pith. sign in

arxiv: 2411.07970 · v4 · submitted 2024-11-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.IM

MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) Science White Paper I: Overview of Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Surveys

Cheng Zhao , Song Huang , Mengfan He , Paulo Montero-Camacho , Yu Liu , Pablo Renard , Yunyi Tang , Aurelien Verdier
show 36 more authors
Wenshuo Xu Xiaorui Yang Jiaxi Yu Yao Zhang Siyi Zhao Xingchen Zhou Shengyu He Jean-Paul Kneib Jiayi Li Zhuoyang Li Wen-Ting Wang Zhong-Zhi Xianyu Yidian Zhang Rafaela Gsponer Xiao-Dong Li Antoine Rocher Siwei Zou Ting Tan Zhiqi Huang Zhuoxiao Wang Pei Li Maxime Rombach Chenxing Dong Daniel Forero-Sanchez Yuanhang Ning Huanyuan Shan Tao Wang Yin Li Zhongxu Zhai Yuting Wang Gong-Bo Zhao Yong Shi Shude Mao Lei Huang Liquan Guo Zheng Cai
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 17:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
keywords large-scale structurespectroscopic surveysdark energycosmologyStage-V surveysgalaxy clusteringredshift surveys
0
0 comments X

The pith

MUST will map over 100 million galaxies and quasars to z~5.5 to test dark energy, gravity, and primordial physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST), a 6.5-meter telescope built for wide-field spectroscopic surveys that can observe more than 20,000 targets at once over a 5 square degree field. It describes a conceptual target selection method to gather local bright galaxies, luminous red galaxies, emission-line galaxies, and high-redshift Lyman-break galaxies, reaching a total sample of over 100 million objects from the nearby universe out to redshift 5.5. Fisher forecasts in the paper indicate that this dataset will constrain the nature of dark energy, test gravity theories, and probe primordial physics. The work is the first in a planned series of science white papers for the instrument.

Core claim

Using Fisher forecasts, the authors demonstrate that the planned MUST survey can address fundamental questions in cosmology, including the nature of dark energy, tests of gravity theories, and investigations into primordial physics, by mapping the 3D distribution of over 100 million galaxies and quasars across 0 < z < 5.5.

What carries the argument

The highly-multiplexed spectroscopic capability with over 20,000 simultaneous targets observed via 6.2-mm pitch positioning robots in a ~5 deg² field of view, combined with an initial conceptual target selection algorithm that covers multiple galaxy populations across the full redshift range.

If this is right

  • Tighter bounds on the dark energy equation of state from baryon acoustic oscillations and redshift-space distortions.
  • Direct tests of gravity theories through measurements of the growth rate of structure over a wide redshift baseline.
  • Constraints on primordial physics such as non-Gaussianity or other early-universe signatures via the large-scale clustering signal.
  • A 3D map of the universe that spans from the local volume to roughly 1 billion years after the Big Bang.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The survey design could support joint analyses with photometric or CMB datasets to break degeneracies in cosmological parameters.
  • Achieving the stated goals would depend on parallel advances in automated spectral classification and large-scale data processing pipelines.
  • Direct comparison of MUST forecasts with those from other Stage-IV and Stage-V facilities would clarify the unique leverage of its multiplexed, high-redshift reach.

Load-bearing premise

The target selection algorithm will deliver the required number and purity of targets across the full redshift range without major unforeseen observational or instrumental limitations.

What would settle it

Actual on-sky performance that falls short of the forecasted target density or survey volume, producing cosmological parameter constraints significantly weaker than those shown in the Fisher analysis.

read the original abstract

The MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) is a 6.5-meter telescope under development. Dedicated to highly-multiplexed, wide-field spectroscopic surveys, MUST observes over 20,000 targets simultaneously using 6.2-mm pitch positioning robots within a ~5 deg$^2$ field of view. MUST aims to conduct the first Stage-V spectroscopic survey in the 2030s, mapping the 3D Universe with over 100 million galaxies and quasars, spanning from the nearby Universe to a redshift of z ~ 5.5, corresponding to approximately 1 billion years after the Big Bang. To cover this extensive redshift range, we present an initial conceptual target selection algorithm for different types of galaxies, ranging from local bright galaxies and luminous red galaxies to emission-line galaxies, and high-redshift (2 < z < 5.5) Lyman-break galaxies. Using Fisher forecasts, we demonstrate that MUST can address fundamental questions in cosmology, including the nature of dark energy, tests of gravity theories, and investigations into primordial physics. This is the first paper in the series of science white papers for MUST, with subsequent developments focusing on additional scientific cases such as galaxy and quasar evolution, Milky Way physics, and dynamic phenomena in the time-domain Universe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is the first in a series of science white papers for the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST), a 6.5 m telescope for highly multiplexed spectroscopic surveys. It describes the instrument (20,000+ simultaneous targets in a ~5 deg² FOV), presents an initial conceptual target selection algorithm spanning local galaxies to z~5.5 Lyman-break galaxies with the goal of >100 million objects, and invokes Fisher forecasts to argue that the survey can address dark energy, gravity tests, and primordial physics.

Significance. If the survey specifications are realized, the resulting Stage-V LSS dataset would be a major resource for cosmology. The white paper usefully motivates the project and identifies broad science drivers, but the forecasts remain high-level and conditional on unvalidated performance assumptions.

major comments (2)
  1. [target selection algorithm description (abstract and associated section)] The abstract and target-selection section present only an 'initial conceptual target selection algorithm' for LRGs, ELGs, LBGs, etc., yet the Fisher forecasts that underpin the central cosmological claims assume the survey will deliver the required number densities, redshift coverage (0<z<5.5), and sample purity. No completeness/purity metrics, end-to-end simulations, fiber-assignment studies, or redshift-success-rate estimates are reported to support these inputs.
  2. [Fisher forecasts discussion] The Fisher-forecast results cited to demonstrate constraints on dark energy, modified gravity, and primordial physics are referenced without quantitative details on the assumed survey parameters, covariance model, fiducial cosmology, or validation against mocks. This renders the forecasted constraints difficult to assess for robustness.
minor comments (1)
  1. [abstract] Clarify in the abstract and introduction that all cosmological forecasts are conditional on the target-selection algorithm meeting its (currently unquantified) performance goals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on the MUST science white paper. We respond to each major comment below, clarifying the scope of this overview paper while proposing targeted revisions to improve transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract and target-selection section present only an 'initial conceptual target selection algorithm' for LRGs, ELGs, LBGs, etc., yet the Fisher forecasts that underpin the central cosmological claims assume the survey will deliver the required number densities, redshift coverage (0<z<5.5), and sample purity. No completeness/purity metrics, end-to-end simulations, fiber-assignment studies, or redshift-success-rate estimates are reported to support these inputs.

    Authors: We agree that the target selection is presented as an initial conceptual algorithm and that the Fisher forecasts rely on the number densities and redshift ranges derived from it. This manuscript is the first in a series and serves as an overview to motivate the project and identify broad science drivers; the forecasts are intended to illustrate potential reach rather than deliver finalized predictions. Detailed completeness/purity metrics, end-to-end simulations, fiber-assignment studies, and success-rate estimates are beyond the scope of this paper and will be developed in subsequent papers. We will revise the text to explicitly note that the forecasts are illustrative and conditional on achieving the assumed performance, and we will add a short paragraph summarizing the key assumptions used to derive the target densities. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The Fisher-forecast results cited to demonstrate constraints on dark energy, modified gravity, and primordial physics are referenced without quantitative details on the assumed survey parameters, covariance model, fiducial cosmology, or validation against mocks. This renders the forecasted constraints difficult to assess for robustness.

    Authors: The manuscript provides the primary survey parameters (target numbers, field of view, redshift range) in the main text, but we acknowledge that further quantitative details on the covariance model, fiducial cosmology, and any mock validation would improve assessability. We will revise the Fisher-forecast section to include a concise summary of the key assumptions, such as the fiducial cosmology and basic covariance treatment, presented in a table or dedicated paragraph. Full validation against mocks lies outside the scope of this overview white paper and is reserved for follow-up studies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forecasts are forward calculations from design assumptions

full rationale

The paper presents a conceptual target selection algorithm whose outputs (number densities, redshift coverage) serve as inputs to standard Fisher-matrix forecasts. This is a conventional forward prediction exercise and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted-inputs-renamed-as-predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation chain. The central claims remain independent of any circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the document is an overview of planned observations and forecasts.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5951 in / 1029 out tokens · 58505 ms · 2026-05-23T17:42:36.601973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 9 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Kinematic Lensing Ratio: Reviving Weak Lensing Cosmography as a Geometric Dark Energy Probe

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    KiLeR combines shear ratios with kinematic intrinsic shapes to mitigate first-order lensing systematics and forecasts a 192% improvement in dark energy constraints from the Roman telescope.

  2. Differentiable Fuzzy Cosmic-Web for Field Level Inference

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces HICOBIAN, a differentiable fuzzy hierarchical cosmic-web bias model using sigmoid gradients for smooth region transitions, enabling accurate Bayesian field-level reconstruction of primordial density fields ...

  3. Into the Gompverse: A robust Gompertzian reionization model for CMB analyses

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Gompertzian reionization model with three nuisance parameters demotes optical depth to a derived quantity, reducing its uncertainty by a factor of three and revealing potential neutrino mass tension in CMB analyses.

  4. Constraining Neutrino Mass with the Void Weak Lensing Effect

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Simulations of void-shear cross-correlation demonstrate that void lensing can constrain total neutrino mass to σ(M_ν)=0.096 eV without shape noise and 0.340 eV with Stage-III-like noise.

  5. An Updated Characterization of Luminous Ly{\alpha} emitters at the End of Reionization

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Luminous Lyα emitters at z≈6 are low-mass ultra-young dwarf starbursts with median Lyα escape fractions above 40 percent, driven by vigorous star formation and low dust content.

  6. Atmospheric turbulence profiling with the Multistar Turbulence Monitor

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MTM recovers integrated seeing and vertical Cn2(z) profiles via multi-star differential image motion, with simulations and on-sky tests at Daocheng matching DIMM results.

  7. Counting voids and filaments: Betti Curves as a Powerful Probe for Cosmology

    astro-ph.CO 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Betti curves from persistent homology of large-scale structure provide complementary cosmological constraints on ns, sigma8, and Om, with tighter bounds when analyzed jointly with the power spectrum.

  8. A Gaia-linked High-purity QSO Candidate Catalog in Selected Fields with Extinction-binned Calibration and Spectrum-informed Training

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The P3 selector achieves 0.9809 purity and 0.8869 completeness for QSO candidates in selected fields, outperforming Gaia's official probabilities.

  9. From Large Telescopes to the MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST)

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MUST is a new 6.5 m telescope designed to deliver simultaneous optical spectra for over 20,000 targets across a 5 deg² field, enabling the largest 3D spectroscopic map of the Universe with redshifts for more than 100 ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · cited by 9 Pith papers · 147 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Huchra , M

    J. Huchra , M. Davis , D. Latham , and J. Tonry , 52, 89 (1983)

    work page 1983

  2. [2]

    de Lapparent , M

    V. de Lapparent , M. J. Geller , and J. P. Huchra , 302, L1 (1986)

    work page 1986

  3. [3]

    C. L. Bennett , D. Larson , J. L. Weiland et al., 208, 20 (2013), arXiv: 1212.5225

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration , N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami et al., 641, A6 (2020), arXiv: 1807.06209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release

    D. Scolnic , D. Brout , A. Carr et al., 938, 113 (2022), arXiv: 2112.03863

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples

    M. Betoule , R. Kessler , J. Guy et al., 568, A22 (2014), arXiv: 1401.4064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    DES Collaboration , T. M. C. Abbott , M. Acevedo et al., arXiv e-prints 973, arXiv:2401.02929 (2024), arXiv: 2401.02929

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    T. M. C. Abbott , M. Aguena , A. Alarcon et al., 105, 023520 (2022), arXiv: 2105.13549

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Heymans et al., KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clus- tering constraints, Astron

    C. Heymans , T. Tr \"o ster , M. Asgari et al., 646, A140 (2021), arXiv: 2007.15632

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological Implications from two Decades of Spectroscopic Surveys at the Apache Point observatory

    S. Alam , M. Aubert , S. Avila et al., 103, 083533 (2021), arXiv: 2007.08991

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Overview of the Instrumentation for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument

    DESI Collaboration , B. Abareshi , J. Aguilar et al., 164, 207 (2022), arXiv: 2205.10939

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    D. J. Eisenstein , I. Zehavi , D. W. Hogg et al., 633, 560 (2005), arXiv: astro-ph/0501171

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [13]

    Kaiser , 227, 1 (1987)

    N. Kaiser , 227, 1 (1987)

    work page 1987

  14. [14]

    DESI Collaboration , A. G. Adame , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.03000 (2024), arXiv: 2404.03000

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Report of the Dark Energy Task Force

    A. Albrecht , G. Bernstein , R. Cahn et al., arXiv e-prints astro-ph/0609591 (2006), arXiv: astro-ph/0609591

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  16. [16]

    Sailer , E

    N. Sailer , E. Castorina , S. Ferraro , and M. White , 2021, 049 (2021), arXiv: 2106.09713

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    2021, Chinese Science Bulletin, 66, 1290, doi: 10.1360/TB-2021-0016

    H. Zhan, Chinese Sci. Bull. 66, 1290 (2021), ://www.sciengine.com/10.1360/TB-2021-0016

    work page doi:10.1360/tb-2021-0016 2021

  18. [18]

    Mellier, Abdurro’uf, J

    Euclid Collaboration , Y. Mellier , Abdurro'uf et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2405.13491 (2024), arXiv: 2405.13491

    work page arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Wide-Field InfraRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA Final Report

    D. Spergel , N. Gehrels , J. Breckinridge et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1305.5422 (2013), arXiv: 1305.5422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  20. [20]

    LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products

    Z . Ivezi \'c , S. M. Kahn , J. A. Tyson et al., 873, 111 (2019), arXiv: 0805.2366

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Ruhlmann-Kleider , C

    V. Ruhlmann-Kleider , C. Y \`e che , C. Magneville et al., 2024, 059 (2024), arXiv: 2404.03569

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Payerne , W

    C. Payerne , W. d'Assignies Doumerg , C. Y \`e che et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2410.08062 (2024), arXiv: 2410.08062

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    McCullough , D

    J. McCullough , D. Gruen , A. Amon et al., 531, 2582 (2024), arXiv: 2309.13109

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Samuroff , R

    S. Samuroff , R. Mandelbaum , J. Blazek et al., 524, 2195 (2023), arXiv: 2212.11319

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Lamman , D

    C. Lamman , D. Eisenstein , J. N. Aguilar et al., 522, 117 (2023), arXiv: 2209.03949

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    R. C. Wolf , C. B. D'Andrea , R. R. Gupta et al., 821, 115 (2016), arXiv: 1602.02674

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    M. T. Soumagnac , P. Nugent , R. A. Knop et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2405.03857 (2024), arXiv: 2405.03857

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Are peculiar velocity surveys competitive as a cosmological probe?

    J. Koda , C. Blake , T. Davis et al., 445, 4267 (2014), arXiv: 1312.1022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Said et al., DESI Peculiar Velocity Survey – Funda- mental Plane (2024), 2408.13842

    K. Said , C. Howlett , T. Davis et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2408.13842 (2024), arXiv: 2408.13842

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Kitanidis and M

    E. Kitanidis and M. White , 501, 6181 (2021), arXiv: 2010.04698

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Myles, A

    J. Myles, A. Alarcon, A. Amon et al., 505, 4249 (2021), arXiv: 2012.08566 , ://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1515

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1515 2021

  32. [32]

    Yuan , C

    S. Yuan , C. Blake , A. Krolewski et al., 533, 589 (2024), arXiv: 2403.00915

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    J. U. Lange , C. Blake , C. Saulder et al., The Open Journal of Astrophysics 7, 57 (2024), arXiv: 2404.09397

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Chen et al

    S. Chen , J. DeRose , R. Zhou et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.04795 (2024), arXiv: 2407.04795

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Amiri , K

    M. Amiri , K. Bandura , T. Chen et al., 947, 16 (2023), arXiv: 2202.01242

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    C. L. Chang , L. Newburgh , D. Shoemaker et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2209.08265 (2022), arXiv: 2209.08265

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Annis , J

    J. Annis , J. A. Newman , and A. Slosar , arXiv e-prints arXiv:2209.08049 (2022), arXiv: 2209.08049

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    D. J. Schlegel , J. A. Kollmeier , G. Aldering et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2209.04322 (2022), arXiv: 2209.04322

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    G. A. Blanc , J. H. Silber , S. Smee et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, (edited by H. K. Marshall , J. Spyromilio , and T. Usuda ), volume 12182 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1218230 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Asai et al., arXiv:2407.19176 [hep-ex]

    S. Asai , A. Ballarino , T. Bose et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.19176 (2024), arXiv: 2407.19176

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Sheinis , S

    A. Sheinis , S. C. Barden , and J. Sobeck , Astronomische Nachrichten 344, e20230108 (2023), arXiv: 2307.07667

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    V. Mainieri , R. I. Anderson , J. Brinchmann et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2403.05398 (2024), arXiv: 2403.05398

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    D.-q. Su , H. Bai , X. Yuan , and X. Cui , Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 67, 279511 (2024), arXiv: 2310.04697

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Jiang, S. Shectman et al., PhotoniX 4, 16 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    arXiv , author =:1808.04493 , keywords =

    N. Galitzki , A. Ali , K. S. Arnold et al., in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IX, (edited by J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao ), volume 10708 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1070804 (2018), arXiv: 1808.04493

    work page arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    K. N. Abazajian , P. Adshead , Z. Ahmed et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:1610.02743 (2016), arXiv: 1610.02743

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  47. [47]

    Allys, K

    LiteBIRD Collaboration , E. Allys, K. Arnold et al., Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv: 2202.02773

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Square Kilometre Array Cosmology Science Working Group , D. J. Bacon , R. A. Battye et al., 37, e007 (2020), arXiv: 1811.02743

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    J. B. Oke and J. E. Gunn , 266, 713 (1983)

    work page 1983

  50. [50]

    D. J. Schlegel , S. Ferraro , G. Aldering et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2209.03585 (2022), arXiv: 2209.03585

    work page arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Marchiori , S

    G. Marchiori , S. De Lorenzi , L. Ghedin et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes X, (edited by H. K. Marshall , J. Spyromilio , and T. Usuda ), volume 13094 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1309439 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    P. Li , Z. Wang , S. Huang et al., Optics Express 32, 20931 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Xing , C

    X. Xing , C. Zhai , H. Du , W. Li , H. Hu , R. Wang , and D. Shi , in Advanced Technology Optical/IR Telescopes VI, (edited by L. M. Stepp ), volume 3352 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 839--849 (1998)

    work page 1998

  54. [54]

    Smith , J

    G. Smith , J. Brzeski , S. Miziarski , P. R. Gillingham , A. Moore , and A. McGrath , in Astronomical Structures and Mechanisms Technology, (edited by J. Antebi and D. Lemke ), volume 5495 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 348--359 (2004)

    work page 2004

  55. [55]

    Akiyama , S

    M. Akiyama , S. Smedley , P. Gillingham et al., in Advanced Optical and Mechanical Technologies in Telescopes and Instrumentation, (edited by E. Atad-Ettedgui and D. Lemke ), volume 7018 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 70182V (2008)

    work page 2008

  56. [56]

    N. F. Staszak , J. Lawrence , D. M. Brown et al., in Advances in Optical and Mechanical Technologies for Telescopes and Instrumentation II, (edited by R. Navarro and J. H. Burge ), volume 9912 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 99121W (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Brzeski , G

    J. Brzeski , G. Baker , S. Baker et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VII, (edited by C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami ), volume 10702 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1070279 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Schubnell , J

    M. Schubnell , J. Ameel , R. W. Besuner et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, (edited by C. J. Evans , L. Simard , and H. Takami ), volume 9908 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 990892 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Rombach , X

    M. Rombach , X. Xu , R. Araujo et al., in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy X, (edited by J. J. Bryant , K. Motohara , and J. R. D. Vernet ), volume 13096 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 130969V (2024)

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    J. H. Silber , D. J. Schlegel , R. Araujo et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2212.07908 (2022), arXiv: 2212.07908

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Besuner , A

    R. Besuner , A. Dey , A. Drlica-Wagner et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.07923 (2025), arXiv: 2503.07923

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Deng , F

    L. Deng , F. Yang , X. Chen et al., 596, 353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [63]

    JUST Team , C. Liu , Y. Zu et al., Astronomical Techniques and Instruments 1, 16 (2024), arXiv: 2402.14312

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Gaia Collaboration , A. G. A. Brown , A. Vallenari et al., 649, A1 (2021), arXiv: 2012.01533

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

    Planck Collaboration , N. Aghanim , Y. Akrami et al., 641, A5 (2020), arXiv: 1907.12875

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  66. [66]

    A. G. Riess , A. V. Filippenko , P. Challis et al., 116, 1009 (1998), arXiv: astro-ph/9805201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  67. [67]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter , G. Aldering , G. Goldhaber et al., 517, 565 (1999), arXiv: astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  68. [68]

    S. M. Carroll , W. H. Press , and E. L. Turner , 30, 499 (1992)

    work page 1992

  69. [69]

    Challenges for $\Lambda$CDM: An update

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara , 95, 101659 (2022), arXiv: 2105.05208

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    E. J. Copeland , M. Sami , and S. Tsujikawa , International Journal of Modern Physics D 15, 1753 (2006), arXiv: hep-th/0603057

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter

    M. Chevallier and D. Polarski , International Journal of Modern Physics D 10, 213 (2001), arXiv: gr-qc/0009008

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  72. [72]

    E. V. Linder , 90, 091301 (2003), arXiv: astro-ph/0208512

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  73. [73]

    D. J. Eisenstein and W. Hu , 496, 605 (1998), arXiv: astro-ph/9709112

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  74. [74]

    O. H. E. Philcox , B. D. Sherwin , G. S. Farren , and E. J. Baxter , 103, 023538 (2021), arXiv: 2008.08084

    work page arXiv 2021

  75. [75]

    Dong , C

    F. Dong , C. Park , S. E. Hong , J. Kim , H. S. Hwang , H. Park , and S. Appleby , 953, 98 (2023), arXiv: 2305.00206

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-spectrum analysis of the final dataset and cosmological implications

    S. Cole , W. J. Percival , J. A. Peacock et al., 362, 505 (2005), arXiv: astro-ph/0501174

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    DESI Collaboration , M. Abdul-Karim , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.14738 (2025), arXiv: 2503.14738

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    DESI Collaboration , A. G. Adame , J. Aguilar et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2404.03002 (2024), arXiv: 2404.03002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    A. S. Chou , M. Soares-Santos , T. M. P. Tait et al., arXiv e-prints arXiv:2211.09978 (2022), arXiv: 2211.09978

    work page arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Huterer , 31, 2 (2023), arXiv: 2212.05003

    D. Huterer , 31, 2 (2023), arXiv: 2212.05003

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.