The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2401.03601 · v1 · pith:KTOMXPLV · submitted 2024-01-07 · cs.CL · cs.AI

InFoBench: Evaluating Instruction Following Ability in Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:KTOMXPLVrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords drfrinstructionsllmsmetricabilitybenchmarkcomplexdecomposed
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This paper introduces the Decomposed Requirements Following Ratio (DRFR), a new metric for evaluating Large Language Models' (LLMs) ability to follow instructions. Addressing a gap in current methodologies, DRFR breaks down complex instructions into simpler criteria, facilitating a detailed analysis of LLMs' compliance with various aspects of tasks. Alongside this metric, we present InFoBench, a benchmark comprising 500 diverse instructions and 2,250 decomposed questions across multiple constraint categories. Our experiments compare DRFR with traditional scoring methods and explore annotation sources, including human experts, crowd-sourced workers, and GPT-4. The findings demonstrate DRFR's higher reliability and the effectiveness of using GPT-4 as a cost-efficient annotator. The evaluation of several advanced LLMs using this framework reveals their strengths and areas needing improvement, particularly in complex instruction-following. This study contributes a novel metric and benchmark, offering insights for future LLM development and evaluation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 14 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. IFMTBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multilingual Translation Instruction Following

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    IFMTBench is a new benchmark for multilingual translation instruction following that tests models on single and multi-constraint scenarios using deterministic checkers and LLM judges.

  2. SpatialGrammar: A Domain-Specific Language for LLM-Based 3D Indoor Scene Generation

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SpatialGrammar provides a grid-based DSL and compiler that lets LLMs generate collision-free 3D indoor scenes more reliably than raw-coordinate or code-based approaches.

  3. SAGE: A Service Agent Graph-guided Evaluation Benchmark

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SAGE is a new multi-agent benchmark that formalizes service SOPs as dynamic dialogue graphs to measure LLM agents on logical compliance and path coverage, uncovering an execution gap and empathy resilience across 27 m...

  4. Language Models Don't Know What You Want: Evaluating Personalization in Deep Research Needs Real Users

    cs.CL 2026-03 conditional novelty 7.0

    Personalized deep research systems need evaluation with real users because LLM judges overlook nuanced errors that matter to researchers.

  5. Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Instruction-Induction Conflict in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Experiments reveal that LLMs follow instructions at rates from 1% to 99% when opposed by hardcoded conflicting patterns, with robustness tied to output diversity and alignment with model priors rather than general capability.

  6. Do as I Say, Not as I Do: Instruction-Induction Conflict in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LLMs show instruction-following rates from 1% to 99% when instructions conflict with hardcoded pattern demonstrations, with output diversity as the main predictor of resistance.

  7. Beyond Fixed Benchmarks and Worst-Case Attacks: Dynamic Boundary Evaluation for Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamic Boundary Evaluation adaptively identifies each LLM's performance boundary on a shared difficulty scale using a calibrated item bank and a search algorithm.

  8. Beyond Fixed Benchmarks and Worst-Case Attacks: Dynamic Boundary Evaluation for Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Dynamic Boundary Evaluation locates each LLM's performance boundary at ~50% pass probability via a calibrated item bank and Skill-Guided Boundary Search algorithm to enable unified, adaptive evaluations across safety,...

  9. Token-Level LLM Collaboration via FusionRoute

    cs.AI 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    FusionRoute augments token-level expert routing with a trainable complementary logit generator to expand the policy class and recover optimal decoding under mild conditions, outperforming prior collaboration and mergi...

  10. Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    PRIME enables online process reward model updates in LLM RL using implicit rewards from rollouts and outcome labels, yielding 15.1% average gains on reasoning benchmarks and surpassing a stronger instruct model with 1...

  11. SingGuard: A Policy-Adaptive Multimodal LLM Guardrail with Dynamic Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SingGuard presents a policy-adaptive multimodal LLM guardrail family with hybrid reasoning regimes and a new benchmark of 56,340 examples, claiming SOTA F1 across 35 datasets and improved policy adherence under runtim...

  12. SingGuard: A Policy-Adaptive Multimodal LLM Guardrail with Dynamic Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    SingGuard introduces a policy-adaptive multimodal LLM guardrail with dynamic reasoning regimes and SingGuard-Bench, reporting SOTA F1 scores across 35 datasets and improved policy-following accuracy under runtime shifts.

  13. ComplexConstraints and Beyond: Expert Rubrics for RLVR

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Expert-curated rubrics in the new ComplexConstraints dataset improve LLM instruction following by 12-15% when used as RL training signals, with gains transferring to out-of-distribution agentic benchmarks.

  14. Intelligent Drill-Down: Large Language Model-Driven Drill-Down Technique for Human-AI Collaborative Visual Exploration

    cs.HC 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An LLM-based framework recommends drill-down paths in visual analytics by approximating a greedy algorithm, interpreting user intent, and managing exploration branches to reduce cognitive load.