may be detectable in future CMB data.

  8. Positive Running of the Spectral Index for Scalar Theory and Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Positive running of the spectral index is achievable in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with viable inflation, unlike standard scalar field and F(R) models which face challenges.

  9. Electro-Weak Phase Transitions and Collider Signals in the Aligned 2-Higgs Doublet Model

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The Aligned 2HDM supports strong first-order electroweak phase transitions that yield LISA-detectable gravitational waves together with LHC-accessible signals from additional neutral and charged Higgs states.

  10. Probing High-Quality Axions with Gravitational Waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    High-quality axion models with N_DW=1 and dark matter abundance requirement restrict the gauge breaking scale to 1.6e11-1e16 GeV, yielding a band of gravitational wave signals from two-step phase transitions consisten...

  11. Uncool soft-wall transitions and gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Soft-wall warped geometries yield rapid, mildly supercooled phase transitions whose TeV-scale gravitational wave signals are accessible to space-based interferometers.

  12. Isotropic stochastic gravitational wave background reconstruction for Taiji constellation

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A trans-dimensional MCMC pipeline recovers parameters of injected SGWB signals in Taiji simulations and reconstructs backgrounds with unknown spectral shapes.

  13. Estimating galactic foreground with the population of resolved galactic binaries

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population properties of resolved galactic binaries can be used to model and subtract the confusion foreground, yielding feasible detection of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds in Taiji simulations under stati...

  14. Sensitivity of Weak Lensing Surveys to Gravitational Waves from Inspiraling Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Weak lensing surveys cannot detect nanohertz-microhertz gravitational waves from supermassive black hole binaries under realistic conditions; only unattainable idealized surveys could probe this band.

  15. Gauge-independent Gravitational Waves from Cogenesis in a $B-L$ Conserving Universe

    hep-ph 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In a B-L conserving SM extension with U(1)_x dark sector, CP-violating Yukawas generate opposite lepton asymmetries in visible and hidden sectors that sphalerons convert to baryon asymmetry, with gauge-independent bub...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 15 Pith papers · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P . Addesso, and R. X. Adhikari. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(6):061102, Feb 2016

  2. [2]

    The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, the Virgo Collaboration, B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, and R. X. Adhikari. GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Ob- served by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs. arXiv e- prints, page arXiv:1811.12907, Nov 2018

  3. [3]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P . Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and V . B. Adya. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. ApJ, 848(2):L12, Oct 2017

  4. [4]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P . Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and V . B. Adya. GW170817: Measurements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(16):161101, Oct 2018

  5. [5]

    Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event

    Daniel Kasen, Brian Metzger, Jennifer Barnes, Eliot Quataert, and Enrico Ramirez- Ruiz. Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event. Nature, 551(7678):80–84, Nov 2017

  6. [6]

    B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P . Addesso, R. X. Adhikari, and V . B. Adya. A gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant. Nature, 551(7678):85–88, Nov 2017

  7. [7]

    New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics

    National Research Council. New Worlds, New Horizons in Astronomy and Astrophysics . The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2010

  8. [8]

    New Worlds, New Hori- zons: A Midterm Assessment

    Engineering National Academies of Sciences and Medicine. New Worlds, New Hori- zons: A Midterm Assessment . The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2016

  9. [9]

    The Gravitational Universe

    eLISA Consortium, P . Amaro Seoane, S. Aoudia, H. Audley, G. Auger, S. Babak, J. Baker, E. Barausse, S. Barke, and M. Bassan. The Gravitational Universe. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1305.5720, May 2013

  10. [10]

    Gravitational-Wave Astronomy in the 2020s and Beyond: A view across the gravitational wave spectrum

    David Shoemaker, Maura McLaughlin, James Ira Thorpe, and Gravitational Wave International Committee. Gravitational-Wave Astronomy in the 2020s and Beyond: A view across the gravitational wave spectrum. In BAAS, volume 51, page 232, May 2019

  11. [11]

    LISA science requirements document

    LISA Science Study Team. LISA science requirements document. Technical Report ESA-L3-EST-SCI-RS-001, European Space Agency, 2018

  12. [12]

    C. J. Moore, R. H. Cole, and C. P . L. Berry. Gravitational-wave sensitivity curves. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 32(1):015014, Jan 2015. 11 The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna An Astro2020 APC Whitepaper

  13. [13]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane, Heather Audley, Stanislav Babak, John Baker, Enrico Barausse, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Pierre Binetruy, Michael Born, and Daniele Bortoluzzi. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1702.00786, Feb 2017

  14. [14]

    Korol, E

    V . Korol, E. M. Rossi, P . J. Groot, G. Nelemans, S. Toonen, and A. G. A. Brown. Prospects for detection of detached double white dwarf binaries with Gaia, LSST and LISA. MNRAS, 470:1894–1910, September 2017

  15. [15]

    Predicting the LISA white dwarf binary pop- ulation in the Milky Way with cosmological simulations

    Astrid Lamberts, Sarah Blunt, Tyson Littenberg, Shea Garrison-Kimmel, Thomas Kupfer, and Robyn Sanderson. Predicting the LISA white dwarf binary pop- ulation in the Milky Way with cosmological simulations. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1907.00014, Jun 2019

  16. [16]

    Kupfer, V

    T. Kupfer, V . Korol, S. Shah, G. Nelemans, T. R. Marsh, G. Ramsay, P . J. Groot, D. T. H. Steeghs, and E. M. Rossi. LISA verification binaries with updated distances from Gaia Data Release 2. MNRAS, 480(1):302–309, Oct 2018

  17. [17]

    Astro2020 Decadal Science White Paper: Gravitational Wave Survey of Galactic Ultra Compact Binaries

    Tyson B. Littenberg, Katelyn Breivik, Warren R. Brown, Michael Eracleous, J. J. Her- mes, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Kyle Kremer, Thomas Kupfer, and Shane L. Larson. Astro2020 Decadal Science White Paper: Gravitational Wave Survey of Galactic Ul- tra Compact Binaries. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.05583, Mar 2019

  18. [18]

    Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914

    Alberto Sesana. Prospects for Multiband Gravitational-Wave Astronomy after GW150914. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(23):231102, Jun 2016

  19. [19]

    Kovetz, Shane L

    Curt Cutler, Emanuele Berti, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Karan Jani, Ely D. Kovetz, Shane L. Larson, Tyson Littenberg, Sean T. McWilliams, Guido Mueller, and Lisa Randall. What can we learn from multi-band observations of black hole binaries? In BAAS, volume 51, page 109, May 2019

  20. [20]

    The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astron- omy

    Christopher Berry, Scott Hughes, Carlos Sopuerta, Alvin Chua, Anna Heffernan, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Deyan Mihaylov, Coleman Miller, and Alberto Sesana. The unique potential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational-wave astron- omy. In BAAS, volume 51, page 42, May 2019

  21. [21]

    An Arena for Multi-Messenger Astro- physics: Inspiral and Tidal Disruption of White Dwarfs by Massive Black Holes

    Michael Eracleous, Suvi Gezari, Alberto Sesana, Tamara Bogdanovic, Morgan MacLeod, Nathaniel Roth, and Lixin Dai. An Arena for Multi-Messenger Astro- physics: Inspiral and Tidal Disruption of White Dwarfs by Massive Black Holes. In BAAS, volume 51, page 10, May 2019

  22. [22]

    Disentangling nature from nurture: tracing the ori- gin of seed black holes

    Priyamvada Natarajan, Vivienne Baldassare, Jillian Bellovary, Peter Bender, Emanuele Berti, Nico Cappelluti, Andrea Ferrara, Jenny Greene, Zoltan Haiman, and Kelly Holley-Bockelmann. Disentangling nature from nurture: tracing the ori- gin of seed black holes. In BAAS, volume 51, page 73, May 2019

  23. [23]

    Astro2020 science white paper: The gravitational wave view of massive black holes

    Monica Colpi, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Tamara Bogdanovic, Priya Natarajan, Jil- lian Bellovary, Alberto Sesana, Michael Tremmel, Jeremy Schnittman, Julia Comer- ford, and Enrico Barausse. Astro2020 science white paper: The gravitational wave view of massive black holes. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1903.06867, Mar 2019. 12 The Laser Interferometer Space Ant...

  24. [24]

    D’Orazio

    John Baker, Zoltan Haiman, Elena Maria Rossi, Edo Berger, Niel Brandt, Elme Breedt, Katelyn Breivik, Maria Charisi, Andrea Derdzinski, and Daniel J. D’Orazio. Multimessenger science opportunities with mHz gravitational waves. In BAAS, vol- ume 51, page 123, May 2019

  25. [25]

    The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy

    Neil Cornish, Emanuele Berti, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Shane Larson, Sean McWilliams, Guido Mueller, Priyamvada Natarajan, and Michele Vallisneri. The Discovery Potential of Space-Based Gravitational Wave Astronomy. In BAAS, vol- ume 51, page 76, May 2019

  26. [26]

    Where are the Intermediate Mass Black Holes? In BAAS, vol- ume 51, page 175, May 2019

    Jillian Bellovary, Alyson Brooks, Monica Colpi, Michael Eracleous, Kelly Holley- Bockelmann, Ann Hornschemeier, Lucio Mayer, Priya Natarajan, Jacob Slutsky, and Michael Tremmel. Where are the Intermediate Mass Black Holes? In BAAS, vol- ume 51, page 175, May 2019

  27. [27]

    Astro2020 Science White Paper: Cosmology with a Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatory

    Robert Caldwell, Mustafa Amin, Craig Hogan, Kelly Holley-Bockelmann, Daniel Holz, Philippe Jetzer, Ely Kovitz, Priya Natarajan, David Shoemaker, and Tristan Smith. Astro2020 Science White Paper: Cosmology with a Space-Based Gravitational Wave Observatory. In BAAS, volume 51, page 67, May 2019

  28. [28]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, and A. M. Cruise. Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20 µ Hz. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120(6):061101, Feb 2018

  29. [29]

    Anderson, J

    G. Anderson, J. Anderson, M. Anderson, G. Aveni, D. Bame, P . Barela, K. Blackman, A. Carmain, L. Chen, and M. Cherng. Experimental results from the ST7 mission on LISA Pathfinder. Phys. Rev. D, 98(10):102005, Nov 2018

  30. [30]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, and A. M. Cruise. Precision charge control for isolated free-falling test masses: LISA pathfinder results. Phys. Rev. D, 98(6):062001, Sep 2018

  31. [31]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, and A. M. Cruise. LISA Pathfinder platform stability and drag-free performance. Phys. Rev. D, 99(8):082001, Apr 2019

  32. [32]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, and A. M. Cruise. Temperature stability in the sub- milliHertz band with LISA Pathfinder. Accepted, 2019

  33. [33]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, J. Baird, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bortoluzzi, E. Castelli, A. Cavalleri, A. Cesarini, and A. M. Cruise. Temperature stability in the sub- milliHertz band with LISA Pathfinder. MNRAS, 486(3):3368–3379, Jul 2019

  34. [34]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J. Aasi, B. P . Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Aber- nathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, and P . Addesso. Advanced LIGO. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(7):074001, Apr 2015. 13 The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna An Astro2020 APC Whitepaper

  35. [35]

    Acernese, M

    F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, N. Allemandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P . Astone, G. Balestri, and G. Ballardin. Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector. Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 32(2):024001, Jan 2015

  36. [36]

    W. M. Folkner, F. Hechler, T. H. Sweetser, M. A. Vincent, and P . L. Bender. LISA orbit selection and stability. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 14(6):1405–1410, Jun 1997

  37. [37]

    J. W. Armstrong, F. B. Estabrook, and Massimo Tinto. Time-Delay Interferometry for Space-based Gravitational Wave Searches. ApJ, 527(2):814–826, Dec 1999

  38. [38]

    D. A. Shaddock, B. Ware, R. E. Spero, and M. Vallisneri. Postprocessed time-delay interferometry for LISA. Phys. Rev. D, 70(8):081101, Oct 2004

  39. [39]

    Geometric time delay interferometry

    Michele Vallisneri. Geometric time delay interferometry. Phys. Rev. D, 72(4):042003, Aug 2005

  40. [40]

    On orbit performance of the GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometer

    Klaus Abich, Claus Braxmaier, Martin Gohlke, Josep Sanjuan, Alexander Abramovici, Brian Bachman Okihiro, David C. Barr, Maxime P . Bize, Michael J. Burke, and Ken C. Clark. On orbit performance of the GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometer. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:1907.00104, Jun 2019

  41. [41]

    A LISA data-analysis primer

    Michele Vallisneri. A LISA data-analysis primer. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 26(9):094024, May 2009

  42. [42]

    Arnaud, Stanislav Babak, John G

    Keith A. Arnaud, Stanislav Babak, John G. Baker, Matthew J. Benacquista, Neil J. Cornish, Curt Cutler, Shane L. Larson, B. S. Sathyaprakash, Michele Vallisneri, and Alberto Vecchio. An Overview of the Mock LISA Data Challenges. In Stephen M. Merkovitz and Jeffrey C. Livas, editors, Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: 6th Inter- national LISA Symposium, vo...

  43. [43]

    Baker, Matthew J

    Stanislav Babak, John G. Baker, Matthew J. Benacquista, Neil J. Cornish, Jeff Crow- der, Curt Cutler, Shane L. Larson, Tyson B. Littenberg, Edward K. Porter, and Michele Vallisneri. Report on the second Mock LISA data challenge. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(11):114037, Jun 2008

  44. [44]

    L3 Study Team Interim Report

    NASA L3 Study Team. L3 Study Team Interim Report. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Agency, 2016

  45. [45]

    NASA LISA Study Office Technology Plan

    NASA LISA Study Office. NASA LISA Study Office Technology Plan. Technical report, National Aeronautics and Space Agency, 2019

  46. [46]

    Armano, H

    M. Armano, H. Audley, G. Auger, J. T. Baird, M. Bassan, P . Binetruy, M. Born, D. Bor- toluzzi, N. Brandt, and M. Caleno. Sub-Femto-g Free Fall for Space-Based Gravita- tional Wave Observatories: LISA Pathfinder Results. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(23):231101, Jun 2016

  47. [47]

    NASA’s Beyond Einstein Program: An Architecture for Im- plementation

    National Research Council. NASA’s Beyond Einstein Program: An Architecture for Im- plementation. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2007. 14