pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (60%).

73 Pith papers citing it
Background 60% of classified citations
abstract

In this paper we study yes/no questions that are naturally occurring --- meaning that they are generated in unprompted and unconstrained settings. We build a reading comprehension dataset, BoolQ, of such questions, and show that they are unexpectedly challenging. They often query for complex, non-factoid information, and require difficult entailment-like inference to solve. We also explore the effectiveness of a range of transfer learning baselines. We find that transferring from entailment data is more effective than transferring from paraphrase or extractive QA data, and that it, surprisingly, continues to be very beneficial even when starting from massive pre-trained language models such as BERT. Our best method trains BERT on MultiNLI and then re-trains it on our train set. It achieves 80.4% accuracy compared to 90% accuracy of human annotators (and 62% majority-baseline), leaving a significant gap for future work.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6 dataset 3 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

claims ledger

  • abstract In this paper we study yes/no questions that are naturally occurring --- meaning that they are generated in unprompted and unconstrained settings. We build a reading comprehension dataset, BoolQ, of such questions, and show that they are unexpectedly challenging. They often query for complex, non-factoid information, and require difficult entailment-like inference to solve. We also explore the effectiveness of a range of transfer learning baselines. We find that transferring from entailment data is more effective than transferring from paraphrase or extractive QA data, and that it, surprisingl
  • dataset els with different architectures, including LLaMA-2 [62], Mistral [28], and Mixtral [29], where Mixtral is a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model. Model accuracy is measured on multiple datasets, including the Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) [25] in the five-shot setting and zero-shot Commonsense QA benchmarks such as WinoGrande [58], PIQA [12], HellaSwag [68], ARC [16], BoolQ [15] and OBQA [45]. All evaluations are conducted using the Language Model Evaluation Harness [21]. 4.2 In-Net
  • dataset MultiRC dataset encompasses around 6, 000 multi- sentence questions gathered from over 800 paragraphs. On average, each question offers about two valid answer alternatives out of a total of five. B. Datasets for Emergent: ICL, reasoning (CoT), instruction following This section centers on the benchmarks and datasets em- ployed to evaluate the emergent abilities of LLMs. • GSM8K [190] is designed to evaluate the model's ability for multi-step mathematical reasoning. GSM8K includes 8.5K linguistic
  • background the chunk size C is the small fixed constant (More detail in the § D with Algorithm 1). Further, the chunk form of bt and theγ t,i are computed as following Eq.(10) and (11), b[t] = exp(µlog [t] +c log [t] )∈R C,(10) Γ[t] = exp(eAlog [t] )⊙  1−exp(S log [t] )  ∈R C×C ,(11) where the chunk matrix eAlog [t] ,S log [t] ∈R C×C is computed, (eAlog [t] )ij = ( ¯αlog [t] +c log [t] )i −( ¯µlog [t] )j fori≥j,(12) (Slog [t] )ij = (clog [t] )j−1 −(c log [t] )i fori≥j.(13) These lower triangular matrices
  • background with the hope of stimulating further study of test-time behavior of language models. 3.9.1 Arithmetic To test GPT-3's ability to perform simple arithmetic operations without task-specific training, we developed a small battery of 10 tests that involve asking GPT-3 a simple arithmetic problem in natural language: • 2 digit addition (2D+) - The model is asked to add two integers sampled uniformly from [0, 100), phrased in the form of a question, e.g. "Q: What is 48 plus 76? A: 124." • 2 digit subtr
  • background Moreover, to ensure that the whole Mamba block output matches that of Hedgehog at initialization, we also set the parameters of the gate branch and the convolution so that they reduce to the identity operator. Additional details can be found in App. B. Attention scores normalization With the substitution in (7), the SSM mixer outputs Yϕ := ϕMLP(Q)ϕMLP(K)T V . (8) However, the Attention scores in this formula come in an un-normalized fashion. For the Attention scores formulation to more closely

co-cited works

clear filters

representative citing papers

Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervision

cs.CL · 2022-12-07 · conditional · novelty 8.0

An unsupervised technique extracts latent yes-no knowledge from language model activations by locating a direction that satisfies logical consistency properties, outperforming zero-shot accuracy by 4% on average across models and datasets.

Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

cs.CL · 2020-05-28 · accept · novelty 8.0

GPT-3 shows that scaling an autoregressive language model to 175 billion parameters enables strong few-shot performance across diverse NLP tasks via in-context prompting without fine-tuning.

Path-Constrained Mixture-of-Experts

cs.LG · 2026-03-18 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PathMoE constrains expert paths in MoE models by sharing router parameters across layer blocks, yielding more concentrated paths, better performance on perplexity and tasks, and no need for auxiliary losses.

EvoESAP: Non-Uniform Expert Pruning for Sparse MoE

cs.LG · 2026-03-06 · conditional · novelty 7.0

EvoESAP uses evolutionary search guided by a speculative-decoding-inspired ESAP metric to discover non-uniform layer-wise sparsity allocations for MoE expert pruning, improving generation accuracy up to 19.6% at 50% sparsity.

Deep Delta Learning

cs.LG · 2026-01-01 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Deep Delta Learning replaces additive residual updates with a gated delta-rule that selectively overwrites residual content along learned directions, improving language modeling quality over standard ResNet-style accumulation.

MIDUS: Memory-Infused Depth Up-Scaling

cs.LG · 2025-12-15 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

MIDUS replaces duplicated FFN branches in depth up-scaling with head-wise memory layers using product-key retrieval and HIVE to deliver lightweight, head-conditioned residual capacity.

PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

cs.NE · 2025-04-22 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotations

cs.LG · 2024-05-26 · conditional · novelty 7.0

SpinQuant learns optimal rotations to enable accurate 4-bit quantization of LLM weights, activations, and KV cache, reducing the zero-shot gap to full precision to 2.9 points on LLaMA-2 7B.

Massive Activations in Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2024-02-27 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.

citing papers explorer

Showing 12 of 12 citing papers after filters.

  • Functional-level Uncertainty Quantification for Calibrated Fine-tuning on LLMs cs.LG · 2024-10-09 · unverdicted · none · ref 22 · internal anchor

    UQ4CT integrates functional-level uncertainty calibration into mixture-of-experts LoRA fine-tuning via a dedicated loss, cutting expected calibration error by over 25% on multiple-choice and generative QA tasks.

  • SpinQuant: LLM quantization with learned rotations cs.LG · 2024-05-26 · conditional · none · ref 2 · internal anchor

    SpinQuant learns optimal rotations to enable accurate 4-bit quantization of LLM weights, activations, and KV cache, reducing the zero-shot gap to full precision to 2.9 points on LLaMA-2 7B.

  • The Era of 1-bit LLMs: All Large Language Models are in 1.58 Bits cs.CL · 2024-02-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 3 · internal anchor

    BitNet b1.58 shows that ternary 1.58-bit LLMs can match full-precision performance at substantially lower inference cost.

  • Massive Activations in Large Language Models cs.CL · 2024-02-27 · unverdicted · none · ref 111 · internal anchor

    Massive activations are constant large values in LLMs that function as indispensable bias terms and concentrate attention probabilities on specific tokens.

  • Condense, Don't Just Prune: Enhancing Efficiency and Performance in MoE Layer Pruning cs.LG · 2024-11-26 · unverdicted · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    CD-MoE condenses fine-grained MoE layers with shared experts into dense layers, retaining 90% accuracy with 27.5% memory cut and 1.26x speedup on DeepSeekMoE-16B, recovering 98% via brief fine-tuning.

  • Transfusion: Predict the Next Token and Diffuse Images with One Multi-Modal Model cs.AI · 2024-08-20 · unverdicted · none · ref 5 · internal anchor

    A single transformer combines language modeling loss and diffusion loss on mixed-modality data, scaling to 7B parameters and 2T tokens while matching specialized language and diffusion models.

  • LaMI: Augmenting Large Language Models via Late Multi-Image Fusion cs.CL · 2024-06-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 14 · internal anchor

    LaMI augments LLMs with visual commonsense via late fusion of predictions from multiple text-generated images, outperforming prior augmented LLMs on visual tasks while matching VLMs and preserving or improving NLP performance.

  • Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models cs.CL · 2024-05-16 · unverdicted · none · ref 6 · internal anchor

    Chameleon is an early-fusion token model that handles mixed image-text sequences for understanding and generation, achieving competitive or superior performance to larger models like Llama-2, Mixtral, and Gemini-Pro on captioning, VQA, text, and image tasks.

  • Mixtral of Experts cs.LG · 2024-01-08 · unverdicted · none · ref 7 · internal anchor

    Mixtral 8x7B is a sparse MoE LLM activating 2 of 8 experts per layer that matches or exceeds Llama 2 70B and GPT-3.5 on benchmarks while using only 13B active parameters.

  • Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology cs.CL · 2024-03-13 · accept · none · ref 71 · internal anchor

    Gemma introduces open 2B and 7B LLMs derived from Gemini technology that beat comparable open models on 11 of 18 text tasks and come with safety assessments.

  • Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Size cs.CL · 2024-07-31 · conditional · none · ref 78 · internal anchor

    Gemma 2 models achieve leading performance at their sizes by combining established Transformer modifications with knowledge distillation for the 2B and 9B variants.

  • Large Language Models: A Survey cs.CL · 2024-02-09 · accept · none · ref 190 · internal anchor

    The paper surveys key large language models, their training methods, datasets, evaluation benchmarks, and future research directions in the field.