arxiv: 2604.04953 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-03 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.HC· cs.IR· cs.MM

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Generative AI for Video Trailer Synthesis: From Extractive Heuristics to Autoregressive Creativity

Abhishek Dharmaratnakar , Srivaths Ranganathan , Debanshu Das , Anushree Sinha

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 20:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.HCcs.IRcs.MM

keywords video trailer generationgenerative AIautoregressive transformerstext-to-video modelsextractive heuristicssemantic reconstructionfoundation modelsmultimodal LLMs

0 comments

The pith

Video trailer systems are shifting from selecting existing clips to generating new coherent narratives with AI.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey maps the change in automatic trailer creation from early methods that used low-level features and rules to pick shots to newer systems built on large language models and diffusion-based video generators that synthesize content. It shows how these generative approaches can identify important moments and then build emotionally connected stories by reconstructing scenes semantically. A sympathetic reader would care because the change points to faster production of promotional videos on user-generated platforms while raising questions about scale and ethics. The paper organizes recent work into a taxonomy covering autoregressive transformers and foundation models such as Sora and Veo.

Core claim

The paper establishes a new taxonomy for AI-driven trailer generation by tracing the move from Graph Convolutional Networks and heuristic extraction to Trailer Generation Transformers, LLM-orchestrated pipelines, and text-to-video foundation models, which enable systems to construct coherent, emotionally resonant narratives through controllable generative editing and semantic reconstruction rather than simple shot selection.

What carries the argument

The progression from extractive heuristics to autoregressive Transformers and text-to-video foundation models, which perform semantic reconstruction to build full narratives instead of selecting clips.

If this is right

Automated generation increases content velocity on UGC platforms.
High-fidelity neural synthesis introduces new ethical challenges around synthetic media.
Future systems move toward controllable generative editing of trailers.
The proposed taxonomy organizes techniques around foundation-model capabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Hybrid systems combining extraction with generation may stay useful while coherence limits persist.
Integration with multimodal models could allow real-time adaptation of trailers to specific audience data.
Scalability claims could be tested by measuring production time and engagement metrics on live platforms.

Load-bearing premise

Current generative models can reliably produce coherent and emotionally resonant video narratives at scale.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison where trailers generated by current text-to-video models are shown to human viewers alongside traditional ones and consistently score lower on measures of narrative coherence or emotional impact.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.04953 by Abhishek Dharmaratnakar, Anushree Sinha, Debanshu Das, Srivaths Ranganathan.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Trailer Synthesis to "see" the global distribution of exciting moments before making local decisions. (2) Context Encoder: This stack of Transformer encoder layers processes the movie sequence (enriched with trailerness scores) to create contextualized shot representations. Through self-attention, each shot’s embedding is updated based on its relationship to every other shot in the movie. This allows the m… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The domain of automatic video trailer generation is currently undergoing a profound paradigm shift, transitioning from heuristic-based extraction methods to deep generative synthesis. While early methodologies relied heavily on low-level feature engineering, visual saliency, and rule-based heuristics to select representative shots, recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), and diffusion-based video synthesis have enabled systems that not only identify key moments but also construct coherent, emotionally resonant narratives. This survey provides a comprehensive technical review of this evolution, with a specific focus on generative techniques including autoregressive Transformers, LLM-orchestrated pipelines, and text-to-video foundation models like OpenAI's Sora and Google's Veo. We analyze the architectural progression from Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) to Trailer Generation Transformers (TGT), evaluate the economic implications of automated content velocity on User-Generated Content (UGC) platforms, and discuss the ethical challenges posed by high-fidelity neural synthesis. By synthesizing insights from recent literature, this report establishes a new taxonomy for AI-driven trailer generation in the era of foundation models, suggesting that future promotional video systems will move beyond extractive selection toward controllable generative editing and semantic reconstruction of trailers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A survey that maps the shift from extractive trailer methods to generative AI but adds no new techniques or data.

read the letter

This paper is a survey that traces video trailer generation from heuristic extraction using saliency and GCNs to generative pipelines with autoregressive Transformers, LLM orchestration, and models like Sora and Veo. The central contribution is a taxonomy framing future systems around controllable generative editing and semantic reconstruction rather than shot selection. It does a reasonable job pulling together the architectural progression and touching on economic effects for UGC platforms plus ethical questions around high-fidelity synthesis. The review of cited work on these topics is clear and stays grounded in external literature without circularity. The soft spots are straightforward: there are no new experiments, benchmarks, derivations, or error analyses, so the narrative of a profound paradigm shift rests entirely on trends observed in other papers. The forward-looking claim that generative approaches will dominate assumes current coherence and fidelity limits in text-to-video models can be solved at scale, but the paper does not dig into how those limits might constrain adoption. Citation patterns are standard for a survey. This is for researchers in computer vision or generative media who want a structured overview of trailer-specific applications. It organizes ideas usefully for someone new to the area but will not advance technical work. I would send it to peer review as a survey because the structure holds up and the topic is current, though it would need revisions to address limitations more directly.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a comprehensive survey on the evolution of video trailer synthesis, detailing the shift from extractive heuristics relying on low-level features, visual saliency, and GCNs to generative approaches using LLMs, MLLMs, autoregressive Transformers, and foundation models like Sora and Veo. It establishes a taxonomy for AI-driven trailer generation, analyzes economic implications for UGC platforms, and discusses ethical challenges, positing that future systems will emphasize controllable generative editing over extractive selection.

Significance. If the synthesized narrative holds, the paper offers a timely taxonomy and forward-looking perspective on generative AI applications in media production, potentially influencing research directions toward semantic reconstruction techniques. The inclusion of economic and ethical analyses enhances its relevance, though the lack of original experiments or quantitative meta-analysis tempers its immediate impact.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] The assertion of a 'profound paradigm shift' and the ability of generative models to produce 'coherent, emotionally resonant narratives' is presented without addressing the documented limitations in coherence and long-term consistency of current text-to-video models such as Sora and Veo; this weakens the support for the central claim of moving beyond extractive methods.

minor comments (2)

The manuscript would benefit from a table or figure summarizing key methods, their architectures, and reported performance metrics from the cited literature to make the architectural progression clearer.
[Abstract] Expand the acronym UGC on first mention for accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our survey and for the constructive feedback on the abstract. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve balance and precision.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] The assertion of a 'profound paradigm shift' and the ability of generative models to produce 'coherent, emotionally resonant narratives' is presented without addressing the documented limitations in coherence and long-term consistency of current text-to-video models such as Sora and Veo; this weakens the support for the central claim of moving beyond extractive methods.

Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing is overly concise and would benefit from explicit acknowledgment of current limitations to better support the central narrative. The full manuscript already reviews documented shortcomings in coherence, temporal consistency, and controllability for models such as Sora and Veo (particularly in the foundation-model sections and the discussion of autoregressive versus diffusion-based approaches). In the revised version we will adjust the abstract to frame the paradigm shift as an ongoing transition: generative methods enable semantic reconstruction and narrative synthesis beyond pure extraction, yet they still face the very consistency challenges noted in the literature. This revision preserves the survey's forward-looking taxonomy while strengthening the evidential grounding of the claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is a literature survey synthesizing external prior work on the transition from extractive heuristics (GCNs, saliency methods) to generative pipelines (autoregressive Transformers, LLMs, text-to-video models like Sora and Veo). No original equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-referential constructions appear; the taxonomy and forward claims rest on cited trends rather than reducing to the paper's own inputs by definition or self-citation chains.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The survey rests on the assumption that the cited body of work on extractive methods and generative models accurately represents the field's state and that generative approaches will dominate future systems.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The reviewed literature on LLMs, diffusion models, and prior trailer systems is representative and up-to-date
The taxonomy and claims about paradigm shift depend on the completeness of the synthesized papers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1084 out tokens · 36692 ms · 2026-05-13T20:17:53.729666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

taxonomy ... Heuristic, Affective, Graph-Based, LLM-Agent, Autoregressive, Foundation-Diffusion

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Rehusevych, O.: movie2trailer: Unsupervised trailer generation using anomaly detection. (2019)

work page 2019
[2]

et al.: Vision-to-Music Generation: A Survey

Wang, Z. et al.: Vision-to-Music Generation: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21254 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

In: Proc

Hu, Y., Jin, L., Jiang, X.: A GCN-Based Framework for Generating Trailers. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Computing and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 610–617 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

In: 2023 Int

Singh, H., Kaur, K., Singh, P.P.: Artificial intelligence as a facilitator for film production process. In: 2023 Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Communication (AISC), pp. 969–972. IEEE (2023)

work page 2023
[5]

In: 2025 IEEE 14th CSNT, pp

Praveen, P., et al.: Video Trailer Generation using Multimodal Data Analysis. In: 2025 IEEE 14th CSNT, pp. 604–609 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

Mishra, P., et al.: A semi-automatic approach for generating video trailers for learning pathways. In: Int. Conf. on AI in Education, pp. 302–305. Springer (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

CSI Transactions on ICT 11(4), 193–201 (2023)

Mishra, P., et al.: AI based approach to trailer generation for online educational courses. CSI Transactions on ICT 11(4), 193–201 (2023)

work page 2023
[8]

In: 2024 9th Int

Balestri, R., Cascarano, P., Degli Esposti, M., Pescatore, G.: An Auto- matic Deep Learning Approach for Trailer Generation through Large Language Models. In: 2024 9th Int. Conf. on Frontiers of Signal Pro- cessing (ICFSP), pp. 93–100. IEEE (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

In: Proc

Argaw, D.M., et al.: Towards automated movie trailer generation. In: Proc. of the IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, pp. 7445–7454 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Scientific Reports 15(1), 7819 (2025)

Yao, X., Du, W., Sun, L., Hu, B.: Automatic trailer generation for movies using convolutional neural network. Scientific Reports 15(1), 7819 (2025)

work page 2025
[11]

In: 2020 Int

Shambharkar, P.G., Anand, A., Kumar, A.: A survey paper on movie trailer genre detection. In: 2020 Int. Conf. on Computing and Data Science (CDS), pp. 238–244. IEEE (2020)

work page 2020
[12]

ACM Computing Surveys 55(13s), 1–31 (2023)

Liu, C., Yu, H.: AI-empowered persuasive video generation: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys 55(13s), 1–31 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16038 (2024)

Zhou, P., et al.: A survey on generative ai and llm for video generation, understanding, and streaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16038 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[14]

Applied Sciences 14(13), 5770 (2024)

Yu, T., Yang, W., Xu, J., Pan, Y.: Barriers to industry adoption of AI video generation tools. Applied Sciences 14(13), 5770 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12489 (2025)

Ji, S., et al.: A Comprehensive Survey on Generative AI for Video-to- Music Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12489 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

In: Proc

Smith, J.R., Joshi, D., Huet, B., Hsu, W., Cota, J.: Harnessing ai for augmenting creativity: Application to movie trailer creation. In: Proc. of the 25th ACM Int. Conf. on Multimedia, pp. 1799–1808 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

In: Proc

Irie, G., Satou, T., Kojima, A., Yamasaki, T., Aizawa, K.: Automatic trailer generation. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM Int. Conf. on Multimedia, pp. 839–842 (2010)

work page 2010
[18]

Balestri, R., Pescatore, G., Cascarano, P.: Trailer Reimagined: An In- novative, LLM-Driven, Expressive Automated Movie Summary frame- work. (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

Applied Sciences 14(11), 4400 (2024)

Peronikolis, M., Panagiotakis, C.: Personalized Video Summarization: a comprehensive survey of methods and datasets. Applied Sciences 14(11), 4400 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

Workie, A., Sharma, R., Chung, Y.K.: Digital video summarization techniques: A survey. Int. J. Eng. Technol 9(1), 81–85 (2020)

work page 2020
[21]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20962 (2024)

Chi, X., et al.: Mmtrail: A multimodal trailer video dataset with lan- guage and music descriptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20962 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

In: Proc

Wang, S., et al.: PodReels: Human-AI Co-Creation of Video Podcast Teasers. In: Proc. of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conf., pp. 958–974 (2024)

work page 2024
[23]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12948 (2019)

Sen, D., Raman, B.: Video skimming: Taxonomy and comprehensive survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12948 (2019)

work page arXiv 1909
[24]

Multimedia Tools and Applications 80(18), 27187–27221 (2021)

Tiwari, V., Bhatnagar, C.: A survey of recent work on video summariza- tion: approaches and techniques. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80(18), 27187–27221 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05586 (2024) Generative AI for Video Trailer Synthesis: From Extractive Heuristics to Autoregressive Creativity

Xu, W., et al.: TeaserGen: Generating Teasers for Long Documentaries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05586 (2024) Generative AI for Video Trailer Synthesis: From Extractive Heuristics to Autoregressive Creativity

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 23(2), 79–89 (2006)

Li, Y., et al.: Techniques for movie content analysis and skimming: tutorial and overview on video abstraction techniques. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 23(2), 79–89 (2006)

work page 2006
[27]

In: Proc

Tian, Z., et al.: Vidmuse: A simple video-to-music generation frame- work with long-short-term modeling. In: Proc. of CVPR, pp. 18782– 18793 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Tank, D.: A survey on sport video summarization. Int. J. Sci. Adv. Res. Technol 2(10), 435–439 (2016)

work page 2016
[29]

Cho, J., et al.: Sora as an AGI world model? arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05131 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models

Liu, Y., et al.: Sora: A review on background, technology, limi- tations, and opportunities of large vision models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177 (2024)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[31]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14665 (2024)

Mogavi, R.H., et al.: Sora OpenAI’s Prelude: Social media perspectives on Sora OpenAI. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14665 (2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

In: 2025 IEEE 15th CCWC, pp

Ehtesham, A., et al.: Movie Gen: SWOT Analysis of Meta’s Generative AI. In: 2025 IEEE 15th CCWC, pp. 189–195 (2025)

work page 2025
[33]

Cureus 17(1) (2025)

Temsah, M.H., et al.: OpenAI’s Sora and Google’s Veo 2 in Action: A Narrative Review. Cureus 17(1) (2025)

work page 2025
[34]

Romanian Journal of Petroleum & Gas Technology 5, 131–144 (2024)

Ros,ca, C.M., et al.: Artificial intelligence-powered video content gen- eration tools. Romanian Journal of Petroleum & Gas Technology 5, 131–144 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

In: 2018 1st Int

Hesham, M., et al.: Smart trailer: Automatic generation of movie trailer using only subtitles. In: 2018 1st Int. Workshop on Deep and Represen- tation Learning, pp. 26–30. IEEE (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

Journal of Marketing 82(4), 86–101 (2018)

Liu, X., Shi, S.W., Teixeira, T., Wedel, M.: Video content marketing: The making of clips. Journal of Marketing 82(4), 86–101 (2018)

work page 2018
[37]

In: IJCAI, pp

Xu, H., Zhen, Y., Zha, H.: Trailer Generation via a Point Process-Based Visual Attractiveness Model. In: IJCAI, pp. 2198–2204 (2015)

work page 2015
[38]

Product review based on optimized facial expression de- tection,

V. Chaugule, D. Abhishek, A. Vijayakumar, P. B. Ramteke, and S. G. Koolagudi, “Product review based on optimized facial expression de- tection, ” in2016 Ninth International Conference on Contemporary Com- puting (IC3), pp. 1–6. IEEE, 2016

work page 2016
[39]

Zero-shot Cross-domain Knowledge Distilla- tion: A Case study on YouTube Music,

S. Ranganathan et al., “Zero-shot Cross-domain Knowledge Distilla- tion: A Case study on YouTube Music, ” inProceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’25), pp. 1122–1125. ACM, 2025

work page 2025
[40]

DSL Approach for Development of Gaming Applications,

A. Vijayakumar, D. Abhishek, and K. Chandrasekaran, “DSL Approach for Development of Gaming Applications, ” inInformation Systems Design and Intelligent Applications, vol. 433, pp. 1–9. Springer, 2016

work page 2016
[41]

Multi-Agent Video Recommenders: Evo- lution, Patterns, and Open Challenges,

S. Ranganathan et al., “Multi-Agent Video Recommenders: Evo- lution, Patterns, and Open Challenges, ”TechRxiv, 2025. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.176471435.56211583/v1

work page doi:10.36227/techrxiv.176471435.56211583/v1 2025