pith. sign in

arxiv: 2406.05967 · v2 · pith:AFY3QMJ5new · submitted 2024-06-10 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.LG

CVQA: Culturally-diverse Multilingual Visual Question Answering Benchmark

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords languagesmodelsbenchmarkculturalcvqavisualansweringdatasets
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is an important task in multimodal AI, and it is often used to test the ability of vision-language models to understand and reason on knowledge present in both visual and textual data. However, most of the current VQA models use datasets that are primarily focused on English and a few major world languages, with images that are typically Western-centric. While recent efforts have tried to increase the number of languages covered on VQA datasets, they still lack diversity in low-resource languages. More importantly, although these datasets often extend their linguistic range via translation or some other approaches, they usually keep images the same, resulting in narrow cultural representation. To address these limitations, we construct CVQA, a new Culturally-diverse multilingual Visual Question Answering benchmark, designed to cover a rich set of languages and cultures, where we engage native speakers and cultural experts in the data collection process. As a result, CVQA includes culturally-driven images and questions from across 30 countries on four continents, covering 31 languages with 13 scripts, providing a total of 10k questions. We then benchmark several Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) on CVQA, and show that the dataset is challenging for the current state-of-the-art models. This benchmark can serve as a probing evaluation suite for assessing the cultural capability and bias of multimodal models and hopefully encourage more research efforts toward increasing cultural awareness and linguistic diversity in this field.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CrossCult-KIBench provides 9,800 test cases for cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs and shows that existing methods cannot reliably adapt to one culture while preserving behavior in others.

  2. CrossCult-KIBench: A Benchmark for Cross-Cultural Knowledge Insertion in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CrossCult-KIBench is a new benchmark for evaluating cross-cultural knowledge insertion in MLLMs, paired with the MCKI baseline method, showing current approaches fail to balance adaptation and preservation.

  3. ProMQA-Assembly: Multimodal Procedural QA Dataset on Assembly

    cs.CL 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ProMQA-Assembly is a new multimodal procedural QA dataset with 646 pairs on assembly activities, built via LLM-generated candidates verified by humans plus 81 task graphs, and used to benchmark multimodal models.

  4. EduArt: An educational-level benchmark for evaluating art history knowledge in large language models

    cs.CL 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EduArt is a new benchmark of 871 educational questions that reveals multimodal LLMs perform near ceiling on multiple-choice art history items but drop sharply on open completion and error identification tasks.

  5. Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Community members from the UK blind community, Kerala, and Tamil Nadu helped define what counts as culturally appropriate depictions of artifacts, and the authors tested whether those definitions can be turned into re...

  6. Evaluating AI-Generated Images of Cultural Artifacts with Community-Informed Rubrics

    cs.CY 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Case studies with blind UK residents and people from Kerala and Tamil Nadu demonstrate that community input at the systematization stage produces culturally grounded definitions of appropriateness for text-to-image mo...