Music for All: Representational Bias and Cross-Cultural Adaptability of Music Generation Models
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:G6G27MJGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
The advent of Music-Language Models has greatly enhanced the automatic music generation capability of AI systems, but they are also limited in their coverage of the musical genres and cultures of the world. We present a study of the datasets and research papers for music generation and quantify the bias and under-representation of genres. We find that only 5.7% of the total hours of existing music datasets come from non-Western genres, which naturally leads to disparate performance of the models across genres. We then investigate the efficacy of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques in mitigating this bias. Our experiments with two popular models -- MusicGen and Mustango, for two underrepresented non-Western music traditions -- Hindustani Classical and Turkish Makam music, highlight the promises as well as the non-triviality of cross-genre adaptation of music through small datasets, implying the need for more equitable baseline music-language models that are designed for cross-cultural transfer learning.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Persian MusicGen: A Large-Scale Dataset and Culturally-Aware Generative Model for Persian Music
Introduces the first large-scale Persian music dataset and shows fine-tuned MusicGen produces compositions more aligned with Persian stylistic conventions via tag-based evaluation.
-
Cross-Cultural Bias in Mel-Scale Representations: Evidence and Alternatives from Speech and Music
Mel-scale features exhibit measurable cultural bias with 12.5% higher WER on tonal languages and 15.7% F1 drop on non-Western music, while adaptive alternatives reduce these gaps substantially.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.