pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.14340 · v3 · pith:DMWAKR3Bnew · submitted 2024-08-26 · 💻 cs.SD · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.LG· eess.AS

Foundation Models for Music: A Survey

classification 💻 cs.SD cs.AIcs.CLcs.LGeess.AS
keywords musicmodelsfoundationlearningdiverseinsightsissuespre-training
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In recent years, foundation models (FMs) such as large language models (LLMs) and latent diffusion models (LDMs) have profoundly impacted diverse sectors, including music. This comprehensive review examines state-of-the-art (SOTA) pre-trained models and foundation models in music, spanning from representation learning, generative learning and multimodal learning. We first contextualise the significance of music in various industries and trace the evolution of AI in music. By delineating the modalities targeted by foundation models, we discover many of the music representations are underexplored in FM development. Then, emphasis is placed on the lack of versatility of previous methods on diverse music applications, along with the potential of FMs in music understanding, generation and medical application. By comprehensively exploring the details of the model pre-training paradigm, architectural choices, tokenisation, finetuning methodologies and controllability, we emphasise the important topics that should have been well explored, like instruction tuning and in-context learning, scaling law and emergent ability, as well as long-sequence modelling etc. A dedicated section presents insights into music agents, accompanied by a thorough analysis of datasets and evaluations essential for pre-training and downstream tasks. Finally, by underscoring the vital importance of ethical considerations, we advocate that following research on FM for music should focus more on such issues as interpretability, transparency, human responsibility, and copyright issues. The paper offers insights into future challenges and trends on FMs for music, aiming to shape the trajectory of human-AI collaboration in the music realm.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can LLMs understand LilyPond? A benchmark for symbolic music generation and understanding

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LilyBench evaluates open-weight LLMs on zero-shot LilyPond generation (achievable) and structural understanding tasks (challenging), with metric disagreements noted and code released.

  2. VocalParse: Towards Unified and Scalable Singing Voice Transcription with Large Audio Language Models

    cs.SD 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VocalParse applies interleaved and Chain-of-Thought prompting to a Large Audio Language Model to jointly transcribe lyrics, melody and word-note alignments, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple singing datasets.

  3. Less is More: Efficient Black-box Attribution via Minimal Interpretable Subset Selection

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LiMA reformulates attribution as submodular subset selection and uses bidirectional greedy search to identify minimal important regions, reporting 36.3% better insertion and 39.6% better deletion scores than prior met...

  4. AudioX-Turbo: A Unified Framework for Efficient Anything-to-Audio Generation

    cs.SD 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AudioX-Turbo distills a Multimodal Diffusion Transformer into a 4-step student model for efficient multimodal anything-to-audio generation, trained on a new 9.2M-sample dataset IF-caps-Pro.