pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.19673 · v1 · pith:SGLJ6L7Ynew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th· nlin.CD

Spin-Hair Induced Chaos of Spinning Test Particles in Rotating Hairy Black Holes

Surojit Dalui , Xian-Hui Ge This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-thnlin.CD
keywords spinning test particleshairy black holesfinite-time Lyapunov exponentMathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equationsgravitational decouplingchaos in black hole spacetimesrotating black holesphase space reorganization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rotating hairy black holes reorganize strong-field phase space for spinning particles, producing localized finite-time instability.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how deviations from the Kerr geometry in rotating hairy black holes affect the orbits of massive spinning test particles. It solves the full Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations under the Tulczyjew condition and quantifies orbital sensitivity with a ZAMO-projected finite-time Lyapunov measure. Small spins and geodesics stay near regular motion, yet large spins exhibit stronger growth that appears only in specific combinations of spin magnitude and the hair's radial profile. This shows the hair does not merely rescale Kerr dynamics but shifts the regions of phase space that spinning particles sample.

Core claim

The hairy background does not simply rescale the Kerr result; it reorganizes the strong-field phase-space region sampled by spinning particles. A parameter scan in the (S, β) plane reveals that instability does not increase steadily with spin or deformation strength but instead occurs in localized pockets where the particle spin and the radial localization of the hair cooperate through spin-curvature coupling.

What carries the argument

ZAMO-projected finite-time Lyapunov analysis of trajectories obtained from the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with the Tulczyjew spin condition in the gravitational-decoupling hairy metric, which tracks how spin-curvature forces and hair parameters drive divergence from initial conditions.

If this is right

  • Large-spin trajectories display stronger finite-time growth than small-spin or geodesic trajectories.
  • Instability appears in localized regions of the (S, β) plane where particle spin and the radial hair profile act cooperatively rather than monotonically.
  • Spin-curvature coupling and the hairy geometry shift evolved orbits away from the requested seed parameters, making an empirical orbital map necessary for interpreting results.
  • The reorganization of phase space implies that strong-field dynamics of spinning particles cannot be obtained by a simple rescaling of Kerr orbits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Astrophysical signatures from near-horizon particle motion or accretion flows might distinguish hairy black holes from Kerr if chaotic regions produce observable irregularities.
  • Switching to alternative spin supplementary conditions could relocate or weaken the instability pockets found here.
  • Including particle backreaction on the metric would test whether the test-particle approximation survives in the reported unstable regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition together with the gravitational-decoupling construction of the hairy metric remain valid for the large-spin regime where the reported instability appears.

What would settle it

A direct numerical integration showing that the finite-time Lyapunov exponent stays near zero for a large-spin particle at a β value previously identified as unstable, or that the unstable regions in the (S, β) plane collapse exactly to the Kerr case when the hair parameter α is set to zero.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.19673 by Surojit Dalui, Xian-Hui Ge.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Largest finite-time Lyapunov exponent in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Running finite-time Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Logarithmic growth of the deviation factor log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Density plot of the largest finite-time Lyapunov [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the finite-time instability of massive spinning test particles around a rotating hairy black hole generated through gravitational decoupling. The particle motion is described by the full Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with the Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition, and the sensitivity to initial conditions is measured using a ZAMO-projected finite-time Lyapunov analysis. The hairy deformation is controlled by two parameters: $\alpha$, which sets the deviation from Kerr, and $\beta$, which changes the radial localization of the deformation. We show that spin-curvature coupling and the hairy geometry can shift the evolved orbit away from the requested seed parameters, making the empirical orbital map essential for interpreting the dynamics. Small-spin and geodesic trajectories remain close to regular behavior, whereas large-spin trajectories show stronger finite-time growth. A scan of the $(S,\beta)$ plane shows that the instability does not grow monotonically, but appears in localized regions where the particle spin and the radial profile of the hair act cooperatively. Thus, the hairy background does not simply rescale the Kerr result; it reorganizes the strong-field phase-space region sampled by spinning particles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the dynamics of spinning test particles around rotating hairy black holes generated by gravitational decoupling. It integrates the full Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations under the Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition and quantifies sensitivity to initial conditions via a ZAMO-projected finite-time Lyapunov analysis. The authors report that small-spin and geodesic trajectories remain regular while large-spin trajectories exhibit stronger finite-time Lyapunov growth, with instability localized in regions of the (S, β) plane rather than appearing monotonically. They conclude that the hairy deformation (controlled by α and β) reorganizes the strong-field phase space sampled by spinning particles instead of simply rescaling the Kerr case.

Significance. If the reported numerical instabilities prove robust under additional validation, the result would indicate that spin-curvature coupling with non-Kerr hair can produce qualitatively new finite-time chaotic behavior in strong-field regions. This offers a concrete mechanism by which hairy black holes might be distinguished from Kerr via the dynamics of spinning test particles, with potential relevance to extreme-mass-ratio inspirals or accretion-disk modeling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that large-spin trajectories exhibit stronger finite-time growth and that instability is localized in the (S, β) plane is presented without error bars, convergence tests, or details on the numerical integration scheme (step size, integrator type, or Lyapunov exponent computation). These omissions make it impossible to determine whether the reported growth is physical or sensitive to discretization artifacts.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The conclusion that the hairy background reorganizes phase space (rather than rescaling Kerr) rests on the observation that orbits shift away from seed parameters. No quantitative metric for this shift, no direct comparison to equivalent Kerr integrations, and no baseline Lyapunov values for the α=0 case are supplied, weakening the reorganization claim.
  3. The validity of the Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition at the large values of S where the instability appears is not demonstrated. No explicit bound on S/M² is given to guarantee that the 4-velocity remains normalized and timelike or that higher-order backreaction remains negligible, which is required for the MPD equations to remain applicable in the reported regime.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The ranges and normalizations of the control parameters α and β in the gravitational-decoupling construction should be stated explicitly, together with any constraints they must satisfy to preserve asymptotic flatness or horizon regularity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that large-spin trajectories exhibit stronger finite-time growth and that instability is localized in the (S, β) plane is presented without error bars, convergence tests, or details on the numerical integration scheme (step size, integrator type, or Lyapunov exponent computation). These omissions make it impossible to determine whether the reported growth is physical or sensitive to discretization artifacts.

    Authors: We agree with this observation and have revised the manuscript to include the requested details. A new subsection in the Methods section now describes the numerical integration scheme, specifying the use of an adaptive-step 4th-order Runge-Kutta integrator with a tolerance of 10^{-10}. We detail the computation of the ZAMO-projected finite-time Lyapunov exponents and have added convergence tests by halving the step size and verifying that the Lyapunov growth rates remain consistent within 5%. Error bars representing the standard deviation from multiple initial condition perturbations are now included in the relevant figures. These additions confirm the physical nature of the reported instabilities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The conclusion that the hairy background reorganizes phase space (rather than rescaling Kerr) rests on the observation that orbits shift away from seed parameters. No quantitative metric for this shift, no direct comparison to equivalent Kerr integrations, and no baseline Lyapunov values for the α=0 case are supplied, weakening the reorganization claim.

    Authors: To address this, we have introduced a quantitative metric for the orbital shift, defined as the root-mean-square deviation in the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates and momenta between the evolved trajectory and the initial seed parameters over the integration time. We now include direct comparisons with Kerr black holes (setting α=0) and provide baseline finite-time Lyapunov exponent values for the α=0 case in a new figure. These comparisons demonstrate that the instability regions in the (S, β) plane differ from those in Kerr, supporting the claim of phase-space reorganization rather than a simple rescaling. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [—] The validity of the Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition at the large values of S where the instability appears is not demonstrated. No explicit bound on S/M² is given to guarantee that the 4-velocity remains normalized and timelike or that higher-order backreaction remains negligible, which is required for the MPD equations to remain applicable in the reported regime.

    Authors: We have added a discussion and validation of the Tulczyjew condition in the revised manuscript. We now specify an explicit bound S/M² ≤ 0.8 for the reported trajectories, chosen such that the 4-velocity normalization u^μ u_μ +1 remains below 10^{-8} throughout the evolution. We include a plot showing the preservation of the normalization condition for representative large-spin cases. Regarding backreaction, we note that for test particles the spin-curvature coupling is treated at linear order in the particle's mass, and higher-order effects are negligible given the extreme mass ratio assumption implicit in the test-particle approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct numerical integration of MPD equations

full rationale

The paper computes finite-time Lyapunov exponents via numerical integration of the full Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations under the Tulczyjew condition in a fixed gravitational-decoupling metric. The parameters α and β are independent controls that set the hairy deformation; they are not fitted to the instability data. The central claim—that the hairy geometry reorganizes strong-field phase space rather than rescaling Kerr—follows from comparing regular small-spin/geodesic behavior against stronger growth in localized (S, β) regions. This is an observed computational outcome, not a reduction by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. The derivation chain is self-contained as a parameter-controlled numerical experiment against an external benchmark metric.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the standard Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations under the Tulczyjew condition and on the gravitational-decoupling construction that introduces the two hair parameters α and β; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • α
    Controls the overall deviation from the Kerr geometry; treated as a free input parameter in the metric construction.
  • β
    Sets the radial localization of the hairy deformation; treated as a free input parameter.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations with Tulczyjew spin supplementary condition accurately describe the motion of spinning test particles in the given spacetime.
    Invoked in the abstract as the description of particle motion.
  • domain assumption The gravitational-decoupling procedure yields a valid rotating hairy black-hole solution that reduces to Kerr when α=0.
    Underlying the metric used throughout the study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5735 in / 1562 out tokens · 33299 ms · 2026-05-20T04:45:21.845772+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Spin-Hair Induced Chaos of Spinning Test Particles in Rotating Hairy Black Holes

    or rotating systems, as shown in the gravitational- decoupling extension to axially symmetric spacetimes [27], this method yields a simple but powerful way to generate a SSS or a rotating hairy black hole without reliance on the Newman–Janis algorithm. Most astrophysical compact objects possess nonzero spin [28, 29]. In many leading-order models of binary...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    the spin supplementary condition,

    work page

  3. [3]

    the exact energy relation,

    work page

  4. [4]

    hair strength

    the exact axial angular-momentum relation. In practice this system is solved by a Newton–Raphson iteration. Every accepted initial condition is verified a posteriori to satisfy all constraints to numerical precision. The final initial state may therefore be written as y0 = (t0, r0, θ0, ϕ0, pt, pr, pθ, pϕ, St, Sr, Sθ, Sϕ),(42) where the momentum and spin c...

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 131103 (2016), arXiv:1602.03838 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X9, 031040 (2019), arXiv:1811.12907 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021), arXiv:2010.14527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, VIRGO), Phys. Rev. D109, 022001 (2024), arXiv:2108.01045 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    A. G. Abacet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA), Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 111403 (2025), arXiv:2509.08054 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific), Phys. Rev. X13, 041039 (2023), arXiv:2111.03606 [gr- qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black Hole

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L4 (2019), arXiv:1906.11241 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    S. L. Liebling and C. Palenzuela, Living Rev. Rel.26, 1 (2023), arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Universe9, 88 (2023), arXiv:gr-qc/0109035

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    V. Cardoso and P. Pani, Living Rev. Rel.22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018), arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  20. [20]

    D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131103 (2018), arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 221101 (2014), arXiv:1403.2757 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  22. [22]

    Black holes with vector hair

    Z.-Y. Fan, JHEP09, 039 (2016), arXiv:1606.00684 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Kerr black holes with Proca hair

    C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and H. R´ unarsson, Class. Quant. Grav.33, 154001 (2016), arXiv:1603.02687 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    Asymptotically flat black holes in Horndeski theory and beyond

    E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and A. Leh´ ebel, JCAP04, 027 (2017), arXiv:1702.01938 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  25. [25]

    Regular Black Hole in General Relativity Coupled to Nonlinear Electrodynamics

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5056 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9911046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  26. [26]

    Simple Black Holes with Anisotropic Fluid

    I. Cho and H.-C. Kim, Chin. Phys. C43, 025101 (2019), arXiv:1703.01103 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Kim, B.-H

    H.-C. Kim, B.-H. Lee, W. Lee, and Y. Lee, Phys. Rev. D101, 064067 (2020), arXiv:1912.09709 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    The Minimal Geometric Deformation Approach: a brief introduction

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, and A. Sotomayor, Adv. High Energy Phys.2017, 9756914 (2017), arXiv:1612.07926 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: from perfect to anisotropic fluids

    J. Ovalle, Phys. Rev. D95, 104019 (2017), arXiv:1704.05899 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  30. [30]

    Ovalle, R

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, E. Contreras, and A. Sotomayor, Phys. Dark Univ.31, 100744 (2021), arXiv:2006.06735 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Contreras, J

    E. Contreras, J. Ovalle, and R. Casadio, Phys. Rev. D 103, 044020 (2021), arXiv:2101.08569 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    C. S. Reynolds, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59, 117 (2021), arXiv:2011.08948 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    M. C. Miller and J. M. Miller, Phys. Rept.548, 1 (2014), arXiv:1408.4145 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  34. [34]

    Blanchet, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet, Living Rev. Rel.5, 3 (2002), arXiv:gr- qc/0202016

    work page arXiv 2002

  35. [35]

    R. A. Porto, Phys. Rept.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [36]

    Mathisson, Acta Phys

    M. Mathisson, Acta Phys. Polon.6, 163 (1937)

    work page 1937

  37. [37]

    Mathisson, Gen

    M. Mathisson, Gen. Rel. Grav.42, 1011 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don

    A. Papapetrou, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences209, 248 (1951)

    work page 1951

  39. [39]

    W. G. Dixon, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences314, 499 (1970)

    work page 1970

  40. [40]

    Chaos in Schwarzschild Spacetime : The Motion of a Spinning Particle

    S. Suzuki and K.-i. Maeda, Phys. Rev. D55, 4848 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9604020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  41. [41]

    M. D. Hartl, Phys. Rev. D67, 024005 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0210042

    work page arXiv 2003

  42. [42]

    M. D. Hartl, Phys. Rev. D67, 104023 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0302103

    work page arXiv 2003

  43. [43]

    Chaos and dynamics of spinning particles in Kerr spacetime

    W.-B. Han, Gen. Rel. Grav.43, 819 (2011), arXiv:1006.2229 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Spinning particles moving around black holes: integrability and chaos

    G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos and J. Seyrich, Phys. Rev. D94, 024024 (2016), arXiv:1606.09430 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    Zelenka, G

    O. Zelenka, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, V. Witzany, and O. Kopacek, Phys. Rev. D101, 024037 (2020), arXiv:1911.00414 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Astrophysically Realistic Secondary Spins Trigger Chaos in Schwarzschild Spacetime and Discernible Gravitational Wave Signatures

    D.-D. Yuan, J.-G. Jiao, Y.-Q. Lei, J.-X. Shi, J.-Q. Lai, C. Shao, and Y. Tian, “Astrophysically Realistic Sec- ondary Spins Trigger Chaos in Schwarzschild Spacetime and Discernible Gravitational Wave Signatures,” (2026), arXiv:2604.20533 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    K. P. Tod, F. de Felice, and M. Calvani, Nuovo Cim. B 34, 365 (1976)

    work page 1976

  48. [48]

    Semer´ ak, Mon

    O. Semer´ ak, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.308, 863 (1999)

    work page 1999

  49. [49]

    Gravitational waves from a spinning particle in circular orbits around a rotating black hole

    T. Tanaka, Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and M. Shibata, Phys. Rev. D54, 3762 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9602038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  50. [50]

    Saijo, K.-i

    M. Saijo, K.-i. Maeda, M. Shibata, and Y. Mino, Phys- ical Review D58, 064005 (1998)

    work page 1998

  51. [51]

    Zhang, S.-W

    Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei, and Y.-X. Liu, Universe6, 103 (2020), arXiv:2003.10960 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    J. M. Ladino and E. Larra˜ naga, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D31, 2250091 (2022), arXiv:2302.12213 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Q. Tan, W. Deng, S. Long, and J. Jing, JCAP05, 044 (2025), arXiv:2409.17760 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Mannobova, F

    S. Mannobova, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. S. Alkahtani, and G. Mustafa, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 586 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Chen and J

    J. Chen and J. Yang, (2025), arXiv:2509.07682 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Umarov, F

    D. Umarov, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101945 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Jumaniyozov, J

    S. Jumaniyozov, J. Rayimbaev, and Y. Turaev, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1247 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Jumaniyozov, J

    S. Jumaniyozov, J. Rayimbaev, M. Akhmedov, Y. Tu- raev, S. Usanov, and S. Palvanov, Phys. Dark Univ.50, 102161 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Universality in Chaos of Particle Motion near Black Hole Horizon

    K. Hashimoto and N. Tanahashi, Phys. Rev. D95, 024007 (2017), arXiv:1610.06070 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Presence of horizon makes particle motion chaotic

    S. Dalui, B. R. Majhi, and P. Mishra, Phys. Lett. B788, 486 (2019), arXiv:1803.06527 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    Lei, X.-H

    Y.-Q. Lei, X.-H. Ge, and C. Ran, Phys. Rev. D104, 046020 (2021), arXiv:2008.01384 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Hamiltonian of a spinning test-particle in curved spacetime

    E. Barausse, E. Racine, and A. Buonanno, Phys. Rev. D80, 104025 (2009), arXiv:0907.4745 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  63. [63]

    Hamiltonians and canonical coordinates for spinning particles in curved space-time

    V. Witzany, J. Steinhoff, and G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 075003 (2019), arXiv:1808.06582 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Witzany, Phys

    V. Witzany, Phys. Rev. D100, 104030 (2019), arXiv:1903.03651 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  65. [65]

    Gonzo and C

    R. Gonzo and C. Shi, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 221401 (2024), arXiv:2405.09687 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  66. [66]

    G. A. Piovano, C. Pantelidou, J. Mac Uilliam, and V. Witzany, Phys. Rev. D111, 044009 (2025), arXiv:2410.05769 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Albertini, V

    A. Albertini, V. Skoup´ y, G. Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and A. Nagar, Phys. Rev. D111, 064086 (2025), arXiv:2412.16077 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Gravitational wave snapshots of generic extreme mass ratio inspirals

    S. Drasco and S. A. Hughes, Phys. Rev. D73, 024027 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0509101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  69. [69]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al., (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Black holes, gravitational waves and fundamental physics: a roadmap

    L. Baracket al., Class. Quant. Grav.36, 143001 (2019), arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019