Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

AV-Odyssey Bench: Can Your Multimodal LLMs Really Understand Audio-Visual Information?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.02611 v1 pith:HWXWQCCX submitted 2024-12-03 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.MMcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.MMcs.SDeess.AS
keywords modelsaudio-visualaudiobenchmarkmllmsav-odysseybenchdetermining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, multimodal large language models (MLLMs), such as GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and Reka Core, have expanded their capabilities to include vision and audio modalities. While these models demonstrate impressive performance across a wide range of audio-visual applications, our proposed DeafTest reveals that MLLMs often struggle with simple tasks humans find trivial: 1) determining which of two sounds is louder, and 2) determining which of two sounds has a higher pitch. Motivated by these observations, we introduce AV-Odyssey Bench, a comprehensive audio-visual benchmark designed to assess whether those MLLMs can truly understand the audio-visual information. This benchmark encompasses 4,555 carefully crafted problems, each incorporating text, visual, and audio components. To successfully infer answers, models must effectively leverage clues from both visual and audio inputs. To ensure precise and objective evaluation of MLLM responses, we have structured the questions as multiple-choice, eliminating the need for human evaluation or LLM-assisted assessment. We benchmark a series of closed-source and open-source models and summarize the observations. By revealing the limitations of current models, we aim to provide useful insight for future dataset collection and model development.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MAGNET: A Multi-agent Framework for Finding Audio-Visual Needles by Reasoning over Multi-Video Haystacks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AVHaystacks is a new 3100-question benchmark for audio-visual QA across 500 videos, and the MAGNET multi-agent pipeline beats current baselines on it.

  2. AV-Reasoner: Improving and Benchmarking Clue-Grounded Audio-Visual Counting for MLLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A clue-grounded audio-visual counting benchmark over 497 long videos and an RL-trained counting model, whose headline result is undermined by training on the DVD-Counting evaluation benchmark.

  3. MME-Reasoning: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Logical Reasoning in MLLMs

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 1,188-question multimodal benchmark covering deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning shows that leading MLLMs score around 60% and are especially weak at abductive reasoning.

  4. Learning Sparsity for Effective and Efficient Music Performance Question Answering

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Sparsify reports state-of-the-art accuracy on Music AVQA benchmarks by borrowing three existing sparsification techniques, cutting training time by 28% and retaining 70-80% of accuracy on a 25% data subset.

Pith tools