pith. sign in

Helping or herding? reward model ensembles mitigate but do not eliminate reward hacking.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09244,

18 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

18 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1 method 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 15 2025 3

clear filters

representative citing papers

Uncertainty-Aware Reward Modeling for Stable RLHF

cs.LG · 2026-06-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

UARM equips reward models with quantile-based conformal prediction uncertainty and reweights GRPO advantages via heteroscedastic variance decomposition to improve calibration and reduce reward hacking in RLHF.

A Unifying Lens on Reward Uncertainty in RLHF

cs.LG · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A distributional reward model p(r|x,y) yields the closed-form effective reward ilde r(x,y) = eta ext{log} ext{E}_p[e^{r/eta}] (pessimistic branch) that unifies prior RLHF aggregation heuristics under Bayesian or KL-DRO views.

HARVE: Hacking-Aware Reward-Head Vector Editing for Robust Reward Models

cs.LG · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

HARVE removes the component of the reward-head vector aligned with a multi-directional hacking subspace from residual streams using a small set of contrastive examples, improving robustness on RewardHackBench across eight models without fine-tuning while preserving general capability.

How Far Are Video Models from True Multimodal Reasoning?

cs.CV · 2026-04-21 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Current video models succeed on basic understanding but achieve under 25% success on logically grounded generation and near 0% on interactive generation, exposing gaps in multimodal reasoning.

FUSE: Ensembling Verifiers with Zero Labeled Data

stat.ML · 2026-04-20 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

FUSE ensembles verifiers unsupervisedly by controlling their conditional dependencies to improve spectral ensembling algorithms, matching or exceeding semi-supervised baselines on benchmarks including GPQA Diamond and Humanity's Last Exam.

citing papers explorer

Showing 8 of 8 citing papers after filters.

  • Beyond Semantic Manipulation: Token-Space Attacks on Reward Models cs.LG · 2026-04-03 · unverdicted · none · ref 4

    TOMPA performs black-box adversarial optimization in token space to discover non-linguistic patterns that nearly double the reward scores of GPT-5 answers on Skywork-Reward-V2 while producing gibberish text.

  • Uncertainty-Aware Reward Modeling for Stable RLHF cs.LG · 2026-06-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    UARM equips reward models with quantile-based conformal prediction uncertainty and reweights GRPO advantages via heteroscedastic variance decomposition to improve calibration and reduce reward hacking in RLHF.

  • A Unifying Lens on Reward Uncertainty in RLHF cs.LG · 2026-06-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 5

    A distributional reward model p(r|x,y) yields the closed-form effective reward ilde r(x,y) = eta ext{log} ext{E}_p[e^{r/eta}] (pessimistic branch) that unifies prior RLHF aggregation heuristics under Bayesian or KL-DRO views.

  • HARVE: Hacking-Aware Reward-Head Vector Editing for Robust Reward Models cs.LG · 2026-06-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 24

    HARVE removes the component of the reward-head vector aligned with a multi-directional hacking subspace from residual streams using a small set of contrastive examples, improving robustness on RewardHackBench across eight models without fine-tuning while preserving general capability.

  • Response Time Enhances Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences cs.LG · 2026-05-07 · unverdicted · none · ref 16

    Response times modeled as drift-diffusion processes enable consistent estimation of population-average preferences from heterogeneous anonymous binary choices.

  • Power Distribution Bridges Sampling, Self-Reward RL, and Self-Distillation cs.LG · 2026-05-06 · unverdicted · none · ref 126

    The power distribution is the target of power sampling, the closed-form solution to self-reward KL-regularized RL, and the basis for power self-distillation that matches sampling performance at lower cost.

  • Factored Causal Representation Learning for Robust Reward Modeling in RLHF cs.LG · 2026-01-29 · unverdicted · none · ref 10

    A factored causal representation learning method improves robustness of reward models in RLHF by isolating causal factors from biases like length and sycophancy using adversarial gradient reversal.

  • Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training cs.LG · 2025-09-03 · unverdicted · none · ref 9

    PROF curates RL training data via PRM-ORM consistency to improve both final-answer accuracy and intermediate reasoning quality while reducing reliance on strong process reward models.