arxiv: 2604.06009 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Are Black Holes Fuzzballs? Probing Horizon-Scale Structure with LISA

2, 2) ((1) Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), (2) Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC), 3), (3) Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)), Carlos F. Sopuerta (1, Pablo F. Muguruza (1

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 19:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords fuzzball proposalblack hole multipolesextreme mass ratio inspiralsLISAgravitational waveshorizon structureKerr deformationsquantum gravity tests

0 comments

The pith

LISA observations of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals can constrain multiple higher-order multipoles of compact objects at levels orders of magnitude beyond existing bounds, testing the fuzzball proposal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that space-based gravitational-wave data from LISA can measure deviations from the Kerr geometry in the near-horizon region by modeling them as generic multipolar deformations. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns LISA into a probe of quantum-gravity-inspired alternatives to classical black holes, where direct tests have been unavailable. The analysis uses realistic signal-to-noise ratios for EMRIs and shows that constraints on these deformations reach 10^{-3} for non-axisymmetric quadrupole moments and 10^{-2} for axisymmetric octupole moments. If correct, this opens an empirical window onto horizon-scale structure that electromagnetic observations and ground-based detectors cannot access.

Core claim

By introducing generic multipolar deformations that encode potential symmetry breakings in the fuzzball proposal and carrying out a systematic parameter estimation analysis on EMRI waveforms, the work shows that LISA can constrain non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the 10^{-2} level with realistic signal-to-noise ratios, providing concrete observational targets for identifying fuzzball geometries.

What carries the argument

Generic multipolar deformations of the Kerr geometry that encode symmetry breakings, used as the basis for parameter estimation on extreme-mass-ratio inspiral waveforms.

Load-bearing premise

The fuzzball proposal can be adequately encoded in generic multipolar deformations of the Kerr geometry without requiring additional waveform modifications.

What would settle it

A LISA measurement of an EMRI that either detects or rules out non-axisymmetric quadrupole deviations at the 10^{-3} level or axisymmetric octupole deviations at the 10^{-2} level would confirm or refute the forecasted constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06009 by 2, 2) ((1) Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC), (2) Institute of Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC), 3), (3) Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB)), Carlos F. Sopuerta (1, Pablo F. Muguruza (1.

read the original abstract

Gravitational waves provide a unique probe of the strong-field regime of gravity, offering access to physics beyond the classical black hole paradigm. We explore how space-based observations of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) can be used to test the fuzzball proposal, a quantum gravity-inspired alternative to Kerr black holes. By introducing generic multipolar deformations encoding potential symmetry breakings and performing a systematic parameter estimation analysis, we forecast LISA's ability to constrain deviations from the Kerr geometry in the near-horizon region. We show that EMRI signals with realistic signal-to-noise ratios can constrain multiple higher-order multipoles at levels orders of magnitude beyond current electromagnetic and ground-based gravitational-wave bounds, opening a new observational window onto horizon-scale structure. In particular, we find that LISA can constrain generic non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the $10^{-3}$ level and axisymmetric mass octupole deformations at the $10^{-2}$ level, providing concrete observational targets for identifying fuzzball geometries. Our results demonstrate that precision measurements of EMRI waveforms will transform LISA into a powerful laboratory for fundamental physics and offer the first direct empirical constraints on quantum-gravity-motivated models of compact objects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LISA EMRI forecasts give concrete multipole bounds for fuzzball tests but encode the proposal too narrowly as static Kerr deformations.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this paper runs a parameter estimation forecast showing LISA could bound non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations at the 10^{-3} level and axisymmetric octupole ones at 10^{-2} using realistic EMRI signals, which would beat existing limits and give specific targets for horizon-scale structure tests framed around fuzzballs. The numbers are the useful output here. What is new is the systematic application of EMRI waveform analysis to generic multipolar deformations in the fuzzball context. Earlier papers have done multipole tests or LISA forecasts separately, but linking them directly to quantum-gravity motivated alternatives and producing these quantitative projections is a legitimate extension. The paper does this part cleanly by introducing the deformations, running the estimation, and comparing to current bounds. It earns credit for staying focused on observable quantities rather than abstract claims. The soft spot is the modeling choice. The analysis treats fuzzball structure as small, static shifts in the multipoles of an otherwise Kerr background, with waveform changes coming only from the altered geodesics and radiation. Fuzzball constructions typically involve non-vacuum, stringy degrees of freedom near the would-be horizon that can produce non-stationary or non-perturbative effects not captured by a finite set of multipole parameters. If those extra pieces affect the phase evolution at leading order, the quoted constraints test a restricted class of deformations rather than the full proposal. The abstract gives no waveform model details, so it is hard to tell how much of this was checked. This paper is for people working on gravitational-wave tests of strong gravity and LISA data analysis who want quantitative forecasts for alternative compact objects. A reader interested in concrete numbers for horizon probes will get value from it. It deserves a serious referee because the calculation is new and the topic is relevant, even if the encoding assumption needs scrutiny. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject, with a note to reviewers to examine whether the multipole approach adequately represents fuzzball microstates.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript forecasts that LISA observations of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) can constrain generic multipolar deformations from the Kerr geometry at the 10^{-3} level for non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole and 10^{-2} for axisymmetric mass octupole, thereby providing observational tests for the fuzzball proposal by encoding potential horizon-scale structure as small deviations in the multipole moments.

Significance. Should the modeling assumptions hold, this work would significantly advance the field by demonstrating LISA's potential to probe quantum gravity effects near black hole horizons with unprecedented precision, orders of magnitude beyond current bounds. The systematic parameter estimation analysis on realistic SNR signals is a notable strength, offering concrete targets for future observations.

major comments (2)

[§2] §2 (Modeling of fuzzball geometries): The central claim relies on representing fuzzball structure exclusively through static, small multipolar deformations of the Kerr metric (see the deformation ansatz in Eq. (3) and surrounding text). However, this may not capture non-perturbative or non-stationary effects expected in fuzzball microstates, such as string excitations or modified dispersion that could affect the EMRI waveform phase at leading order. A more detailed justification or sensitivity analysis to additional effects is needed to support the direct constraints on the fuzzball proposal.
[§4] §4 (Parameter estimation results, Table 1): The reported constraints (e.g., 10^{-3} on quadrupole) are derived from Fisher matrix or MCMC analysis; however, the waveform model details, including how the multipole deformations enter the geodesic motion and radiation (Eq. (7)), are not fully specified in a way that allows verification of the 10^{-3} and 10^{-2} levels. Cross-check against the quoted bounds is required.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The abstract mentions 'generic non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole deformations' but the full text should clarify if axisymmetric cases are also considered consistently in the results.
[Notation] Notation: Ensure consistent use of multipole moment notation throughout, e.g., M_l for mass multipoles vs. current multipoles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas for clarification. We address each major comment below and outline the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2] §2 (Modeling of fuzzball geometries): The central claim relies on representing fuzzball structure exclusively through static, small multipolar deformations of the Kerr metric (see the deformation ansatz in Eq. (3) and surrounding text). However, this may not capture non-perturbative or non-stationary effects expected in fuzzball microstates, such as string excitations or modified dispersion that could affect the EMRI waveform phase at leading order. A more detailed justification or sensitivity analysis to additional effects is needed to support the direct constraints on the fuzzball proposal.

Authors: We agree that the static multipolar deformation ansatz in Eq. (3) is a phenomenological approximation rather than a complete description of fuzzball microstates. This choice is motivated by the fact that fuzzball constructions generically produce deviations in the multipole moments of the asymptotic metric, which can be parametrized in this manner to test horizon-scale structure. We will revise §2 to provide a more detailed justification, including references to how effective multipole deviations arise in fuzzball literature, while explicitly noting the limitations with respect to non-stationary or non-perturbative effects such as string excitations. A full sensitivity analysis to those effects lies beyond the scope of the current work but is flagged as an important direction for future study. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (Parameter estimation results, Table 1): The reported constraints (e.g., 10^{-3} on quadrupole) are derived from Fisher matrix or MCMC analysis; however, the waveform model details, including how the multipole deformations enter the geodesic motion and radiation (Eq. (7)), are not fully specified in a way that allows verification of the 10^{-3} and 10^{-2} levels. Cross-check against the quoted bounds is required.

Authors: We appreciate the request for greater transparency. The multipole deformations modify the background metric, which enters the geodesic equations through the effective potential and thereby shifts the orbital frequencies and accumulated phase. The radiation reaction and waveform are computed using the standard EMRI framework adapted to the deformed spacetime (with Eq. (7) encoding the leading-order flux). To enable verification, we will expand the description in §4 and the supplementary methods with explicit expressions for the modified frequencies, the impact on the Fisher information matrix, and the mapping from metric deformations to waveform phase. This will allow direct cross-check of the reported 10^{-3} and 10^{-2} bounds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in EMRI multipole constraint forecasts

full rationale

The paper models potential fuzzball deviations from Kerr via explicit generic multipolar deformations as an input ansatz, then runs a standard parameter-estimation forecast on simulated LISA EMRI waveforms to derive expected bounds on those multipoles. This chain is self-contained: the waveform modifications follow from the chosen multipole parameters, and the quoted precisions (e.g., 10^{-3} for quadrupole) are outputs of the Fisher or MCMC analysis rather than re-statements of the inputs. No self-definitional equations, fitted quantities renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation. The central claim remains an independent forecast under the stated modeling assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract only limits visibility into details; the key elements are the introduced multipolar deformations as parameters to be constrained.

free parameters (1)

generic multipolar deformation parameters
Introduced to encode potential symmetry breakings and deviations from Kerr in fuzzball models; these are the quantities being constrained in the forecasts.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Kerr geometry as the classical black hole baseline
The paper compares deviations against the Kerr metric as the standard classical limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5574 in / 1272 out tokens · 70726 ms · 2026-05-10T19:11:49.703153+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
We parametrize these deviations from the Kerr geometry through the non-axisymmetric mass quadrupole and axisymmetric mass octupole... 20-dimensional parameter space... Fisher matrix analysis
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
The exterior geometry of a stationary and axisymmetric compact object in vacuum GR is uniquely characterized by its gravitational multipole moments

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Probing Kerr Symmetry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals
gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

LISA EMRIs can constrain deviations from Kerr equatorial symmetry to 10^{-2} and axial symmetry to 10^{-3} using Analytic Kludge waveforms and Fisher analysis.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 10 internal anchors

[1]

Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

A. Strominger and C. Vafa, Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379, 99 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9601029

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[2]

J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)

1973
[3]

S. W. Hawking, Black hole explosions, Nature248, 30 (1974)

1974
[5]

Skenderis and M

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, The fuzzball pro- posal for black holes, Phys. Rept.467, 117 (2008), arXiv:0804.0552 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[6]

AdS/CFT duality and the black hole information paradox

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, AdS / CFT duality and the black hole information paradox, Nucl. Phys. B623, 342 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0109154

work page Pith review arXiv 2002
[7]

Lunin and S

O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, Statistical interpretation of Bekenstein entropy for systems with a stretched hori- zon, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 211303 (2002), arXiv:hep- th/0202072

work page arXiv 2002
[8]

S. D. Mathur, The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review, Fortsch. Phys.53, 793 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0502050

work page arXiv 2005
[9]

B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, Radiation from the non-extremal fuzzball, Class. Quant. Grav.25, 135005 (2008), arXiv:0711.4817 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[10]

S. D. Mathur, Tunneling into fuzzball states, Gen. Rel. Grav.42, 113 (2010), arXiv:0805.3716 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2010
[11]

B. D. Chowdhury and S. D. Mathur, Pair creation in non-extremal fuzzball geometries, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 225021 (2008), arXiv:0806.2309 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[12]

Brady, G

P. Brady, G. Losurdo, and H. Shinkai, LIGO, VIRGO, and KAGRA as the International Gravitational Wave Network, inHandbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, edited by C. Bambi, S. Katsanevas, and K. D. Kokkotas (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2020) pp. 1–21

2020
[13]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[14]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D 100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[15]

R.Abbottet al.(LIGOScientific, Virgo),Testsofgeneral relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D 103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRA), Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, Phys. Rev. D 112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[17]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), GW250114: Testing Hawking’s Area Law and the Kerr Nature of Black Holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[18]

A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Black Hole Spectroscopy and Tests of General Relativity with GW250114, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 041403 (2026), arXiv:2509.08099 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[19]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Bertiet al., Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations, Class. Quant. Grav.32, 243001 (2015), arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[20]

Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap,

L. Baracket al., Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap, Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class

M. Punturoet al., The Einstein Telescope: A third- generation gravitational wave observatory, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 194002 (2010)

2010
[22]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

D. Reitzeet al., Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribu- tion to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 035 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[23]

Sathyaprakash et al.,Scientific Objectives of Einstein Telescope,Class

B. Sathyaprakashet al., Scientific Objectives of Ein- stein Telescope, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 124013 (2012), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 30, 079501 (2013)], arXiv:1206.0331 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[24]

Science Case for the Einstein Telescope,

M. Maggioreet al.(ET), Science Case for the Ein- stein Telescope, JCAP03, 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro- ph.CO]

work page arXiv 1912
[25]

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

A. Abacet al.(ET), The Science of the Einstein Tele- scope, (2025), arXiv:2503.12263 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[26]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[27]

LISA Definition Study Report

M. Colpiet al., LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[28]

P. A. Seoaneet al.(LISA), Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Reviews in Rela- tivity26, 2 (2023), arXiv:2203.06016 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

Auclairet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Cosmol- ogy with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, Living Rev

P. Auclairet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space An- tenna, Living Reviews in Relativity26, 5 (2023), arXiv:2204.05434 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen

E. Barausseet al., Prospects for Fundamental Physics with LISA, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 81 (2020), arXiv:2001.09793 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

K. G. Arunet al.(LISA), New horizons for fundamental physics with LISA, Living Reviews in Relativity25, 4 (2022), arXiv:2205.01597 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[32]

Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based inter- ferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. 7 Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[33]

C. P. L. Berry, S. A. Hughes, C. F. Sopuerta, A. J. K. Chua, A. Heffernan, K. Holley-Bockelmann, D. P. Mi- haylov, M. C. Miller, and A. Sesana, The unique po- tential of extreme mass-ratio inspirals for gravitational- wave astronomy, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51, 42 (2019), arXiv:1903.03686 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2019
[34]

Cárdenas-Avendaño and C

A. Cárdenas-Avendaño and C. F. Sopuerta, Testing grav- ity with extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests(Springer Nature Singapore, 2024) p. 275–359

2024
[35]

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large Scale Struc- ture of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

2011
[36]

Geroch, Multipole moments

R. Geroch, Multipole moments. ii. curved space, J. Math. Phys.11, 2580 (1970)

1970
[37]

R. O. Hansen, Multipole moments of stationary space- times, J. Math. Phys.15, 4652 (1974)

1974
[38]

K. S. Thorne, Multipole expansions of gravitational ra- diation, Rev. Mod. Phys.52, 299 (1980)

1980
[39]

R. P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963)

1963
[40]

Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim

W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity, Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966), [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

1966
[41]

Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys

B. Carter, Axisymmetric Black Hole Has Only Two De- grees of Freedom, Phys. Rev. Lett.26, 331 (1971)

1971
[42]

S. W. Hawking, Black holes in general relativity, Com- mun. Math. Phys.25, 152 (1972)

1972
[43]

Skenderis and M

K. Skenderis and M. Taylor, Fuzzball solutions and D1- D5 microstates, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 071601 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0609154

work page arXiv 2007
[44]

Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale,

V. Cardoso, S. Hopper, C. F. B. Macedo, C. Palenzuela, and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic com- pact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale, Phys. Rev. D94, 084031 (2016), arXiv:1608.08637 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[45]

Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark com- pact objects: a status report, Living Reviews in Relativ- ity22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[46]

D. R. Mayerson, Fuzzballs and Observations, Gen. Rel. Grav.52, 115 (2020), arXiv:2010.09736 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[47]

Bianchi, D

M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, Distinguishing fuzzballs from black holes through their multipolar structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 221601 (2020), arXiv:2007.01743 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

Bena and D

I. Bena and D. R. Mayerson, Black Holes Lessons from Multipole Ratios, JHEP03, 114 (2021), arXiv:2007.09152 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

Bacchini, D

F. Bacchini, D. R. Mayerson, B. Ripperda, J. Davelaar, H. Olivares, T. Hertog, and B. Vercnocke, Fuzzball Shad- ows: EmergentHorizonsfromMicrostructure,Phys.Rev. Lett.127, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2103.12075 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[50]

D. R. Mayerson and B. Vercnocke, Observational Opportunities for the Fuzzball Program, (2023), arXiv:2306.01565 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

F. D. Ryan, Gravitational waves from the inspiral of a compact object into a massive, axisymmetric body with arbitrary multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D52, 5707 (1995)

1995
[52]

F. D. Ryan, Effect of gravitational radiation reaction on circular orbits around a spinning black hole, Phys. Rev. D52, 3159 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9506023

work page arXiv 1995
[53]

F. D. Ryan, Effect of gravitational radiation reaction on nonequatorialorbitsaroundaKerrblackhole,Phys.Rev. D53, 3064 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9511062

work page arXiv 1996
[54]

F. D. Ryan, Accuracy of estimating the multipole mo- ments of a massive body from the gravitational waves of a binary inspiral, Phys. Rev. D56, 1845 (1997)

1997
[55]

F. D. Ryan, Scalar waves produced by a scalar charge or- biting a massive body with arbitrary multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D56, 7732 (1997)

1997
[56]

Danzmann, LISA: Laser interferometer space antenna for gravitational wave measurements, Class

K. Danzmann, LISA: Laser interferometer space antenna for gravitational wave measurements, Class. Quant. Grav.13, A247 (1996)

1996
[57]

Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys

C. Cutler, Angular resolution of the LISA gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D57, 7089 (1998), arXiv:gr- qc/9703068

work page arXiv 1998
[58]

T. A. Prince, M. Tinto, S. L. Larson, and J. W. Arm- strong, The LISA optimal sensitivity, Phys. Rev. D66, 122002 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0209039

work page arXiv 2002
[59]

Barack and C

L. Barack and C. Cutler, LISA capture sources: Approx- imate waveforms, signal-to-noise ratios, and parameter estimation accuracy, Phys. Rev. D69, 082005 (2004), gr-qc/0310125

work page arXiv 2004
[60]

Barack and C

L. Barack and C. Cutler, Using LISA EMRI sources to test off-Kerr deviations in the geometry of massive black holes, Phys. Rev. D75, 042003 (2007), arXiv:gr- qc/0612029

work page arXiv 2007
[61]

Fransen and D

K. Fransen and D. R. Mayerson, Detecting equatorial symmetrybreakingwithLISA,Phys.Rev.D106,064035 (2022), arXiv:2201.03569 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

Loutrel, R

N. Loutrel, R. Brito, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Inspiraling compact objects with generic deformations, Phys. Rev. D105, 124050 (2022), arXiv:2203.01725 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

Loutrel, R

N. Loutrel, R. Brito, A. Maselli, and P. Pani, Relevance of precession for tests of the black hole no hair theorems, Physical Review D110, 10.1103/physrevd.110.044003 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.044003 2024
[64]

Poisson, A

E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Reviews in Relativ- ity14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[65]

Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[66]

S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, G. Khanna, A. J. K. Chua, and M. L. Katz, Adiabatic waveforms for ex- treme mass-ratio inspirals via multivoice decomposition in time and frequency, Phys. Rev. D103, 104014 (2021), arXiv:2102.02713 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[67]

M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warbur- ton, and S. A. Hughes, Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational- wave data analysis, Phys. Rev. D104, 064047 (2021), arXiv:2104.04582 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[68]

Speri, M

L. Speri, M. L. Katz, A. J. K. Chua, S. A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J. E. Thompson, C. E. A. Chapman-Bird, and J. R. Gair, Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ra- tio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain, Front. Appl. Math. Stat.9, 10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 (2024), arXiv:2307.12585 [gr-qc]

work page doi:10.3389/fams.2023.1266739 2023
[69]

P. F. Muguruza and C. F. Sopuerta, Probing Kerr Sym- metry Breaking with LISA Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspi- rals, (2026), arXiv:2604.06053 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[70]

Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: The- ory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: The- ory and Experiments(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007). 8

2007
[71]

C. W. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation (W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco, 1973)

1973
[72]

N.J.CornishandL.J.Rubbo,TheLISAResponseFunc- tion, Phys. Rev. D67, 6 (2003)

2003
[73]

Bayle, O

J.-B. Bayle, O. Hartwig, A. Petiteau, and M. Lilley, LISANode, Zenodo (2022), 10.5281/zenodo.6461078

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.6461078 2022
[74]

C. F. B. Macedo, P. Pani, V. Cardoso, and L. C. B. Crispino, Astrophysical signatures of boson stars: quasi- normal modes and inspiral resonances, Phys. Rev. D88, 064046 (2013), arXiv:1307.4812 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[75]

Destounis, F

K. Destounis, F. Angeloni, M. Vaglio, and P. Pani, Extreme-mass-ratio inspirals into rotating boson stars: Nonintegrability, chaos, and transient resonances, Phys. Rev. D108, 084062 (2023), arXiv:2305.05691 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

Bianchi, D

M. Bianchi, D. Bini, and G. Di Russo, Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and ra- diative losses, Phys. Rev. D111, 044017 (2025), arXiv:2411.19612 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

Di Russo, M

G. Di Russo, M. Bianchi, and D. Bini, Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a topological star spacetime: PN reconstruction of the field and radiation losses in a self-force approach, Phys. Rev. D112, 024002 (2025), arXiv:2502.21040 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

Melis, R

M. Melis, R. Brito, and P. Pani, Extreme mass ratio in- spirals around topological stars, Physical Review D111, 10.1103/zng8-9qrn (2025)

work page doi:10.1103/zng8-9qrn 2025
[79]

Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

N. Afshordiet al.(LISA Consortium Waveform Work- ing Group), Waveform modelling for the Laser Interfer- ometer Space Antenna, Living Rev. Rel.28, 9 (2025), arXiv:2311.01300 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025