pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.18976 · v1 · pith:D2UMORX2new · submitted 2024-10-24 · 💻 cs.CV · cs.AI· cs.CL· cs.CY· cs.LG

CAMEL-Bench: A Comprehensive Arabic LMM Benchmark

classification 💻 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.LG
keywords understandingbenchmarkcamel-benchevaluationlmmsarabicbenchmarksclosed-source
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed a significant interest in developing large multimodal models (LMMs) capable of performing various visual reasoning and understanding tasks. This has led to the introduction of multiple LMM benchmarks to evaluate LMMs on different tasks. However, most existing LMM evaluation benchmarks are predominantly English-centric. In this work, we develop a comprehensive LMM evaluation benchmark for the Arabic language to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. The proposed benchmark, named CAMEL-Bench, comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains including, multi-image understanding, complex visual perception, handwritten document understanding, video understanding, medical imaging, plant diseases, and remote sensing-based land use understanding to evaluate broad scenario generalizability. Our CAMEL-Bench comprises around 29,036 questions that are filtered from a larger pool of samples, where the quality is manually verified by native speakers to ensure reliable model assessment. We conduct evaluations of both closed-source, including GPT-4 series, and open-source LMMs. Our analysis reveals the need for substantial improvement, especially among the best open-source models, with even the closed-source GPT-4o achieving an overall score of 62%. Our benchmark and evaluation scripts are open-sourced.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Almieyar-Oryx-BloomBench: A Bilingual Multimodal Benchmark for Cognitively Informed Evaluation of Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BloomBench reveals that state-of-the-art VLMs perform well on semantic understanding but struggle with factual recall and creative synthesis, while also showing large English-Arabic performance gaps.