pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.16813 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-18 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Flow Map Language Models: One-step Language Modeling via Continuous Denoising

Chanhyuk Lee , Jaehoon Yoo , Manan Agarwal , Sheel Shah , Jerry Huang , Aditi Raghunathan , Seunghoon Hong , Nicholas M. Boffi
show 1 more author
Jinwoo Kim
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 20:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords continuous flowflow maplanguage modeldiscrete diffusionone-step generationdenoisingtext generationsimplex geometry
0
0 comments X

The pith

Continuous flows over one-hot token embeddings match discrete diffusion quality and enable one-step generation that exceeds eight-step baselines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that language models can use continuous flows defined over one-hot representations of tokens rather than discrete diffusion processes. This formulation creates a unique flow map that can be learned directly for fast inference, a structure unavailable in discrete methods. Both the flow and the map are trained with cross-entropy objectives that respect the geometry of the probability simplex. On the LM1B and OpenWebText datasets, the resulting flow language model matches the performance of state-of-the-art discrete diffusion baselines. Distilling the flow into a flow map language model then produces single-step samples of higher quality than the eight-step outputs from recent few-step discrete diffusion models.

Core claim

Language models based on continuous flows over one-hot token embeddings can match state-of-the-art discrete diffusion baselines on LM1B and OWT while defining a unique flow map that supports direct one-step inference. The flow and its associated flow map are learned with simple cross-entropy objectives that respect simplex geometry. Distillation of the flow language model into a flow map language model yields one-step generation that exceeds the eight-step quality of recent few-step discrete diffusion language models.

What carries the argument

The flow map induced by the continuous flow over one-hot token embeddings, which is learned directly to enable efficient few-step sampling without requiring discrete constraints.

If this is right

  • The flow language model matches state-of-the-art discrete diffusion baselines on LM1B and OWT.
  • The distilled flow map language model achieves one-step generation that exceeds the quality of eight-step outputs from recent discrete diffusion models.
  • The continuous formulation challenges the hypothesis that discrete noising processes are required for generative modeling over discrete modalities.
  • Simple cross-entropy objectives suffice for learning both the flow and the flow map while respecting simplex geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on other discrete sequence tasks such as code or protein generation to check whether the one-step advantage holds beyond natural language.
  • If the flow map preserves token structure reliably at scale, it may reduce the need for multi-step sampling schedules in production language systems.
  • The absence of post-hoc discrete corrections in the continuous approach suggests potential simplifications for combining language models with continuous control or editing operations.

Load-bearing premise

A continuous flow defined over one-hot token embeddings can be learned such that the associated flow map preserves discrete token structure and yields high-quality samples without additional discrete constraints or post-hoc corrections.

What would settle it

An experiment in which one-step samples from the distilled flow map language model receive lower quality scores than eight-step samples from the compared discrete diffusion models on the same LM1B or OWT evaluation metrics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16813 by Aditi Raghunathan, Chanhyuk Lee, Jaehoon Yoo, Jerry Huang, Jinwoo Kim, Manan Agarwal, Nicholas M. Boffi, Seunghoon Hong, Sheel Shah.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flow map language models. Our FMLM outperforms discrete diffusion models (gray) and matches the 8-step generation perfor￾mance of distilled discrete diffusion models (light purple) in only one step (dark purple). Today’s frontier language models (LMs) are based on an autoregressive process that produces one token per step [1–3]. While these models leverage parallelism during training through teacher forcin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview. (Left) We leverage a simple continuous interpolation between Gaussian noise and a one-hot encoding of language data. (Middle) Our FLM learns a denoiser that predicts the posterior over clean data, which we convert into a flow for sampling. (Right) Our distilled FMLM directly transports states between distant timepoints, enabling few-step generation. substantially reduced to compensate for the ass… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Factorization error in discrete diffusion. A toy dataset with two correlated modes new-york and san-diego. (Left) In many-step sampling, both continuous flows and discrete diffusion models generate valid data. (Right) With few-step sampling, the factorized transition of discrete diffusion yields a spurious mixture of all possible combinations (including the invalid pairings new-diego and san-york). 2 Backg… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Semigroup on the simplex. Xs,u(x) leaves the simplex, but δs,u(x) and δu,t(Xs,u) always lie on it. δs,t(x) is their convex combination, providing a training signal for distillation. Replacing Ds by the one-hot data x1 in the diagonal term recovers the cross-entropy loss (12) for the single-time denoiser, since KL from a one-hot distribution reduces to cross-entropy. This yields a direct training algorithm … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Decoding error rate. Our time repa￾rameterization τ (t) redistributes time so each step contributes uniformly to the denoising signal; time samples shown in ticks. τ (t) = Pe(0) − Pe(t) Pe(0) = 1 − |V | |V | − 1 Pe(t). (25) By construction, this reparameterization redistributes time so that each step contributes equally to reducing the de￾coding error. We find this choice critical for stable training and g… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FLM generation quality. Generation performance of FLM on LM1B (left) and OWT (right) compared to diffusion baselines. FLM outperforms baselines at large step counts. Its performance degrades at low step counts, as it has not yet been distilled into an FMLM. Training. We train our flow-based language model following Section 4 for 1M steps with a batch size of 512 using the Adam optimizer [54] with a learni… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FMLM few-step generation. Few-step generation performance of FMLM on LM1B (left) and OWT (right) compared to distilled discrete diffusion. FMLM maintains strong generative perplexity across step counts and achieves state-of-the-art performance in the very few-step regime. Performance degrades slightly as the step count decreases and can be improved with further distillation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Qualitative one-step generation. One-step samples from FMLM and distilled discrete diffusion baselines trained on LM1B. FMLM produces coherent, grammatical text, while discrete diffusion baselines generate incoherent token sequences (red, Gen. PPL > 1000) or repetitive tokens with collapsed entropy (red, Entropy < 4). number of sampling steps is varied from 8 to 1024, demonstrating that FLM is competitive… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Autoguidance stability. FLM maintains stable generation quality across guidance scales η up to 100, while discrete baselines fail at η ≥ 10. Shaded region shows Gen. PPL > 1000 or entropy < 3.9, indicating nonsensical or collapsed generation. Results shown on LM1B across 128–1024 sampling steps. distillation alone cannot overcome. In contrast, FMLM remains stable across all step counts. On LM1B, our one-s… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Valid one-step samples from FMLM. 2 6 9 1 4 6 3 7 8 7 1 3 2 9 8 5 4 6 4 5 8 6 7 3 1 2 9 6 8 2 3 1 9 4 5 7 5 7 1 4 6 2 9 8 3 9 3 4 8 5 7 6 1 2 1 2 5 6 8 9 7 3 4 8 9 7 5 3 4 2 6 1 3 4 6 7 2 1 8 9 5 1 7 9 2 5 6 8 3 4 5 8 4 9 7 3 1 6 2 6 3 4 2 8 1 5 9 7 4 6 3 1 2 5 7 8 9 9 2 7 3 6 8 4 5 1 8 1 5 7 9 4 6 2 3 2 5 8 4 1 9 3 7 6 3 9 1 8 7 7 2 4 5 7 4 6 5 3 2 9 1 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Eulerian and Lagrangian objectives on the simplex. (Left) The Eulerian teacher ¯δs,t is constructed from Dˆ s(Is) and derivatives of ˆδs,t. (Right) The Lagrangian teacher is constructed from Dˆ t(Xˆ s,t(Is)), requiring an intermediate flow map evaluation off the simplex. In both cases, the teacher may transiently leave the simplex during training due to derivative correction terms, but the cross-entropy l… view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Samples generated by FLM trained on LM1B with different sampling steps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Samples generated by FLM trained on OWT with different sampling steps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_30.png] view at source ↗
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: One-step samples generated by FMLM trained on LM1B. 49 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_31.png] view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: One-step samples generated by FMLM trained on OWT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_32.png] view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: One-step samples generated by few-step masked discrete diffusion baselines trained on OWT. 51 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_33.png] view at source ↗
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: One-step samples generated by few-step uniform discrete diffusion baselines trained on OWT. 52 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_34.png] view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: Samples from FMLM trained on LM1B from fixed starting noise and varying the number of steps. 53 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_35.png] view at source ↗
Figure 36
Figure 36. Figure 36: Samples from FMLM trained on OWT from fixed starting noise and varying the number of steps. 54 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p054_36.png] view at source ↗
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: Samples generated by MDLM + SDTT [10] trained on LM1B from fixed initial random seed and varying the number of sampling steps. 55 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_37.png] view at source ↗
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: Samples generated by Duo + DCD [19] trained on LM1B from fixed initial random seed and varying the number of sampling steps. 56 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p056_38.png] view at source ↗
Figure 39
Figure 39. Figure 39: A sample from FMLM+FMTG (Section 5.3), rewarded by safety (TweetVal-Offensive [63], Label=Non-offensive). 57 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p057_39.png] view at source ↗
Figure 40
Figure 40. Figure 40: A sample from FMLM+FMTG (Section 5.3), rewarded by topic (AG News [60], Label=Sports). 58 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_40.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Language models based on discrete diffusion have attracted widespread interest for their potential to provide faster generation than autoregressive models. Despite their promise, these models typically produce samples whose quality sharply degrades in the few-step regime, preventing a dramatic speedup in practice. Here, we show that language models based on continuous flows over one-hot token embeddings can outperform discrete diffusion in both quality and speed. Importantly, our continuous formulation defines a unique flow map that can be learned directly for efficient few-step inference, a structure we show is unavailable to discrete methods. In this setting, we show that both the flow and its associated flow map can be learned with simple cross-entropy objectives that respect the simplex geometry of the data, and we identify three distinct choices for flow map distillation whose performance we compare in practice. Using these insights, we build a flow language model (FLM), a continuous flow that matches state-of-the-art discrete diffusion baselines on the One Billion Words (LM1B) and OpenWebText (OWT) datasets. We then distill FLM into a flow map language model (FMLM), whose one-step generation exceeds the 8-step quality of recent few-step discrete diffusion language models. Our work challenges the widely-held hypothesis that discrete noising processes are necessary for generative modeling over discrete modalities and paves the way toward accelerated language modeling at scale. Code is available at https://github.com/david3684/flm.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Flow Language Models (FLM) as continuous flows over one-hot token embeddings on the simplex, trained via cross-entropy objectives that respect simplex geometry. It introduces three variants of flow-map distillation to obtain Flow Map Language Models (FMLM) that perform one-step generation, claiming these match state-of-the-art discrete diffusion baselines on LM1B and OpenWebText while exceeding the quality of recent 8-step discrete diffusion models.

Significance. If the central empirical claims hold, the work would be significant for demonstrating that continuous flows can model discrete modalities without discrete noising processes or post-hoc corrections, enabling faster non-autoregressive generation. The availability of code at https://github.com/david3684/flm is a clear strength that supports reproducibility and allows direct verification of the flow-map construction and training objectives.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Flow Map Distillation): the claim that the distilled flow map produces high-quality discrete tokens 'without requiring additional discrete constraints or post-hoc corrections' is load-bearing for the one-step superiority result; the manuscript must explicitly state and demonstrate whether one-step outputs are exactly one-hot vectors or require argmax/projection, and provide analysis showing that trajectories concentrate near simplex vertices rather than merely matching marginals.
  2. [Experimental Results] Experimental section (results on LM1B and OWT): the reported matching of SOTA and outperformance over 8-step discrete baselines requires full tables with exact metrics (perplexity, MAUVE, or equivalent), all baselines with step counts, error bars or multiple seeds, and ablation on the three distillation choices; without these details the central empirical claim has only moderate support.
  3. [§4] §4 (training objectives): the cross-entropy loss on the continuous simplex formulation is presented as directly learning the flow map, but the manuscript should clarify how this objective guarantees preservation of discrete token structure in the one-step map versus merely approximating the data distribution in aggregate.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation in the flow definition: the relationship between the continuous flow ODE and the learned flow map should be stated with an explicit equation reference to avoid ambiguity in how the map is obtained from the flow.
  2. [Figure 1] Figure 1 and trajectory visualizations: captions should explicitly note whether plotted points are raw flow outputs or post-processed, and include scale for simplex concentration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment point-by-point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions have been made to the manuscript to strengthen the presentation and support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (Flow Map Distillation): the claim that the distilled flow map produces high-quality discrete tokens 'without requiring additional discrete constraints or post-hoc corrections' is load-bearing for the one-step superiority result; the manuscript must explicitly state and demonstrate whether one-step outputs are exactly one-hot vectors or require argmax/projection, and provide analysis showing that trajectories concentrate near simplex vertices rather than merely matching marginals.

    Authors: We agree that explicit clarification is needed on this point. In the revised manuscript, we now state in the abstract and §3 that the flow map outputs a continuous vector on the simplex, with discrete tokens recovered via argmax (a deterministic, geometry-respecting operation with no learned parameters). We argue this does not qualify as an 'additional discrete constraint or post-hoc correction' because it involves no extra denoising steps, masking, or distribution adjustments beyond the learned map itself—unlike the post-processing often required in discrete diffusion. We have added quantitative analysis (new Figure 3 and accompanying text) measuring trajectory concentration via average L1 distance to the nearest vertex and entropy of the output distribution, demonstrating that one-step outputs concentrate near vertices far more than marginal matching alone would imply. These additions directly support the one-step superiority claim. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental Results] Experimental section (results on LM1B and OWT): the reported matching of SOTA and outperformance over 8-step discrete baselines requires full tables with exact metrics (perplexity, MAUVE, or equivalent), all baselines with step counts, error bars or multiple seeds, and ablation on the three distillation choices; without these details the central empirical claim has only moderate support.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original experimental reporting could be more comprehensive. The revised manuscript now includes expanded tables (new Tables 2 and 3) reporting exact perplexity and MAUVE scores for FLM, FMLM, and all baselines, with explicit step counts listed for each method. Results are reported with standard deviations from three independent random seeds. We have also added a dedicated ablation subsection comparing the three distillation variants (with full metrics on both LM1B and OWT), including controls for training compute. These revisions provide the requested details and strengthen empirical support for the central claims. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] §4 (training objectives): the cross-entropy loss on the continuous simplex formulation is presented as directly learning the flow map, but the manuscript should clarify how this objective guarantees preservation of discrete token structure in the one-step map versus merely approximating the data distribution in aggregate.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation on the objective's properties. In the revised §4, we have expanded the explanation to show that the cross-entropy loss is computed directly between the flow map's continuous output and the one-hot target vectors. Because the loss is minimized only when the output approaches a vertex (due to the geometry of the simplex and the properties of cross-entropy), the optimization inherently favors discrete structure in the one-step map rather than just aggregate marginal matching. We include a short derivation demonstrating that, under the flow map's Lipschitz continuity assumption, convergence of the loss implies concentration around vertices. This distinguishes our approach from methods that only match distributions without vertex-seeking pressure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; continuous flow and map learned independently via cross-entropy on simplex

full rationale

The paper defines FLM as a continuous flow over one-hot embeddings trained directly with cross-entropy objectives respecting simplex geometry, then distills it to FMLM via one of three explicit map choices. These steps are presented as independent of discrete diffusion baselines; performance matching on LM1B/OWT and superiority in one-step regime are empirical outcomes, not reductions by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The central claim that a unique flow map exists and can be learned directly is supported by the continuous formulation itself rather than imported from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the assumption that continuous flows can be meaningfully defined and trained over the probability simplex of one-hot embeddings; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Continuous flows over one-hot token embeddings respect the simplex geometry sufficiently for generative modeling of discrete tokens
    Invoked when defining the flow and flow map objectives.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1195 out tokens · 25431 ms · 2026-05-15T20:58:47.776782+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sampling from Flow Language Models via Marginal-Conditioned Bridges

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Marginal-conditioned bridges enable training-free sampling from Flow Language Models by drawing clean one-hot endpoints from factorized posteriors and using Ornstein-Uhlenbeck bridges, preserving token marginals and r...

  2. LangFlow: Continuous Diffusion Rivals Discrete in Language Modeling

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    LangFlow is the first continuous diffusion language model to rival discrete diffusion on perplexity and generative perplexity while exceeding autoregressive baselines on several zero-shot tasks.

  3. ELF: Embedded Language Flows

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ELF is a continuous embedding-space flow matching model for language that stays continuous until the last step and outperforms prior discrete and continuous diffusion language models with fewer sampling steps.

  4. How to Train Your Latent Diffusion Language Model Jointly With the Latent Space

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Joint training of the latent space with the diffusion process produces a competitive latent diffusion language model that is faster than existing discrete and continuous diffusion baselines.

  5. Coupling Models for One-Step Discrete Generation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Coupling Models enable single-step discrete sequence generation via learned couplings to Gaussian latents and outperform prior one-step baselines on text perplexity, biological FBD, and image FID metrics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages · cited by 5 Pith papers · 27 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023. (page 1)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models

    Rohan Anil, Sebastian Borgeaud, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, Jiahui Yu, Radu Soricut, Johan Schalkwyk, Andrew M Dai, Anja Hauth, Katie Millican, et al. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023. (page 1)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning

    Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Haowei Zhang, Junxiao Song, Ruoyu Zhang, Runxin Xu, Qihao Zhu, Shirong Ma, Peiyi Wang, Xiao Bi, et al. Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948, 2025. (page 1)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  4. [4]

    Krizhevsky, A

    Samar Khanna, Siddhant Kharbanda, Shufan Li, Harshit Varma, Eric Wang, Sawyer Birnbaum, Ziyang Luo, Yanis Miraoui, Akash Palrecha, Stefano Ermon, et al. Mercury: Ultra-fast language models based on diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.17298, 1, 2025. (pages 1 and 2)

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Gemini diffusion

    Google DeepMind. Gemini diffusion. https://deepmind.google/models/gemini-diffusion/, 2025. Accessed: 2026-01-25. (page 1) 19

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Seed Diffusion: A Large-Scale Diffusion Language Model with High-Speed Inference

    Yuxuan Song, Zheng Zhang, Cheng Luo, Pengyang Gao, Fan Xia, Hao Luo, Zheng Li, Yuehang Yang, Hongli Yu, Xingwei Qu, et al. Seed diffusion: A large-scale diffusion language model with high-speed inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.02193, 2025. (page 1)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Beyond autoregression: Fast llms via self-distillation through time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21035, 2024

    Justin Deschenaux and Caglar Gulcehre. Beyond autoregression: Fast llms via self-distillation through time.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21035, 2024. (pages 1, 3, 14, 26, and 45)

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Diffusion language models

    Sander Dieleman. Diffusion language models. https://benanne.github.io/2023/01/09/diffusion -language.html, 2023. Accessed: 2026-01-25. (page 2)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Masked diffusion models are secretly time-agnostic masked models and exploit inaccurate categorical sampling

    Kaiwen Zheng, Yongxin Chen, Hanzi Mao, Ming-Yu Liu, Jun Zhu, and Qinsheng Zhang. Masked diffusion models are secretly time-agnostic masked models and exploit inaccurate categorical sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02908, 2024. (pages 2, 12, and 26)

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Fast-dLLM: Training-free Acceleration of Diffusion LLM by Enabling KV Cache and Parallel Decoding

    Chengyue Wu, Hao Zhang, Shuchen Xue, Zhijian Liu, Shizhe Diao, Ligeng Zhu, Ping Luo, Song Han, and Enze Xie. Fast-dllm: Training-free acceleration of diffusion llm by enabling kv cache and parallel decoding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.22618, 2025. (pages 2, 4, 44, 46, and 55)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Parallelbench: Understanding the trade-offs of parallel decoding in diffusion llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04767, 2025

    Wonjun Kang, Kevin Galim, Seunghyuk Oh, Minjae Lee, Yuchen Zeng, Shuibai Zhang, Coleman Hooper, Yuezhou Hu, Hyung Il Koo, Nam Ik Cho, et al. Parallelbench: Understanding the trade-offs of parallel decoding in diffusion llms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04767, 2025. (pages 2, 4, and 26)

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Diffusion-lm improves controllable text generation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:4328–4343,

    Xiang Li, John Thickstun, Ishaan Gulrajani, Percy S Liang, and Tatsunori B Hashimoto. Diffusion-lm improves controllable text generation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:4328–4343,

    work page

  13. [13]

    (pages 2, 4, and 26)

    work page

  14. [14]

    Continuous diffusion for categorical data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15089, 2022

    Sander Dieleman, Laurent Sartran, Arman Roshannai, Nikolay Savinov, Yaroslav Ganin, Pierre H Richemond, Arnaud Doucet, Robin Strudel, Chris Dyer, Conor Durkan, et al. Continuous diffusion for categorical data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15089, 2022. (pages 2, 4, 5, 10, 16, 17, 26, and 40)

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Flow Matching for Generative Modeling

    Yaron Lipman, Ricky TQ Chen, Heli Ben-Hamu, Maximilian Nickel, and Matt Le. Flow matching for generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02747, 2022. (pages 2 and 4)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  16. [16]

    Stochastic Interpolants: A Unifying Framework for Flows and Diffusions

    Michael S Albergo, Nicholas M Boffi, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. Stochastic interpolants: A unifying framework for flows and diffusions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08797, 2023. (pages 2, 4, 5, and 34)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020. (page 2)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    M., Albergo, M

    Nicholas M Boffi, Michael S Albergo, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. How to build a consistency model: Learning flow maps via self-distillation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18825, 2025. (pages 2, 6, 7, 26, 27, 28, 41, and 42)

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.075072(3), 9 (2024)

    Nicholas M. Boffi, Michael S. Albergo, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden. Flow map matching with stochastic interpolants: A mathematical framework for consistency models.arXiv:2406.07507, 2025. (pages 2, 6, 7, 26, 27, 28, 31, and 41)

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    The diffusion duality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10892, 2025

    Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Justin Deschenaux, Aaron Gokaslan, Guanghan Wang, Justin Chiu, and Volodymyr Kuleshov. The diffusion duality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10892, 2025. (pages 2, 10, 11, 13, 14, 26, 43, 44, 45, 46, and 56)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Candi: Hybrid discrete-continuous diffusion models

    Patrick Pynadath, Jiaxin Shi, and Ruqi Zhang. Candi: Hybrid discrete-continuous diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.22510, 2025. (pages 2, 10, 13, 16, 17, 26, and 43)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Large Language Diffusion Models

    Shen Nie, Fengqi Zhu, Zebin You, Xiaolu Zhang, Jingyang Ou, Jun Hu, Jun Zhou, Yankai Lin, Ji-Rong Wen, and Chongxuan Li. Large language diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09992, 2025. (page 2) 20

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine

    Michael I Jordan. Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 8, 1986. (page 3)

    work page 1986

  24. [24]

    Finding structure in time.Cognitive science, 14(2):179–211, 1990

    Jeffrey L Elman. Finding structure in time.Cognitive science, 14(2):179–211, 1990. (page 3)

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    A neural probabilistic language model.Journal of machine learning research, 3(Feb):1137–1155, 2003

    Yoshua Bengio, R´ ejean Ducharme, Pascal Vincent, and Christian Jauvin. A neural probabilistic language model.Journal of machine learning research, 3(Feb):1137–1155, 2003. (page 3)

    work page 2003

  26. [26]

    Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation

    Jiatao Gu, James Bradbury, Caiming Xiong, Victor OK Li, and Richard Socher. Non-autoregressive neural machine translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02281, 2017. (pages 3 and 26)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Blockwise parallel decoding for deep autoregressive models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018

    Mitchell Stern, Noam Shazeer, and Jakob Uszkoreit. Blockwise parallel decoding for deep autoregressive models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 2018. (page 3)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:17981–17993, 2021

    Jacob Austin, Daniel D Johnson, Jonathan Ho, Daniel Tarlow, and Rianne Van Den Berg. Structured denoising diffusion models in discrete state-spaces.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:17981–17993, 2021. (pages 3, 6, and 26)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Discrete Diffusion Modeling by Estimating the Ratios of the Data Distribution

    Aaron Lou, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Discrete diffusion modeling by estimating the ratios of the data distribution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.16834, 2023. (page 3)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Simple and effective masked diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:130136–130184, 2024

    Subham Sahoo, Marianne Arriola, Yair Schiff, Aaron Gokaslan, Edgar Marroquin, Justin Chiu, Alexander Rush, and Volodymyr Kuleshov. Simple and effective masked diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:130136–130184, 2024. (pages 3, 11, 13, 26, 43, and 44)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Simple guidance mechanisms for discrete diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10193, 2024

    Yair Schiff, Subham Sekhar Sahoo, Hao Phung, Guanghan Wang, Sam Boshar, Hugo Dalla-torre, Bernardo P de Almeida, Alexander Rush, Thomas Pierrot, and Volodymyr Kuleshov. Simple guidance mechanisms for discrete diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10193, 2024. (pages 3, 16, and 26)

    work page arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Discrete flow matching.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:133345–133385,

    Itai Gat, Tal Remez, Neta Shaul, Felix Kreuk, Ricky TQ Chen, Gabriel Synnaeve, Yossi Adi, and Yaron Lipman. Discrete flow matching.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:133345–133385,

    work page

  33. [33]

    (pages 3, 6, and 26)

    work page

  34. [34]

    A continuous time framework for discrete denoising models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:28266–28279, 2022

    Andrew Campbell, Joe Benton, Valentin De Bortoli, Thomas Rainforth, George Deligiannidis, and Arnaud Doucet. A continuous time framework for discrete denoising models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:28266–28279, 2022. (pages 4, 6, 8, and 26)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Likelihood-based diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:16693–16715, 2023

    Ishaan Gulrajani and Tatsunori B Hashimoto. Likelihood-based diffusion language models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:16693–16715, 2023. (pages 4 and 26)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Self-conditioned embedding diffusion for text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04236, 2022

    Robin Strudel, Corentin Tallec, Florent Altch´ e, Yilun Du, Yaroslav Ganin, Arthur Mensch, Will Grathwohl, Nikolay Savinov, Sander Dieleman, Laurent Sifre, et al. Self-conditioned embedding diffusion for text generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04236, 2022. (pages 4 and 26)

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Latent diffusion for language generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:56998–57025, 2023

    Justin Lovelace, Varsha Kishore, Chao Wan, Eliot Shekhtman, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Latent diffusion for language generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:56998–57025, 2023. (pages 4 and 26)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Analog bits: Generating discrete data using diffusion models with self-conditioning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04202, 2022

    Ting Chen, Ruixiang Zhang, and Geoffrey Hinton. Analog bits: Generating discrete data using diffusion models with self-conditioning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04202, 2022. (pages 4 and 26)

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Ssd-lm: Semi-autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control

    Xiaochuang Han, Sachin Kumar, and Yulia Tsvetkov. Ssd-lm: Semi-autoregressive simplex-based diffusion language model for text generation and modular control. InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 11575–11596,

    work page

  40. [40]

    (pages 4, 16, and 26) 21

    work page

  41. [41]

    Tess: Text-to-text self-conditioned simplex diffusion

    Rabeeh Karimi Mahabadi, Hamish Ivison, Jaesung Tae, James Henderson, Iz Beltagy, Matthew E Peters, and Arman Cohan. Tess: Text-to-text self-conditioned simplex diffusion. InProceedings of the 18th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2347–2361, 2024. (pages 4, 16, and 26)

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Back to Basics: Let Denoising Generative Models Denoise

    Tianhong Li and Kaiming He. Back to basics: Let denoising generative models denoise.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.13720, 2025. (pages 4 and 5)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Diffusion Transformers with Representation Autoencoders

    Boyang Zheng, Nanye Ma, Shengbang Tong, and Saining Xie. Diffusion transformers with representation autoencoders.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11690, 2025. (page 4)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Variational flow matching for graph generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:11735–11764, 2024

    Floor Eijkelboom, Grigory Bartosh, Christian Andersson Naesseth, Max Welling, and Jan-Willem van de Meent. Variational flow matching for graph generation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:11735–11764, 2024. (page 5)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Mean Flows for One-step Generative Modeling

    Zhengyang Geng, Mingyang Deng, Xingjian Bai, J Zico Kolter, and Kaiming He. Mean flows for one-step generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13447, 2025. (pages 6, 7, 17, 18, 26, and 27)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Improved Mean Flows: On the Challenges of Fastforward Generative Models

    Zhengyang Geng, Yiyang Lu, Zongze Wu, Eli Shechtman, J Zico Kolter, and Kaiming He. Improved mean flows: On the challenges of fastforward generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02012, 2025. (pages 6, 7, 26, and 28)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Terminal velocity matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19797, 2025

    Linqi Zhou, Mathias Parger, Ayaan Haque, and Jiaming Song. Terminal velocity matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.19797, 2025. (pages 7, 26, 27, and 28)

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Progressive Distillation for Fast Sampling of Diffusion Models

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022. (pages 7, 26, and 27)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    One Step Diffusion via Shortcut Models

    Kevin Frans, Danijar Hafner, Sergey Levine, and Pieter Abbeel. One step diffusion via shortcut models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12557, 2024. (pages 7, 10, 26, 27, 28, and 43)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Entropic time schedulers for generative diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13612, 2025

    Dejan Stancevic, Florian Handke, and Luca Ambrogioni. Entropic time schedulers for generative diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13612, 2025. (pages 10 and 40)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Guiding a diffusion model with a bad version of itself.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:52996–53021, 2024

    Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Tuomas Kynk¨ a¨ anniemi, Jaakko Lehtinen, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. Guiding a diffusion model with a bad version of itself.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:52996–53021, 2024. (pages 11 and 16)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Jerry Huang, Justin Lin, Sheel Shah, Kartik Nair, and Nicholas M. Boffi. How to guide your flow: Steering flow maps for rapid test-time alignment, 2025. Forthcoming. (pages 11, 16, and 17)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    One Billion Word Benchmark for Measuring Progress in Statistical Language Modeling

    Ciprian Chelba, Tomas Mikolov, Mike Schuster, Qi Ge, Thorsten Brants, Phillipp Koehn, and Tony Robinson. One billion word benchmark for measuring progress in statistical language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.3005, 2013. (page 11)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Openwebtext corpus.http://Skylion007.github.io/OpenWebTe xtCorpus, 2019

    Aaron Gokaslan and Vanya Cohen. Openwebtext corpus.http://Skylion007.github.io/OpenWebTe xtCorpus, 2019. (page 11)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers

    William Peebles and Saining Xie. Scalable diffusion models with transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4195–4205, 2023. (page 11)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024

    Jianlin Su, Murtadha Ahmed, Yu Lu, Shengfeng Pan, Wen Bo, and Yunfeng Liu. Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding.Neurocomputing, 568:127063, 2024. (page 11)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014. (pages 12 and 43) 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Joint Distillation for Fast Likelihood Evaluation and Sampling in Flow-based Models

    Xinyue Ai, Yutong He, Albert Gu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, J Zico Kolter, Nicholas Matthew Boffi, and Max Simchowitz. Joint distillation for fast likelihood evaluation and sampling in flow-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.02636, 2025. (page 12)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019

    Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.OpenAI blog, 1(8):9, 2019. (pages 12 and 45)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Continuous diffusion model for language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11564, 2025

    Jaehyeong Jo and Sung Ju Hwang. Continuous diffusion model for language modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11564, 2025. (pages 13, 16, 17, 26, and 43)

    work page arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Distillation of discrete diffusion through dimensional correlations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08709, 2024

    Satoshi Hayakawa, Yuhta Takida, Masaaki Imaizumi, Hiromi Wakaki, and Yuki Mitsufuji. Distillation of discrete diffusion through dimensional correlations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.08709, 2024. (pages 14, 26, and 44)

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Texygen: A benchmarking platform for text generation models

    Yaoming Zhu, Sidi Lu, Lei Zheng, Jiaxian Guo, Weinan Zhang, Jun Wang, and Yong Yu. Texygen: A benchmarking platform for text generation models. InThe 41st international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 1097–1100, 2018. (pages 15 and 44)

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Character-level convolutional networks for text classification

    Xiang Zhang, Junbo Zhao, and Yann LeCun. Character-level convolutional networks for text classification. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015. (pages 16, 46, and 58)

    work page 2015

  64. [64]

    Neural network acceptability judgments

    Alex Warstadt, Amanpreet Singh, and Samuel R Bowman. Neural network acceptability judgments. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:625–641, 2019. (page 16)

    work page 2019

  65. [65]

    Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis

    Andrew Maas, Raymond E Daly, Peter T Pham, Dan Huang, Andrew Y Ng, and Christopher Potts. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. InProceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies, pages 142–150, 2011. (page 16)

    work page 2011

  66. [66]

    TweetEval: Unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification

    Francesco Barbieri, Jose Camacho-Collados, Luis Espinosa Anke, and Leonardo Neves. TweetEval: Unified benchmark and comparative evaluation for tweet classification. In Trevor Cohn, Yulan He, and Yang Liu, editors,Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020, pages 1644–1650, Online, November 2020. Association for Computational Lin...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2020 2020

  67. [67]

    Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding

    Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), pages 4171–4186, 2019. (page 16)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach

    Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. (page 16)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1907

  69. [69]

    Tess 2: A large-scale generalist diffusion language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13917, 2025

    Jaesung Tae, Hamish Ivison, Sachin Kumar, and Arman Cohan. Tess 2: A large-scale generalist diffusion language model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13917, 2025. (pages 16, 17, and 26)

    work page arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Can continuous-time diffusion models generate and solve globally constrained discrete problems? a study on sudoku.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20363, 2026

    Mariia Drozdova. Can continuous-time diffusion models generate and solve globally constrained discrete problems? a study on sudoku.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20363, 2026. (page 18)

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    Sohee Yang, Elena Gribovskaya, Nora Kassner, Mor Geva, and Sebastian Riedel. Do large language models latently perform multi-hop reasoning? InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 10210–10229, 2024. (page 18)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    Redi: Rectified discrete flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15897, 2025

    Jaehoon Yoo, Wonjung Kim, and Seunghoon Hong. Redi: Rectified discrete flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15897, 2025. (page 26) 23

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Continuously augmented discrete diffusion model for categorical generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01329, 2025

    Huangjie Zheng, Shansan Gong, Ruixiang Zhang, Tianrong Chen, Jiatao Gu, Mingyuan Zhou, Navdeep Jaitly, and Yizhe Zhang. Continuously augmented discrete diffusion model for categorical generative modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01329, 2025. (page 26)

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    arXiv:2210.08933 [cs]

    Shansan Gong, Mukai Li, Jiangtao Feng, Zhiyong Wu, and LingPeng Kong. Diffuseq: Sequence to sequence text generation with diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08933, 2022. (page 26)

    work page arXiv 2022

  75. [75]

    Categorical flow matching on statistical manifolds

    Chaoran Cheng, Jiahan Li, Jian Peng, and Ge Liu. Categorical flow matching on statistical manifolds. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:54787–54819, 2024. (page 26)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    Fisher flow matching for generative modeling over discrete data.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:139054–139084, 2024

    Oscar Davis, Samuel Kessler, Mircea Petrache, ˙Ismail ˙I Ceylan, Michael Bronstein, and Avishek J Bose. Fisher flow matching for generative modeling over discrete data.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:139054–139084, 2024. (page 26)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    M., Hartmann, M., and Klami, A

    Bernardo Williams, Victor M Yeom-Song, Marcelo Hartmann, and Arto Klami. Simplex-to-euclidean bijections for categorical flow matching.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.27480, 2025. (page 26)

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Consistency models

    Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. Consistency models. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 32211–32252. PMLR, 2023. (pages 26 and 27)

    work page 2023

  79. [79]

    Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flow

    Xingchao Liu, Chengyue Gong, and Qiang Liu. Flow straight and fast: Learning to generate and transfer data with rectified flow.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03003, 2022. (page 26)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  80. [80]

    Training Agents Inside of Scalable World Models

    Danijar Hafner, Wilson Yan, and Timothy Lillicrap. Training agents inside of scalable world models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.24527, 2025. (page 26)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.