The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2411.07191 · v2 · pith:Q6CQSEQJ · submitted 2024-11-11 · cs.CL · cs.AI

The Super Weight in Large Language Models

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:Q6CQSEQJrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords superweightlargemodeloutliersparametersquantizationweights
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Recent works have shown a surprising result: a small fraction of Large Language Model (LLM) parameter outliers are disproportionately important to the quality of the model. LLMs contain billions of parameters, so these small fractions, such as 0.01%, translate to hundreds of thousands of parameters. In this work, we present an even more surprising finding: Pruning as few as a single parameter can destroy an LLM's ability to generate text -- increasing perplexity by 3 orders of magnitude and reducing zero-shot accuracy to guessing. We propose a data-free method for identifying such parameters, termed super weights, using a single forward pass through the model. We additionally find that these super weights induce correspondingly rare and large activation outliers, termed super activations. When preserved with high precision, super activations can improve simple round-to-nearest quantization to become competitive with state-of-the-art methods. For weight quantization, we similarly find that by preserving the super weight and clipping other weight outliers, round-to-nearest quantization can scale to much larger block sizes than previously considered. To facilitate further research into super weights, we provide an index of super weight coordinates for common, openly available LLMs.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Supernodes and Halos: Loss-Critical Hubs in LLM Feed-Forward Layers

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    In LLM feed-forward networks, the top 1% of channels per layer carry a median 58.7% of loss sensitivity, forming supernodes whose protection enables effective 50% sparsity pruning with much lower perplexity than baselines.

  2. Preserving Long-Tailed Expert Information in Mixture-of-Experts Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A new SFT framework for MoE models combines bias-driven sparsification with gated condenser experts to retain long-tailed expert information, outperforming DenseMixer and ESFT by over 2.5% on math reasoning and common...

  3. AgenTEE: Confidential LLM Agent Execution on Edge Devices

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AgenTEE isolates LLM agent runtime, inference, and apps in independently attested cVMs on Arm-based edge devices, achieving under 5.15% overhead versus commodity OS deployments.

  4. Attention Sink in Transformers: A Survey on Utilization, Interpretation, and Mitigation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The first survey on Attention Sink in Transformers structures the literature around fundamental utilization, mechanistic interpretation, and strategic mitigation.

  5. Ablation-Reversible Heads Don't Transfer: A Stress Test for Mechanistic Role Claims in Transformers

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Standard tests for mechanistic roles in transformer attention heads are insufficient because heads that pass them fail to transfer computations across prompts under matched controls.

  6. A Two-Parameter Weibull Framework for Diagnosing Transformer Weight Distributions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A Weibull diagnostic framework classifies transformer weight matrices into consistent functional classes via the shape parameter k and tracks training progress via the scale parameter lambda across multiple architectures.

  7. Perturbation Probing: A Two-Pass-per-Prompt Diagnostic for FFN Behavioral Circuits in Aligned LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Perturbation probing identifies tiny sets of FFN neurons that control refusal templates and language routing in LLMs, enabling precise ablations and directional interventions that alter behavior on benchmarks while pr...

  8. Rethinking the Role of Tensor Decompositions in Post-Training LLM Compression

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Tensor decompositions face practical limits in large-scale LLM compression due to mismatch between assumed shared subspaces and heterogeneous model representations.