LLM user simulators exhibit a disengagement deficit: they match real buyers but systematically overstate purchase intent among real non-buyers by reducing expressed resistance and increasing deliberation.
super hub Mixed citations
$\tau$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (61%).
171
Pith papers citing it
Background
61% of classified citations
abstract
Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ an efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state. We also propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate the reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art function calling agents (like gpt-4o) succeed on <50% of the tasks, and are quite inconsistent (pass^8 <25% in retail). Our findings point to the need for methods that can improve the ability of agents to act consistently and follow rules reliably.
hub tools
citation-role summary
background 22
dataset 12
extension 1
method 1
citation-polarity summary
claims ledger
- abstract Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $\tau$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ an efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state. We also propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate th
authors
co-cited works
representative citing papers
CL-Bench is the first expert-validated benchmark for continual learning in frontier LLMs across six real-world domains, showing limited gains and that naive in-context learning outperforms dedicated memory systems.
A new native-runtime benchmark reveals that current frontier AI agents succeed on at most 62 percent of realistic long-horizon CLI tasks.
Agent-ValueBench is the first dedicated benchmark for agent values, showing they diverge from LLM values, form a homogeneous 'Value Tide' across models, and bend under harnesses and skill steering.
OccuBench is a new benchmark for AI agents on real-world occupational tasks via LLM-driven simulators, showing no model dominates all industries, implicit faults are hardest, and larger models with more reasoning perform better.
MCP-Atlas is a new benchmark with 1000 tasks on production MCP servers that uses claim-level scoring to evaluate LLM agents on realistic multi-step tool-use competency.
The SDE benchmark shows LLMs lag on scientific discovery tasks relative to general science tests, with diminishing scaling returns and shared weaknesses across models.
UnderSpecBench shows coding agents guess and violate boundaries in 55.8-67.8% of underspecified DevOps tasks rather than clarifying or refusing.
A²utoLPBench is a generator that produces unlimited LP word problems with ground-truth answers known by construction via inverse-KKT, bundled with a Docker environment for agent evaluation.
A meta-benchmarking framework organizes 452 LLM benchmarks into 41 O*NET Generalized Work Activities and 38 BIAN domains, using discrimination-coverage-recency weights to scale K-factors in an Elo tournament for comparable financial-services scores.
The paper defines entity binding failures as a distinct error category in tool-augmented agents separate from tool selection errors and evaluates entity-aware mechanisms that eliminate such failures in a controlled diagnostic setting.
PrincipalBench exposes a sharp split in frontier LLMs between selective and over-refusing behavior on multi-party loyalty, with prompt scaffolding and KL distillation reducing harm rates but only along an existing leak/over-refusal trade-off.
CLQT is a new closed-loop, cost-aware benchmark that diagnoses LLM trading agent capabilities through strategy-consistent metrics and hash-verifiable trails rather than outcome rankings.
KV caches function as notebooks of prefilled conclusions, enabling field-level edits that recover decisions (especially with CoT) and position-portable skill composition with near-identical outputs at O(L) cost.
AgentBeats implements agentified evaluation of diverse AI agents through standardized interfaces, validated at scale in a five-month competition with 298 judges and 467 subjects plus a coding case study.
SENTINEL generates targeted tasks from model failures in a Controller-Proposer-Solver loop, raising Pass^1 from 66.4 to 74.9 on Tau2-Bench Retail and outperforming standard RL.
A Gaussian information-gain metric in embedding space quantifies semantic progress in dialogues via uncertainty reduction and shows competitive agreement with human judgments on MT-Bench and UltraFeedback.
ISE creates 23,132 execution-grounded multi-turn OS agent trajectories via intent simulation and live execution, improving agent performance on ClawEval from 19.3 to 37.7 pass@1 with Qwen3-8B.
MAC-Bench is a new adversarial benchmark that converts legal texts into executable scenarios via the SERV pipeline to measure procedural compliance in multi-agent LLM systems using CSR and MG metrics.
ADK Arena evaluates 51 Python ADKs by having an LLM learn each framework's API, write and repair agent code, and run on benchmarks, finding 57% success rate, 5.6x cost variation, no dominant framework, and substitutable information sources.
RealClawBench turns 281 real OpenClaw sessions into reproducible tasks that preserve the original distribution and shows the best of 14 models solves only 65.8 percent.
SkillDAG builds a self-evolving typed skill graph that LLM agents query and update at inference time, raising success on ALFWorld and SkillsBench by 12.8 and 8.6 points over graph baselines.
An empirical protocol measures rediscovery costs when coding agents resume interrupted tasks and finds that context-bearing handoffs cut agent events 20-59% and tokens 42-63% versus repository-only handoffs across three models.
SelSkill applies dual-granularity preference learning to selective skill-or-skip decisions, improving task success by 10.9 points and execution precision by 29.1 points on ALFWorld with Qwen3-8B.
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Large Language Models in Scientific Discovery
The SDE benchmark shows LLMs lag on scientific discovery tasks relative to general science tests, with diminishing scaling returns and shared weaknesses across models.
-
$\tau^2$-Bench: Evaluating Conversational Agents in a Dual-Control Environment
τ²-bench provides a Dec-POMDP-based telecom domain with compositional task generation and a tool-constrained user simulator to measure agent performance drops in dual-control versus single-control settings.
-
DIAL: Direct Iterative Adversarial Learning for Realistic Multi-Turn Dialogue Simulation
DIAL uses iterative adversarial learning to restore lexical diversity in user simulators and achieve strong correlation with real failure rates while keeping low divergence in failure mode distributions for mental health dialogues.
-
Don't Pass@k: A Bayesian Framework for Large Language Model Evaluation
A Dirichlet-prior Bayesian estimator for model success probability replaces Pass@k, delivering faster-converging and more stable rankings with credible intervals on math benchmarks.
-
Towards Real-World Validity in Generative AI Benchmarks: Understanding and Designing Domain-Centered Evaluations for Journalism Practitioners
A human-centered design workshop with journalism practitioners yields an evaluation cookbook and design requirements for contextualized, value-aligned generative AI benchmarks.
-
DoubleAgents: Human-Agent Alignment in a Socially Embedded Workflow
DoubleAgents shows that a distributed-cognition design with coordination agent, dashboard, and policy module increases user comfort and reliance on AI agents for coordination tasks over time.
-
GenoMAS: A Multi-Agent Framework for Scientific Discovery via Code-Driven Gene Expression Analysis
GenoMAS deploys six specialized LLM agents with guided planning to preprocess transcriptomic data and identify genes, reaching 89.13% composite similarity and 60.48% F1 on the GenoTEX benchmark while outperforming prior methods.
-
Disambiguation-Centric Finetuning Makes Enterprise Tool-Calling LLMs More Realistic and Less Risky
DiaFORGE is a disambiguation-centric fine-tuning pipeline that boosts LLM tool-calling success by 27-49 percentage points on a dynamic benchmark compared to GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet.
-
gpt-oss-120b & gpt-oss-20b Model Card
OpenAI releases two open-weight reasoning models, gpt-oss-120b and gpt-oss-20b, trained via distillation and RL with claimed strong results on math, coding, and safety benchmarks.
-
Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence
Kimi K2 is a 1-trillion-parameter MoE model that leads open-source non-thinking models on agentic benchmarks including 65.8 on SWE-Bench Verified and 66.1 on Tau2-Bench.
-
Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI
Small language models are sufficiently capable, more suitable, and far more economical than large models for the repetitive tasks that dominate agentic AI systems.
-
Humanity's Last Exam
Humanity's Last Exam is a new 2,500-question benchmark at the frontier of human knowledge where state-of-the-art LLMs show low accuracy.
-
Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
-
GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Models
GLM-4.5, a 355B-parameter MoE model with hybrid reasoning, scores 70.1% on TAU-Bench, 91.0% on AIME 24, and 64.2% on SWE-bench Verified while ranking 3rd overall and 2nd on agentic benchmarks.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
-
From LLM Reasoning to Autonomous AI Agents: A Comprehensive Review
A survey consolidating benchmarks, agent frameworks, real-world applications, and protocols for LLM-based autonomous agents into a proposed taxonomy with recommendations for future research.