The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2410.15326 · v1 · pith:I3Z77EGY · submitted 2024-10-20 · cs.CL

A Survey of Uncertainty Estimation in LLMs: Theory Meets Practice

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:I3Z77EGYrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL
keywords uncertaintyestimationllmsapproachesmethodscriticalheuristicincluding
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As large language models (LLMs) continue to evolve, understanding and quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions is critical for enhancing application credibility. However, the existing literature relevant to LLM uncertainty estimation often relies on heuristic approaches, lacking systematic classification of the methods. In this survey, we clarify the definitions of uncertainty and confidence, highlighting their distinctions and implications for model predictions. On this basis, we integrate theoretical perspectives, including Bayesian inference, information theory, and ensemble strategies, to categorize various classes of uncertainty estimation methods derived from heuristic approaches. Additionally, we address challenges that arise when applying these methods to LLMs. We also explore techniques for incorporating uncertainty into diverse applications, including out-of-distribution detection, data annotation, and question clarification. Our review provides insights into uncertainty estimation from both definitional and theoretical angles, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of this critical aspect in LLMs. We aim to inspire the development of more reliable and effective uncertainty estimation approaches for LLMs in real-world scenarios.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 11 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Can LLMs Use Linguistic Uncertainty Markers to Reliably Reflect Intrinsic Confidence?

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LLMs struggle to associate epistemic markers with stable internal confidence levels across distributions, even under model-centric interpretations, while maintaining somewhat consistent marker rankings.

  2. Walking Through Uncertainty: An Empirical Study of Uncertainty Estimation for Audio-Aware Large Language Models

    eess.AS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Semantic-level and verification-based uncertainty methods outperform token-level baselines for audio reasoning in ALLMs, but their relative performance on hallucination and unanswerable-question benchmarks is model- a...

  3. Uncertainty Propagation in LLM-Based Systems

    cs.SE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    This paper introduces a systems-level conceptual framing and a three-level taxonomy (intra-model, system-level, socio-technical) for uncertainty propagation in compound LLM applications, along with engineering insight...

  4. From Competition to Collaboration: Designing Sustainable Mechanisms Between LLMs and Online Forums

    cs.AI 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new sequential interaction framework lets LLMs propose questions to forums, with simulations on real Stack Exchange data showing players can reach roughly half the utility of an ideal full-information scenario despi...

  5. Estimating Uncertainty from Reasoning: A Large-Scale Study of Multi- and Crosslingual MCQA Performance in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A large-scale multilingual evaluation of LLM uncertainty estimation methods across 22 languages and 9 models finds that English reasoning closes the UE gap for low-resource languages and that optimal UE method choice ...

  6. Reinforcement Learning with Metacognitive Feedback Elicits Faithful Uncertainty Expression in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLMF uses quality of model self-judgments to refine RL rankings and select training data, achieving SOTA faithful calibration while preserving accuracy and outperforming standard RL by up to 63%.

  7. LPDS: Evaluating LLM Robustness Through Logic-Preserving Difficulty Scaling

    cs.LG 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    LPDS quantifies difficulty of logic-preserving problem variations and searches for the hardest ones, producing up to 5x larger performance drops than random sampling and better robustness gains from fine-tuning on dif...

  8. Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DPUA is a two-phase framework that aligns LLM uncertainty expressions with human disagreement distributions in subjectivity analysis while preserving task performance.

  9. Estimating the Black-box LLM Uncertainty with Distribution-Aligned Adversarial Distillation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DisAAD trains a 1%-sized proxy model via adversarial distillation to quantify uncertainty in black-box LLMs by aligning with their output distributions.

  10. Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    DPUA framework aligns LLM uncertainty expressions with human disagreement distributions in subjectivity analysis via adaptive decoupled learning and GRPO-based optimization while preserving task accuracy.

  11. Detecting Hallucinations in SpeechLLMs at Inference Time Using Attention Maps

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Four attention metrics enable logistic regression classifiers that detect hallucinations in SpeechLLMs with up to +0.23 PR-AUC gains over baselines on ASR and translation tasks.