arxiv: 2601.11780 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-16 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the tbar{t} production threshold in sqrt{s}=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

ATLAS Collaboration

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords ttbar productionproduction thresholdquasi-bound statesnon-relativistic QCDATLAS detectorcross-section measurementspin correlationsLHC

0 comments

The pith

ATLAS data show an excess of top-antitop pairs near the production threshold consistent with quasi-bound states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures ttbar production in the dilepton channel near the 345 GeV threshold using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV collisions. It compares the data to a baseline perturbative QCD model and to an extended model that adds non-relativistic QCD simulations of colour-singlet S-wave quasi-bound states. A profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed invariant-mass distribution in bins of spin-sensitive angular variables finds an excess over the baseline prediction. The excess reaches more than 8 standard deviations and matches the NRQCD expectation for an additional cross section of 9.3 pb. A sympathetic reader would care because the result indicates that non-perturbative bound-state dynamics are visible in top-quark pair production at current collider energies.

Core claim

In the invariant-mass region near the ttbar threshold the data exhibit a clear excess above the perturbative QCD prediction; this excess is well described by the inclusion of colour-singlet spin-singlet S-wave quasi-bound tt states, yielding a fitted cross-section contribution of 9.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3} pb with an observed significance exceeding 8 standard deviations.

What carries the argument

Profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed m_ttbar distribution in bins of two angular observables sensitive to ttbar spin correlations, performed on the baseline perturbative QCD model versus the NRQCD-extended model that incorporates quasi-bound-state formation.

If this is right

The quasi-bound-state contribution adds a measured 9.3 pb to the near-threshold ttbar cross section.
Spin correlations near threshold align with expectations for S-wave singlet states.
Threshold calculations for top-quark pair production must incorporate non-relativistic QCD bound-state effects to match data.
The same framework predicts analogous enhancements that can be tested in other heavy-quark systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Precision extractions of the top-quark mass from threshold scans will need to include this bound-state contribution to control systematic uncertainty.
The angular distributions measured here could be used to distinguish colour-singlet from colour-octet contributions in future runs.
Similar quasi-bound-state signals may appear in bottom-quark pair production at the LHC and should be searched for with dedicated analyses.

Load-bearing premise

The observed excess arises from the formation of colour-singlet S-wave quasi-bound tt states rather than from unmodeled systematic effects in background estimation or deficiencies in the baseline perturbative QCD simulation.

What would settle it

A higher-statistics dataset or refined analysis in which the excess significance drops below 3 standard deviations after improved background modeling or detector-response corrections.

read the original abstract

A measurement of $t\bar{t}$ production is presented in the invariant-mass region near the pair production threshold, $m_{t\bar{t}} \sim 345$ GeV, in final states with two charged leptons and multiple jets. The measurement is based on $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The data are compared to two models of $t\bar{t}$ production: a baseline model including only perturbative QCD predictions for the hard process, and an extended model that, in addition, incorporates non-relativistic QCD simulations of colour-singlet quasi-bound-state formation near the $t\bar{t}$ threshold. The agreement between the data and the models is quantified via a profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed $m_{t\bar{t}}$ distributions, in bins of two angular observables sensitive to spin-correlations in the $t\bar{t}$ system. An excess of events is observed over the baseline perturbative QCD prediction, with an observed significance over $8$ standard deviations. This excess is consistent with the formation of colour-singlet and spin-singlet $S$-wave quasi-bound $t\bar{t}$ states, as predicted by non-relativistic QCD, and corresponds to an observed cross-section of $9.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3}$ pb.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ATLAS sees a >8σ excess near the ttbar threshold that fits NRQCD quasi-bound states, but the claim depends on the baseline pQCD generator being accurate in a tricky region.

read the letter

The main point is that ATLAS measures a clear excess over their baseline perturbative QCD prediction in the m_tt spectrum around 345 GeV, with over 8 sigma significance, and attributes it to color-singlet S-wave tt quasi-bound states from NRQCD. The fitted cross section for that piece comes out to 9.3 pb with roughly 15% uncertainty. They use the full 140 fb^{-1} at 13 TeV and fit the reconstructed mass distribution in bins of two angular variables that carry spin-correlation information. That setup is a reasonable way to separate the threshold component from the rest of the ttbar continuum and backgrounds via profile likelihood. The quantitative match to the NRQCD expectation in actual data is the genuinely new element relative to earlier theory papers. The analysis is straightforward and uses standard tools, which is a plus. The soft spot is the one flagged in the stress test. Near threshold the perturbative series has large logarithms, and the parton shower plus scale choices in the baseline generator can easily shift the rate or shape by 10% or more. If that baseline is low by even a modest amount, the excess can be reabsorbed without any bound-state contribution. The abstract gives no numbers on how the baseline was validated in control regions away from the peak or how generator variations affect the significance, so that needs to be checked in the full text. This is for top-physics and QCD-threshold groups who want to see how NRQCD ideas look in data. It is worth sending to peer review because the statistical power and experimental care are high enough that referees should examine the modeling assumptions directly, even if the result ends up needing revisions on the baseline uncertainties.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a measurement of ttbar production near the pair-production threshold (m_tt ~ 345 GeV) in the dilepton + jets channel using 140 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV ATLAS data. Data are compared to a baseline perturbative QCD model and an extended model that adds NRQCD simulations of colour-singlet, spin-singlet S-wave quasi-bound states. A profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed m_tt distribution in bins of two angular observables sensitive to spin correlations finds an excess over the baseline with observed significance >8 sigma, interpreted as an observed cross-section of 9.3^{+1.4}_{-1.3} pb for the quasi-bound-state contribution.

Significance. If the excess is robust against modeling uncertainties, the result would constitute a significant observation of non-perturbative QCD dynamics in top-pair production, providing direct support for NRQCD predictions of threshold quasi-bound states. The use of angular observables to probe spin correlations and the high quoted significance are strengths, but the interpretation rests on the accuracy of the fixed baseline pQCD simulation.

major comments (2)

The profile-likelihood fit defines the >8σ excess relative to a fixed baseline pQCD prediction. No control region or floated normalization parameter for the baseline is described that would independently constrain its rate or shape in the m_tt ≈ 345 GeV window, where soft-gluon resummation and parton-shower modeling are known to be marginal; a 10–15 % underprediction in the baseline could therefore absorb the excess without requiring an NRQCD component.
The abstract and fit description provide no quantitative breakdown of systematic uncertainties (e.g., background modeling, jet energy scale, or parton-shower variations) propagated through the profile-likelihood fit, nor any stability tests (e.g., fit bias or pull distributions) that would confirm the quoted significance is not inflated by unaccounted modeling deficiencies.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states the observed cross-section but does not define the exact fiducial phase space or the precise normalization convention used for the 9.3 pb value.
Notation for the invariant mass (m_{t bar t} vs. m_tt) should be made uniform throughout the text and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both concerns are valid and will be resolved through revisions to the analysis and manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The profile-likelihood fit defines the >8σ excess relative to a fixed baseline pQCD prediction. No control region or floated normalization parameter for the baseline is described that would independently constrain its rate or shape in the m_tt ≈ 345 GeV window, where soft-gluon resummation and parton-shower modeling are known to be marginal; a 10–15 % underprediction in the baseline could therefore absorb the excess without requiring an NRQCD component.

Authors: We acknowledge that the baseline pQCD prediction enters the fit with a fixed normalization and that no dedicated control region is used to constrain it inside the narrow threshold window. The angular observables are intended to provide shape discrimination, but this does not fully protect against a possible overall rate mismatch. In the revised analysis we will therefore introduce a floating normalization parameter for the baseline pQCD component, re-perform the profile-likelihood fit, and report the updated significance and quasi-bound-state cross section. revision: yes
Referee: The abstract and fit description provide no quantitative breakdown of systematic uncertainties (e.g., background modeling, jet energy scale, or parton-shower variations) propagated through the profile-likelihood fit, nor any stability tests (e.g., fit bias or pull distributions) that would confirm the quoted significance is not inflated by unaccounted modeling deficiencies.

Authors: We agree that the submitted manuscript does not contain a quantitative breakdown of systematic uncertainties or the requested stability tests. In the revised version we will add (i) a table listing all systematic variations and their impact on the fitted quasi-bound-state cross section and significance, and (ii) results from pseudo-experiment ensembles showing fit bias, pull distributions, and coverage to demonstrate that the quoted significance is not inflated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct profile-likelihood extraction of excess from data vs fixed baseline

full rationale

The paper compares data to a fixed baseline perturbative QCD simulation and an extended model that adds an external NRQCD quasi-bound-state component. Agreement is quantified by a standard profile-likelihood fit to the reconstructed m_tt spectrum in bins of angular observables. The reported >8σ excess and 9.3 pb cross-section are fitted observables extracted from this comparison; they are not defined in terms of themselves, nor is any input parameter floated and then relabeled as a prediction. No self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorem is invoked to force the result. The derivation chain is self-contained against external data and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on established pQCD for the hard process and NRQCD for threshold dynamics, both drawn from prior literature. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced; the reported cross-section is the fitted result of the measurement itself.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Perturbative QCD accurately describes the hard ttbar production process away from threshold
Required for the baseline model used in the fit
domain assumption Non-relativistic QCD correctly simulates colour-singlet quasi-bound state formation near threshold
Required for the extended model that explains the observed excess

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5567 in / 1312 out tokens · 46156 ms · 2026-05-16T13:34:50.658973+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

An excess of events is observed over the baseline perturbative QCD prediction, with an observed significance over 8 standard deviations. This excess is consistent with the formation of colour-singlet and spin-singlet S-wave quasi-bound tt states, as predicted by non-relativistic QCD
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The data are compared to two models of tt production: a baseline model including only perturbative QCD predictions for the hard process, and an extended model that, in addition, incorporates non-relativistic QCD simulations

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Observation of a cross-section enhancement near the $t\bar{t}$ production threshold in $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
hep-ex 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

ATLAS observes a clear excess in ttbar cross section near production threshold consistent with quasi-bound states.
Study of $t\bar{t}$ threshold effects in $e\mu$ differential distributions measured in $\sqrt{s}=13$\,TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector
hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

ATLAS data on eμ invariant mass and angle distributions in 13 TeV collisions are better described by ttbar models that include color-singlet quasi-bound states near threshold, with fits showing over 3 sigma evidence a...
Reconstructing Toponium using Recursive Jigsaw Reconstruction
hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

Recursive Jigsaw Reconstruction is applied to reconstruct toponium at the ttbar threshold, with two variables proposed to improve signal sensitivity.
Threshold Top-Quark Pair-Production: Cross Sections and Key Uncertainties
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

Near-threshold top-quark pair production cross section at 13 TeV LHC is 11.67 pb with +1.43/-1.47 pb uncertainty, including NRQCD Green's function effects and comparison to POWHEG-BOX.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

140 extracted references · 140 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 64 internal anchors

[1]

Evans and P

L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3(2008) S08001

work page 2008
[2]

Y. Kiyo, J. H. Kühn, S. Moch, M. Steinhauser and P. Uwer, Top-quark pair production near threshold at LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C60(2009) 375, arXiv:0812.0919 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[3]

Afik and J

Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907, arXiv:2003.02280 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[4]

ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector, Nature633(2024) 542, arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

CMS Collaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) 117801, arXiv:2406.03976 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

M. V. Garzelli, J. Mazzitelli, S. .-. Moch and O. Zenaiev, Top-quark pole mass extraction at NNLO accuracy, from total, single- and double-differential cross sections for𝑡𝑡+ X production at the LHC, JHEP05(2024) 321, arXiv:2311.05509 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

CMS Collaboration,Measurement of the top quark Yukawa coupling from𝑡¯𝑡kinematic distributions in the lepton+jets final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 072007, arXiv:1907.01590 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the top-quark Yukawa coupling from𝑡¯𝑡production in the lepton+jets final state using𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, (2025), arXiv:2509.16039 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[9]

I. I. Y. Bigi, Y. L. Dokshitzer, V. A. Khoze, J. H. Kühn and P. M. Zerwas, Production and Decay Properties of Ultraheavy Quarks, Phys. Lett. B181(1986) 157

work page 1986
[10]

V. S. Fadin and V. A. Khoze,Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production in𝑒+𝑒− Collisions, JETP Lett.46(1987) 525

work page 1987
[11]

V. S. Fadin, V. A. Khoze and T. Sjostrand,On the Threshold Behavior of Heavy Top Production, Z. Phys. C48(1990) 613

work page 1990
[12]

Sumino, K

Y. Sumino, K. Fujii, K. Hagiwara, H. Murayama and C.-K. Ng, Top-quark pair production near threshold, Phys. Rev. D47(1993) 56

work page 1993
[13]

DØ Collaboration,Observation of the top quark, Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 2632, arXiv:hep-ex/9503003

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[14]

CDF Collaboration, Observation of Top Quark Production in¯𝑝 𝑝collisions with the Collider Detector at Fermilab, Phys. Rev. Lett.74(1995) 2626, arXiv:hep-ex/9503002

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[15]

W. E. Caswell and G. P. Lepage, Effective Lagrangians for Bound State Problems in QED, QCD, and Other Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B167(1986) 437

work page 1986
[16]

G. T. Bodwin, E. Braaten and G. P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D51(1995) 1125, arXiv:hep-ph/9407339, Erratum: Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5853. 38

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[17]

Bound-state Effects on Top Quark Production at Hadron Colliders

K. Hagiwara, Y. Sumino and H. Yokoya, Bound-state Effects on Top Quark Production at Hadron Colliders, Phys. Lett. B666(2008) 71, arXiv:0804.1014 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[18]

Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders

Y. Sumino and H. Yokoya, Bound-state effects on kinematical distributions of top quarks at hadron colliders, JHEP09(2010) 034, arXiv:1007.0075 [hep-ph], Erratum: JHEP06(2016) 037

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[19]

M. V. Garzelli, G. Limatola, S. .-. Moch, M. Steinhauser and O. Zenaiev, Updated predictions for toponium production at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B866(2025) 139532, arXiv:2412.16685 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Nason, E

P. Nason, E. Re and L. Rottoli, Spin correlations in𝑡𝑡production and decay at the LHC in QCD perturbation theory, JHEP10(2025) 149, arXiv:2505.00096 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Ju et al., Top quark pair production near threshold: single/double distributions and mass determination, JHEP06(2020) 158, arXiv:2004.03088 [hep-ph]

W.-L. Ju et al., Top quark pair production near threshold: single/double distributions and mass determination, JHEP06(2020) 158, arXiv:2004.03088 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert, P. Nason, C. Oleari and S. Pozzorini,An NLO+PS generator for𝑡¯𝑡 and 𝑊𝑡 production and decay including non-resonant and interference effects, Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 691, arXiv:1607.04538 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[23]

T. Ježo, J. M. Lindert and S. Pozzorini, Resonance-aware NLOPS matching for off-shell𝑡𝑡+ tW production with semileptonic decays, JHEP10(2023) 008, arXiv:2307.15653 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

ATLAS Collaboration,Measurement of the𝑡 ¯𝑡production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in𝑒𝜇dilepton events from𝑝 𝑝collisions at √𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 528, arXiv:1910.08819 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

ATLAS Collaboration,Inclusive and differential cross-sections for dilepton𝑡¯𝑡production measured in√𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP07(2023) 141, arXiv:2303.15340 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

ATLAS Collaboration,Search for heavy neutral Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark pair in 140fb −1 of proton–proton collision data at√𝑠=13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2024) 013, arXiv:2404.18986 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

ATLAS Collaboration, Precise measurement of the𝑡¯𝑡 production cross-section and lepton differential distributions in𝑒𝜇 dilepton events from√𝑠=13TeV𝑝 𝑝collisions with the ATLAS detector, (2025), arXiv:2509.15066 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

CMS Collaboration,Differential cross section measurements for the production of top quark pairs and of additional jets using dilepton events from𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, JHEP02(2025) 064, arXiv:2402.08486 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

CMS Collaboration, Measurements of polarization and spin correlation and observation of entanglement in top quark pairs using lepton+jets events from proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 112016, arXiv:2409.11067 [hep-ex]. 39

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

CMS Collaboration,Search for heavy pseudoscalar and scalar bosons decaying to a top quark pair in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠=13TeV, Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 127801, arXiv:2507.05119 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y.-J. Zheng, Signatures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 034023, arXiv:2102.11281 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[32]

Maltoni, C

F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou, Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC, JHEP03(2024) 099, arXiv:2401.08751 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra,Toponium hunter’s guide, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 054032, arXiv:2407.20330 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

CMS Collaboration, Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quark pair production threshold, Rept. Prog. Phys.88(2025) 087801, arXiv:2503.22382 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[35]

B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and Y.-J. Zheng,Simulating toponium formation signals at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 157, arXiv:2411.18962 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma, L. Munoz-Aillaud and Y.-J. Zheng, Prospects for toponium formation at the LHC in the single-lepton mode, (2025), arXiv:2509.03596 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[37]

Fuks, ‘Toponium physics at the Large Hadron Collider’, 59th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 2025, arXiv:2505.03869 [hep-ph]

B. Fuks, ‘Toponium physics at the Large Hadron Collider’, 59th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories, 2025, arXiv:2505.03869 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3(2008) S08003

work page 2008
[39]

Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13(2018) P07017

work page 2018
[40]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

ATLAS Collaboration,Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 234, arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 907

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠=13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15(2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

ATLAS Collaboration,Performance of electron and photon triggers in ATLAS during LHC Run 2, Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 47, arXiv:1909.00761 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2020
[45]

ATLAS Collaboration,The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv:1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[46]

Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4– a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506(2003) 250. 40

work page 2003
[47]

A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
[48]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867(2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[49]

ATLAS Collaboration,The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

work page arXiv 2016
[50]

Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7(2019) 034, arXiv:1905.09127 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2019
[51]

D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152

work page 2001
[52]

An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159, arXiv:1410.3012 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[53]

A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3

C. Bierlich et al.,A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of PYTHIA 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases (2022) 8, arXiv:2203.11601 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022
[54]

ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS Pythia 8 tunes to7TeV data, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2014-021, 2014, url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/1966419

work page arXiv 2014
[55]

Single-top Wt-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method

E. Re, Single-top𝑊𝑡-channel production matched with parton showers using the POWHEG method, Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1547, arXiv:1009.2450 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[56]

A Positive-Weight Next-to-Leading-Order Monte Carlo for Heavy Flavour Hadroproduction

S. Frixione, G. Ridolfi and P. Nason, A positive-weight next-to-leading-order Monte Carlo for heavy flavour hadroproduction, JHEP09(2007) 126, arXiv:0707.3088 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[57]

A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

P. Nason,A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[58]

Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[59]

A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06(2010) 043, arXiv:1002.2581 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[60]

NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions for the LHC run II, JHEP04(2015) 040, arXiv:1410.8849 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[61]

ATLAS Collaboration,Studies on top-quark Monte Carlo modelling for Top2016, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-020, 2016,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2216168

work page arXiv 2016
[62]

Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation

M. Beneke, P. Falgari, S. Klein and C. Schwinn, Hadronic top-quark pair production with NNLL threshold resummation, Nucl. Phys. B855(2012) 695, arXiv:1109.1536 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[63]

Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation

M. Cacciari, M. Czakon, M. Mangano, A. Mitov and P. Nason,Top-pair production at hadron colliders with next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic soft-gluon resummation, Phys. Lett. B710(2012) 612, arXiv:1111.5869 [hep-ph]. 41

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[64]

Percent level precision physics at the Tevatron: first genuine NNLO QCD corrections to q qbar -> t tbar + X

P. Bärnreuther, M. Czakon and A. Mitov,Percent-Level-Precision Physics at the Tevatron: Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD Corrections to𝑞¯𝑞→𝑡¯𝑡+𝑋, Phys. Rev. Lett.109(2012) 132001, arXiv:1204.5201 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[65]

NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels

M. Czakon and A. Mitov,NNLO corrections to top-pair production at hadron colliders: the all-fermionic scattering channels, JHEP12(2012) 054, arXiv:1207.0236 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[66]

NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction

M. Czakon and A. Mitov, NNLO corrections to top pair production at hadron colliders: the quark-gluon reaction, JHEP01(2013) 080, arXiv:1210.6832 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[67]

The total top quark pair production cross-section at hadron colliders through O(alpha_S^4)

M. Czakon, P. Fiedler and A. Mitov, Total Top-Quark Pair-Production Cross Section at Hadron Colliders ThroughO (𝛼4 𝑆), Phys. Rev. Lett.110(2013) 252004, arXiv:1303.6254 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[68]

Top++: a program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

M. Czakon and A. Mitov, Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, arXiv:1112.5675 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[69]

R. D. Ball et al.,The PDF4LHC21 combination of global PDF fits for the LHC Run III, J. Phys. G49(2022) 080501, arXiv:2203.05506 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[70]

Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and M. Wiesemann,Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX, Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 537, arXiv:1711.06631 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[71]

-- HATHOR -- HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR

M. Aliev et al.,HATHOR – HAdronic Top and Heavy quarks crOss section calculatoR, Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 1034, arXiv:1007.1327 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[72]

J. H. Kühn, A. Scharf and P. Uwer, Weak interaction effects in top-quark pair production at hadron colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C51(2007) 37, arXiv:hep-ph/0610335

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[73]

J. H. Kühn, A. Scharf and P. Uwer, Weak Interactions in Top-Quark Pair Production at Hadron Colliders: An Update, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 014020, arXiv:1305.5773 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[74]

J. H. Kühn, A. Scharf and P. Uwer, Electroweak corrections to top-quark pair production in quark -antiquark annihilation, Eur. Phys. J. C45(2006) 139, arXiv:hep-ph/0508092

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[75]

On the Treatment of Resonances in Next-to-Leading Order Calculations Matched to a Parton Shower

T. Ježo and P. Nason,On the Treatment of Resonances in Next-to-Leading Order Calculations Matched to a Parton Shower, JHEP12(2015) 065, arXiv:1509.09071 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[76]

ATLAS Collaboration, Towards a Systematic Uncertainty Model for thePowheg𝑏𝑏4ℓMonte Carlo sample, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2025-036, 2025,url:https://cds.cern.ch/record/2942776

work page arXiv 2025
[77]

Buonocore, M

L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. M. Lindert and C. Savoini, Towards NNLO QCD predictions for off-shell top-quark pair production and decays, JHEP10(2025) 195, arXiv:2507.11410 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[78]

Jeżabek, J

M. Jeżabek, J. H. Kühn and T. Teubner, Momentum distributions in t anti-t production and decay near threshold, Z. Phys. C56(1992) 653

work page 1992
[79]

Probing CP violation in $e^{+}e^{-}$ production of the Higgs boson and toponia

K. Hagiwara, K. Ma and H. Yokoya, Probing CP violation in𝑒+𝑒− production of the Higgs boson and toponia, JHEP06(2016) 048, arXiv:1602.00684 [hep-ph]. 42

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[80]

Probing the CP properties of top Yukawa coupling at an $e^+e^-$ collider

K. Hagiwara, H. Yokoya and Y.-J. Zheng, Probing the CP properties of top Yukawa coupling at an𝑒+𝑒− collider, JHEP02(2018) 180, arXiv:1712.09953 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

Showing first 80 references.