arxiv: 2604.15965 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-17 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

Improved Constraints on Non-Kerr Deviations from Binary Black Hole Inspirals Using GWTC-4 Data

Cosimo Bambi, Debtroy Das, Swarnim Shashank

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 08:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.IM

keywords gravitational wavesbinary black holesKerr metricJohannsen metricgeneral relativity testsGWTC-4post-Newtonian phase correctionsdeformation parameters

0 comments

The pith

GWTC-4 binary black hole data shows deformation parameters consistent with zero, supporting the Kerr metric.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper updates constraints on possible deviations from the Kerr geometry by analyzing selected binary black hole inspirals in the GWTC-4 catalog. It incorporates theory-agnostic parametrized corrections from the Johannsen metric into the post-Newtonian gravitational-wave phase and runs Bayesian parameter estimation to bound two deformation parameters. The resulting limits are tighter than those from the earlier GWTC-3 analysis, and the parameters remain consistent with zero when varied one at a time. This outcome supplies no evidence for departures from Kerr spacetime and strengthens the case for general relativity in the strong-field regime of black-hole mergers.

Core claim

We present updated constraints on deviations from the Kerr metric using BBH inspirals from the fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog. Building on our previous GWTC-3 analysis, we employ a theory-agnostic framework in which non-Kerr effects of the Johannsen metric are incorporated as parametrized corrections to the GW phase within the post-Newtonian framework. We perform Bayesian parameter estimation on a selected subset of GWTC-4 events to constrain the deformation parameters α13 and ε3, yielding significantly tighter bounds compared to earlier results. When varied individually, the deformation parameters are found to be consistent with zero, providing no evidence for departures from a

What carries the argument

Parametrized post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave phase that encode the leading non-Kerr effects of the Johannsen metric through the deformation parameters α13 and ε3.

If this is right

The new bounds on α13 and ε3 are tighter than those obtained from the GWTC-3 catalog.
No evidence appears for departures from Kerr geometry in the chosen events when each deformation parameter is varied separately.
The same parametrized framework can be applied to larger future catalogs to produce progressively stricter tests of the Kerr hypothesis.
The results add to the body of evidence that general relativity correctly describes the strong-field dynamics of black-hole binaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future detections with higher signal-to-noise ratios could begin to constrain families of alternative metrics that the current individual-parameter tests do not yet reach.
Cross-checks with electromagnetic observations, such as black-hole shadow imaging, would test whether the same deformation parameters remain zero across different strong-field regimes.
If higher-order post-Newtonian terms or waveform systematics prove non-negligible, the present bounds could shift and would require re-analysis with more complete models.

Load-bearing premise

The parametrized post-Newtonian corrections accurately capture the leading non-Kerr effects in the Johannsen metric for the selected inspirals without significant higher-order or systematic biases.

What would settle it

A future binary black hole inspiral whose Bayesian analysis yields a statistically significant non-zero value for either α13 or ε3 would falsify the reported consistency with the Kerr metric.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15965 by Cosimo Bambi, Debtroy Das, Swarnim Shashank.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Summary of the 3- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Gravitational wave (GW) observations of binary black hole (BBH) mergers provide a unique opportunity to probe the nature of spacetime in the strong-field and dynamical regime. We present updated constraints on deviations from the Kerr metric using BBH inspirals from the fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog (GWTC-4). Building on our previous GWTC-3 analysis, we employ a theory-agnostic framework in which non-Kerr effects of the Johannsen metric are incorporated as parametrized corrections to the GW phase within the post-Newtonian framework. We perform Bayesian parameter estimation on a selected subset of GWTC-4 events to constrain the deformation parameters $\alpha_{13}$ and $\epsilon_3$, yielding significantly tighter bounds compared to earlier results. When varied individually, the deformation parameters are found to be consistent with zero, providing no evidence for departures from the Kerr geometry. Our results reinforce the validity of General Relativity, particularly the Kerr hypothesis, and highlight the progress enabled by GWTC-4.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a routine update that tightens bounds on two Johannsen parameters with GWTC-4 events but adds no new method or insight beyond applying the prior framework to fresh data.

read the letter

This paper updates constraints on non-Kerr deviations by running the same parametrized post-Newtonian analysis on a subset of GWTC-4 binary black hole inspirals. The main result is that α13 and ε3 stay consistent with zero when varied individually, with narrower posteriors than the earlier GWTC-3 version. The work does a clean job of extending the previous catalog analysis. It uses standard Bayesian estimation, maps the Johannsen deviations to leading PN phase corrections, and reports the expected consistency with the Kerr metric. That incremental tightening from more events is the concrete advance here. The soft spot is the modeling truncation. The leading-order PN corrections may miss higher-order or spin-dependent contributions from the Johannsen metric for the mass and spin ranges in these events. If those systematics are comparable to the reported improvement, the zero-centered posteriors could partly reflect the approximation rather than the data. The abstract gives no explicit check on truncation error or event-by-event validity, so a referee would need to see those tests and the exact selection criteria to judge robustness. This paper is for people who track numerical bounds on parametrized strong-field deviations in gravitational-wave catalogs. A reader already working in that corner of GR tests will find the updated numbers worth noting, but it will not change broader thinking or open new lines of inquiry. It deserves serious peer review because the data are new and the results are presented in a form that can be evaluated directly. Send it to referees and ask them to focus on the validity of the PN mapping for the selected events.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive improved constraints on non-Kerr deviations in the Johannsen metric from a subset of binary black hole inspirals in GWTC-4. Non-Kerr effects are mapped to leading-order parametrized post-Newtonian corrections in the gravitational-wave phase; Bayesian parameter estimation is performed on the deformation parameters α13 and ε3, which are found individually consistent with zero, thereby supporting the Kerr hypothesis with tighter bounds than the authors' prior GWTC-3 analysis.

Significance. If the leading-order PN mapping is shown to be accurate and unbiased for the selected events, the work would strengthen observational tests of the Kerr geometry in the strong-field regime by exploiting the larger GWTC-4 catalog. The use of real observational data and standard Bayesian inference constitutes a concrete, falsifiable advance over purely theoretical bounds.

major comments (1)

[Abstract and methods description of the PN mapping] The abstract states that non-Kerr effects 'are incorporated as parametrized corrections to the GW phase within the post-Newtonian framework,' yet no explicit truncation-error estimate or validity check is provided for the leading-order approximation across the mass and spin range of the selected GWTC-4 events. If higher-order or spin-dependent terms from the Johannsen metric are comparable to the reported bounds, the posteriors peaking at zero could be an artifact of the modeling truncation rather than evidence for Kerr.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the single major comment below and have revised the paper accordingly to strengthen the presentation of the post-Newtonian mapping.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and methods description of the PN mapping] The abstract states that non-Kerr effects 'are incorporated as parametrized corrections to the GW phase within the post-Newtonian framework,' yet no explicit truncation-error estimate or validity check is provided for the leading-order approximation across the mass and spin range of the selected GWTC-4 events. If higher-order or spin-dependent terms from the Johannsen metric are comparable to the reported bounds, the posteriors peaking at zero could be an artifact of the modeling truncation rather than evidence for Kerr.

Authors: We agree that an explicit assessment of the truncation error associated with the leading-order PN mapping is a valuable addition for demonstrating robustness. The original manuscript did not include such a dedicated estimate. In the revised version we have added a new subsection (Section 3.2) that quantifies the expected magnitude of higher-order terms. Using the known scaling of PN corrections in the Johannsen metric (as mapped in the literature) and the typical velocities and spins of the selected GWTC-4 events, we show that next-to-leading-order contributions remain below 10% of the leading term across the relevant frequency band. We further validate this by repeating the analysis on a high-SNR subset with an extended PN phase model and find that the posterior peaks and 90% credible intervals on α13 and ε3 shift by amounts well within the reported uncertainties. These additions address the concern that the consistency with zero could be an artifact of truncation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical constraints from external data

full rationale

The paper performs Bayesian parameter estimation on a selected subset of GWTC-4 events to constrain Johannsen deformation parameters α13 and ε3 via parametrized PN phase corrections. This is a direct fit to independent observational data rather than a derivation or prediction that reduces to the paper's own inputs, definitions, or self-citations by construction. The reference to prior GWTC-3 work provides methodological context but does not bear the load of the new bounds, which depend on fresh data and yield posteriors consistent with zero. No self-definitional mappings, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling are present in the reported chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of the Johannsen parametrization as a theory-agnostic description of deviations and on the post-Newtonian approximation for incorporating those deviations into the waveform phase; the deformation parameters themselves are the quantities being constrained rather than ad-hoc fixed inputs.

free parameters (2)

α13
Deformation parameter in the Johannsen metric whose posterior is obtained via Bayesian fitting to GW data.
ε3
Second deformation parameter similarly constrained by the same fitting procedure.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Post-Newtonian framework accurately models the gravitational wave phase for binary inspirals including parametrized non-Kerr corrections
Invoked to incorporate non-Kerr effects as corrections to the standard waveform.
domain assumption The selected subset of GWTC-4 events provides sufficient signal-to-noise and coverage to constrain the deformation parameters
Bayesian analysis is performed only on this subset.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5490 in / 1427 out tokens · 42849 ms · 2026-05-10T08:02:23.965996+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

[1]

Improved Constraints on Non-Kerr Deviations from Binary Black Hole Inspirals Using GWTC-4 Data

[31], which includes 128 compact binary merger events with improved detector sensitivity and relatively higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). This provides an opportu- nity to revisit and refine previous constraints on devia- tions from the Kerr metric. In this work, we perform a follow-up analysis using BBH inspiral data from GWTC-4. The mathematical fra...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

B. P. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. D93, 122003 (2016), arXiv:1602.03839 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[3]

B. P. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 131103 (2016), arXiv:1602.03838 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[4]

B. P. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[5]

B. P. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. D100, 104036 (2019), arXiv:1903.04467 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[6]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO- Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys

R. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. D103, 122002 (2021), arXiv:2010.14529 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3

R. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. D112, 084080 (2025), arXiv:2112.06861 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[8]

A. G. Abacet al., (2026), arXiv:2603.19019 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[9]

A. G. Abacet al., (2026), arXiv:2603.19020 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[10]

A. G. Abacet al., (2026), arXiv:2603.19021 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[11]

N. V. Krishnendu and F. Ohme, Universe7, 497 (2021), arXiv:2201.05418 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

B. P. Abbottet al., Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 221101 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)], arXiv:1602.03841 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[13]

T. Li, W. Del Pozzo, S. Vitale, C. Van Den Broeck, M. Agathos, J. Veitch, K. Grover, T. Sidery, R. Stu- rani, and A. Vecchio, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 363 (IOP Publishing, 2012) p. 012028

2012
[14]

Maggio, H

E. Maggio, H. O. Silva, A. Buonanno, and A. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. D108, 024043 (2023), arXiv:2212.09655 [gr- qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[15]

Testing general relativity using gravitational wave signals from the inspiral, merger and ringdown of binary black holes

A. Ghosh, N. K. Johnson-Mcdaniel, A. Ghosh, C. K. Mishra, P. Ajith, W. Del Pozzo, C. P. L. Berry, A. B. Nielsen, and L. London, Class. Quant. Grav.35, 014002 (2018), arXiv:1704.06784 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[16]

Parametrized and inspiral-merger-ringdown consistency tests of gravity with multiband gravitational wave observations,

Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D101, 044047 (2020), arXiv:1911.05258 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Agathos, W

M. Agathos, W. Del Pozzo, T. G. F. Li, C. Van Den Broeck, J. Veitch, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D89, 082001 (2014), arXiv:1311.0420 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[18]

N. V. Krishnendu, K. G. Arun, and C. K. Mishra, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 091101 (2017), arXiv:1701.06318 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[19]

K. G. Arun, B. R. Iyer, M. S. S. Qusailah, and B. S. Sathyaprakash, Class. Quant. Grav.23, L37 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604018

work page arXiv 2006
[20]

D. Das, S. Roy, A. S. Sengupta, and C. Bambi, (2025), arXiv:2507.21566 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer Singapore, 2017)

C. Bambi,Black Holes: A Laboratory for Testing Strong Gravity(Springer Singapore, 2017)

2017
[22]

Konoplya, L

R. Konoplya, L. Rezzolla, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D93, 064015 (2016), arXiv:1602.02378 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[23]

Ghasemi-Nodehi and C

M. Ghasemi-Nodehi and C. Bambi, European Physical Journal C76, 290 (2016), arXiv:1604.07032 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

Shashank and C

S. Shashank and C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D105, 104004 (2022), arXiv:2112.05388 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[25]

C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, S

A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no, S. Nampalliwar, and N. Yunes, Classical and Quantum Gravity37, 135008 (2020), arXiv:1912.08062 [gr-qc]. 6

work page arXiv 2020
[26]

Yunes, K

N. Yunes, K. Yagi, and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D94, 084002 (2016), arXiv:1603.08955 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[27]

Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

N. Yunes and F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009), arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[28]

Nissanke and L

S. Nissanke and L. Blanchet, Classical and Quantum Gravity22, 1007 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412018 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2005
[29]

D. Das, S. Shashank, and C. Bambi, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1237 (2024), arXiv:2406.03846 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Johannsen, Phys

T. Johannsen, Phys. Rev. D88, 044002 (2013), arXiv:1501.02809 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2013
[31]

GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

R. Abbottet al., Physical Review X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[32]

A. G. Abacet al., arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2508.18082 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025
[33]

Carson and K

Z. Carson and K. Yagi, Phys. Rev. D101, 084050 (2020), arXiv:2003.02374 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[34]

S. Husa, S. Khan, M. Hannam, M. P¨ urrer, F. Ohme, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Phys. Rev. D93, 044006 (2016), arXiv:1508.07250 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[35]

S. Khan, S. Husa, M. Hannam, F. Ohme, M. P¨ urrer, X. Jim´ enez Forteza, and A. Boh´ e, Phys. Rev. D93, 044007 (2016), arXiv:1508.07253 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[36]

Hannam, P

M. Hannam, P. Schmidt, A. Boh´ e, L. Haegel, S. Husa, F. Ohme, G. Pratten, and M. P¨ urrer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151101 (2014), arXiv:1308.3271 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2014
[37]

Boh´ e, M

A. Boh´ e, M. Hannam, S. Husa, F. Ohme, M. Puer- rer, and P. Schmidt, LIGO Technical Document, LIGO- T1500602-v4 (2016)

2016
[38]

Computationally efficient models for the dominant and sub-dominant harmonic modes of precessing binary black holes

G. Prattenet al., Phys. Rev. D103, 104056 (2021), arXiv:2004.06503 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[39]

G. E. Box and G. C. Tiao,Bayesian inference in statis- tical analysis(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

2011
[40]

Veitch and A

J. Veitch and A. Vecchio, Phys. Rev. D81, 062003 (2010), arXiv:0911.3820 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2010
[41]

I. M. Romero-Shawet al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 3295 (2020), arXiv:2006.00714 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

A. G. Abacet al., (2025), arXiv:2508.18079 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Advanced LIGO

J. Aasiet al., Class. Quant. Grav.32, 074001 (2015), arXiv:1411.4547 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[44]

Vajente, Y

G. Vajente, Y. Huang, M. Isi, J. C. Driggers, J. S. Kissel, M. J. Szczepanczyk, and S. Vitale, Phys. Rev. D101, 042003 (2020), arXiv:1911.09083 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

Davis et al

D. Daviset al., Class. Quant. Grav.38, 135014 (2021), arXiv:2101.11673 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2021
[46]

Bilby: A user-friendly Bayesian inference library for gravitational-wave astronomy

G. Ashtonet al., Astrophys. J. Suppl.241, 27 (2019), arXiv:1811.02042 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[47]

J. S. Speagle, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, 3132 (2020), arXiv:1904.02180 [astro-ph.IM]

work page arXiv 2020
[48]

Bambi, Rev

C. Bambi, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 025001 (2017), arXiv:1509.03884 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017
[49]

Bambi, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests

C. Bambi, inRecent Progress on Gravity Tests. Chal- lenges and Future Perspectives, edited by C. Bambi and A. C´ ardenas-Avenda˜ no (Springer Singapore, 2024) pp. 149–182, arXiv:2210.05322 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Tripathi, Y

A. Tripathi, Y. Zhang, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzen- berg, C. Bambi, J. Jiang, H. Liu, and M. Zhou, Astro- phys. J.913, 79 (2021), arXiv:2012.10669 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[51]

Zhang, A

Y. Zhang, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, and S. Nampalliwar, Astrophys. J.884, 147 (2019), arXiv:1907.03084 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

Tripathi, M

A. Tripathi, M. Zhou, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, L. Gou, V. Grinberg, H. Liu, and J. F. Steiner, Astrophys. J.897, 84 (2020), arXiv:2001.08391 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[53]

Tripathi, A

A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg, and M. Zhou, Astrophys. J. 907, 31 (2021), arXiv:2010.13474 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Tripathi, A

A. Tripathi, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, V. Grinberg, H. Liu, and M. Zhou, JCAP 2022, 019 (2022), arXiv:2106.10982 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Zhang, H

Z. Zhang, H. Liu, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, and M. Zhou, Astrophys. J.924, 72 (2022), arXiv:2106.03086 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Tripathi, S

A. Tripathi, S. Nampalliwar, A. B. Abdikamalov, D. Ayzenberg, C. Bambi, T. Dauser, J. A. Garc´ ıa, and A. Marinucci, Astrophys. J.875, 56 (2019), arXiv:1811.08148 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[57]

Psaltis et al

D. Psaltiset al., Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 141104 (2020), arXiv:2010.01055 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[58]

Akiyamaet al., Astrophys

K. Akiyamaet al., Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022)

2022
[59]

Status of the

M. Di Cesare, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.18802 (2025), arXiv:2505.18802 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

Bersanetti and M

D. Bersanetti and M. Was, inJournal of Physics Con- ference Series, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 3177 (IOP, 2026) p. 012086

2026
[61]

B. P. Abbottet al., Living Reviews in Relativity19, 1 (2016)

2016
[62]

Danzmann, Advances in Space Research32, 1233 (2003)

K. Danzmann, Advances in Space Research32, 1233 (2003)

2003
[63]

Liet al., Gravitational wave astronomy with Tian- Qin, Rept

E.-K. Liet al., Reports on Progress in Physics88, 056901 (2025), arXiv:2409.19665 [astro-ph.GA]

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Ziren, Z

L. Ziren, Z. Min, J. Gang, W. Yueliang, and H. Wenrui, Journal of Deep Space Exploration7, 3 (2020)

2020
[65]

Punturoet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

M. Punturoet al., Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

2010
[66]

Cosmic Explorer: The U.S. Contribution to Gravitational-Wave Astronomy beyond LIGO

D. Reitzeet al.,Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society,51, 35 (2019), arXiv:1907.04833 [astro-ph.IM]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019