Pith. sign in

REVIEW 27 cited by

xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.13651 v1 pith:IBPHXL2O submitted 2025-06-16 cs.LG

xbench: Tracking Agents Productivity Scaling with Profession-Aligned Real-World Evaluations

classification cs.LG
keywords agentsxbenchevaluationproductivityreal-worldadvertiserbenchmarkscapabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce xbench, a dynamic, profession-aligned evaluation suite designed to bridge the gap between AI agent capabilities and real-world productivity. While existing benchmarks often focus on isolated technical skills, they may not accurately reflect the economic value agents deliver in professional settings. To address this, xbench targets commercially significant domains with evaluation tasks defined by industry professionals. Our framework creates metrics that strongly correlate with productivity value, enables prediction of Technology-Market Fit (TMF), and facilitates tracking of product capabilities over time. As our initial implementations, we present two benchmarks: Recruitment and Marketing. For Recruitment, we collect 50 tasks from real-world headhunting business scenarios to evaluate agents' abilities in company mapping, information retrieval, and talent sourcing. For Marketing, we assess agents' ability to match influencers with advertiser needs, evaluating their performance across 50 advertiser requirements using a curated pool of 836 candidate influencers. We present initial evaluation results for leading contemporary agents, establishing a baseline for these professional domains. Our continuously updated evalsets and evaluations are available at https://xbench.org.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 27 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GraphPO: Graph-based Policy Optimization for Reasoning Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GraphPO represents reasoning rollouts as a DAG to merge semantically equivalent paths, share suffixes, and assign separate efficiency and correctness advantages for lower variance and better performance than chain or ...

  2. FORT-Searcher: Synthesizing Shortcut-Resistant Search Tasks for Training Deep Search Agents

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FORT synthesizes shortcut-resistant search tasks by controlling four identified shortcut risks across entity selection, graph construction, question formulation, and refinement, producing training data that yields age...

  3. Argus: Evidence Assembly for Scalable Deep Research Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Argus coordinates a Navigator and multiple Searchers via an evidence graph to assemble complete, source-traced answers, yielding benchmark gains up to 12.7 points with 8 parallel agents and 86.2 on BrowseComp with 64 agents.

  4. Learning Agentic Policy from Action Guidance

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    ActGuide-RL uses human action data as plan-style guidance in mixed-policy RL to overcome exploration barriers in LLM agents, matching SFT+RL performance on search benchmarks without cold-start training.

  5. Inference-Time Scaling of Verification: Self-Evolving Deep Research Agents via Test-Time Rubric-Guided Verification

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    DeepVerifier enables self-evolving deep research agents via rubric-guided verification at test time, delivering 8-11% accuracy gains on GAIA and XBench-DeepSearch subsets.

  6. ACE: Pluggable Adaptive Context Elasticizer across Agents

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ACE is a pluggable module that elastically orchestrates historical agent steps as raw, abstract, or dropped to maintain compact yet recoverable context for LLM agents handling long trajectories.

  7. APPO: Agentic Procedural Policy Optimization

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    APPO refines branching and credit assignment in agentic RL via a Branching Score and procedure-level scaling, improving baselines by nearly 4 points on 13 benchmarks.

  8. Toward Generalist Autonomous Research via Hypothesis-Tree Refinement

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Arbor combines a coordinator, executors, and a hypothesis tree to enable cumulative autonomous research, outperforming Codex and Claude Code by over 2.5x on six real tasks and reaching 86.36% Any Medal on MLE-Bench Lite.

  9. TreeSeeker: Tree-Structured Trial, Error, and Return in Deep Search

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TreeSeeker is an inference-time tree-structured branch-and-return framework that applies textual UCB signals for controlled trial-and-error in deep search and outperforms baselines on XBench-DeepSearch and BrowseComp.

  10. Beyond Trajectory Rewards: Step-level Credit Assignment for Agentic Search via Graph Modeling

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GDCR assigns step-level rewards via distance to the answer node in a training-time ER graph and SAPO combines these with trajectory advantages for credit assignment in agentic search.

  11. EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    EvoMemBench evaluates 15 memory methods for LLM agents and finds long-context baselines competitive with no single memory approach working consistently across settings.

  12. Argus: Evidence Assembly for Scalable Deep Research Agents

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Argus coordinates a Navigator and multiple Searchers via an evidence graph for deep research, reporting average gains of 5.5 points with one Searcher and 12.7 points with eight parallel Searchers across eight benchmar...

  13. Profiling for Pennies: Unveiling the Privacy Iceberg of LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLM agents can reconstruct high-fidelity personal profiles from minimal PII seeds with over 90% accuracy in under 10 minutes at less than $3 cost, exposing three escalating tiers of privacy risks.

  14. LongSeeker: Elastic Context Orchestration for Long-Horizon Search Agents

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Context-ReAct enables agents to dynamically manage context via five atomic operations, and LongSeeker fine-tuned on 10k trajectories achieves 61.5% and 62.5% on BrowseComp benchmarks, outperforming prior agents.

  15. LLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegate

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs corrupt an average of 25% of document content during long delegated editing workflows across 52 domains, even frontier models, and agentic tools do not mitigate the issue.

  16. EcoGym: Evaluating LLMs for Long-Horizon Plan-and-Execute in Interactive Economies

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    EcoGym is a new open benchmark with three economic environments that reveals no leading LLM dominates at sustained plan-and-execute decision making across scenarios.

  17. MiroThinker: Pushing the Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Research Agents via Model, Context, and Interactive Scaling

    cs.CL 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MiroThinker shows that scaling agent-environment interactions via reinforcement learning lets a 72B open-source model reach up to 81.9% on GAIA and approach commercial performance on research benchmarks.

  18. Scaling the Horizon, Not the Parameters: Reaching Trillion-Parameter Performance with a 35B Agent

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A 35B MoE agent model trained on 45K-token trajectories via three-stage SFT and domain-routed distillation achieves leading or competitive scores against 1T models on SEAL-0, IFBench, HiPhO, FrontierScience-Olympiad a...

  19. PBSD: Privileged Bayesian Self-Distillation for Long-Horizon Credit Assignment

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    PBSD derives autoregressive turn-level credit signals from outcome rewards via the posterior-to-prior ratio converted through Bayes' rule between student and privileged teacher models.

  20. Struct-Searcher: Agentic Structural Thinking Advances Multimodal Deep Information Seeking

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Struct-Searcher introduces a structural agentic workflow grounded in belief revision theory that maintains an evolving multimodal graph for conflict-aware deep information seeking and reports accuracy gains on several...

  21. LiteResearcher: A Scalable Agentic RL Training Framework for Deep Research Agent

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    Injecting 1% targeted synthetic data into GPT-2's pre-training substantially improves performance on 8 of 9 failing BLiMP grammatical paradigms, indicating data scarcity causes formal linguistic failures.

  22. LiteResearcher: A Scalable Agentic RL Training Framework for Deep Research Agent

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    LiteResearcher uses a lite virtual world to make agentic RL training scalable and stable, enabling a 4B model to achieve 71.3% on GAIA and 78.0% on Xbench, outperforming larger open-source and commercial systems.

  23. Mind DeepResearch Technical Report

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MindDR combines a Planning Agent, DeepSearch Agent, and Report Agent with SFT cold-start, Search-RL, Report-RL, and preference alignment to reach competitive scores on research benchmarks using 30B-scale models.

  24. AlphaEval: Evaluating Agents in Production

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AlphaEval is a benchmark of 94 production-sourced tasks from seven companies for evaluating full AI agent products across six domains using multiple judgment methods, plus a framework to build similar benchmarks.

  25. EigentSearch-Q+: Enhancing Deep Research Agents with Structured Reasoning Tools

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Structured query and evidence tools added to an AI research agent improve benchmark accuracy by 0.6 to 3.8 percentage points.

  26. Towards Trustworthy Report Generation: A Deep Research Agent with Progressive Confidence Estimation and Calibration

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A deep research agent incorporates progressive confidence estimation and calibration to produce trustworthy reports with transparent confidence scores on claims.

  27. A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence

    cs.AI 2025-07 accept novelty 4.0

    The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.