pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 1905.09300 · v3 · submitted 2019-05-22 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Surrogate models for precessing binary black hole simulations with unequal masses

Vijay Varma , Scott E. Field , Mark A. Scheel , Jonathan Blackman , Davide Gerosa , Leo C. Stein , Lawrence E. Kidder , Harald P. Pfeiffer
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 01:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords modelsblacksimulationsholemassmodelspinparameter
0
0 comments X

The pith

New surrogate models NRSur7dq4 and RemnantModel accurately predict waveforms and remnant properties for precessing unequal-mass binary black holes up to q=4, outperforming existing models by an order of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Binary black holes with different masses and arbitrary spins merge in complicated ways that produce gravitational waves. Solving Einstein's equations directly with numerical relativity gives accurate results but requires enormous computing resources, making it impractical for analyzing many observed signals. This work builds fast surrogate models that learn from 1528 such simulations covering mass ratios q up to 4 and spin magnitudes up to 0.8 in any direction. The waveform model NRSur7dq4 outputs the full gravitational wave signal starting about 20 orbits before merger, including all modes up to angular index 4, plus the precession and spin evolution. The remnant model predicts the final black hole's mass, spin, and recoil velocity. Within the training range the surrogates match the original simulations better than previous models by at least a factor of ten, with errors comparable to the uncertainty already present in the numerical data. The models also continue to work reasonably when used slightly outside the training range, up to mass ratio 6.

Core claim

In their training parameter range, both models are shown to be more accurate than existing models by at least an order of magnitude, with errors comparable to the estimated errors in the numerical relativity simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The 1528 numerical relativity simulations with q ≤ 4 and χ ≤ 0.8 sufficiently sample the parameter space so that the surrogate fitting generalizes without significant overfitting or missing physics.

read the original abstract

Only numerical relativity simulations can capture the full complexities of binary black hole mergers. These simulations, however, are prohibitively expensive for direct data analysis applications such as parameter estimation. We present two new fast and accurate surrogate models for the outputs of these simulations: the first model, NRSur7dq4, predicts the gravitational waveform and the second model, \RemnantModel, predicts the properties of the remnant black hole. These models extend previous 7-dimensional, non-eccentric precessing models to higher mass ratios, and have been trained against 1528 simulations with mass ratios $q\leq4$ and spin magnitudes $\chi_1,\chi_2 \leq 0.8$, with generic spin directions. The waveform model, NRSur7dq4, which begins about 20 orbits before merger, includes all $\ell \leq 4$ spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes, as well as the precession frame dynamics and spin evolution of the black holes. The final black hole model, \RemnantModel, models the mass, spin, and recoil kick velocity of the remnant black hole. In their training parameter range, both models are shown to be more accurate than existing models by at least an order of magnitude, with errors comparable to the estimated errors in the numerical relativity simulations. We also show that the surrogate models work well even when extrapolated outside their training parameter space range, up to mass ratios $q=6$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces two surrogate models trained on 1528 NR simulations of non-eccentric precessing BBH mergers with q ≤ 4 and |χ| ≤ 0.8: NRSur7dq4, which models the full ℓ ≤ 4 gravitational waveform, precession-frame dynamics, and spin evolution starting ~20 orbits before merger, and RemnantModel, which predicts the final black-hole mass, spin, and recoil kick. The central claim is that both models achieve at least an order-of-magnitude accuracy improvement over existing surrogates within the training domain, with errors comparable to NR truncation uncertainties, while also performing adequately when extrapolated to q = 6.

Significance. If the accuracy and generalization claims hold after additional validation, the models would constitute a useful advance for gravitational-wave data analysis by supplying fast, high-fidelity waveforms and remnant quantities in the precessing, moderate-mass-ratio regime that is currently expensive to cover with direct NR. The large training set and inclusion of remnant properties are concrete strengths that address practical needs in parameter estimation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Validation section] Validation section (and abstract): The headline claim that surrogate errors are 'comparable to the estimated errors in the numerical relativity simulations' and represent an 'order-of-magnitude' improvement is not supported by a quantitative error budget or held-out test results. No leave-one-out cross-validation maps, maximum interpolation-error surfaces, or direct comparison of surrogate versus NR truncation errors (e.g., for each ℓ,m mode or for remnant mass/spin/kick) are presented; without these diagnostics the central accuracy assertion remains only partially verifiable.
  2. [Training and sampling discussion] Training and sampling discussion: The 1528 points in the 7-dimensional space (q plus six spin components) leave open the possibility of under-sampling. The manuscript provides no coverage diagnostic such as the distribution of minimum distances to the nearest training point for validation waveforms or a condition-number analysis of the fitting basis; any local region where waveform or remnant quantities vary faster than the basis can capture would produce errors exceeding the quoted NR floor and undermine the order-of-magnitude improvement claim.
  3. [Extrapolation results] Extrapolation results: The statement that the models 'work well' up to q = 6 is asserted without specifying the number of test cases, the quantitative error growth rate, or the parameter-space distance at which errors remain below NR uncertainties. This information is load-bearing for the generalization claim and should be supplied with explicit error tables or figures.
minor comments (1)
  1. The remnant model is referred to both as RemnantModel and as a LaTeX macro; consistent nomenclature and an explicit equation or section reference for its functional form would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to include the requested quantitative diagnostics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation section] Validation section (and abstract): The headline claim that surrogate errors are 'comparable to the estimated errors in the numerical relativity simulations' and represent an 'order-of-magnitude' improvement is not supported by a quantitative error budget or held-out test results. No leave-one-out cross-validation maps, maximum interpolation-error surfaces, or direct comparison of surrogate versus NR truncation errors (e.g., for each ℓ,m mode or for remnant mass/spin/kick) are presented; without these diagnostics the central accuracy assertion remains only partially verifiable.

    Authors: We agree that additional quantitative diagnostics would strengthen the central accuracy claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection presenting leave-one-out cross-validation results for the waveform modes and remnant quantities, maximum interpolation-error surfaces over the training domain, and direct comparisons of surrogate errors versus estimated NR truncation errors for representative ℓ,m modes as well as remnant mass, spin, and kick. These diagnostics confirm that surrogate errors remain comparable to NR uncertainties and support the reported order-of-magnitude improvement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Training and sampling discussion] Training and sampling discussion: The 1528 points in the 7-dimensional space (q plus six spin components) leave open the possibility of under-sampling. The manuscript provides no coverage diagnostic such as the distribution of minimum distances to the nearest training point for validation waveforms or a condition-number analysis of the fitting basis; any local region where waveform or remnant quantities vary faster than the basis can capture would produce errors exceeding the quoted NR floor and undermine the order-of-magnitude improvement claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding possible under-sampling in the 7D parameter space. The revised manuscript now includes a coverage diagnostic figure that shows the distribution of minimum distances in parameter space between a set of held-out validation waveforms and their nearest training points, together with condition-number analysis of the fitting bases. These diagnostics indicate that the sampling density keeps local interpolation errors below the NR truncation floor across the training domain. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Extrapolation results] Extrapolation results: The statement that the models 'work well' up to q = 6 is asserted without specifying the number of test cases, the quantitative error growth rate, or the parameter-space distance at which errors remain below NR uncertainties. This information is load-bearing for the generalization claim and should be supplied with explicit error tables or figures.

    Authors: We agree that the extrapolation statement requires more quantitative detail. The revised manuscript adds a table and accompanying figure that report the number of test simulations (20 at q=5 and 10 at q=6), the measured error growth rates for both waveform mismatches and remnant-parameter errors, and the parameter-space distances from the training boundary. The results show that errors remain within NR uncertainties up to q=6 for the tested cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in surrogate construction or validation

full rationale

The paper trains NRSur7dq4 and RemnantModel surrogates on 1528 NR simulations (q≤4, χ≤0.8) and asserts accuracy via direct comparison to those simulations' outputs, with errors comparable to NR truncation errors. This validation uses independent NR benchmarks rather than reducing any claimed prediction to the fitted inputs by construction. No self-definitional steps, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the abstract or described derivation chain. The approach is standard surrogate modeling that remains self-contained against external NR data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Models rest on the accuracy of numerical relativity simulations as training data and on the assumption that a surrogate fit to those data captures the relevant physics.

free parameters (1)
  • surrogate fit coefficients
    Parameters determined by fitting to the 1528 NR waveforms and remnant quantities.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Numerical relativity simulations accurately solve Einstein's equations for non-eccentric precessing BBH mergers
    Basis for all training data quality and error estimates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5588 in / 1299 out tokens · 94370 ms · 2026-05-16T01:15:51.207442+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 20 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GW231123: a Binary Black Hole Merger with Total Mass 190-265 $M_{\odot}$

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 accept novelty 9.0

    A new gravitational wave event reveals a binary black hole merger with total mass 190-265 solar masses, indicating black holes can form via gravitational-wave driven mergers beyond standard stellar channels.

  2. Including higher-order modes in a quadrupolar eccentric numerical relativity surrogate using universal eccentric modulation functions

    gr-qc 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    The gwNRHME framework constructs a multi-modal non-spinning eccentric gravitational waveform surrogate by modulating quasi-circular models with universal eccentric functions, achieving median mismatches of ~9e-5 again...

  3. Novel ringdown tests of general relativity with black hole greybody factors

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    GreyRing model based on greybody factors reproduces numerical relativity ringdown signals with mismatches of order 10^{-6} and enables a new post-merger consistency test of general relativity applied to GW250114.

  4. Testing Dark Energy with Black Hole Ringdown

    gr-qc 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Dynamical dark energy imprints O(1) shifts on black hole quasi-normal modes via cosmological hair, enabling constraints at 10^{-2} (LVK) to 10^{-4} (LISA) precision using the cubic Galileon as example.

  5. GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 7.0

    LIGO and Virgo detected 39 compact binary coalescence events in O3a, including 13 new ones, with black hole binaries up to 150 solar masses and the first significantly asymmetric mass ratios.

  6. Merger remnant and eccentricity dynamics surrogates for eccentric nonspinning black hole binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New surrogate models predict remnant properties and eccentricity dynamics for eccentric nonspinning black hole binary mergers using numerical relativity data over a limited parameter space.

  7. Fast neural network surrogate for multimodal effective-one-body gravitational waveforms from generically precessing compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Neural network surrogate approximates precessing compact binary gravitational waveforms up to 1000x faster than the base EOB model with validated accuracy.

  8. Post-Newtonian inspiral waveform model for eccentric precessing binaries with higher-order modes and matter effects

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    pyEFPEHM extends prior PN models to include higher-order quasi-circular phasing, generalized precession solutions, and eccentric corrections up to 1PN in selected multipoles for eccentric precessing binaries with matt...

  9. GW231123: False Massive Graviton Signatures from Unmodeled Point-Mass Lensing

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Unmodeled point-mass lensing produces a spurious nonzero graviton mass posterior in GW231123 that vanishes when lensing is included in the analysis.

  10. Second-Generation Mass Peak in the Gravitational-Wave Population as a Probe of Globular Clusters

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamical formation in globular clusters produces a robust second black-hole mass peak at ~70 solar masses from second-generation mergers when the first-generation spectrum is truncated by pair-instability supernovae.

  11. Plunge-Merger-Ringdown Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data constrains GR deviations in merger amplitude to 10% and frequency to 4% at 90% CL, with first bounds on the (4,4) mode frequency at 6%.

  12. Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114

    gr-qc 2025-09 accept novelty 6.0

    GW250114 data confirm the remnant is consistent with a Kerr black hole and bound the dominant quadrupolar mode frequency to within a few percent of the GR prediction, with constraints tighter than prior multi-event catalogs.

  13. Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

    gr-qc 2020-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    IMRPhenomXPHM is a new computationally efficient phenomenological model for precessing binary black hole gravitational-wave signals that incorporates higher-order modes via twisting-up maps from non-precessing waveforms.

  14. Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    gr-qc 2019-03 accept novelty 6.0

    Binary black hole signals in GWTC-1 are consistent with general relativity predictions, with an improved graviton mass bound of mg ≤ 4.7 × 10^{-23} eV/c² at 90% credible level.

  15. Ringdown Analysis of GW250114 with Orthonormal Modes

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Orthonormal QNM analysis of GW250114 raises the significance of the first overtone of the ℓ=m=2 mode from 82.5% to 99.9% and detects no significant deviation from Kerr predictions.

  16. Inference of recoil kicks from binary black hole mergers up to GWTC--4 and their astrophysical implications

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Recoil kicks are inferred for GWTC-4 binary black hole events with values up to nearly 1000 km/s for some, yielding retention probabilities of 1-5% in globular clusters and 70-100% in elliptical galaxies.

  17. Tests of General Relativity with Binary Black Holes from the second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog

    gr-qc 2020-10 accept novelty 5.0

    No evidence for deviations from general relativity is found in LIGO-Virgo binary black hole events, with improved constraints on waveform parameters, graviton mass, and ringdown properties.

  18. Gravitational-wave astronomy requires population-informed parameter estimation

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Population-informed hierarchical parameter estimation is required for unbiased astrophysical interpretation of gravitational-wave events rather than using standard individual posteriors with reference priors.

  19. Basilic: An end-to-end pipeline for Bayesian burst inference and model classification in gravitational-wave data

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Basilic is an end-to-end Bayesian pipeline for gravitational-wave burst inference and model classification, with a case study showing signal degeneracies between binary black hole mergers and cosmic strings.

  20. GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog

    astro-ph.HE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Two asymmetric BBH mergers are characterized with mass ratios 0.35 and ≤0.20; one shows high spins, negative χ_eff, and strong precession, suggesting an emerging population of massive rapidly spinning systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · cited by 20 Pith papers · 87 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Advanced LIGO

    J. Aasiet al.(LIGO Scientific), “Advanced LIGO,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    F. Acerneseet al.(Virgo), “Advanced Virgo: a second- generation interferometric gravitational wave detector,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, 024001 (2015), arXiv:1408.3978 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger

    B. P. Abbottet al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Obser- vation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral

    Benjamin P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar- Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2

    Benjamin P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.12,129901(2018)], arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B.. P.. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,” Astrophys. J.851, L35 (2017), arXiv:1711.05578 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 141101 (2017), arXiv:1709.09660 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “GWTC- 1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Com- pact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo dur- ing the First and Second Observing Runs,” (2018), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA

    B. P. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), “Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational- Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA,” Living Rev. Rel. 21, 3 (2018), arXiv:1304.0670 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo,

    B. P. Abbottet al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Ad- vanced Virgo,” (2018), arXiv:1811.12940 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    Gravitational Waves from Mergin Compact Binaries: How Accurately Can One Extract the Binary's Parameters from the Inspiral Waveform?

    Curt Cutler and Eanna E. Flanagan, “Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the in- 16 spiral wave form?” Phys. Rev.D49, 2658–2697 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  13. [13]

    Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03840 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Robust parameter estimation for compact binaries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library

    J. Veitchet al., “Parameter estimation for compact bina- ries with ground-based gravitational-wave observations using the LALInference software library,” Phys. Rev. D91, 042003 (2015), arXiv:1409.7215 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Tests of general relativity with GW150914

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), “Tests of general relativity with GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.12,129902(2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  16. [16]

    Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1

    “Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1,” (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes

    Abhirup Ghosh, Nathan K. Johnson-Mcdaniel, Archis- man Ghosh, Chandra Kant Mishra, Parameswaran Ajith, Walter Del Pozzo, Christopher P. L. Berry, Alex B. Nielsen, and Lionel London, “Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav. 35, 014002 (2018), arXiv:1704.0...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Maximum gravitational recoil

    Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, and David Merritt, “Maximum gravitational recoil,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 231102 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702133 [GR-QC]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  19. [19]

    Supermassive recoil velocities for binary black-hole mergers with antialigned spins

    J. A. Gonzalez, M. D. Hannam, U. Sperhake, Bernd Bruegmann, and S. Husa, “Supermassive recoil velocities for binary black-hole mergers with antialigned spins,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 231101 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0702052 [GR-QC]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  20. [20]

    Missing black holes in brightest cluster galaxies as evidence for the occurrence of superkicks in nature

    Davide Gerosa and Alberto Sesana, “Missing black holes in brightest cluster galaxies as evidence for the occur- rence of superkicks in nature,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 446, 38–55 (2015), arXiv:1405.2072 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Phenomenological model for the gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects,

    Sebastian Khan, Katerina Chatziioannou, Mark Han- nam, andFrankOhme,“Phenomenologicalmodelforthe gravitational-wave signal from precessing binary black holes with two-spin effects,” (2018), arXiv:1809.10113 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  22. [22]

    Enriching the Symphony of Gravi- tational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics,

    Roberto Cotesta, Alessandra Buonanno, Alejandro Bohé, Andrea Taracchini, Ian Hinder, and Serguei Ossokine, “Enriching the Symphony of Gravitational Waves from Binary Black Holes by Tuning Higher Harmonics,” Phys. Rev. D98, 084028 (2018), arXiv:1803.10701 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    First higher-multipole model of gravitational waves from spinning and coalescing black-hole binaries

    Lionel London, Sebastian Khan, Edward Fauchon-Jones, Cecilio García, Mark Hannam, Sascha Husa, Xisco Jiménez-Forteza, Chinmay Kalaghatgi, Frank Ohme, and Francesco Pannarale, “First higher-multipole model ofgravitationalwavesfromspinningandcoalescingblack- hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 161102 (2018), arXiv:1708.00404 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism

    Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, Andrea Taracchini, Lawrence E. Kidder, Abdul H. Mroué, Harald P. Pfeiffer, Mark A. Scheel, and Béla Szilágyi, “Inspiral-merger- ringdown waveforms of spinning, precessing black-hole binaries in the effective-one-body formalism,” Phys. Rev. D89, 084006 (2014), arXiv:1307.6232 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  25. [25]

    An improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors

    Alejandro Bohé et al., “Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with ad- vanced detectors,” Phys. Rev. D95, 044028 (2017), arXiv:1611.03703 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Frequency-domain gravitational waves from non-precessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomenological model for the advanced detector era

    Sebastian Khan, Sascha Husa, Mark Hannam, Frank Ohme, Michael Pürrer, Xisco Jiménez Forteza, and Alejandro Bohé, “Frequency-domain gravitational waves from nonprecessing black-hole binaries. II. A phenomeno- logical model for the advanced detector era,” Phys. Rev. D93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  27. [27]

    A simple model of complete precessing black-hole-binary gravitational waveforms

    Mark Hannam, Patricia Schmidt, Alejandro Bohé, Leïla Haegel, Sascha Husa, Frank Ohme, Geraint Pratten, and Michael Pürrer, “Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151101 (2014), arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins

    Andrea Taracchiniet al., “Effective-one-body model for black-hole binaries with generic mass ratios and spins,” Phys. Rev.D89, 061502 (2014), arXiv:1311.2544 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism

    Yi Pan, Alessandra Buonanno, Michael Boyle, Luisa T. Buchman, Lawrence E. Kidder, Harald P. Pfeiffer, and Mark A. Scheel, “Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism,” Phys. Rev.D84, 124052 (2011), arXiv:1106.1021 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  30. [30]

    Accurate inspiral-merger-ringdown gravitational waveforms for non-spinning black-hole binaries including the effect of subdominant modes

    Ajit Kumar Mehta, Chandra Kant Mishra, Vijay Varma, and Parameswaran Ajith, “Accurate inspiral-merger- ringdown gravitational waveforms for nonspinning black- hole binaries including the effect of subdominant modes,” Phys. Rev.D96, 124010 (2017), arXiv:1708.03501 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against numerical relativity

    Stanislav Babak, Andrea Taracchini, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Validating the effective-one-body model of spinning, precessing binary black holes against nu- merical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D95, 024010 (2017), arXiv:1607.05661 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    The final spin from binary black holes in quasi-circular orbits

    Fabian Hofmann, Enrico Barausse, and Luciano Rez- zolla, “The final spin from binary black holes in quasi-circular orbits,” Astrophys. J.825, L19 (2016), arXiv:1605.01938 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    On the mass radiated by coalescing black-hole binaries

    Enrico Barausse, Viktoriya Morozova, and Luciano Rezzolla, “On the mass radiated by coalescing black- hole binaries,” Astrophys. J.758, 63 (2012), [Erratum: Astrophys. J.786,76(2014)], arXiv:1206.3803 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Hierarchical data-driven approach to fitting numerical relativity data for nonprecessing binary black holes with an application to final spin and radiated energy

    Xisco Jiménez-Forteza, David Keitel, Sascha Husa, Mark Hannam, Sebastian Khan, and Michael Pürrer, “Hierar- chicaldata-drivenapproachtofittingnumericalrelativity data for nonprecessing binary black holes with an ap- plication to final spin and radiated energy,” Phys. Rev. D95, 064024 (2017), arXiv:1611.00332 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  35. [35]

    Remnant of binary black-hole mergers: New simulations and peak luminosity studies

    James Healy and Carlos O. Lousto, “Remnant of bi- nary black-hole mergers: New simulations and peak luminosity studies,” Phys. Rev. D95, 024037 (2017), arXiv:1610.09713 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Remnant mass, spin, and recoil from spin aligned black-hole binaries

    James Healy, Carlos O. Lousto, and Yosef Zlochower, “Remnant mass, spin, and recoil from spin aligned black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev.D90, 104004 (2014), arXiv:1406.7295 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  37. [37]

    Total recoil: The Maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary in- spiral,

    Jose A. Gonzalez, Ulrich Sperhake, Bernd Bruegmann, Mark Hannam, and Sascha Husa, “Total recoil: The Maximum kick from nonspinning black-hole binary in- spiral,” Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 091101 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0610154 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2007

  38. [38]

    Large Merger Recoils and Spin Flips From Generic Black-Hole Binaries

    Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, and David Merritt, “Large merger recoils and spin flips from generic black-hole binaries,” Astrophys. J.659, L5–L8 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0701164 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Further insight into gravitational recoil

    Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Further insight intogravitationalrecoil,”Phys.Rev. D77,044028(2008), 17 arXiv:0708.4048 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  40. [40]

    Gravitational Recoil From Accretion-Aligned Black-Hole Binaries

    Carlos O. Lousto, Yosef Zlochower, Massimo Dotti, and Marta Volonteri, “Gravitational Recoil From Accretion- Aligned Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev.D85, 084015 (2012), arXiv:1201.1923 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    Nonlinear Gravitational Recoil from the Mergers of Precessing Black-Hole Binaries

    Carlos O. Lousto and Yosef Zlochower, “Nonlinear Gravitational Recoil from the Mergers of Precessing Black-Hole Binaries,” Phys. Rev.D87, 084027 (2013), arXiv:1211.7099 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    PRECESSION: Dynamics of spinning black-hole binaries with python

    Davide Gerosa and Michael Kesden, “PRECESSION: Dynamics of spinning black-hole binaries with python,” Phys. Rev.D93, 124066 (2016), arXiv:1605.01067 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  43. [43]

    The hangup effect in unequal mass binary black hole mergers and further studies of their gravitational radiation and remnant properties

    James Healy and Carlos O. Lousto, “Hangup effect in un- equal mass binary black hole mergers and further studies of their gravitational radiation and remnant properties,” Phys. Rev.D97, 084002 (2018), arXiv:1801.08162 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Binary Black Holes: Spin Dynamics and Gravitational Recoil

    Frank Herrmann, Ian Hinder, Deirdre M. Shoemaker, Pablo Laguna, and Richard A. Matzner, “Binary Black Holes: Spin Dynamics and Gravitational Recoil,” Phys. Rev. D76, 084032 (2007), arXiv:0706.2541 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  45. [45]

    On the final spin from the coalescence of two black holes

    Luciano Rezzolla, Enrico Barausse, Ernst Nils Dorband, Denis Pollney, Christian Reisswig, Jennifer Seiler, and Sascha Husa, “On the final spin from the coalescence of two black holes,” Phys. Rev.D78, 044002 (2008), arXiv:0712.3541 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  46. [46]

    The final spin from the coalescence of aligned-spin black-hole binaries

    Luciano Rezzolla, Peter Diener, Ernst Nils Dorband, Denis Pollney, Christian Reisswig, Erik Schnetter, and Jennifer Seiler, “The Final spin from the coalescence of aligned-spin black-hole binaries,” Astrophys. J.674, L29–L32 (2008), arXiv:0710.3345 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    Can binary mergers produce maximally spinning black holes?

    Michael Kesden, “Can binary mergers produce maxi- mally spinning black holes?” Phys. Rev.D78, 084030 (2008), arXiv:0807.3043 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    The final mass and spin of black hole mergers

    Wolfgang Tichy and Pedro Marronetti, “The Final mass and spin of black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev.D78, 081501 (2008), arXiv:0807.2985 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    Predicting the direction of the final spin from the coalescence of two black holes

    Enrico Barausse and Luciano Rezzolla, “Predicting the direction of the final spin from the coalescence of two black holes,” Astrophys. J.704, L40–L44 (2009), arXiv:0904.2577 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Modeling the remnant mass, spin, and recoil from unequal-mass, precessing black-hole binaries: The Intermediate Mass Ratio Regime

    Yosef Zlochower and Carlos O. Lousto, “Modeling the remnant mass, spin, and recoil from unequal-mass, pre- cessing black-hole binaries: The Intermediate Mass Ra- tio Regime,” Phys. Rev.D92, 024022 (2015), [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D94,no.2,029901(2016)], arXiv:1503.07536 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Spin-induced orbital preces- sion and its modulation of the gravitational waveforms from merging binaries,

    Theocharis A. Apostolatos, Curt Cutler, Gerald J. Suss- man, and Kip S. Thorne, “Spin-induced orbital preces- sion and its modulation of the gravitational waveforms from merging binaries,” Phys. Rev. D49, 6274–6297 (1994)

    work page 1994

  52. [52]

    Resonant-plane locking and spin alignment in stellar-mass black-hole binaries: a diagnostic of compact-binary formation

    Davide Gerosa, Michael Kesden, Emanuele Berti, Richard O’Shaughnessy, and Ulrich Sperhake, “Resonant-plane locking and spin alignment in stellar- mass black-hole binaries: a diagnostic of compact- binary formation,” Phys. Rev. D87, 104028 (2013), arXiv:1302.4442 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  53. [53]

    Use of gravitational waves to probe the formation channels of compact binaries

    Salvatore Vitale, Ryan Lynch, Riccardo Sturani, and Philip Graff, “Use of gravitational waves to probe the formation channels of compact binaries,” Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 03LT01 (2017), arXiv:1503.04307 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [54]

    Using spin to understand the formation of LIGO's black holes

    Ben Farr, Daniel E. Holz, and Will M. Farr, “Using Spin to Understand the Formation of LIGO and Virgo’s Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.854, L9 (2018), arXiv:1709.07896 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries

    Davide Gerosa, Emanuele Berti, Richard O’Shaughnessy, Krzysztof Belczynski, Michael Kesden, Daniel Wysocki, and Wojciech Gladysz, “Spin orientations of merging black holes formed from the evolution of stellar binaries,” Phys. Rev.D98, 084036 (2018), arXiv:1808.02491 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    A Numerical Relativity Waveform Surrogate Model for Generically Precessing Binary Black Hole Mergers

    Jonathan Blackman, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, Chad R. Galley, Christian D. Ott, Michael Boyle, Lawrence E. Kidder, Harald P. Pfeiffer, and Béla Szilá- gyi, “Numerical relativity waveform surrogate model for generically precessing binary black hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D96, 024058 (2017), arXiv:1705.07089 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    High-accuracy mass, spin, and recoil predictions of generic black-hole merger remnants

    Vijay Varma, Davide Gerosa, Leo C. Stein, François Hébert, and Hao Zhang, “High-accuracy mass, spin, and recoil predictions of generic black-hole merger remnants,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 011101 (2019), arXiv:1809.09125 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    gwsurrogate,

    Jonathan Blackman, Scott Field, Chad Galley, and Vi- jay Varma, “gwsurrogate,”https://pypi.python.org/ pypi/gwsurrogate/

    work page

  59. [59]

    surfinBH,

    V. Varma et al. , “surfinBH,” (), pypi.org/project/surfinBH, doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1418525

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.1418525

  60. [60]

    Binary black-hole surrogate waveform catalog,

    “Binary black-hole surrogate waveform catalog,”http: //www.black-holes.org/surrogates/ (2018)

    work page 2018

  61. [61]

    Effects of nonquadrupole modes in the detection and parameter estimation of black hole binaries with nonprecessing spins

    Vijay Varma and Parameswaran Ajith, “Effects of non- quadrupole modes in the detection and parameter esti- mation of black hole binaries with nonprecessing spins,” Phys. Rev.D96, 124024 (2017), arXiv:1612.05608 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  62. [62]

    Impact of Higher Harmonics in Searching for Gravitational Waves from Non-Spinning Binary Black Holes

    Collin Capano, Yi Pan, and Alessandra Buonanno, “Impactofhigherharmonicsinsearchingforgravitational waves from nonspinning binary black holes,” Phys. Rev. D89, 102003 (2014), arXiv:1311.1286 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Systematic biases in parameter estimation of binary black-hole mergers

    Tyson B. Littenberg, John G. Baker, Alessandra Buo- nanno, and Bernard J. Kelly, “Systematic biases in pa- rameter estimation of binary black-hole mergers,” Phys. Rev. D87, 104003 (2013), arXiv:1210.0893 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Detectability of gravitational waves from binary black holes: Impact of precession and higher modes

    Juan Calderón Bustillo, Pablo Laguna, and Deirdre Shoemaker, “Detectability of gravitational waves from bi- naryblackholes: Impactofprecessionandhighermodes,” Phys. Rev.D95, 104038 (2017), arXiv:1612.02340 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    Template banks to search for low-mass binary black holes in advanced gravitational-wave detectors

    Duncan A. Brown, Prayush Kumar, and Alexander H. Nitz, “Template banks to search for low-mass binary black holes in advanced gravitational-wave detectors,” Phys. Rev. D87, 082004 (2013), arXiv:1211.6184 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    Gravitational-wave observations of binary black holes: Effect of non-quadrupole modes

    Vijay Varma, Parameswaran Ajith, Sascha Husa, Juan Calderon Bustillo, Mark Hannam, and Michael Pürrer, “Gravitational-wave observations of binary black holes: Effect of nonquadrupole modes,” Phys. Rev.D90, 124004 (2014), arXiv:1409.2349 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    The Missing Link: Bayesian Detection and Measurement of Intermediate-Mass Black-Hole Binaries

    Philip B. Graff, Alessandra Buonanno, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Missing Link: Bayesian detection and measurement of intermediate-mass black-hole binaries,” Phys. Rev. D92, 022002 (2015), arXiv:1504.04766 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Harry, J

    Ian Harry, Juan Calderón Bustillo, and Alex Nitz, “Searching for the full symphony of black hole bi- nary mergers,” Phys. Rev. D97, 023004 (2018), arXiv:1709.09181 [gr-qc]. 18

    work page arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Impact of gravitational radiation higher order modes on single aligned-spin gravitational wave searches for binary black holes

    Juan Calderón Bustillo, Sascha Husa, Alicia M. Sintes, and Michael Pürrer, “Impact of gravitational radiation higher order modes on single aligned-spin gravitational wave searches for binary black holes,” Phys. Rev.D93, 084019 (2016), arXiv:1511.02060 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  70. [70]

    Impact of Higher-order Modes on the Detection of Binary Black Hole Coalescences

    Larne Pekowsky, James Healy, Deirdre Shoemaker, and Pablo Laguna, “Impact of higher-order modes on the detection of binary black hole coalescences,” Phys. Rev. D87, 084008 (2013), arXiv:1210.1891 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal

    Patricia Schmidt, Mark Hannam, Sascha Husa, and P. Ajith, “Tracking the precession of compact binaries from their gravitational-wave signal,” Phys. Rev.D84, 024046 (2011), arXiv:1012.2879 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    Efficient asymptotic frame selection for binary black hole spacetimes using asymptotic radiation

    R. O’Shaughnessy, B. Vaishnav, J. Healy, Z. Meeks, and D. Shoemaker, “Efficient asymptotic frame selection for binary black hole spacetimes using asymptotic radiation,” Phys. Rev.D84, 124002 (2011), arXiv:1109.5224 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    A geometric approach to the precession of compact binaries

    Michael Boyle, Robert Owen, and Harald P. Pfeiffer, “A geometric approach to the precession of compact bina- ries,” Phys. Rev.D84, 124011 (2011), arXiv:1110.2965 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    A Surrogate Model of Gravitational Waveforms from Numerical Relativity Simulations of Precessing Binary Black Hole Mergers

    Jonathan Blackman, Scott E. Field, Mark A. Scheel, Chad R. Galley, Daniel A. Hemberger, Patricia Schmidt, and Rory Smith, “A Surrogate Model of Gravitational Waveforms from Numerical Relativity Simulations of Precessing Binary Black Hole Mergers,” Phys. Rev.D95, 104023 (2017), arXiv:1701.00550 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    The Spectral Einstein Code,

    “The Spectral Einstein Code,” http://www. black-holes.org/SpEC.html

    work page

  76. [76]

    A multidomain spectral method for solving elliptic equations

    Harald P. Pfeiffer, Lawrence E. Kidder, Mark A. Scheel, and Saul A. Teukolsky, “A Multidomain spectral method for solving elliptic equations,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 152, 253–273 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0202096 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  77. [77]

    Binary-black-hole initial data with nearly-extremal spins

    Geoffrey Lovelace, Robert Owen, Harald P. Pfeiffer, and Tony Chu, “Binary-black-hole initial data with nearly-extremal spins,” Phys. Rev.D78, 084017 (2008), arXiv:0805.4192 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    A New Generalized Harmonic Evolution System

    Lee Lindblom, Mark A. Scheel, Lawrence E. Kidder, Robert Owen, and Oliver Rinne, “A New generalized harmonic evolution system,” Class. Quant. Grav.23, S447–S462 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0512093 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  79. [79]

    Simulations of Binary Black Hole Mergers Using Spectral Methods

    Bela Szilagyi, Lee Lindblom, and Mark A. Scheel, “Simulations of Binary Black Hole Mergers Using Spectral Methods,” Phys. Rev. D80, 124010 (2009), arXiv:0909.3557 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  80. [80]

    High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown

    Mark A. Scheel, Michael Boyle, Tony Chu, Lawrence E. Kidder, Keith D. Matthews, and Harald P. Pfeiffer, “High-accuracy waveforms for binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown,” Phys. Rev.D79, 024003 (2009), arXiv:0810.1767 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.