The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2404.19205 · v1 · pith:UUMINGEW · submitted 2024-04-30 · cs.CV · cs.AI

TableVQA-Bench: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark on Multiple Table Domains

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:UUMINGEWrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CV cs.AI
keywords tablemllmstablevqa-benchpairsperformancevisualansweringbenchmark
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper, we establish a benchmark for table visual question answering, referred to as the TableVQA-Bench, derived from pre-existing table question-answering (QA) and table structure recognition datasets. It is important to note that existing datasets have not incorporated images or QA pairs, which are two crucial components of TableVQA. As such, the primary objective of this paper is to obtain these necessary components. Specifically, images are sourced either through the application of a \textit{stylesheet} or by employing the proposed table rendering system. QA pairs are generated by exploiting the large language model (LLM) where the input is a text-formatted table. Ultimately, the completed TableVQA-Bench comprises 1,500 QA pairs. We comprehensively compare the performance of various multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) on TableVQA-Bench. GPT-4V achieves the highest accuracy among commercial and open-sourced MLLMs from our experiments. Moreover, we discover that the number of vision queries plays a significant role in TableVQA performance. To further analyze the capabilities of MLLMs in comparison to their LLM backbones, we investigate by presenting image-formatted tables to MLLMs and text-formatted tables to LLMs, respectively. Our findings suggest that processing visual inputs is more challenging than text inputs, as evidenced by the lower performance of MLLMs, despite generally requiring higher computational costs than LLMs. The proposed TableVQA-Bench and evaluation codes are available at \href{https://github.com/naver-ai/tablevqabench}{https://github.com/naver-ai/tablevqabench}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 17 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 8.0

    WildTableBench is the first QA benchmark for naturally occurring table images, where 21 multimodal models were evaluated and only one exceeded 50% accuracy.

  2. WildTableBench: Benchmarking Multimodal Foundation Models on Table Understanding In the Wild

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    WildTableBench is the first benchmark for multimodal models on naturally occurring table images, with only one of 21 tested models exceeding 50% accuracy and most ranging from 4.1% to 49.9%.

  3. How Robust is OCR-Reasoning? Evaluating OCR-Reasoning Robustness of Vision-Language Models under Visual Perturbations

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Introduces OCR-Robust benchmark and evaluates 18 VLMs showing clean accuracy does not guarantee robustness with charts and tables more fragile than documents under selected perturbations.

  4. TABVERSE: Benchmarking Cross-Format Table Understanding in LLMs and VLMs

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TABVERSE benchmark shows representation format substantially affects LLM and VLM performance on table QA, structural understanding, and reconstruction tasks.

  5. TableVista: Benchmarking Multimodal Table Reasoning under Visual and Structural Complexity

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TableVista benchmark finds foundation models maintain performance across visual styles but degrade sharply on complex table structures and vision-only settings.

  6. VT-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Visual-Tabular Multi-Modal Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VT-Bench aggregates 14 datasets totaling over 756K samples across 9 domains and evaluates 23 models to establish a unified testbed for visual-tabular multi-modal discriminative and generative tasks.

  7. VT-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Visual-Tabular Multi-Modal Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VT-Bench aggregates 14 datasets from 9 domains and evaluates 23 models to standardize visual-tabular discriminative and generative tasks.

  8. VT-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Visual-Tabular Multi-Modal Learning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VT-Bench is the first unified benchmark aggregating 14 visual-tabular datasets with over 756K samples and evaluating 23 models to expose challenges in this multi-modal area.

  9. TableVision: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Spatially Grounded Reasoning over Complex Hierarchical Tables

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    TableVision benchmark shows explicit spatial grounding recovers MLLM reasoning on hierarchical tables, delivering 12.3% accuracy improvement through a decoupled perception-reasoning framework.

  10. Internalized Reasoning for Long-Context Visual Document Understanding

    cs.CV 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A synthetic pipeline creates and internalizes reasoning traces in VLMs for long-context visual document understanding, with a 32B model surpassing a 235B model on MMLongBenchDoc and showing 12.4x fewer output tokens.

  11. Visual-TableQA: Open-Domain Benchmark for Reasoning over Table Images

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    Visual-TableQA is a new open-domain benchmark of rendered table images and complex QA pairs created via multi-LLM collaborative generation, with fine-tuned models showing robust generalization to external tests.

  12. OCRBench v2: An Improved Benchmark for Evaluating Large Multimodal Models on Visual Text Localization and Reasoning

    cs.CV 2024-12 accept novelty 7.0

    OCRBench v2 is a new benchmark with four times more tasks than prior versions that reveals most large multimodal models score below 50 out of 100 on visual text tasks and share five specific weaknesses.

  13. Large Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Attention

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    In LVLMs, attention can be replaced by random Gaussian weights with little or no performance loss, indicating that current models get lost in attention rather than efficiently using visual context.

  14. DenTab: A Dataset for Table Recognition and Visual QA on Real-World Dental Estimates

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    DenTab provides 2,000 annotated dental table images and 2,208 questions to benchmark 16 systems on table structure recognition and VQA, revealing that strong layout recovery does not ensure reliable multi-step arithme...

  15. IAPO: Input Attribution-Aware Policy Optimization for Tool Use in Small Multimodal Agents

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    IAPO is an RL method that aligns model input attributions with a teacher to improve tool-calling in multimodal SLMs, reporting 3% average VQA accuracy gains on Qwen2.5-VL-3B across six tests.

  16. DataArc-SynData-Toolkit: A Unified Closed-Loop Framework for Multi-Path, Multimodal, and Multilingual Data Synthesis

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    DataArc-SynData-Toolkit is an open-source, configuration-driven framework that unifies synthetic data generation for multimodal, multilingual, and multi-task LLM training with improved usability and quality control.

  17. Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A survey that categorizes TQA benchmarks and LLM modeling strategies by challenges while identifying underexplored areas such as reinforcement learning.